Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Helsinki Atruin
Assisted Suicide Services Epicenter.
2
|
Posted - 2016.02.12 16:12:31 -
[31] - Quote
Eija-Riitta Veitonen wrote:Any chance for target painters to also get the decreasing effectiveness over fallof rather than current dice roll mechanic, like it's being done to Sensor Dampeners and done to neuts/nos?
i believe that is a reason for all the ewar tiericide they are doing, make effectiveness change with range rather than rng |
Kyria Stenory
Flying Blacksmiths
9
|
Posted - 2016.02.13 12:51:57 -
[32] - Quote
Changes are maybe interesting, but not the name.
RIP great TP names. #ccpfailoncemore. |
Sugilite
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
29
|
Posted - 2016.02.17 17:17:40 -
[33] - Quote
How am I suppose to pwn my enemies now that I'm stuck with a some "TP" and "petp."
Gross. |
ColdCutz
Frigonometry
125
|
Posted - 2016.02.21 10:12:29 -
[34] - Quote
CCP taking all of the flavor out of the game. |
Amak Boma
Dragon Factory
169
|
Posted - 2016.02.22 11:46:14 -
[35] - Quote
changing the module statistics dont require the name change for module. CCP's solid-concrete logic makes no sense over renaming modules since theres no apparent reason to rename just to change the module effects there is much easier way than that , releasing second-line of target painters so players can choose between the old ones and better new ones this module tiercide makes no sense with the name change. either keep it and release second line of target painters or keep the names and just do module effect changes on exsisting ones |
Darkwing Fiftytwo
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2016.03.02 17:49:10 -
[36] - Quote
Nooo Phased Weapon Array Semenation Megatron!!! JK'ing all the upcoming changes are exciting, although some of the other modules you tiericided have such high drops rates the prices have gone to zero. Small Neut/Nos's ex.
Can we at least keep the Exitron TPer? Everyone loves that one. |
Cyrek Ohaya
Blazing Sun Group
22
|
Posted - 2016.03.05 21:36:05 -
[37] - Quote
Could we have the targeting range of the Bellicose looked at?, these buffs are meaningless if the ship can't make full use of the new ranges, should be more on par with the Celestis and the Blackbird. Also look into the implants related to these, saving 5% capacitor use on painters is literally worthless at the cost of approximately 150,000,000 isk. |
Harvey James
The Sengoku Legacy
1263
|
Posted - 2016.03.05 21:52:13 -
[38] - Quote
Cyrek Ohaya wrote:Could we have the targeting range of the Bellicose looked at?, these buffs are meaningless if the ship can't make full use of the new ranges, should be more on par with the Celestis and the Blackbird. Also look into the implants related to these, saving 5% capacitor use on painters is literally worthless at the cost of approximately 150,000,000 isk.
or its a bad attempt at making them less lame compared too webs instead of actually nerfing webs.. as the range is stupidly long
T3's need to be versatile not have T2 resists, OP dps and tank obsoleting T2 ships entirely.
ABC's should be T2, remove drone assist, separate HAM's and Torps range, -3 highslots for droneboats
Nerf web strength, Make the blaster Eagle worth using
|
Opertone
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
336
|
Posted - 2016.03.06 10:37:01 -
[39] - Quote
yes, revision to target paining implants and rigs
right now the implementation of 5% capacitor is useless, long as target painters cost 30 cap charge over 60 seconds or so...
boost its effectiveness please, or an implant that removes the stacking penalty
This post sums up why the 'best' work with DCM inc.
|
The Desktop
The Art of Ninja
0
|
Posted - 2016.03.09 11:10:21 -
[40] - Quote
ZOMG CCP NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOES!!!!!!!. You MUST (note the caps) keep the name of the pwnage target painter! This is a sad sad day forget the buffs lol we want the NAMMMMMMMMMMME! *cries to sleep at night* :'( |
|
Saltpeter Taffy
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2016.03.09 16:22:36 -
[41] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:This is a class of modules that I've been especially nervous about touching for a fairly unusual reason: names. Their current names are one of my favorite old EVE easter eggs, and I know many of you share that opinion. We do plan to change the names of the modules to more closely match other "named" modules in the new system, but rest assured that their old names will live on in special descriptions for the modules.
I think I speak for everyone when I say: Awww. :( |
MajorEvan
The Scope Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2016.03.10 08:40:46 -
[42] - Quote
I am disappointed that you guys got rid of my favorite target painter "PWNAGE". From a stealth bomber pilot point of view, a large signature radius is crucial to killing smaller ships with bombs. I'm very upset that you guys nerfed the signature radius bonus. |
Darkwing Fiftytwo
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4
|
Posted - 2016.04.27 14:02:48 -
[43] - Quote
+1 to Target Painter for the Highslot, although I dont know how that doesnt open up a can of worms to fit all ewar in highs. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |