Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Deitra Vess
Khushakor Clan Matari Safari
747
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 02:06:18 -
[121] - Quote
Hawk! I suck at flying them but they're fun to fly! |
Elmund Egivand
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
846
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 04:14:32 -
[122] - Quote
Had some ideas for my Breacher.
Postponing plan to fly something else for a bit.
Evergreen ~ Evergreen ~ Evergreen ~ EVERGREEN ~ Evergreen ~ Evergreen ~Evergreen ~ Family
|
Tyrel Toov
Delusions of Granduer SpaceMonkey's Alliance
655
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 04:18:28 -
[123] - Quote
Deitra Vess wrote: So in her eyes Tyrel is some form of righteous defender of the Caldari people? Wow.... Feels like yesterday we were flying in matari militia fleets together... NOW THIS?!?!? For shame Tyrel, FOR SHAME....... Have you no honor good sir?
I'm minmatar, I thought we weren't allowed to have honor!?
I want to paint my ship Periwinkle.
|
Deitra Vess
Khushakor Clan Matari Safari
747
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 04:22:31 -
[124] - Quote
Tyrel Toov wrote:Deitra Vess wrote: So in her eyes Tyrel is some form of righteous defender of the Caldari people? Wow.... Feels like yesterday we were flying in matari militia fleets together... NOW THIS?!?!? For shame Tyrel, FOR SHAME....... Have you no honor good sir?
I'm minmatar, I thought we weren't allowed to have honor!? Heh speak for yourself! Maybe I don't have honor but I have standards. That's kinda' close, right? Can't hate the Amarr guy fighting for the TLF... |
Diana Kim
State Protectorate Caldari State
2203
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 04:27:19 -
[125] - Quote
Neph wrote:I wouldn't call Provists righteous defenders of the Caldari people... Why wouldn't you call righteous defenders of the Caldari people as righteous defenders of the Caldari people. It doesn't sound logical.
Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.
In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.
|
Elmund Egivand
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
847
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 04:37:18 -
[126] - Quote
Deitra Vess wrote:Tyrel Toov wrote:Deitra Vess wrote: So in her eyes Tyrel is some form of righteous defender of the Caldari people? Wow.... Feels like yesterday we were flying in matari militia fleets together... NOW THIS?!?!? For shame Tyrel, FOR SHAME....... Have you no honor good sir?
I'm minmatar, I thought we weren't allowed to have honor!? Heh speak for yourself! Maybe I don't have honor but I have standards. That's kinda' close, right? Can't hate the Amarr guy fighting for the TLF...
I don't know if I can be considered honourable being the dirty money-grubbing privateer that I am, but I do have draw some lines on what I can or cannot do:
1. Do not kill civvies unless they shoot first. 2. Do not backstab allies (it's one of the reasons I left Biohazard.) 3. Do not engage if chance of success is known to be less than 50%, assuming that I am not a screw-up. 4. If crew can be replaced with mechanization and automation, then they will be replaced with mechanization and automation. 5. If I start it, I must finish it.. 6. Do not join in team efforts if I cannot contribute in any meaningful way. 7. Always annoy the Kim.
Evergreen ~ Evergreen ~ Evergreen ~ EVERGREEN ~ Evergreen ~ Evergreen ~Evergreen ~ Family
|
Deitra Vess
Khushakor Clan Matari Safari
747
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 04:45:20 -
[127] - Quote
Elmund Egivand wrote:
I don't know if I can be considered honourable being the dirty money-grubbing privateer that I am, but I do have draw some lines on what I can or cannot do:
1. Do not kill civvies unless they shoot first. 2. Do not backstab allies (it's one of the reasons I left Biohazard.) 3. Do not engage if chance of success is known to be less than 50%, assuming that I am not a screw-up. 4. If crew can be replaced with mechanization and automation, then they will be replaced with mechanization and automation. 5. If I start it, I must finish it.. 6. Do not join in team efforts if I cannot contribute in any meaningful way. 7. Always annoy the Kim.
Well said, and from the things I was told about them by my...... Former..... Corporation and alliance, I can't blame you for leaving them. Not biohazard per say, just that alliance in general. |
Diana Kim
State Protectorate Caldari State
2204
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 05:54:54 -
[128] - Quote
Elmund Egivand wrote:1. Do not kill civvies unless they shoot first. That's not honor, that's incompetence.
Elmund Egivand wrote:3. Do not engage if chance of success is known to be less than 50%, assuming that I am not a screw-up. Nice excuse for a coward, by the way. With a little bit over or underestimation could be put under any engagement.
Elmund Egivand wrote:4. If crew can be replaced with mechanization and automation, then they will be replaced with mechanization and automation. Naiviety and incompetence.
Elmund Egivand wrote:6. Do not join in team efforts if I cannot contribute in any meaningful way. Said gallentean lapdog about his employment, claiming earlier just to be a "privateer".
Elmund Egivand wrote:7. Always annoy the Kim. Said another gallentean forum troll.
Well, you can try to annoy as much as you can, but on the field we will always win anyway.
Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.
In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.
|
Arrendis
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1594
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 13:22:09 -
[129] - Quote
Deitra Vess wrote:So in her eyes Tyrel is some form of righteous defender of the Caldari people? Wow.... Feels like yesterday we were flying in matari militia fleets together... NOW THIS?!?!? For shame Tyrel, FOR SHAME....... Have you no honor good sir?
Clearly not, he's joined SpaceMonkey's. |
Arrendis
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1594
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 13:28:01 -
[130] - Quote
Diana Kim wrote:Elmund Egivand wrote:1. Do not kill civvies unless they shoot first. That's not honor, that's incompetence.
So not indiscriminately shooting civilians is incompetence? Giving you an opportunity to clarify this statement, Kim.
|
|
Deitra Vess
Khushakor Clan Matari Safari
747
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 13:49:30 -
[131] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:Deitra Vess wrote:So in her eyes Tyrel is some form of righteous defender of the Caldari people? Wow.... Feels like yesterday we were flying in matari militia fleets together... NOW THIS?!?!? For shame Tyrel, FOR SHAME....... Have you no honor good sir? Clearly not, he's joined SpaceMonkey's. Way to be blunt about it...
|
Tyrel Toov
Delusions of Granduer SpaceMonkey's Alliance
656
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 13:57:36 -
[132] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:Deitra Vess wrote:So in her eyes Tyrel is some form of righteous defender of the Caldari people? Wow.... Feels like yesterday we were flying in matari militia fleets together... NOW THIS?!?!? For shame Tyrel, FOR SHAME....... Have you no honor good sir? Clearly not, he's joined SpaceMonkey's. Hey! There's nothing wrong with the SMA. I'm learning quite a bit out here.
I want to paint my ship Periwinkle.
|
Diana Kim
State Protectorate Caldari State
2205
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 14:53:38 -
[133] - Quote
Arrendis wrote: So not indiscriminately shooting civilians is incompetence? Giving you an opportunity to clarify this statement, Kim.
You didn't understand it, and you won't understand it even if I explain it, as you have shown before. So, why would I waste my time giving you explanations, that you would pervert anyway to make up more crap about me?
No, thanks.
Meanwhile. If anyone, who isn't a complete brickhead, didn't understand what I did mean, I'll gladly explain. Please ask in a separate thread or mail.
Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.
In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.
|
Arrendis
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1596
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 15:04:20 -
[134] - Quote
Deitra Vess wrote:Way to be blunt about it...
Tyrel Toov wrote: Hey! There's nothing wrong with the SMA. I'm learning quite a bit out here.
Nah, I love SMA. ;) Ivory Kantenu's one of my best guys. |
Tyrel Toov
Delusions of Granduer SpaceMonkey's Alliance
656
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 15:08:24 -
[135] - Quote
Diana Kim wrote:Arrendis wrote: So not indiscriminately shooting civilians is incompetence? Giving you an opportunity to clarify this statement, Kim.
You didn't understand it, and you won't understand it even if I explain it, as you have shown before. So, why would I waste my time giving you explanations, that you would pervert anyway to make up more crap about me? No, thanks.
Meanwhile. If anyone, who isn't a complete brickhead, didn't understand what I did mean, I'll gladly explain. Please ask in a separate thread or mail. Read as: "I have no excuse for my lack of clarity/willingness to shoot civilians. But I'm totally not at fault for my mistakes, you should conform to my line of thinking so you can understand me better."
I want to paint my ship Periwinkle.
|
Arrendis
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1596
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 15:11:01 -
[136] - Quote
Diana Kim wrote:Arrendis wrote: So not indiscriminately shooting civilians is incompetence? Giving you an opportunity to clarify this statement, Kim.
You didn't understand it, and you won't understand it even if I explain it, as you have shown before. So, why would I waste my time giving you explanations, that you would pervert anyway to make up more crap about me? No, thanks.
Meanwhile. If anyone, who isn't a complete brickhead, didn't understand what I did mean, I'll gladly explain. Please ask in a separate thread or mail.
I don't make things up about you, Kim, I simply hold you to account for the words you use. In this case, your reply clearly indicates you misspoke, and that your meaning was that shooting civilians would be incompetence.
Or, precisely the opposite of what you actually said.
Still, thank you for demonstrating you're not an unrepentant monster. |
Deitra Vess
Khushakor Clan Matari Safari
747
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 15:14:40 -
[137] - Quote
Diana Kim wrote: Meanwhile. If anyone, who isn't a complete brickhead, didn't understand what I did mean, I'll gladly explain. Please ask in a separate thread or mail.
Mail sent.....
Arrendis wrote:Deitra Vess wrote:Way to be blunt about it... Tyrel Toov wrote: Hey! There's nothing wrong with the SMA. I'm learning quite a bit out here.
Nah, I love SMA. ;) Ivory Kantenu's one of my best guys. They were kinda funny when I did a raid on their space with spectre fleet (I thought we were attacking provi so I signed up). It wasn't exactly great since there's a bunch in SMA and the rest of the Imperium I either respect or like. Alot of great people in there, also alot of not so great but they're the minority. |
Arrendis
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1596
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 15:34:36 -
[138] - Quote
Deitra Vess wrote:They were kinda funny when I did a raid on their space with spectre fleet (I thought we were attacking provi so I signed up). It wasn't exactly great since there's a bunch in SMA and the rest of the Imperium I either respect or like. Alot of great people in there, also alot of not so great but they're the minority.
Pfft, nothing wrong with raiding. Spectre Fleet is good people. |
Diana Kim
State Protectorate Caldari State
2208
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 16:59:09 -
[139] - Quote
Tyrel Toov wrote: Read as: "I have no excuse for my lack of clarity/willingness to shoot civilians. But I'm totally not at fault for my mistakes, you should conform to my line of thinking so you can understand me better."
Read as: another minmatar tries to understand, but fails epically and makes another ridiculously stupid and offensive conclusion.
Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.
In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.
|
Deitra Vess
Khushakor Clan Matari Safari
747
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 17:07:46 -
[140] - Quote
Can't we all jus get along?
Let me guess...
Read as: " grr grr Caldari don't understand" Also read as: "stupid tribal wants people to shut up and stop bickering over semantics" |
|
Neph
Operation Meatshield Plexodus
191
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 17:20:10 -
[141] - Quote
Arrendis wrote:Diana Kim wrote:Elmund Egivand wrote:1. Do not kill civvies unless they shoot first. That's not honor, that's incompetence. So not indiscriminately shooting civilians is incompetence? Giving you an opportunity to clarify this statement, Kim.
Diana Kim wrote:Tyrel Toov wrote: Read as: "I have no excuse for my lack of clarity/willingness to shoot civilians. But I'm totally not at fault for my mistakes, you should conform to my line of thinking so you can understand me better."
Read as: another minmatar tries to understand, but fails epically and makes another ridiculously stupid and offensive conclusion.
Let this Minmatar take a stab at it. "In a warzone in low-security space, everybody is guilty until proven innocent. Assuming a civilian capsuleer is about to do anything less than try to shoot me dead would be incompetence, as I am needlessly risking the lives of my crew. Besides, they might be helping the enemy."
A pragmatic sentiment for sure. While I see how such an attitude might often give you that second's edge before pirates attack, it's not always true. for example. if you're in a 20-man sivpul gatecamp and a neutral jumps through in an enyo, they pose no risk to you. There's surely other cases where this is a needless position to take.
My corp has no rules, but I don't shoot neutrals unless they shoot first or they slide in with intent to kill. Or if I'm camping Martoh.
Our peoples have stared extinction in the eye; but we have spat in that eye and stood to fight with valor and undying loyalty to our culture and our kin. Our struggle is as one, so let us struggle together.
|
Arrendis
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1596
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 18:20:27 -
[142] - Quote
Neph wrote:Let this Minmatar take a stab at it. [i]"In a warzone in low-security space, everybody is guilty until proven innocent. Assuming a civilian capsuleer is about to do anything less than try to shoot me dead would be incompetence, as I am needlessly risking the lives of my crew. Besides, they might be helping the enemy."
Well, Egivand didn't say anything about 'in a warzone'. In a warzone, there are no capsuleers you should assume are 'civilians'. Outside of a warzone, shooting someone in low-sec is an invitation for the dozen friends he has in-system to shoot you. They may not be the same corp or alliance - so unless you have a reason other than 'shoot him back first', then it's usually not advisable. In nullsec, standings, standings, standings. Outside of Providence/PFR space, you're pretty much held to be hostile unless you've arranged blue standings with the locals - again, there's no such thing as a 'civilian'. In high-sec, randomly shooting civilians gets you CONCORDed... so if you didn't intend to blow up, I'd call that incompetent.
As I said, I was giving Kim the chance to clarify herself - which she did, even if she did it in about the most obtusely insulting way she could manage. |
Diana Kim
State Protectorate Caldari State
2208
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 21:55:35 -
[143] - Quote
Neph wrote: Let this Minmatar take a stab at it. "In a warzone in low-security space, everybody is guilty until proven innocent. Assuming a civilian capsuleer is about to do anything less than try to shoot me dead would be incompetence, as I am needlessly risking the lives of my crew. Besides, they might be helping the enemy."
A pragmatic sentiment for sure. While I see how such an attitude might often give you that second's edge before pirates attack, it's not always true. for example. if you're in a 20-man sivpul gatecamp and a neutral jumps through in an enyo, they pose no risk to you. There's surely other cases where this is a needless position to take.
My corp has no rules, but I don't shoot neutrals unless they shoot first or they slide in with intent to kill. Or if I'm camping Martoh.
I think you forgot the most important: an order to kill. As for low-security space, I don't follow rule "guilty until proven innocent". Counterwise. However, any trespasser into a military installation without given permission is considered hostile.
And again, I believe it is a discussion for a different topic, and idiots like Egivand and Arrendis won't understand it anyway, they will just use any of these words to troll, misinterpret and lie.
Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.
In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.
|
Calliste Dauvienne
Echelon Mirage
17
|
Posted - 2015.11.11 23:56:35 -
[144] - Quote
I am curious. How does one even qualify who is a, "civilian" capsuleer or not? If one considers the legal maxim that a civilian is a non-combatant, then how can a capsuleer that even in the smallest vessel is able to deploy kilotons of firepower be considered a civilian?
Are they a civilian only if they're using something like an industrial and suddenly not when they're in an armed HAC? What if that industrial has a cynosural field generator or if their mining barge has a warp disruptor for a gate camp, are they still a civilian?
When any capsuleer can potentially become a combatant then how can any capsuleer be qualified as, "civilian"? |
Elmund Egivand
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
847
|
Posted - 2015.11.12 02:55:45 -
[145] - Quote
Deitra Vess wrote: Well said, and from the things I was told about them by my...... Former..... Corporation and alliance, I can't blame you for leaving them. Not biohazard per say, just that alliance in general.
While I can understand the corpGÇÖs justification for attacking that TLF-aligned POS, I cannot abide such an action with good conscience. Had I stayed, I will continuously feel that uncomfortable prickling in my brain for months. Eventually, I believe, the experience and my continuously allegiance to the corp will change me for, I suspect, the worse. I knew I had to leave or risk allowing the cognitive dissonance to erode and degrade my spirit and reduce me into a husk.
Evergreen ~ Evergreen ~ Evergreen ~ EVERGREEN ~ Evergreen ~ Evergreen ~Evergreen ~ Family
|
Elmund Egivand
Federal Defense Union Gallente Federation
847
|
Posted - 2015.11.12 03:03:10 -
[146] - Quote
Diana Kim wrote: (Formatting with clear attempt at ensuring I can't respond so you can feel like you won and feel better about yourself.)
On point 1, since when did I say I have honour? And how is GÇÿnot shooting the unarmed population of a hab unitGÇÖ considered GÇÿincompetentGÇÖ?
On point 2, letGÇÖs use these scenarios as examples: 1.Chance of success against a Tristan in a Breacher: about 50% depending on fittings. 2.Chance of success against a Slicer: case-by-case. If Slicer is already on-grid and flown by a capsuleer with less than 1-year-operation experience and assuming I do not screw up slingshotting in a standard Breacher, chance of success is about 50%. If flown by a capsuleer with more than 3-years of combat experience, chance of success is about 10%, if my Breacher is standard-fit. If dual-prop, elevate chance to 75%, assuming that I do not screw up the slingshotting and the approach. 3.Chance of success against a Merlin with Breacher standard fit? About 90%. 4.Chance of success in Breacher standard fit against an Enyo? Assuming that I could rapidly establish stable orbit at 6-9km, chance of success is approximately 80%. 5.Chance of success against a Hawk flown by a capsuleer with two-year combat experience? 0%
Also, I still see you are sore about your utter failure in catching that two-drone Probe in a Data Site in a Caracal. Let me tell you the chance of success of a Probe fitted for exploration work against a Caracal. Zero-f-ing percent! I will be stupid for sticking around. If you canGÇÖt comprehend that, I see exactly why you absolutely had to fly Daredevils and Confessors and stick to your home system and vicinity when you are operating solo, and why you very rarely operate solo.
Point 4: I actually had great success reducing the crew numbers of my frigates to the absolute minimum: One. Myself. Everything else is machine. ItGÇÖs working well so far. I need to change out much of the ship machinery and rework the architecture however. The downside is lengthened maintenance cycles, which I can handle by getting more experienced work crew to assist.
By the way, had you actually taken the trouble to walk in your ships, you will find that even your humble Condor uses fully automatic missilery system and that the AI manages input from the sensor suite and regulates Engineering. The crew you do actually have in your Condor is there only for damage control, which you can replace with drones or use better redundancy systems.
Point 6: Even privateers have cause to join other privateers or to assist in filling out the cannon fodder roster. This has happened before in the TLF and I suspect this will also happen in the FDU.
Point 7: Maybe if you stop overreacting over everything I might actually get bored from poking you as a pastime. Besides, you had not stopped me from completing my objective while you utterly fail at your attempt at scoring a kill on an exploration probe in a Data Site after taking the trouble of scanning it out. Keep convincing yourself that you are not a buffoon of a pilot and maybe one day a Rifter will take pity on you and let you score an easy kill on her when you fight her in a Merlin.
Who am I kidding? That's not going to happen. You are just going to keep joining the fleets as cannon fodder and fly around in a Daredevil or a Confessor chasing down Thrashers or Tristans and convince yourself that you are somehow the cream of the crop.
Evergreen ~ Evergreen ~ Evergreen ~ EVERGREEN ~ Evergreen ~ Evergreen ~Evergreen ~ Family
|
Diana Kim
State Protectorate Caldari State
2209
|
Posted - 2015.11.12 22:06:12 -
[147] - Quote
Calliste Dauvienne wrote:I am curious. How does one even qualify who is a, "civilian" capsuleer or not? If one considers the legal maxim that a civilian is a non-combatant, then how can a capsuleer that even in the smallest vessel is able to deploy kilotons of firepower be considered a civilian?
Are they a civilian only if they're using something like an industrial and suddenly not when they're in an armed HAC? What if that industrial has a cynosural field generator or if their mining barge has a warp disruptor for a gate camp, are they still a civilian?
When any capsuleer can potentially become a combatant then how can any capsuleer be qualified as, "civilian"? All capsuleers and their crews are to be considered combatants, ma'am. There's only a question whether they are Friends or Foes. And if this identification can't be performed on the spot, I could suggest easy recommendations: 1) If unidentified vessel ("neutral") enters a military installation, it is hostile, disregarding if the installation is friendly or hostile. 2) All unidentified vessels in null security space are hostile. 3) All unidentified vessels in high security space or low security space are friendly. 4) An unidentified vessel becoming suspect or criminal is to be considered hostile. 5) An unidentified vessel with security status below -5.0 should be considered hostile. 6) If FC orders fire on the unidentified vessel, it should be considered hostile.
As you can see, all recommendations except 1 and 6 reflect CONCORD rules of engagement.
Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.
In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.
|
Diana Kim
State Protectorate Caldari State
2209
|
Posted - 2015.11.12 22:10:16 -
[148] - Quote
Elmund Egivand wrote: Who am I kidding? That's not going to happen. You are just going to keep joining the fleets as cannon fodder and fly around in a Daredevil or a Confessor chasing down Thrashers or Tristans and convince yourself that you are somehow the cream of the crop.
I am not "convincing" myself in anything, you minmatar blockhead. I am simply destroying scum that has to be destroyed, and chose for this whatever I see fit. If you don't like it - keep shaking in fear as you did when you saw my ship on scan. That gallentean errand boys like you run away in terror, it is still a success.
Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.
In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.
|
Diana Kim
State Protectorate Caldari State
2209
|
Posted - 2015.11.12 22:14:30 -
[149] - Quote
Elmund Egivand wrote: Point 4: I actually had great success reducing the crew numbers of my frigates to the absolute minimum: One. Myself.
And now, that's an utter ignorance. I don't know whom are you lying more, to all of us or yourself. Minmatar ships are known to hold most of crew than any other ship. I have "opened" up these rust cans with my laser "knives" quite a lot of times - none of them were empty.
I can think only about a single scenario when a minmatar ship would fly completely without crew: it is unfitted empty hull. Yes, I have seen these too. Farmers tend to use them sometimes. But even warp core stabbed farmer ship is filled with crew.
ESPECIALLY if is is minmatar ship. So, would you please stop spreading ignorance here more?
Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.
In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.
|
Arrendis
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1601
|
Posted - 2015.11.12 22:45:20 -
[150] - Quote
Calliste Dauvienne wrote:I am curious. How does one even qualify who is a, "civilian" capsuleer or not? If one considers the legal maxim that a civilian is a non-combatant, then how can a capsuleer that even in the smallest vessel is able to deploy kilotons of firepower be considered a civilian?
Are they a civilian only if they're using something like an industrial and suddenly not when they're in an armed HAC? What if that industrial has a cynosural field generator or if their mining barge has a warp disruptor for a gate camp, are they still a civilian?
When any capsuleer can potentially become a combatant then how can any capsuleer be qualified as, "civilian"?
Well, for one thing, a neutral capsuleer in a T1 hauler, shuttle, or pod would normally qualify. The shuttle/pod can't have any weapons, and if the hauler's a q-ship, then he's probably not going to fire unprovoked, simply to avoid blowing his cover when he doesn't know what you've got in the system.
As for HACs and other combat-capable vessels - if I'm not under a wardec by that individual's corp, then yes, I consider them to be a non-combatant/civilian for purposes of whether or not I'm weapons-free in low-sec. Obviously, this changes if I'm with a fleet, but then the decision's on the FC, not me. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |