EVE Search - Eve Territorial Maps

Search EVE-Online forums for:

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Eve Territorial Maps

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Topic
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.03.11 19:10:00 - [1] Originally by: Vando Originally by: R0ot Now I know my pleas are probably falling on deaf ears as goons wont listen to a bob 'slave' (damn i love my shiny collar) and United Legion will ignore for probably the same reason. Actually your pleas will be ignored for the UNL map because its completely automated based on ingame sov, so if you want it marked as BoB space get them to start spamming POSes or they can turn off their sovereignty and take down their poses.
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.03.22 18:56:00 - [2] ips constellation in gem (currently ci) should be marked as some combination of smash and roadkill.
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.04.02 20:30:00 - [3] Originally by: Serenity Steele Please consider adding Outpost Alert! to the resources here. Ok, it's not a map per se, but as a resource, it does show the number of Sovereign systems and current outposts controlled by alliances. Up to email alert #30 as of today. I would endorse this being added to the list.
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.04.07 03:42:00 - [4] i think/hope several people have fallen victim to belated april 1st :P
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.05.11 03:20:00 - [5] Originally by: Joshua Foiritain You prolly missed the part where FLA surrendered? Does that mean that its suddenly storm armada space, and that they have full control?
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.05.11 19:16:00 - [6] Originally by: Joshua Foiritain Originally by: Graalum Originally by: Joshua Foiritain You prolly missed the part where FLA surrendered? Does that mean that its suddenly storm armada space, and that they have full control? If two parties are fighting over space and one leaves that'll give you; 2 - 1 = 1, hence one party left claiming space = it their space. Dont like it? Go there and contest it. Unfortunately it wasn't just fla and storm there though.
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.05.24 02:28:00 - [7] Originally by: Pepperami In case you missed one of the 5 threads, COW has left Great Wildlands along with INFOD and RIOT, we're now fighting in Geminate. Great Wildlands should perhaps be a pirate infestation, left unmarked or await someone to step forward and exert some sort of power in the region. Smash/Kill POS have been destroyed(BWF & 8MG), and stations have changed hands(8MG). However no serious sovereignty challenges have really been made. The region certainly should have a warzone marker at the least, perhaps IPS deserves contesting, but it doesn't really matter. Significant Entities are COW & RIOT & INFOD vs Smash & Roadkill (& HellHounds?). I'm not so sure about the sovereignty contestation for ips anymore, but certainly a warzone and perhaps a pirate infestation is warranted.
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.06.25 05:58:00 - [8] the icon on great wildlands is the wrong foundation ticker. I believe that the foundation alliance ticker is fdn. Thanks.
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.08.23 05:50:00 - [9] um josh, when did smash take over k25 station?
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.08.29 21:40:00 - [10] Originally by: Moloc Edited by: Moloc on 29/08/2007 09:07:52 Edited by: Moloc on 29/08/2007 09:02:37 Originally by: Graalum um josh, when did smash take over k25 station? I think having SMASH and RK territorial control as combined would be more accurate, for both Geminate (all) and 87- (our half) This is what I propose: SMASHKill Claim Any Objections? Also note the little Pure. claim in that part geminate (9P40) has been inaccurate for the better part of a year. As is the current map that has SMASH with a claim over the Pure. Station in 87-. SMASH and R0ADKILL manage our territory jointly, and any attack one is considered a direct attack on the other. a dual smashkill claim would be appropriate. I endorse this revision. Not that i matter.

Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.08.31 06:56:00 - [11] Originally by: Moloc Sounds like we need a war marker in S-I6VU region, SMASH, R0ADKILL, Pure. & Atlas vs Invictus. FREGE, OXIDE, Imperial Order & Project Entropy Intrepid Crossing.
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.11.21 19:42:00 - [12] Originally by: Joshua Foiritain Ohnoes, its back (Though now with even more bias \o/) oxide space has been in atlas hands for two weeks, and there is currently no oxide/iron conflict that i am aware of. s-i region should be split with atlas at the top, then smashkill, ra/xdeath, smashkill, and finally choas incarnate as you work towards the south. Currently its marked as empty space. furthermore, your map shows smash claiming the rk capital system, smash space including a pure station, and pure space including and chunk of geminate that now includes 2 rk outposts. On that note, at least 5 outposts in our neighborhood don't exist on your map. barring my nitpicking not a bad effort, and roughly accurate barring the whole s-i region being unclaimed thing. can smash and rk be made the same color next time pls? Your signature graphic must reflect your ingame persona as per The Forum rules - Kreul Intentions (mods@ccpgames.com)
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.12.02 08:36:00 - [13] Originally by: Wendat Huron Isn't it time to recognize Atlas Alliances claims in the drone regions? i blame dastommy for this thread and this poast. Your signature graphic must reflect your ingame persona as per The Forum rules - Kreul Intentions (mods@ccpgames.com)
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.12.06 02:04:00 - [14] its nice to see smachkill holdings accruately represented, thanks and good work Your signature graphic must reflect your ingame persona as per The Forum rules - Kreul Intentions (mods@ccpgames.com)
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.12.16 03:31:00 - [15] josh's map has been updated 3 times in the last couple weeks, if you don't want to look at it, don't click the link. Your signature graphic must reflect your ingame persona as per The Forum rules - Kreul Intentions (mods@ccpgames.com)
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.12.20 20:27:00 - [16] Originally by: Tetsujin someone remove joshua whatever the ** his name is and his ** maps which aren't being updated anymore from the top of the list thanks in advance Its been updated 5 times in the last month. Your signature graphic must reflect your ingame persona as per The Forum rules - Kreul Intentions (mods@ccpgames.com)
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2007.12.26 19:43:00 - [17] Originally by: Erik Amirault Edited by: Erik Amirault on 26/12/2007 00:42:01 Can someone remove Josh's crappy map or at least move it down so people can more easily see Verite's much better map? It's bad enough we had to suffer through in-house, ccp supported bias of a non-updated map. If you want to see his map you can make it the background of scrapheap. Your right its been 2 days since it was updated, and a day since he started posting in a new format. Your signature graphic must reflect your ingame persona as per The Forum rules - Kreul Intentions (mods@ccpgames.com)
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2008.01.30 01:07:00 - [18] Originally by: Dungar Loghoth Originally by: McFly Rock on Map makers, Eve-Dev/Josh.... Josh: Love seeing SmashKill recognized as a powerbloc on your map now.... it must be great being the 5th best powerblock out of five powerblocks josh if you consider smashkill a powerblock why isn't tri/atf/destiny a powerblock? what are the conditions for being considered a powerblock? Tri leadership asked to be removed since they were red to half the people in their 'powerblock.'
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2008.03.22 06:34:00 - [19] Originally by: Joshua Foiritain Edited by: Joshua Foiritain on 20/03/2008 15:08:08 9? Wtf have you people been up to while we're on the subject you have fdz4-1 marked with an outpost symbol (its npc) and are missing mj- in drone regions.
Graalum Foundation R0ADKILL	Posted - 2008.04.25 19:33:00 - [20] Originally by: Spoon Thumb I actually find the power blocks on Josh's map a little misleading. Especially since not all the southern coalition are napped anymore, and there is a big fat arrow going from IAC space into Providence where IAC are CVA (at least) allies several of the powerblocks need adjustment

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.