Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Solecist Project
The Scope Gallente Federation
31945
|
Posted - 2016.08.09 00:58:22 -
[1] - Quote
... why not consider a more radical and worthy change.
First please allow me to criticise the latest tidbit i found ...
An invulnerability phase at a button-¦s press is bad game design.
i apologize for being blunt about it ... ... and i-¦m not a game designer.
But.
1. it-¦s extremely lazy and unimaginative. Not awe inspiring and engaging as it should be.
2. it sets a precedent. people will whine about it either way ... ... but there willl be those who demand longer invul for protection ... ... and invul for other ships as well eventually. a trainwreck waiting to happen!
3. in general do miners not have friends and small sov owners have no one to batphone ... ... unless PL turns into a mafia and runs a costly security/protection service.
please consider my idea(s).
people have been waiting many years for this one ship to become usefull again. it-¦s a monster in it-¦s own way. it deserves to matter !
the rorqual will have heavy influence on the markets eventually ... ... so why not build around that fact, putting it into an appropriate package.
make it a mobile plattform that unfolds relatively quickly where ever the owner wants ... ... including the belt. a skill shortening the anchoring delay could fit here.
give it a specific fitting system for the anchored mode or allow loading of fittings ... ... like making it its own depot.
add point defenses, or respective point defense modules for eyecandy !
give it a bonus to smartbomb range and damage ... ... against drones and frigates under the guns/point defenses. (i do not know the tracking of citadel-¦s p.d.)
keep the clonevat. allow players to use the rorqual as strategic assets during fights ... ... by spawning into their rorqual clone after death, if installed.
implement mtu-like behaviour, sucking cans in by itself ... ... seperating ore from modules.
that-¦s all. i hope i was able to inspire you with this post.
in the long run, people will be really happy about an epic rorqual with multiple features ... ... and the proposed features satisfy the price. (2.1bill as of now, supply low and wide spread)
that is all. good luck!
please everyone add your own ideas as well! think big! :)
(ps: i didn-¦t see any thread about the rorquals revamp here or in the other feature forum)
"That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breaths of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly pulverised by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds." -- Tippia
|
Dark Lord Trump
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
77
|
Posted - 2016.08.09 11:31:02 -
[2] - Quote
Might I ask why the invunl button is so bad? It's so your mining fleet can be protected long enough for you to form a defense fleet to defend them. If you don't have friends/PvPers then why are you even using a rorqual in the first place?
I'm going to build a big wall that will keep the Gallente out, and they're going to pay for it!
|
Solecist Project
The Scope Gallente Federation
31957
|
Posted - 2016.08.09 11:46:21 -
[3] - Quote
Dark Lord Trump wrote:Might I ask why the invunl button is so bad? It's so your mining fleet can be protected long enough for you to form a defense fleet to defend them. If you don't have friends/PvPers then why are you even using a rorqual in the first place? Wow the first reply. A few minutes ago i realized it's in the wrong forum and reported for having it moved. Lol
I already stated the reasons why it's bad and they stand well. They cover yours as well.
And no, this time the "can't have it without friends" doesn't count ... ... because this would build up on bad, lazy game design ... ... and we shouldn't have people make decisions on that. At all.
The idea that there are significant defensive fleets out there is an assumption.
Small sov owners might be able to hold their own well enough at specific times ... ... but unless they have hundreds of players spread across timezones ... ... they won't be able to defend it, making usage extremely restricted.
See it from this way: if all the small sov owners who actually keep sov ... ... won't own one, because they can't protect it ... ... then there's no point for the revamp and it would only serve all the big entities.
Why spend so much time and literal pain on it ... ... and then have no use for it for a wider audience? Silly!
And to repeat it: it's bad, lazy game design and does not serve the rorqual. It's underwhelming, lazy and builds upon way too many assumptions.
Make the Rorqual great again! It deserves it and is an account magnet if done right.
"That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breaths of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly pulverised by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds." -- Tippia
|
Brokk Witgenstein
Extreme Agony The Wraithguard.
587
|
Posted - 2016.08.09 13:56:12 -
[4] - Quote
Cloaking field projector. Cloaks everything around it in a 100km radius, but remains visible itself AND, when such a cloaked ship targets anything, it becomes uncloaked.
|
Brokk Witgenstein
Extreme Agony The Wraithguard.
589
|
Posted - 2016.08.09 14:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
Another pretty cool one: Capital Tractor Beam capable of reeling ships in (frigs at full burn may be able to escape, anything slower gets pulled towards the Rorq making a very easy target for drones and other blappy armaments).
Hilarity ensues!
(only fitting a space whale has a counter-harpoon right?) |
Solecist Project
The Scope Gallente Federation
31968
|
Posted - 2016.08.09 14:13:04 -
[6] - Quote
I could swear it was in the wrong forum ... ... i didn't find it on the list.
don't post late at night.
"That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breaths of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly pulverised by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds." -- Tippia
|
Syrias Bizniz
Zebra Corp Goonswarm Federation
519
|
Posted - 2016.08.09 14:14:35 -
[7] - Quote
... can you ... maybe ... think about ...
...
what you ... want to write ... before... you post it... so you...
... ... ...
don't ... have to... ... type so many ... dots... ... ?
On your whole "disser...tation":
Quote: [...] It's underwhelming, lazy and builds upon way too many assumptions. [...]
Well, here's an opinion: You build your whole posting here around the assumption that this invulnerability-device is the only thing happening to the Rorqual. So maybe take some of you own medicine and don't assume just because you read this one sentence somewhere, that this will be the only change made to the Rorqual. And while i agree, that this change alone would be an insult to every Rorqual pilot around, I strongly disagree that this change is bad.
Your arguments on why the invulnerability is bad is also revolved around a few, unproven assumptions, which boil down to "BUT MINERS DON'T HAVE FRIENDS". Get real.
Another thing you suggested is to make it into some kind of "depot" anchored anywhere where the pilot desires and then your suggestion ends. You did not provide any ideas on what it is supposed to do in that state, what impact it would have on other people interacting with it, and you ESPECIALLY didn't consider what happens when some hostiles show up.
Please go back to the drawing board, and once you have some solid ideas to spark a discussion and are able to formulate in a readable way, present them.
TIA |
Solecist Project
The Scope Gallente Federation
31968
|
Posted - 2016.08.09 14:52:36 -
[8] - Quote
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:Cloaking field projector. Cloaks everything around it in a 100km radius, but remains visible itself AND, when such a cloaked ship targets anything, it becomes uncloaked.
I don't think this would work well.
It would be like having a big flag out there showing that you're hiding here ... ... which kind of negates the purpose of hising. ^_^
"That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breaths of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly pulverised by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds." -- Tippia
|
Brokk Witgenstein
Extreme Agony The Wraithguard.
591
|
Posted - 2016.08.09 14:55:01 -
[9] - Quote
....but you don't know what's hiding in there. Could be a mining fleet ..... could be 20 Tornadoes ;-p |
Syrias Bizniz
Zebra Corp Goonswarm Federation
519
|
Posted - 2016.08.09 14:56:37 -
[10] - Quote
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:....but you don't know what's hiding in there. Could be a mining fleet ..... could be 20 Tornadoes ;-p
Or 120 Supercarriers. |
|
Solecist Project
The Scope Gallente Federation
31970
|
Posted - 2016.08.09 14:58:42 -
[11] - Quote
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:....but you don't know what's hiding in there. Could be a mining fleet ..... could be 20 Tornadoes ;-p Aahhh true, valid point!
I like that! Can I add it to the list?
"That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breaths of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly pulverised by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds." -- Tippia
|
Dark Lord Trump
Pandemic Horde Inc. Pandemic Horde
77
|
Posted - 2016.08.09 18:23:06 -
[12] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:Dark Lord Trump wrote:Might I ask why the invunl button is so bad? It's so your mining fleet can be protected long enough for you to form a defense fleet to defend them. If you don't have friends/PvPers then why are you even using a rorqual in the first place? Wow the first reply. A few minutes ago i realized it's in the wrong forum and reported for having it moved. Lol I already stated the reasons why it's bad and they stand well. They cover yours as well. And no, this time the "can't have it without friends" doesn't count ... ... because this would build up on bad, lazy game design ... ... and we shouldn't have people make decisions on that. At all. The idea that there are significant defensive fleets out there is an assumption. Small sov owners might be able to hold their own well enough at specific times ... ... but unless they have hundreds of players spread across timezones ... ... they won't be able to defend it, making usage extremely restricted. See it from this way: if all the small sov owners who actually keep sov ... ... won't own one, because they can't protect it ... ... then there's no point for the revamp and it would only serve all the big entities. Why spend so much time and literal pain on it ... ... and then have no use for it for a wider audience? Silly! And to repeat it: it's bad, lazy game design and does not serve the rorqual. It's underwhelming, lazy and builds upon way too many assumptions. Make the Rorqual great again! It deserves it and is an account magnet if done right. Your reasons are meaningless. All you do is complain about how it's 'bad game design' (you never explain this), 'people will complain' (someone will always complain), and 'small alliances can't use it all the time (if you can't defend it, either don't build it or accept that it will get destroyed). If you have a half-decent intel channel you can probably warp/jump the thing away anyway.
I'm going to build a big wall that will keep the Gallente out, and they're going to pay for it!
|
Solecist Project
The Scope Gallente Federation
31980
|
Posted - 2016.08.09 18:44:08 -
[13] - Quote
Dark Lord Trump wrote:Your reasons are meaningless. All you do is complain about how it's 'bad game design' (you never explain this), 'people will complain' (someone will always complain), and 'small alliances can't use it all the time (if you can't defend it, either don't build it or accept that it will get destroyed). If you have a half-decent intel channel you can probably warp/jump the thing away anyway. Fine, maybe it's not as braindead obvious to you as it is to me.
Never before in this game ever, EVER has there been an invulnerability button. I kind of doubt they ever dared thinking about that idea. Imagine something like this happening in high or low. It's unthinkable.
It sets a precedent. Now I even looked up the word, just in case I used it wrong. This part should be so extremely braindead obvious to anyone ... ... but I'll just explain it anyway.
People will not just "whine" anyway. It's a precedent.
A lot of different people whine about a lot of different things The difference between "they whine" and "they whine" is that the vast majority of people ... ... mistake "they" for always the same people. Which is barely ever the case.
It's always different people complaining about different things ... ... but most people only see "the forums are complaining".
An invulnerability button gives a lot of people who complain about the same thing ... ... a great ground to stand together, complain together and make noise together ... ... about how nullsec miners have this, but we don't.
Or in other words, from the perspective of CCP: When you cross the line once you will cross it again.
That's what makes it bad.
What makes it lazy is a bit more complex.
Of course, from a simple perspective "lazy" means that they didn't even try ... ... and just put this out there, because it seems to most likeliest "easy fix".
It gives the feeling that they didn't even try, no matter if they did or not ... ... but this doesn't even stand on its own. This goes together with other things.
The information we have shows that there is absolutely no epicness behind it. There is nothing deeper about it.
**** They didn't make a thing about it, even though they absolutely should have! ****
From a marketing-perspective it was a complete failure. Absolutely embarrassing!
What do you think whey they pushed it towards fall/winter? Just so? No reason?
No, they pushed it because they knew they ****** up!
The rorqual is a big thing. It's really a big, big thing. Not just sizewise!
They can't **** that up. There's lots of people out there waiting for it.
Lots of upset people who would resub again when it comes back ... ... and not just comes back, but bathes in its own glory!
It's not just "a capital". It can and will strongly influence the economy in the long run!
Are we clear on this now?
"That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breaths of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly pulverised by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds." -- Tippia
|
Solecist Project
The Scope Gallente Federation
31980
|
Posted - 2016.08.09 18:57:52 -
[14] - Quote
And to add on top of that, they have to consider that they can't just orient themselves on big entities wanting it.
There's lots of small sov holders out there who don't have the numbers, especially high enough numbers to have people spread across enough timezones to make sure anyone with a rorqual can be defended!
And the best part is that it's not even really predictable how it will work out ... ... except that it definitely will influence things.
The reason for the invulnerability field adds to the lazyness as well. "It's there for your friends to show up and defend you".
It's based on the assumption that there will be people awake.
This is DIFFERENT to the law of "you can't have it when you can't defend it" ... ... because in the usual way it is a law of the game world.
If you can't defend your stuff or avoid combat, then it's too bad. Goners. Adapt and learn. Suck it up, buttercup.
And now CCP comes and implements a ship that demands that there are enough people around ... ... forcing a certain behaviour onto people ... (like waiting on guard for probably nothing, for hours) ... or not using a rorqual at all.
Which means the only people who get to use it are the big powerblocks with thousands ... ... and I kind of doubt anyone of us wants that to happen. Except them, of course.
Anything you'd like to address properly?
"That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breaths of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly pulverised by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds." -- Tippia
|
Syrias Bizniz
Zebra Corp Goonswarm Federation
520
|
Posted - 2016.08.10 00:25:41 -
[15] - Quote
I am not saying that you are mentally handicapped, as that would be an insult. But i sure think you are!
If you are in a "small sov holding alliance" that doesn't have a lot of people in your timezone, maybe look for a small sov holding alliance somewhere else that is in your timezone. Don't come with a ****** argument here that you might want to play with those guys cause they're cool, cause either you play with them and you have people in your timezone obviously, or you don't, and exchange friendship through mails, a forum, or whatnot. Also, you seem so fixiated on that invul button, it really seems you think it is MANDATORY to push that button. And holy cow, we don't even know yet whether or not it will even make it to the release! You claim that the whole Rorqual rebalance is based on an assumption, but fail to realize that your whole "highly intelectual" opinion here is one single big assumption without any reasonable basis to support it.
About people in highsec crying over things nullsec people have, but highsec people don't: Well, I don't ******* see dozens of threads and hundreds of upset players that rant how they can't have sanctums in highsec, how they can't have Moongoo in highsec, how they can't have rorqual boosts in highsec, how they can't build supercapitals in highsec, and how they can't mine ABC in highsec. [Also, if you mine in highsec, you're either mentally handicapped or just don't know it better, unless it's icemining, then you're just a minor masochist. Just My 2 Cents.]
Next up, you claim an invulnerability window that expires after a short timeframe is something totally different and damaging, as it will lead to players demanding that there are enough other players around Bla Bla Bla, but fail to realize that this would then already be the case for every dude out there in a Carrier doing his ratting routine. Somethig something "you can't have it when you can't defend it" well guess what, press your invulbutton as you please, if you don't get bailed out you just lost what you can't defend.
Your whole... EVERYTHING is short sighted and narrow minded. EVERYTHING. |
Celthric Kanerian
Ascendance Of New Eden Workers Trade Federation
818
|
Posted - 2016.08.10 10:14:04 -
[16] - Quote
writing... ...like ...this... ...makes....it... unbearable....to read.
Enough with the space, dots and everything.
To the actual idea, I cannot really say what I think is correct or not, as I don't fly the Rorqual... |
Shallanna Yassavi
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
314
|
Posted - 2016.08.10 22:25:04 -
[17] - Quote
One gameplay answer to Rorqals' stuck-in-the-belt vulnerability is: "blueball harder and have a lot of supercaps to drop on anything which might mess with it."
It's one way to get people to make bigger blunders.
A signature :o
|
Solecist Project
32018
|
Posted - 2016.08.11 15:18:43 -
[18] - Quote
i'd like to thank the angry goon miner's ego for his words i didn't read.
now hopefully someone relevant, not from an alliance sporting several thousands, also has sometning to say.
"That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breaths of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly pulverised by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds." -- Tippia
|
morion
Lighting Build
115
|
Posted - 2016.08.11 16:35:36 -
[19] - Quote
feedback:
TLDR : lot Roqual fuel were ship can't operate.
1. I have traded the siege fuel heavy water the rouqal uses the past half decade daily. 2. observations since the rouqal lost it's primary compession utility to a single cycle tower mod. much of the compressed ice of all flavors leaving null and lowsec inbound to enpire trade hubs. gets refined and the isotopes leave raw out bound for tavel use but a ever increasing amount of fuel the roqual would have used ends up in enpire markets. With a single fuel block use. the ratio over time has widened and its getting quite reduiculis actuly. 3. the fuel has a bace price from 2004 of 1000isk per unit it's curently trading just above 100isk 10% of its bace price and at less than 2% of the ratio of cost to build a fuel block. bace price 1isk tritanium trading for 0.10 isk equivelent 4. regardless of that price wierdness fuel the roqual could consume is located in a section of space enpire where it can not opperate to give that fuel a propper use. 5. i"m a interregional trader and never flown a roqual let alone seen one "own the BPO never build that either" so no input on how to fix the ship itself for the operating enviroment. regarding the fuel it uses and were it is located i have some sugestions that might supprise. 6. in order to over time exspell some of this roqual fuel that entered empire space from null but never left I suggest the replacement of jump bridge and cyno jumping with ratio fixed fuel blocks to function. 7 why? it would promote wide spread lagistics and manufacturing and heavy water out of enpire in block form wear the stuff did not originate and can not be consumed by the intended ship that can.thats been crippled so bad the guy that trades its fule took the tital ghost its so dead. and that would likley not fully stabilise the issue. This fuel issue goes all the way back to off line tower mods veriable fuel ratios in 2005 8 sugestion two fit a compression mod to the orca that can operate in high sec. where historic null sec ice came and comes to die in our enpire hubs to never leave. I have a crystal ball I guess what ccp 5 YEAR PLAN IS AS MUCH AS ANYONE.
summery: allow the orca compression use that fuel and jump using fuel blocks stop null sec miners dumping unusable waste in enpire for the next ten years. or at least stabilise the situation roqual Heavy water fuel once in enpire has only 3x uses and thats fuel block, meta , and trade has never been even close to the curve of sustainable living. since compression chang obsevations from a ice trader
POCO 1 block per hour use
will return to edit ( ;
Words...
|
Solecist Project
32018
|
Posted - 2016.08.11 16:58:18 -
[20] - Quote
I felt free to make it a tad easier to read. If you copy this into your own post i will remove this.
morion wrote:feedback: TLDR : lot Roqual fuel were ship can't operate. 1. I have traded the siege fuel heavy water the rouqal uses the past half decade daily. 2. I have observed since the rorqual lost its primary compression utility to a single cycle tower mod. much of the compressed ice of all flavors leaving null and lowsec is inbound to empire trade hubs, gets refined and the isotopes leave raw out bound for travel use but an ever increasing amount of fuel the rorqual would have used ends up in empire markets. With a single fuel block use, the ratio over time has widened and its getting quite ridiculous actually. 3. the fuel has a base price from 2004 of 1000isk per unit its currently trading just above 100isk, 10% of its base price and at less than 2% of the ratio of cost to build a fuel block. base price 1isk tritanium trading for 0.10 isk equivalent. 4. regardless of that price wierdness, fuel the rorqual could consume is located in a section of space empire where it can not operate to give that fuel a proper use. 5. i'm an interregional trader and never flown a rorqual let alone seen one "own the BPO never build that either", so no input on how to fix the ship itself for the operating enviroment. regarding the fuel it uses and were it is located i have some suggestions that might surprise. 6. in order to over time expell some of this roqual fuel that entered empire space from null but never left, I suggest the replacement of jump bridge and cyno jumping with ratio fixed fuel blocks to function. 7 Why? it would promote wide spread logistics and manufacturing and heavy water out of empire in block form where the stuff did not originate and can not be consumed by the intended ship anyway. thats been crippled so bad, the guy that trades its fuel took the tital ghost its so dead. and that would likley not fully stabilise the issue. This fuel issue goes all the way back to offline tower mods variable fuel ratios in 2005! 8 suggestion to fit a compression mod to the orca that can operate in high sec. where historic null sec ice came and comes to die in our enpire hubs to never leave. I have a crystal ball I guess what ccp 5 YEAR PLAN IS AS MUCH AS ANYONE. summary: allow the orca compression use that fuel and jump using fuel blocks. stop null sec miners dumping unusable waste in empire for the next ten years, or at least stabilise the situation. rorquals heavy water fuel, once in empire, has only 3x uses and thats fuel block, meta , and trade. has never been even close to the curve of sustainable living. POCO 1 block per hour usewill return to edit ( ; Words...
It's interesting to see how you would engage the rorqual problem from a completely different, yet completely valid perspective.
"That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breaths of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly pulverised by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds." -- Tippia
|
|
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat Working Stiffs
6318
|
Posted - 2016.08.11 17:35:28 -
[21] - Quote
Syrias Bizniz wrote:Brokk Witgenstein wrote:....but you don't know what's hiding in there. Could be a mining fleet ..... could be 20 Tornadoes ;-p Or 120 Supercarriers. ... in a mining anomaly, or asteroid belt.
Ya, supercarriers would be my first guess.
Note that we already have that functionality in-game. It is called a Mobile Scan Inhibitor (small 30 km radius though).
Next idea, please. |
Brokk Witgenstein
Extreme Agony The Wraithguard.
601
|
Posted - 2016.08.11 20:24:20 -
[22] - Quote
You just gonna debunk mine, or will you post one yourself? Not only are you wrong on two counts (it's not a MSI and there's nothing wrong with copying anchorable functionality onto a module- as in anchorable bubble -- HIC bubble) but you've apparently never seen a miner fleet reship from a ship maintenance hangar either.
Doesn't matter. Just keep posting ideas please- not every single one requires a whole pro-and-con chain. This is a brainstorm, nothing more; treat is as such. |
Solecist Project
32027
|
Posted - 2016.08.12 10:32:54 -
[23] - Quote
Brokk Witgenstein wrote:You just gonna debunk mine, or will you post one yourself? Not only are you wrong on two counts (it's not a MSI and there's nothing wrong with copying anchorable functionality onto a module- as in anchorable bubble -- HIC bubble) but you've apparently never seen a miner fleet reship from a ship maintenance hangar either. Doesn't matter. Just keep posting ideas please- not every single one requires a whole pro-and-con chain. This is a brainstorm, nothing more; treat is as such. As I would expect from a Wittgenstein, you figured it out. ;)
"That ringing in your ears you're experiencing right now is the last gasping breaths of a dying inner ear as it got thoroughly pulverised by the point roaring over your head at supersonic speeds." -- Tippia
|
morion
Lighting Build
120
|
Posted - 2016.08.14 21:16:21 -
[24] - Quote
Solecist Project wrote:...
An invulnerability phase at a button-¦s press is bad game design.
1. it-¦s extremely lazy and unimaginative. Not awe inspiring and engaging as it should be.
2. it sets a precedent. people will whine about it either way ...
o7 show ... |
Papa Yoru
Orange Street
0
|
Posted - 2016.08.15 01:35:39 -
[25] - Quote
And how long exactly till the big blocks start chain bridging in rorquals to 'invuln' super fleets etc. 2 bill for a rorq is nothing if it invulns a fleet of titans + supers while the next fleet arrives to back em up.
Very disappointed with this plan. Really poor design just waiting to be abused. |
morion
Lighting Build
121
|
Posted - 2016.08.15 02:57:12 -
[26] - Quote
Papa Yoru wrote:And how long exactly till the big blocks start chain bridging in rorquals to 'invuln' super fleets etc. 2 bill for a rorq is nothing if it invulns a fleet of titans + supers while the next fleet arrives to back em up.
Very disappointed with this plan. Really poor design just waiting to be abused.
Rorqual defensive super weapon.
Activate this super weapon and completely make itself and all of its allied mining ships and industrial ships invulnerable. |
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
391
|
Posted - 2016.08.15 06:15:46 -
[27] - Quote
morion wrote:Papa Yoru wrote:And how long exactly till the big blocks start chain bridging in rorquals to 'invuln' super fleets etc. 2 bill for a rorq is nothing if it invulns a fleet of titans + supers while the next fleet arrives to back em up.
Very disappointed with this plan. Really poor design just waiting to be abused. Rorqual defensive super weapon. Activate this super weapon and completely make itself and all of its allied mining ships and industrial ships invulnerable. Mentioning or alluding to white whale : novel Moby-**** story included. reference
im going to camp a system in null sec.. easy to do im going to cloak up and set my bookmarks and nothing can be done about it in null sec.. hahaha you null bears im going to stay out of range and just watch a fat rorqual and its crew head out to the mining barge.. ill just wait till they begin eating up that dark glitter.. haha miners.. you silly rabbits.. fozzie came up with this idea.. so well.. like a Michael bay movie.. time for EXPLOSIONS!!.
Covert CYNO UP!! ... in comes hell and death to the rorqual and its pets... oh but the rorq pilot is smart.. he has the powaaaaa of greyskull.. he hits his "COME SAVE ME BUTTON"..which in turns locks all the hens in place( hey shouldn't the miners be able to jump out of their ship into defense ships?? oh wait??? ... i just then decide to chill.. cause hell i popped that cyno and now my friend is here with me cloaked up.. just flirting with titan and super pilots since they're all within jump range.. im waiting and waiting for that win button to go down... and tackle that rorqual.. oh its a tasty treat.. thank you fozzie...
they came up with this idea cause they are not and have never been miners.. they dont do the indy thing cause its supplied to them until those rabbits get fed to the sharks.. right now id say its a good time to break the mechanics and begin HOT DROP O'clock once again...
be warned and be very afraid.. campers will make sure the rorq will never ever mine a single rock just due to the stupidity ccp just came up with.
|
morion
Lighting Build
121
|
Posted - 2016.08.15 07:31:00 -
[28] - Quote
Milla Goodpussy wrote:
im going to camp a system in null sec.. easy to do im going to cloak up and set my bookmarks and nothing can be done about it in null sec.. hahaha you null bears im going to stay out of range and just watch a fat rorqual and its crew head out to the mining barge.. ill just wait till they begin eating up that dark glitter.. haha miners.. you silly rabbits.. fozzie came up with this idea.. so well.. like a Michael bay movie.. time for EXPLOSIONS!!.
Covert CYNO UP!! ... in comes hell and death to the rorqual and its pets... oh but the rorq pilot is smart.. he has the powaaaaa of greyskull.. he hits his "COME SAVE ME BUTTON"..which in turns locks all the hens in place( hey shouldn't the miners be able to jump out of their ship into defense ships?? oh wait??? ... i just then decide to chill.. cause hell i popped that cyno and now my friend is here with me cloaked up.. just flirting with titan and super pilots since they're all within jump range.. im waiting and waiting for that win button to go down... and tackle that rorqual.. oh its a tasty treat.. thank you fozzie...
they came up with this idea cause they are not and have never been miners.. they dont do the indy thing cause its supplied to them until those rabbits get fed to the sharks.. right now id say its a good time to break the mechanics and begin HOT DROP O'clock once again...
be warned and be very afraid.. campers will make sure the rorq will never ever mine a single rock just due to the stupidity ccp just came up with.
Heavy Defender Missile I <--- not very useful Rorqual defensive super weapon ? Super Heavy Defender Missile II ...
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |