Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
5pitf1re
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
82
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 08:56:04 -
[31] - Quote
Orca Platypus wrote:Incompetent - 3 Unknown - 4 Corrupt - 12 Good - 7
This is literally worse than T3 group. I guess for the next group CCP bias will finally get full power, and corrupt people finally get the majority they need to get rid of everything threatening their bot empires in eve.
I wasn't aware that being known or famous would be a requirement for experience. TIL. |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 10:14:49 -
[32] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Orca Platypus wrote:Incompetent - 3 Unknown - 4 Corrupt - 12 Good - 7
This is literally worse than T3 group. I guess for the next group CCP bias will finally get full power, and corrupt people finally get the majority they need to get rid of everything threatening their bot empires in eve. Oh come ON. There has to be some overlap. I am sure at least one person is incompetent, unknown AND corrupt. m
You are the overlap of Incompetent, Corrupt and Vegetable, Mike. Is there anything you do at all, except listening to your gewn masters and trying to be smug on forums? |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 10:16:41 -
[33] - Quote
5pitf1re wrote:I wasn't aware that being known or famous would be a requirement for experience. TIL. Unknown only means I wasn't able to draw a conclusion based on killboards, posting and corp history to reliably place a person within any other group. It doesn't mean nobody knows a guy, it's his intentions that are unknown. |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 10:19:14 -
[34] - Quote
Lazarus Telraven wrote:I know I'm not very well known, but to put me in the unknown list hurts my feelings :\ You are not known at all, but your affiliation has clearly placed you within a group, intentions of which are definitely not unknown. |
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 10:44:22 -
[35] - Quote
Wish I could take a peek at the clawing of two corrupt groups with conflicting intentions...
Gewnie intentions reek from miles away: 1) Protect the blessed jump range reduction that keeps Deklein out of hotdrop range. 2) Secure and expand the capital ratting, flourishing as a consequence of 1). 3) Preserve and expand the impenetrable safety mechanics for ratting capitals. 4) Turn supercapitals into defensive N+1 superweapons to secure the irl income sources until eve dies.
Pathetic Legion intentions clash with the former: 1) Undo Phoebe, because butthurt. 2) Secure and expand dropping capitals on rifters, as a consequence of 1) 3) Obtain and expand the impenetrable safety mechanics for moving capitals. 4) Turn supercapitals into offensive N+1 superweapons to secure the tear income sources until eve dies.
They will quickly push for the respective 3) together, forming a corrupt coalition, but the following ego clash over the rest of the respective agendas would probably be fun to see. |
Lazarus Telraven
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
93
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 11:47:58 -
[36] - Quote
Orca Platypus wrote:Wish I could take a peek at the clawing of two corrupt groups with conflicting intentions...
Gewnie intentions reek from miles away: 1) Protect the blessed jump range reduction that keeps Deklein out of hotdrop range. 2) Secure and expand the capital ratting, flourishing as a consequence of 1). 3) Preserve and expand the impenetrable safety mechanics for ratting capitals. 4) Turn supercapitals into defensive N+1 superweapons to secure the irl income sources until eve dies.
Pathetic Legion intentions clash with the former: 1) Undo Phoebe, because butthurt. 2) Secure and expand dropping capitals on rifters, as a consequence of 1) 3) Obtain and expand the impenetrable safety mechanics for moving capitals. 4) Turn supercapitals into offensive N+1 superweapons to secure the tear income sources until eve dies.
They will quickly push for the respective 3) together, forming a corrupt coalition, but the following ego clash over the rest of the respective agendas would probably be fun to see.
I am going to refrain trolling the **** out of you because it would be too easy.
1.) If you could take the tin foil hat off for a few seconds and look at some of the things I have said in regards to supers you will know I am one of the biggest advocates for fixing supers so that small groups can operate moderately safely with them. Especially the guys and gals trying to move their super through lowsec. (I can move my supers through lowsec because I have a fleet of 100 of them)
2.) the 'Gewnies' don't care about 'protecting deklein' most of our active ratters enjoy the combat when they get tackled, check MoA and NCdot killboard for the past months you will see that Deklein isn't some safe mecca.
3.) You can currently make more isk doing HiSec incursions with complete safety.
4.) There is a wide variety of different viewpoints in this group from many different parts of EVE.
5.) You have no idea what the top level of this games motives are as shown by your 8 bullet points. No one wants EVE to die.
6.) The #1 goal of everyone I know is for capitals to have a reason to be fielded thus being put at risk for pvp purposes.
7.) The logs of the slack channel will be logged and made public so everyone will know whats going in. |
5pitf1re
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
82
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 11:51:37 -
[37] - Quote
Lazarus Telraven wrote:Orca Platypus wrote:Wish I could take a peek at the clawing of two corrupt groups with conflicting intentions...
Gewnie intentions reek from miles away: 1) Protect the blessed jump range reduction that keeps Deklein out of hotdrop range. 2) Secure and expand the capital ratting, flourishing as a consequence of 1). 3) Preserve and expand the impenetrable safety mechanics for ratting capitals. 4) Turn supercapitals into defensive N+1 superweapons to secure the irl income sources until eve dies.
Pathetic Legion intentions clash with the former: 1) Undo Phoebe, because butthurt. 2) Secure and expand dropping capitals on rifters, as a consequence of 1) 3) Obtain and expand the impenetrable safety mechanics for moving capitals. 4) Turn supercapitals into offensive N+1 superweapons to secure the tear income sources until eve dies.
They will quickly push for the respective 3) together, forming a corrupt coalition, but the following ego clash over the rest of the respective agendas would probably be fun to see. I am going to refrain trolling the **** out of you because it would be too easy. 1.) If you could take the tin foil hat off for a few seconds and look at some of the things I have said in regards to supers you will know I am one of the biggest advocates for fixing supers so that small groups can operate moderately safely with them. Especially the guys and gals trying to move their super through lowsec. (I can move my supers through lowsec because I have a fleet of 100 of them) 2.) the 'Gewnies' don't care about 'protecting deklein' most of our active ratters enjoy the combat when they get tackled, check MoA and NCdot killboard for the past months you will see that Deklein isn't some safe mecca. 3.) You can currently make more isk doing HiSec incursions with complete safety. 4.) There is a wide variety of different viewpoints in this group from many different parts of EVE. 5.) You have no idea what the top level of this games motives are as shown by your 8 bullet points. No one wants EVE to die. 6.) The #1 goal of everyone I know is for capitals to have a reason to be fielded thus being put at risk for pvp purposes. 7.) The logs of the slack channel will be logged and made public so everyone will know whats going in.
All of your points are invalid. Who even are you!? Should we know you? :D |
Sgt Ocker
Kenshin. DARKNESS.
772
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 12:51:36 -
[38] - Quote
Lazarus Telraven wrote:Orca Platypus wrote:Wish I could take a peek at the clawing of two corrupt groups with conflicting intentions...
Gewnie intentions reek from miles away: 1) Protect the blessed jump range reduction that keeps Deklein out of hotdrop range. 2) Secure and expand the capital ratting, flourishing as a consequence of 1). 3) Preserve and expand the impenetrable safety mechanics for ratting capitals. 4) Turn supercapitals into defensive N+1 superweapons to secure the irl income sources until eve dies.
Pathetic Legion intentions clash with the former: 1) Undo Phoebe, because butthurt. 2) Secure and expand dropping capitals on rifters, as a consequence of 1) 3) Obtain and expand the impenetrable safety mechanics for moving capitals. 4) Turn supercapitals into offensive N+1 superweapons to secure the tear income sources until eve dies.
They will quickly push for the respective 3) together, forming a corrupt coalition, but the following ego clash over the rest of the respective agendas would probably be fun to see. I am going to refrain trolling the **** out of you because it would be too easy. 1.) If you could take the tin foil hat off for a few seconds and look at some of the things I have said in regards to supers you will know I am one of the biggest advocates for fixing supers so that small groups can operate moderately safely with them. Especially the guys and gals trying to move their super through lowsec. (I can move my supers through lowsec because I have a fleet of 100 of them) 2.) the 'Gewnies' don't care about 'protecting deklein' most of our active ratters enjoy the combat when they get tackled, check MoA and NCdot killboard for the past months you will see that Deklein isn't some safe mecca. 3.) You can currently make more isk doing HiSec incursions with complete safety. 4.) There is a wide variety of different viewpoints in this group from many different parts of EVE. 5.) You have no idea what the top level of this games motives are as shown by your 8 bullet points. No one wants EVE to die. 6.) The #1 goal of everyone I know is for capitals to have a reason to be fielded thus being put at risk for pvp purposes. 7.) The logs of the slack channel will be logged and made public so everyone will know whats going in.
6) (the only one worth responding to) - Is not going to be achieved while ever groups like your exist - You simply create too much imbalance with your risk averse game play.
Until there is reason for the large dominating groups to fight each other - Small groups will always be "content" for the blobs. CCP has no idea how to and no intention of, getting the blobbers to fight each other, so nothing changes. (As long as they keep paying subs CCP is happy - Small groups don't matter) Capital ship changes.. Jump nerfs and fatigue.. Citadels.. All worse for small groups than blobs. No amount of ship balancing or new Citadels (Which further limit the ability of smaller groups to operate supers, optimally) is going to change the risk averse nature of PVP in Eve.
My opinions are mine.
If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - -
Just don't bother Hating - I don't care
Why can't CCP see the obvious - Large dominating groups are bad for Eve.
|
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 12:57:51 -
[39] - Quote
Lazarus Telraven wrote:I am going to refrain trolling the **** out of you because it would be too easy. That's right, go back to your ratting nyx.
Lazarus Telraven wrote:1.) If you could take the tin foil hat off for a few seconds and look at some of the things I have said in regards to supers you will know I am one of the biggest advocates for fixing supers so that small groups can operate moderately safely with them. Especially the guys and gals trying to move their super through lowsec. (I can move my supers through lowsec because I have a fleet of 100 of them)
2.) the 'Gewnies' don't care about 'protecting deklein' most of our active ratters enjoy the combat when they get tackled, check MoA and NCdot killboard for the past months you will see that Deklein isn't some safe mecca.
3.) You can currently make more isk doing HiSec incursions with complete safety.
4.) There is a wide variety of different viewpoints in this group from many different parts of EVE.
5.) You have no idea what the top level of this games motives are as shown by your 8 bullet points. No one wants EVE to die.
6.) The #1 goal of everyone I know is for capitals to have a reason to be fielded thus being put at risk for pvp purposes.
7.) The logs of the slack channel will be logged and made public so everyone will know whats going in.
1) Yep, in full accordance with Pathetic Legion point 3), you already push for safety mechanics when moving supers. So far you're supporting my call. 2) Sure, sure. Gewn tears are always tasty, keep them coming. I not only read the killboards, but also the MoA mail section, you know. So much "enjoyment" there, oh my. Just remembering the interceptor tears... yum! 3) "Nerf hisec". Now we're back to citating gewn forum crying guidelines. The incursion point has been refuted many times, update your guidelines already. 4) I never denied variety. I just stated a fact that within this group there is a corrupt cell which has ulterior motives. 5) Sure, sure. Not to die, just to be milked to the bone at the expense of everything else. And then die. 6) The #1 goal of your corrupt party is to remove any and all risk to your $$$. Don't bother denying the obvious, you've been at it for years. 7) So what? You'll get a deal under the table with the other corrupt party and both make a push for priorities I stated, with a fake agenda - maybe the usual "help the little guy" or something more fitting to the cause, I don't really care to take apart the double face charade here. I just state that the double face will appear, and for whatever fake reasoning it bring, will push towards the priorities I stated. |
Sgt Ocker
Kenshin. DARKNESS.
772
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 13:04:12 -
[40] - Quote
Always Shi wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote: wall of insane nerdrage
Heh you are pretty nuts dude If pointing out others shortcomings and failures to understand simple English is nuts - Then yes I am.
My opinions are mine.
If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - -
Just don't bother Hating - I don't care
Why can't CCP see the obvious - Large dominating groups are bad for Eve.
|
|
FT Diomedes
The Graduates Get Off My Lawn
1929
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 13:08:17 -
[41] - Quote
Lazarus Telraven wrote:Orca Platypus wrote:Incompetent - 3 Unknown - 4 Corrupt - 12 Good - 7
This is literally worse than T3 group. I guess for the next group CCP bias will finally get full power, and corrupt people finally get the majority they need to get rid of everything threatening their bot empires in eve. I know I'm not very well known, but to put me in the unknown list hurts my feelings :\
You certainly were not on his "Good" list...
CCP should add more NPC 0.0 space to open it up and liven things up: the Stepping Stones project.
|
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 13:17:54 -
[42] - Quote
FT Diomedes wrote:You certainly were not on his "Good" list... You forgot "...and for a good reason". People who drop whole regions of content to hole up where drops can't reach them, surrounding themselves with fake targets like renters from those who come like the real men - don't deserve to be anywhere near the good list. |
Moac Tor
Cy-Core Industries Stain Confederation
316
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 13:37:53 -
[43] - Quote
Orca Platypus wrote:FT Diomedes wrote:You certainly were not on his "Good" list... You forgot "...and for a good reason". People who drop whole regions of content to hole up where drops can't reach them, surrounding themselves with fake targets like renters from those who come like the real men - don't deserve to be anywhere near the good list. Is this a joke or are you serious?...
You do realise that Larrikin will be publishing all of the logs too right?
Modulated ECM Effects
An Alternative to Skill Trading
|
Sgt Ocker
Kenshin. DARKNESS.
773
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 13:41:04 -
[44] - Quote
Lazarus Telraven wrote:Orca Platypus wrote:Incompetent - 3 Unknown - 4 Corrupt - 12 Good - 7
This is literally worse than T3 group. I guess for the next group CCP bias will finally get full power, and corrupt people finally get the majority they need to get rid of everything threatening their bot empires in eve. I know I'm not very well known, but to put me in the unknown list hurts my feelings :\ Seems you put yourself in the "unknown" group. Most of us know your intentions are not in the best interest of Eve as a whole, your alliance alone says that (maybe not corrupt but certainly biased)
My opinions are mine.
If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - -
Just don't bother Hating - I don't care
Why can't CCP see the obvious - Large dominating groups are bad for Eve.
|
Lazarus Telraven
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
94
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 13:44:50 -
[45] - Quote
Orca Platypus wrote:FT Diomedes wrote:You certainly were not on his "Good" list... You forgot "...and for a good reason". People who drop whole regions of content to hole up where drops can't reach them, surrounding themselves with fake targets like renters from those who come like the real men - don't deserve to be anywhere near the good list.
We have some open space in Pure Blind if you're looking to rent, good price and I will personally protect your space from all of the bad guys.
|
Minty Aroma
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
61
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 14:41:13 -
[46] - Quote
Sgt Ocker wrote:Always Shi wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote: wall of insane nerdrage
Heh you are pretty nuts dude Nuts response trying to sound witty
Confirmed completely insane - please take your free straight jacket courtesy of the government in the country you live in on the way out. |
Sgt Ocker
Kenshin. DARKNESS.
773
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 14:58:52 -
[47] - Quote
Minty Aroma wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote:Always Shi wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote: wall of insane nerdrage
Heh you are pretty nuts dude Nuts response trying to sound witty Confirmed completely insane - please take your free straight jacket courtesy of the government in the country you live in on the way out. Ahh Gee, a lil Goon drone making an inane, uninformed comment comment - So cute.
My opinions are mine.
If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - -
Just don't bother Hating - I don't care
Why can't CCP see the obvious - Large dominating groups are bad for Eve.
|
ChYph3r
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
163
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 17:03:12 -
[48] - Quote
Sgt Ocker wrote:Minty Aroma wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote:Always Shi wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote: wall of insane nerdrage
Heh you are pretty nuts dude Nuts response trying to sound witty Confirmed completely insane - please take your free straight jacket courtesy of the government in the country you live in on the way out. Ahh Gee, a lil Goon drone making an inane, uninformed comment comment - So cute.
Can your grr gons get any deeper, please inform us were the little bee touched you so that we can get you the proper psychological help.
Want to find all the podcasts around EVE Online visit
http://evepodcasts.com
@chyph3r on Twitter
|
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 18:18:51 -
[49] - Quote
Lazarus Telraven wrote:We have some open space in Pure Blind if you're looking to rent, good price and I will personally protect your space from all of the bad guys. Will definitely settle around when gewnies are evicted, just to personally protect my space from all the gewn guys. Thanks for the offer.
Lazarus Telraven wrote:What should I have for breakfast you guys seem to know a lot about me. I mean I don't know much, I typically sit in deklein for 6-8 hours a day ratting on my 3 alts. And you still can't deny that's what your whole coalition does more than anything else. |
xttz
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
754
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 18:22:33 -
[50] - Quote
Orca Platypus wrote:Wish I could take a peek at the clawing of two corrupt groups with conflicting intentions...
Gewnie intentions reek from miles away: 1) Protect the blessed jump range reduction that keeps Deklein out of hotdrop range. 2) Secure and expand the capital ratting, flourishing as a consequence of 1). 3) Preserve and expand the impenetrable safety mechanics for ratting capitals. 4) Turn supercapitals into defensive N+1 superweapons to secure the irl income sources until eve dies.
As it happens, the points I personally plan to advocate in the focus group are:
1) Increase jump range and nerf watchlist to bring back hotdrop/counter-drop play, but keep a version of the current system to prevent people to cross the map super-fast. 2) Carrier ratting is dumb as hell and needs to die in a fire. 3) See above 4) Supercaps should be an inspirational part of the game that drives people to both field them and kill them, without returning to being an N+1 apex ship.
The logs will all be public too. |
|
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 18:31:26 -
[51] - Quote
xttz wrote:Orca Platypus wrote:Wish I could take a peek at the clawing of two corrupt groups with conflicting intentions...
Gewnie intentions reek from miles away: 1) Protect the blessed jump range reduction that keeps Deklein out of hotdrop range. 2) Secure and expand the capital ratting, flourishing as a consequence of 1). 3) Preserve and expand the impenetrable safety mechanics for ratting capitals. 4) Turn supercapitals into defensive N+1 superweapons to secure the irl income sources until eve dies.
As it happens, some points I personally plan to advocate in the focus group are: 1) Increase jump range and nerf watchlist to bring back hotdrop/counter-drop play, but keep a version of the current system to prevent people to cross the map super-fast. 2) Carrier ratting is dumb as hell and needs to die in a fire. 3) See above 4) Supercaps should be an inspirational part of the game that drives people to both field them and kill them, without returning to being an N+1 apex ship. The logs will all be public too.
1) In full accordance with corrupt party goals - both empower hotdrops and safety mechanics. I see the undertable dealing is going full steam. 2) To be replaced with supercapital ratting your coalition does? Or maybe dread ratting? I don't really care what you say on the issue though, your coalition would simply threaten to kick you if anything you say won't go in accordance with their "rat for the $$$ god" agenda, so either way you'll have it worked out with your master. 3) see above (1) 4) And then you're going to say there was no way to do anything else with them but make them into defensive N+1 superweapons because any other way they won't be inspirational part of the only game your coalition knows - the sanctum farming game. |
OriginalName IV
Dropbears Anonymous Brave Collective
3
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 19:18:47 -
[52] - Quote
Orca Platypus wrote:Incompetent - 3 Unknown - 4 Corrupt - 12 Good - 7
This is literally worse than T3 group. I guess for the next group CCP bias will finally get full power, and corrupt people finally get the majority they need to get rid of everything threatening their bot empires in eve.
I'm really pleased that somebody else thinks im incompetent. |
Capqu
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
1184
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 19:45:31 -
[53] - Quote
jesus cripes u guys are dumb
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPntjTPWgKE
|
Orca Platypus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
84
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 20:04:28 -
[54] - Quote
OriginalName IV wrote:I'm really pleased that somebody else thinks im incompetent. The way you can locate yourself is the best proof of correct placement. Let me know what your agenda is, and I'll gladly correct myself placing you into corrupt group. |
Sgt Ocker
Kenshin. DARKNESS.
773
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 20:45:22 -
[55] - Quote
ChYph3r wrote:
Can your grr gons get any deeper, please inform us were the little bee touched you so that we can get you the proper psychological help.
I was an unfortunate member for a good while. Being around fools and puppets for so long left me jaded. For some, the risk averse nature of Goon game play is just too much - It is boring, it is game breaking - it is just pitiful.
Now lets see, a slightly closer look. BOB were an all dominating group no-one liked - GOONS is an all dominating group no-one likes. Only difference is, Goons could never achieve what BOB did without all their pets.
Goons alone are nothing and would soon fade into oblivion to become just another alliance - Which is the only reason they cling so tightly to a style of play others want to abandon - For the good of the game. Goons are what force smaller groups to seek out other groups and align (or quit nulsec and move to lowsec), which in turn causes stagnant boring game play - Without coalitions Eve would be a vibrant lively battleground - More than likely, without Goons because they simply could not survive as an alliance.
CCP need to accept most the blame for the sad state of nulsec game play - They allowed it to happen. Goons and pets, renters, whatever you choose to call them, are just the risk averse fools too afraid to change and play the game..
-- - -- - -- - -- So in answer, no my Grrr can't get any deeper - Goon game play = BAD for Eve.
You did ask............
My opinions are mine.
If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - -
Just don't bother Hating - I don't care
Why can't CCP see the obvious - Large dominating groups are bad for Eve.
|
Syndic Thrass
Amok. Goonswarm Federation
147
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 22:57:54 -
[56] - Quote
Sgt Ocker wrote:ChYph3r wrote:
Can your grr gons get any deeper, please inform us were the little bee touched you so that we can get you the proper psychological help.
I was an unfortunate member for a good while. Being around fools and puppets for so long left me jaded. For some, the risk averse nature of Goon game play is just too much - It is boring, it is game breaking - it is just pitiful. Now lets see, a slightly closer look. BOB were an all dominating group no-one liked - GOONS is an all dominating group no-one likes. Only difference is, Goons could never achieve what BOB did without all their pets. Goons alone are nothing and would soon fade into oblivion to become just another alliance - Which is the only reason they cling so tightly to a style of play others want to abandon - For the good of the game. Goons are what force smaller groups to seek out other groups and align (or quit nulsec and move to lowsec), which in turn causes stagnant boring game play - Without coalitions Eve would be a vibrant lively battleground - More than likely, without Goons because they simply could not survive as an alliance. CCP need to accept most the blame for the sad state of nulsec game play - They allowed it to happen. Goons and pets, renters, whatever you choose to call them, are just the risk averse fools too afraid to change and play the game.. -- - -- - -- - -- So in answer, no my Grrr can't get any deeper - Goon game play = BAD for Eve. You did ask............
I can't imagine how you didnt get along well and fit right in with the puppets and fools with posting like that
Reguards,
Iskies-mommies-toonies-corpies-goonies 0707 m8m8m8
|
Sgt Ocker
Kenshin. DARKNESS.
773
|
Posted - 2015.11.13 23:34:33 -
[57] - Quote
Syndic Thrass wrote:Sgt Ocker wrote:ChYph3r wrote:
Can your grr gons get any deeper, please inform us were the little bee touched you so that we can get you the proper psychological help.
I was an unfortunate member for a good while. Being around fools and puppets for so long left me jaded. For some, the risk averse nature of Goon game play is just too much - It is boring, it is game breaking - it is just pitiful. Now lets see, a slightly closer look. BOB were an all dominating group no-one liked - GOONS is an all dominating group no-one likes. Only difference is, Goons could never achieve what BOB did without all their pets. Goons alone are nothing and would soon fade into oblivion to become just another alliance - Which is the only reason they cling so tightly to a style of play others want to abandon - For the good of the game. Goons are what force smaller groups to seek out other groups and align (or quit nulsec and move to lowsec), which in turn causes stagnant boring game play - Without coalitions Eve would be a vibrant lively battleground - More than likely, without Goons because they simply could not survive as an alliance. CCP need to accept most the blame for the sad state of nulsec game play - They allowed it to happen. Goons and pets, renters, whatever you choose to call them, are just the risk averse fools too afraid to change and play the game.. -- - -- - -- - -- So in answer, no my Grrr can't get any deeper - Goon game play = BAD for Eve. You did ask............ I can't imagine how you didnt get along well and fit right in with the puppets and fools with posting like that That was part of the problem. I was starting to feel I did fit in with the likes of you. There is more to Eve than the risk averse nature of the CFC (change the name to whatever you want - doesn't change what you are)
My opinions are mine.
If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - -
Just don't bother Hating - I don't care
Why can't CCP see the obvious - Large dominating groups are bad for Eve.
|
Sitting Bull Lakota
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
27
|
Posted - 2015.11.14 09:44:04 -
[58] - Quote
I hope in the next round of special commodities we can get a tin-foil hat to commemorate this thread.
Seriously, y'all mother-úuGé¼#ers need to go the #&!\ outside and breath some fresh air. |
DrysonBennington
Aliastra Gallente Federation
242
|
Posted - 2015.11.14 09:50:03 -
[59] - Quote
Yawn...guess we had better undock. |
RoCkEt X
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
171
|
Posted - 2015.11.14 19:45:50 -
[60] - Quote
What group do i come under? LOL |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |