Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Bait'er De'Outlier
Trans-Aerospace Industries
31
|
Posted - 2016.01.24 21:30:47 -
[1] - Quote
Announcing my candidacy for CSM!
Platform: Make hi-sec "hi-sec" again and reduce/reverse the trend towards "safe-sec"...
I would be in favor of doing some things like: Reducing Concord to effectively faction police! No more magical scram/web and superweapons. Let them respond, just less effectively or just merge them and their response duties into faction police.
Make NPC corps a part of faction warfare! Give new accounts 30 days of being not a part of faction warfare then after that anytime they have a character in an NPC corp that character is in faction warfare. Leave out the standings penalties for faction warfare for non-militia NPC corps but allow them to be engaged by other pilots in opposing faction warfare/NPC corps... in my opinion this would give an extra reason to join/form corps and make for a more interesting game.
Let wardecs follow characters from dissolved corps or who drop from an involved corp for the remainder of the wardec or up to 7 days whichever is longer!
Change the bounty system! Payout up to 100% of the kill value of the bounty on a given kill! Add a small percentage killright, like 10% of the character's bounty, to any character with a bounty so "bounty hunters" can directly take a stab at getting that juicy bounty etc. The bounty kill right fee would pay down some of the bounty, directly to the person placing the bounty, if no bounty is collected while the kill right was active. Make the Bounty system worthwhile and more effective.
As a rule of thumb I'm generally against any form of nerfing the game. The unsafe gritty sandbox nature of Eve is it's biggest attraction and nerfing it so some can make easier isk detracts from the attraction in my opinion. Don't like being ganked? Learn not to burn, make friends to help protect you and grow some in the game instead of demanding nerfs to make the playground safer for wusses who would want to solo the MMORPG. |
Mike Adoulin
Adolescent Radioactive Pirate Hamsters
1641
|
Posted - 2016.02.03 12:56:26 -
[2] - Quote
Listen to this guy.
He's pre-med.
Everything in EVE is a trap.
And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)
You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.
Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.
|
DoToo Foo
Sons Of Alexander AL3XAND3R.
59
|
Posted - 2016.02.14 03:26:27 -
[3] - Quote
Quote:Payout up to 100% of the kill value of the bounty on a given kill!
What are your intentions with how this interacts with insurance?
A pilot by default has 40% insurance on a T1 hull. With a 100% bounty, on default insurance, you re-introduce profitable alt-farming to capture bounties.
Some (other) pilots would be happy with this as an outcome.
CSM XI candidate. http://foo-eve.blogspot.com.au/
|
Erebus 'TheChin' Sundance
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2016.02.14 05:09:07 -
[4] - Quote
wow! ...tell you what I'll laugh if this guy gets in.
-1 for complete inability to demonstrate respect for different game styles and the actual objective of the CSM, this guy clearly wants everyone to play his way or not at all, a great vote for the degradation of the already delicate relationship between CCP & CSM.
What about all the other content in EVE? |
Bait'er De'Outlier
Trans-Aerospace Industries
33
|
Posted - 2016.02.15 05:43:58 -
[5] - Quote
DoToo Foo wrote:Quote:Payout up to 100% of the kill value of the bounty on a given kill! What are your intentions with how this interacts with insurance? A pilot by default has 40% insurance on a T1 hull. With a 100% bounty, on default insurance, you re-introduce profitable alt-farming to capture bounties. Some (other) pilots would be happy with this as an outcome.
If CCP wants to turn off the potential isk faucet then CCP could remove insurance payouts from paying out to a character if the character has a bounty on them until the bounty is exhausted. Currently you lose the insurance payout if you are concorded so it would not be a huge step to add losing the insurance benefit if you have bounty on you and such a step would add an extra punitive level to placing bounty on a character. |
Bait'er De'Outlier
Trans-Aerospace Industries
33
|
Posted - 2016.02.15 06:44:28 -
[6] - Quote
Interview audio: http://csmwatch.com/2016/02/13/csm-11-candidate-interview-baiter-deoutlier/ |
Bait'er De'Outlier
Trans-Aerospace Industries
34
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 00:29:40 -
[7] - Quote
Soooooooo why am I not on the ballot? Did i miss a step in the process? Did I miss an email or something? What? |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |