Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
15
|
Posted - 2016.03.15 18:22:04 -
[1] - Quote
http://updates.eveonline.com/date/2016-04-27/
Capital changes are included in the release ! |
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
5865
|
Posted - 2016.03.15 18:45:23 -
[2] - Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=butuDwAvFx0 |
Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
1078
|
Posted - 2016.03.15 19:01:21 -
[3] - Quote
They haven't even fixed the SMA bug yet, days after the last patch, and their announcing citadels already...
Not today spaghetti.
|
Sim Cognito
Obani Gemini Corporation
25
|
Posted - 2016.03.15 19:24:34 -
[4] - Quote
Sexy Cakes wrote:They haven't even fixed the SMA bug yet, days after the last patch, and their announcing citadels already...
POSes are done for. We have been waiting for over a decade to get rid of their awful mechanics. Glitchy, clunky and downright fun-killers.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=9543
Finally the forcefield mess will soon be over for most of the basic functions before disappearing entirely from everyday gameplay. |
Hibbe
Out of Pod Experience
8
|
Posted - 2016.03.15 19:34:28 -
[5] - Quote
Sexy Cakes wrote:They haven't even fixed the SMA bug yet, days after the last patch, and their announcing citadels already...
ccp is confident it will be solved by then, you should trust in ccp and not be sucha pesimist |
Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
1079
|
Posted - 2016.03.15 19:36:48 -
[6] - Quote
Sim Cognito wrote:Sexy Cakes wrote:They haven't even fixed the SMA bug yet, days after the last patch, and their announcing citadels already... POSes are done for. We have been waiting for over a decade to get rid of their awful mechanics. Glitchy, clunky and downright fun-killers. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=9543 Finally the forcefield mess will soon be over for most of the basic functions before disappearing entirely from everyday gameplay.
So until 6 weeks from now, about 50% of the time I need to swap ships in a WH I have to relog?
Not today spaghetti.
|
Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
15
|
Posted - 2016.03.15 23:46:19 -
[7] - Quote
Sexy Cakes wrote:They haven't even fixed the SMA bug yet, days after the last patch, and their announcing citadels already...
You mean SMA is still an alliance ingame ? it sure is a big bug ffs CCP pls fix ! |
Neadayan Drakhon
Heuristic Industrial And Development AddictClan
57
|
Posted - 2016.03.16 03:37:58 -
[8] - Quote
Sim Cognito wrote:Sexy Cakes wrote:They haven't even fixed the SMA bug yet, days after the last patch, and their announcing citadels already... POSes are done for. We have been waiting for over a decade to get rid of their awful mechanics. Glitchy, clunky and downright fun-killers. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=9543 Finally the forcefield mess will soon be over for most of the basic functions before disappearing entirely from everyday gameplay. POS's won't be removed just yet. There are other structures that will be coming out in addition to the citadels before they remove POS's. |
Nortal Aldent
TheLostSoul The Blood Covenant
2
|
Posted - 2016.03.16 04:53:46 -
[9] - Quote
As a player I was wondering, are citadels going to be corp owned or can I own one separate from the corp I'm in? |
Oxide Ammar
234
|
Posted - 2016.03.16 05:41:48 -
[10] - Quote
It is strangely they went silent regarding the rest of structures, things like observatory array, assembly array, drilling platforms and most important structure is POG (player owned gates). Are they coming in late release or they buried the whole idea ?
Lady Areola Fappington: -áSolo PVP isn't dead!-á You just need to make sure you have your booster, remote rep, cyno, and emergency Falcon alts logged in and ready before you do any solo PVPing.
|
|
Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
16
|
Posted - 2016.03.16 05:47:45 -
[11] - Quote
Nortal Aldent wrote: As a player I was wondering, are citadels going to be corp owned or can I own one separate from the corp I'm in?
Corp owned most likely like POSes |
Sim Cognito
Obani Gemini Corporation
27
|
Posted - 2016.03.16 07:56:16 -
[12] - Quote
By the way, will Citadels receive SKINs at some point in the future? |
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
3078
|
Posted - 2016.03.16 10:47:37 -
[13] - Quote
Oxide Ammar wrote:It is strangely they went silent regarding the rest of structures, things like observatory array, assembly array, drilling platforms and most important structure is POG (player owned gates). Are they coming in late release or they buried the whole idea ? They haven't been silent. Those were always intended for later releases, over probably the next year. POG are actually the worst structure planned, opening new space just opens new monopolies to the current power houses if they haven't fixed the systems that make it so easy to just outblob your enemy and the top down income sources. Space should be made denser with more to do per system, and therefore more people doing things per system. Not sparser. (Note, 15 stations is not dense, because they do not add more things to actually do, 1 station gives everything needed to do) |
Aaron Honk
Distributed Denial of Service
17
|
Posted - 2016.03.16 12:05:19 -
[14] - Quote
Sim Cognito wrote:By the way, will Citadels receive SKINs at some point in the future?
I want my citadel with a hello kitty skin
edit: to go with my apo https://i.imgur.com/e4OppRD.jpg |
Reiisha
Repracor Industries
991
|
Posted - 2016.03.16 21:58:03 -
[15] - Quote
Sim Cognito wrote:Sexy Cakes wrote:They haven't even fixed the SMA bug yet, days after the last patch, and their announcing citadels already... POSes are done for. We have been waiting for over a decade to get rid of their awful mechanics. Glitchy, clunky and downright fun-killers. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=9543 Finally the forcefield mess will soon be over for most of the basic functions before disappearing entirely from everyday gameplay.
Why the hell hasn't that idea been implemented yet? CCP? Anyone? Falcon?
If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all...
|
Kieron VonDeux
118
|
Posted - 2016.03.17 01:35:58 -
[16] - Quote
Reiisha wrote: Why the hell hasn't that idea been implemented yet? CCP? Anyone? Falcon?
Probably estimated to take more effort than they were ready to commit to previously and wanted to ensure they had gameplay to replace POSes in place, which is now on the timeline.
|
Shad0w Myst
Altered Dimension
0
|
Posted - 2016.03.18 10:44:04 -
[17] - Quote
Ok, for the life of me I swear I came across a page that stated POS's would be replaced with a medium citadel or has an implant malfunctioned? |
Damjan Fox
Fox Industries and Exploration
265
|
Posted - 2016.03.18 11:01:30 -
[18] - Quote
Quote:It is strangely they went silent regarding the rest of structures, things like observatory array, assembly array, drilling platforms and most important structure is POG (player owned gates). Are they coming in late release or they buried the whole idea ? I guess we are going to more about these next month during Fanfest.
Proposal: >>> New Inventory / Item Hangar <<<
|
Postman
EVE Postal Service
12
|
Posted - 2016.03.18 11:03:27 -
[19] - Quote
Shad0w Myst wrote:Ok, for the life of me I swear I came across a page that stated POS's would be replaced with a medium citadel or has an implant malfunctioned? Nothing of that kind has been stated by CCP yet. So far they only said that you should take down your POS if its used for compression and storage/staging. Moon mining, research and manufacturing are not being done in this release.
Also waiting to see what CCP will do with the current POS. I doubt they will do a swap, half of the POS are offline and littering the universe with citadels nobody is using is just plain stupid. So they will most likely give a ISK refund, probably based on some stupid market value with everybody losing ISK left and right (speculation here). |
Postman
EVE Postal Service
12
|
Posted - 2016.03.18 11:07:46 -
[20] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Oxide Ammar wrote:It is strangely they went silent regarding the rest of structures, things like observatory array, assembly array, drilling platforms and most important structure is POG (player owned gates). Are they coming in late release or they buried the whole idea ? They haven't been silent. Those were always intended for later releases, over probably the next year. POG are actually the worst structure planned, opening new space just opens new monopolies to the current power houses if they haven't fixed the systems that make it so easy to just outblob your enemy and the top down income sources. Space should be made denser with more to do per system, and therefore more people doing things per system. Not sparser. (Note, 15 stations is not dense, because they do not add more things to actually do, 1 station gives everything needed to do) Not quite sure why you think this about the POG. If you were to replace all the gates in nullsec by POG and have players actually figure out the connections between them (of course limited by range and number) then you might actually see less systems open to the public. A corp or alliance could decide to completely close off the system, only have it open to cyno and wormholes (wormholes are random so they can always occur). Would make for a interesting meta game.
And the cost to maintain and build all the gates currently ingame is staggering, so many systems will be left open for grabs. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |