Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
StupidGenius Charante
Alea Iacta Est Universal Blades of Grass
23
|
Posted - 2016.02.03 13:42:56 -
[31] - Quote
Here is the CSM Watch interview with Jin'taan for the CSM 11 election. Enjoy! |
Jin'taan
Pentag Blade Curatores Veritatis Alliance
26
|
Posted - 2016.02.09 07:54:46 -
[32] - Quote
My guest appearance on The Learning Cliff just went up! It was a fun little jaunt, even if we ended it up getting killed by blues!
I also updated my OP to include my appearance on the Jeffraider show was some great discussion there and I'd implore people to give it a listen. |
Jenshae Chiroptera
2518
|
Posted - 2016.02.11 10:05:54 -
[33] - Quote
If we must have a CSM, make sure it has good people like Jin'taan ... - rather than dangerous-to-the-future-of-EVE-candidates.
CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids
I will be voting for Xenuria because...
|
Borat Guereen
Chao3 Chao3 Alliance
48
|
Posted - 2016.02.18 02:41:17 -
[34] - Quote
You have my votes! Best luck!
Candidate for CSM XI
Speaker of Chao3
|
Lynnae Suriyawong
Circle of Steel Inc. Care Factor
0
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 22:33:01 -
[35] - Quote
Jin'Taan!
Some questions for you.
1. What kind of improvements to the UI would you like to see, that would help you FC large fleets better?
2. How would you handle rebalancing T3 cruisers and destroyers? (This is likely to come up during your term, if you were elected)
3. How would you balance the ISK making ability between high sec missions, high sec incursions, and nullsec anoms/DEDs?
4. What do you think about the proposed Rorq change, which puts it in the belt, but gives it a massive AOE shield for the mining fleet? Do you think people in Provi will risk their 2.5B ISK ships?
Good luck, man!
|
Niko Lorenzio
United Eve Directorate
522
|
Posted - 2016.03.05 22:42:05 -
[36] - Quote
I did a lot of research on many of the candidates and Jin'taan def has my full support. You have a second place on my ballot. Good luck!
The CSM XI Election are now open until March 25th, 2016. Please consider Niko Lorenzio for CSM XI.
CSM matters, your voice matters, your vote matters!
|
Utari Onzo
Pentag Blade Curatores Veritatis Alliance
986
|
Posted - 2016.03.05 23:14:46 -
[37] - Quote
JIN'TAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
This dude killed my carrier back when I was a wormholer.
10/10 would trade archon for a **** fit large repper niddy again.
You should definatly have him somewhere on your ballot.
"Face the enemy as a solid wall
For faith is your armor
And through it, the enemy will find no breach
Wrap your arms around the enemy
For faith is your fire
And with it, burn away his evil"
|
Jin'taan
Pentag Blade Curatores Veritatis Alliance
29
|
Posted - 2016.03.06 22:38:52 -
[38] - Quote
Lynnae Suriyawong wrote: 1. What kind of improvements to the UI would you like to see, that would help you FC large fleets better?
I don't have any specific UI improvements as regards to large fleets, but I think the best change with regards to fleet fights that could be done is adding Logistics to killmails. Some people might like being the quiet assistants of the fleet, but many more want to wear their KB stats with pride.
Lynnae Suriyawong wrote: 2. How would you handle rebalancing T3 cruisers and destroyers? (This is likely to come up during your term, if you were elected)
Take away either 2, or all 3 rig slots from them. For the Svipul in particular, I'd buff small arty fitting and nerf the Svipuls powergrid. I think it's a way to nerf them that fits with their original intent.
Lynnae Suriyawong wrote: 3. How would you balance the ISK making ability between high sec missions, high sec incursions, and nullsec anoms/DEDs?
That's a hard question, and I'd want to discuss with a hisec representative as well, but I think the best thing that could be done would be to provide group PvE that is consistent to nullsec. Group work should always be worth more than solo work, as it encourages the social dynamic that is the best part of EvE. I feel like hisec incursions are a little out of whack, but they only need a little bit of shaving to be brought in line.
Lynnae Suriyawong wrote: 4. What do you think about the proposed Rorq change, which puts it in the belt, but gives it a massive AOE shield for the mining fleet?
I really, really think it will be numbers dependant. I hope they provide something for the attacker to do whilst they are in their invulnerable mode, and don't leave it open to abuse. I like the idea of it providing a cyno as well, but disabling locking on all invulnerable ships, to incentive having tackle and a standing fleet to give the attackers a fight.
Lynnae Suriyawong wrote: Do you think people in Provi will risk their 2.5B ISK ships?
You bet, we couldn't stop them if we tried.
Thanks, have a good day and thanks for the questions.
|
Michael Oskold
Adversity. Psychotic Tendencies.
16
|
Posted - 2016.03.16 21:51:29 -
[39] - Quote
have you ever flown a super? your prior comments seem to indicate otherwise.
-1 |
Jin'taan
Pentag Blade Curatores Veritatis Alliance
29
|
Posted - 2016.03.20 17:19:45 -
[40] - Quote
Michael Oskold wrote:have you ever flown a super? your prior comments seem to indicate otherwise.
-1
I have been able to drop a super exactly once in my career (thanks Arche). I am in the process of training up a super alt, just because it's something that I'll look to do in the future, but no I have no experience flying supercarriers or titans. |
|
Sweety Palms
Speed Dating and Exploration Unlimited
0
|
Posted - 2016.03.25 01:41:45 -
[41] - Quote
+1 |
Gavin Genisis
Arx One Arx Alliance
0
|
Posted - 2016.03.30 16:13:12 -
[42] - Quote
+1 |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |