Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 68 post(s) |
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
511
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 00:40:56 -
[91] - Quote
Paranoid Loyd wrote:The problem is, people who do not know he is trolling will take the things that he says and try to use them. It needs to be replied to so it is obvious he is trolling/doesn't know wtf he is talking about. Once I feel this has been completed (at least to anyone trying to be objective) I stop replying. As for those actually in CODE, this kind of thread raises their profile, so feeding the troll only benefits them.
Sure it raises their profile, but is that a good thing? I'm cringing reading both sides of this. |
Caco De'mon
The Conference Elite CODE.
87
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 00:42:20 -
[92] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:I'm cringing reading both sides of this.
Then don't....
*"See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand."
|
Paranoid Loyd
9504
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 00:44:17 -
[93] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Paranoid Loyd wrote:The problem is, people who do not know he is trolling will take the things that he says and try to use them. It needs to be replied to so it is obvious he is trolling/doesn't know wtf he is talking about. Once I feel this has been completed (at least to anyone trying to be objective) I stop replying. As for those actually in CODE, this kind of thread raises their profile, so feeding the troll only benefits them. Sure it raises their profile, but is that a good thing? I'm cringing reading both sides of this. If you understood CODE, you wouldn't ask such a silly question.
"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix
Fix the Prospect!
|
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
511
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 00:49:17 -
[94] - Quote
Caco De'mon wrote:Then don't....
I apologize if I upset you
Paranoid Loyd wrote:If you understood CODE, you wouldn't ask such a silly question.
I understand them, and as usual I cringe when they RP like they do. Good on them for creating content, but I personally don't understand it beyond the extortion scheme |
Caco De'mon
The Conference Elite CODE.
87
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 00:51:52 -
[95] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Caco De'mon wrote:Then don't.... I apologize if I upset you
You're the one with the gun to her head being seemingly force to read a threads against your will....should we call the U.N or are you going to be ok muffin?
*"See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand."
|
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
511
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 01:01:15 -
[96] - Quote
Caco De'mon wrote:You're the one with the gun to her head being seemingly force to read a threads against your will....should we call the U.N or are you going to be ok muffin?
It's absolutely adorable how hard you're trying here. What's next? Keep it coming.
Love you sweetums. Keep it up, you're doing us all proud |
Paranoid Loyd
9505
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 01:03:39 -
[97] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Caco De'mon wrote:You're the one with the gun to her head being seemingly force to read a threads against your will....should we call the U.N or are you going to be ok muffin? It's absolutely adorable how hard you're trying here. What's next? Keep it coming. Love you sweetums. Keep it up, you're doing us all proud Now who's feeding the troll?
"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix
Fix the Prospect!
|
Caco De'mon
The Conference Elite CODE.
87
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 01:04:26 -
[98] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Caco De'mon wrote:You're the one with the gun to her head being seemingly force to read a threads against your will....should we call the U.N or are you going to be ok muffin? It's absolutely adorable how hard you're trying here. What's next? Keep it coming. Love you sweetums.
I only would have to try hard if you stopped posting...but you don't...you whine about then do exactly what you first told others to do...giggle...
Press "Q" twice if you are being forced here against your will....
*"See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand."
|
Caco De'mon
The Conference Elite CODE.
87
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 01:05:13 -
[99] - Quote
Paranoid Loyd wrote:Sonya Corvinus wrote:Caco De'mon wrote:You're the one with the gun to her head being seemingly force to read a threads against your will....should we call the U.N or are you going to be ok muffin? It's absolutely adorable how hard you're trying here. What's next? Keep it coming. Love you sweetums. Keep it up, you're doing us all proud Now who's feeding the troll?
LOL...no kidding...the Force is not strong with this one...
*"See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand."
|
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
511
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 01:10:21 -
[100] - Quote
Caco De'mon wrote:I only would have to try hard if you stopped posting...but you don't...you whine about then do exactly what you first told others to do...giggle...
Press "Q" twice if you are being forced here against your will....
strike 2, try again cutie.
come on man, you can do better than this. I believe in you.
Paranoid Loyd wrote:Now who's feeding the troll?
These guys are adorable. I love seeing them chest bumping while everyone else cringes at what they say. Keep it up please. |
|
Caco De'mon
The Conference Elite CODE.
87
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 01:12:35 -
[101] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Caco De'mon wrote:I only would have to try hard if you stopped posting...but you don't...you whine about then do exactly what you first told others to do...giggle...
Press "Q" twice if you are being forced here against your will.... strike 2, try again cutie. come on man, you can do better than this. I believe in you.
...and you're back again...as predicted...lol...
*"See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand."
|
Faylee Freir
The Phoenix Rising Vendetta Mercenary Group
287
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 01:14:37 -
[102] - Quote
Gankers already have citadels scattered around. The truth here isnt that you want to destroy their assets... I mean im sure you wish you could but the truth is that destroying their citadels requires effort on your part. Thats always been the biggest difference between gankers and most carebears... Gankers are used to adapting and using mechanics to their advantage while the other side just complains and lies down.
I challenge any of you to actually go out and destroy a citadel.. Go gank a bump machariel, steal their loot, or seed a spy to deal damage as you see possible.
HTFU
|
Paranoid Loyd
9505
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 01:15:21 -
[103] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Paranoid Loyd wrote:Now who's feeding the troll? These guys are adorable. I love seeing them chest bumping while everyone else cringes at what they say. Keep it up please.
"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix
Fix the Prospect!
|
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
511
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 01:16:51 -
[104] - Quote
Caco De'mon wrote:...and you're back again...as predicted...lol...
I just can't get enough of you. I think I'm in love. |
Caco De'mon
The Conference Elite CODE.
87
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 01:20:47 -
[105] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Caco De'mon wrote:...and you're back again...as predicted...lol... I just can't get enough of you. I think I'm in love.
Classic Stockholm syndrome....such a shame...
*"See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand."
|
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
511
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 01:30:49 -
[106] - Quote
Caco De'mon wrote:Classic Stockholm syndrome....such a shame...
I know it's wrong, but it feels so right |
Caco De'mon
The Conference Elite CODE.
87
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 01:45:56 -
[107] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:I know it's wrong, but it feels so right
Classic Stockholm syndrome....such a shame...
*"See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand."
|
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
511
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 01:58:02 -
[108] - Quote
Caco De'mon wrote:Classic Stockholm syndrome....such a shame...
this has been a wild ride. troll away my man. |
Caco De'mon
The Conference Elite CODE.
87
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 02:10:30 -
[109] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Caco De'mon wrote:Classic Stockholm syndrome....such a shame... this has been a wild ride. troll away my man.
Ciao....glad to see your captors are letting you go...
*"See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand."
|
ISD Buldath
isd star
478
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 02:49:33 -
[110] - Quote
Quote: 27. Off-topic posting is prohibited.
Off-topic posting is permitted within reason, as sometimes a single comment may color or lighten the tone of discussion. However, excessive posting of off-topic remarks in an attempt to derail a thread may result in the thread being locked, or a forum warning being issued to the off-topic poster.
I have removed the offending posts, and those quoting it.
~ISD Buldath
Commander
Support, Training and Resources Division
Interstellar Services Department
I do not respond to EVE-Mails regarding forum moderation.
|
|
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
2210
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 11:47:30 -
[111] - Quote
I think it would be great if -5 or lower players could only dock in citadels that their corp owns. Just hard code that into all HS citadels. That way gankers would be given some choices. Put up a destructible asset in HS, make the run from LS to HS every time they want to get the band together, or just continually warp around in space until a target is acquired.
I think this would do a couple of things:
1. Citadel must be corp owned for -5 or lower: Provides assets that are at risk. It can be attacked through the war dec mechanics. It's something solid that the AG community can pound on for content. Content is good. (removing space magic from the game so folks could loot the citadel would be more Eve-ish, but I've put that on my 5 year plan to get into the game).
2. The -5 or lower character would need to park in LS, an attackable citadel or log off. The trip from LS would require some effort which is sorely lacking from the profession at this time. Logging in and grabbing a ship in space would also require effort. It would also allow for some game play at the safe spot where the ORCA or whatever provides the ships (yellow carding a pilot for giving ships to -5 or lower types would be acceptable to enhance this content point). Again - content is good. And I like this one as it gives AG some avenues to inflict damage on the gankers. They would have to work for it through scanning down safes or (dare I say) be somewhat evil and infiltrate the ganking organization to discern the names of the ORCA pilots and figure out when they will be where. CONTENT.
Currently ganking is pretty much an alt character function that is ping driven with no reasonable interaction points until the gank is in progress. AFK belt mining is more difficult than ganking currently is. AFK belt mining has obvious interaction / content points, I think adding some interaction / content points to the ganking profession would be healthy for the game. |
Limi Etherseed
Star Nation Elemental Tide
0
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 12:15:07 -
[112] - Quote
I browse these forums fairly regularly of late, and there's something about this whole "CODE vs Miners/Freighter Pilots/Whatever" that confuses me.
Why do the High-Sec carebears still play Eve? If they're not complaining about one mechanic that works against them, it's another. Never mind the fact that the mechanics seem to be applied equally on all fronts.
Want CODE to have to operate out of non-safe Citadels? Fine. Make that change. Take away ALL NPC stations and see how many miners would whine about their assets no longer being safe. It's fine when its only the gankers that are hit, but I don't think many of the carebears would sign off on that change if they were hit by it too.
I was told when I started that Concord did not prevent crime, it punished the offenders. If your defense against someone taking your toys is to rely on the authorities that be to save you every single time then you're doing it wrong. Seems to me that you've got to handle your own business. If you're not willing to tank your ship, cutting into your profits to up your potential survival rate... then you deserve to lose that ship in an always-on pvp game where everything is consumable.
Especially when CODE has seemingly given out tons of information (based on repetition because apparently Carebear heads are hard) on how to minimize losses and minimize encounters. They tell you how to get them to leave you alone. Seems fairly straightforward and simple to me.
Maybe you oppose the permit on principle? Fine. Be prepared to fight for it then, instead of whining and complaining every time your principles get challenged with gunfire.
What I've gathered over the last... I don't know, couple of months probably is that the average High-Sec Carebear/Miner/whatevs wants complete safety, the ability to decline PVP without effort, free and unhindered income and for mechanics to function for them but not against them.
... so why are they still playing Eve?
(I'll be the first to admit that I'm bad at this game, but I like it. Even when I warp into a gatecamp and know what's going to happen before that first server tick rolls over. Still... just what?) |
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
2211
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 13:04:47 -
[113] - Quote
Limi Etherseed wrote:I browse these forums fairly regularly of late, and there's something about this whole "CODE vs Miners/Freighter Pilots/Whatever" that confuses me.
Why do the High-Sec carebears still play Eve? If they're not complaining about one mechanic that works against them, it's another. Never mind the fact that the mechanics seem to be applied equally on all fronts.
Want CODE to have to operate out of non-safe Citadels? Fine. Make that change. Take away ALL NPC stations and see how many miners would whine about their assets no longer being safe. It's fine when its only the gankers that are hit, but I don't think many of the carebears would sign off on that change if they were hit by it too.
I was told when I started that Concord did not prevent crime, it punished the offenders. If your defense against someone taking your toys is to rely on the authorities that be to save you every single time then you're doing it wrong. Seems to me that you've got to handle your own business. If you're not willing to tank your ship, cutting into your profits to up your potential survival rate... then you deserve to lose that ship in an always-on pvp game where everything is consumable.
Especially when CODE has seemingly given out tons of information (based on repetition because apparently Carebear heads are hard) on how to minimize losses and minimize encounters. They tell you how to get them to leave you alone. Seems fairly straightforward and simple to me.
Maybe you oppose the permit on principle? Fine. Be prepared to fight for it then, instead of whining and complaining every time your principles get challenged with gunfire.
What I've gathered over the last... I don't know, couple of months probably is that the average High-Sec Carebear/Miner/whatevs wants complete safety, the ability to decline PVP without effort, free and unhindered income and for mechanics to function for them but not against them.
... so why are they still playing Eve?
(I'll be the first to admit that I'm bad at this game, but I like it. Even when I warp into a gatecamp and know what's going to happen before that first server tick rolls over. Still... just what?)
I'd say that's true of players in general. Look at the act of acquiring skills. It's been made increasingly easy over time. More SP at sign up. Adjustable attributes. Skill maps. BONUS skill maps. Learning skills removed. Training accelerators from time to time. Newbro rate perks. Skill injectors to bypass the whole thing. And still folks are trying to 'improve' the process. It's pretty insane.
So for ganking it's 'just one more nerf' and for skilling it's 'just one more buff'. It's not ganking that is the problem - it's society and parenting and the media and what not. The world is swirling toward the drain on all fronts. All that being said, in the little immortal elite space pilot simulator we know as Eve, let's just focus on creating more interaction / content points and kind of leave the larger more far reaching societal problems alone. The masses will always want more handouts, that's the way of things right now. Accept it. It's not a ganking or CODE (mostly irrelevant deep immersion role players) thing specifically. Please don't try to make miners out to be the only ninnies whining around looking for a handout. (don't get me started on needy, self important super pilots - Gaaahhhh).
You're probably not bad at the game. If you log in and overall you're enjoying the game, then you're good at it and possibly winning. |
Limi Etherseed
Star Nation Elemental Tide
1
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 13:18:30 -
[114] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:I'd say that's true of players in general. Look at the act of acquiring skills. It's been made increasingly easy over time. More SP at sign up. Adjustable attributes. Skill maps. BONUS skill maps. Learning skills removed. Training accelerators from time to time. Newbro rate perks. Skill injectors to bypass the whole thing. And still folks are trying to 'improve' the process. It's pretty insane.
So for ganking it's 'just one more nerf' and for skilling it's 'just one more buff'. It's not ganking that is the problem - it's society and parenting and the media and what not. The world is swirling toward the drain on all fronts. All that being said, in the little immortal elite space pilot simulator we know as Eve, let's just focus on creating more interaction / content points and kind of leave the larger more far reaching societal problems alone. The masses will always want more handouts, that's the way of things right now. Accept it. It's not a ganking or CODE (mostly irrelevant deep immersion role players) thing specifically. Please don't try to make miners out to be the only ninnies whining around looking for a handout. (don't get me started on needy, self important super pilots - Gaaahhhh).
You're probably not bad at the game. If you log in and overall you're enjoying the game, then you're good at it and possibly winning.
I didn't intend to pin that all on miners, so for that you have my apologies. Just seems like every time the conversation comes up they are one of the most vocal parties about it. I have no exposure to the world of super pilots yet, so I can't speak to that. :)
I'm bad by my own metrics. I have yet to successfully defend myself to the degree I want, but I'm trying to improve and get better when I do get a chance to play. I figure if something is really and truly broken, then sure that needs reporting and fixing. But if the problem is me... then all that can fix it is me. And experience mixed with a bit of learning and work.
I'd rather Eve remain a complex balancing act, since it seems like you have to actually think, prepare and play well to survive. And I like that. At least on the level where I'm at, which is frigate to cruiser small fights. I've not been involved with anything beyond that. Yet. Honestly, I need to stir myself to get out and PVP more so I can learn by fire. Trying now to rat a bit, up my skills some and get more comfortable with what ships I like and how they function, as well as building an income source so I can go out and do dumb crap. :D
|
Caco De'mon
The Conference Elite CODE.
88
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 13:23:12 -
[115] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote: It's not ganking that is the problem - it's society and parenting and the media and what not.
This.
You can look to daily news, anywhere, to find examples of people ignoring the common wisdom, knowledge and information of the day that will keep them safe(safer) if event XYZ happens. Yet, this small percentage of people refuse to learn, adapt or do anything to protect themselves and when something does happen, it's the other 90% of society that needs to bail them out...over and over and over. And if not bail them out, listen to them whine on and on about how they never thought it could happen to them.
*"See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand."
|
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
511
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 14:04:22 -
[116] - Quote
Limi Etherseed wrote:I browse these forums fairly regularly of late, and there's something about this whole "CODE vs Miners/Freighter Pilots/Whatever" that confuses me.
Why do the High-Sec carebears still play Eve? If they're not complaining about one mechanic that works against them, it's another. Never mind the fact that the mechanics seem to be applied equally on all fronts.
Want CODE to have to operate out of non-safe Citadels? Fine. Make that change. Take away ALL NPC stations and see how many miners would whine about their assets no longer being safe. It's fine when its only the gankers that are hit, but I don't think many of the carebears would sign off on that change if they were hit by it too.
I was told when I started that Concord did not prevent crime, it punished the offenders. If your defense against someone taking your toys is to rely on the authorities that be to save you every single time then you're doing it wrong. Seems to me that you've got to handle your own business. If you're not willing to tank your ship, cutting into your profits to up your potential survival rate... then you deserve to lose that ship in an always-on pvp game where everything is consumable.
Especially when CODE has seemingly given out tons of information (based on repetition because apparently Carebear heads are hard) on how to minimize losses and minimize encounters. They tell you how to get them to leave you alone. Seems fairly straightforward and simple to me.
Maybe you oppose the permit on principle? Fine. Be prepared to fight for it then, instead of whining and complaining every time your principles get challenged with gunfire.
What I've gathered over the last... I don't know, couple of months probably is that the average High-Sec Carebear/Miner/whatevs wants complete safety, the ability to decline PVP without effort, free and unhindered income and for mechanics to function for them but not against them.
... so why are they still playing Eve?
(I'll be the first to admit that I'm bad at this game, but I like it. Even when I warp into a gatecamp and know what's going to happen before that first server tick rolls over. Still... just what?)
They play because it's a sandbox, and you don't get to tell anyone their play style is right or wrong in a sandbox.
And when we say "high sec carebear" we're talking about the miner and the ganker. HS ganking is one of the safest, most risk free playstyles in the game. There's nothing wrong with it by any means, it's healthy for the game, but it's like playing a game with the difficulty set to easy 24/7. I'm rarely in HS, so I don't have a horse in the race, but we should be honest about how HS truly works.
|
Limi Etherseed
Star Nation Elemental Tide
1
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 14:20:56 -
[117] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:They play because it's a sandbox, and you don't get to tell anyone their play style is right or wrong in a sandbox.
And when we say "high sec carebear" we're talking about the miner and the ganker. HS ganking is one of the safest, most risk free playstyles in the game. There's nothing wrong with it by any means, it's healthy for the game, but it's like playing a game with the difficulty set to easy 24/7. I'm rarely in HS, so I don't have a horse in the race, but we should be honest about how HS truly works.
You're right. It is a sandbox. Meaning a person has to make connections and content all on their own. Every person playing has to do this. In this particular form of sandbox, you also have to defend what you have... on your own. That includes, in my head, making friends or hiring muscle. Admittedly, this is purely my opinion so take it for what it is, you'll get what you paid for it.
The creators of this sandbox have said, to my recollection, that nowhere undocked in Eve is 100% safe. There are few rules in the sandbox, but that is one of the founding edicts is it not? So when a miner or freighter or whoever happens to be complaining today relies completely on Super NPC intervention to save them from other players who are "making connections and content all on their own", that's their choice.
If those same miners, freighters or whoever happens to be complaining then goes off and lobbies for changes to make their stuff safer, but make it harder to gank or store assets for ganks... that's wrong. Those players are trying to change the rules of the sandbox in their favor, without allowing for the gankers (who are players with the same rights to content creation and choice) to also be extended the same courtesies. Which is what confuses me.
In a sandbox game as I've ever known them, there are loose rules and then people are allowed to behave as they want. Want to gank? Awesome. Want to pirate and ransom? Awesome. Want to mine, ship freight and make money? Awesome. They are all allowed and more. But you start changing the rules for some groups and it's no longer a sandbox. If High-Sec carebears don't really want a sandbox, I'll repeat myself. Why are they playing Eve? If it's just about casually making money and an always-increasing number score, I know a number of idle games I can link to people.
Also, as I understand it... gankers are racing the clock the moment they undock, aren't they? Especially at -10sec status. Wouldn't that make it harder for them, and nearly impossible if the target is paying attention and looking out for themselves? If they bring more friends to make the gank work, they did better at coordinating than the carebear did. In a sandbox where community and social connections appear to be as important as skill and equipment.
|
Zanar Skwigelf
Boa Innovations Brothers of Tangra
33
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 14:28:18 -
[118] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:I think it would be great if -5 or lower players could only dock in citadels that their corp owns. Just hard code that into all HS citadels. That way gankers would be given some choices. Put up a destructible asset in HS, make the run from LS to HS every time they want to get the band together, or just continually warp around in space until a target is acquired.
I think this would do a couple of things:
1. Citadel must be corp owned for -5 or lower: Provides assets that are at risk. It can be attacked through the war dec mechanics. It's something solid that the AG community can pound on for content. Content is good. (removing space magic from the game so folks could loot the citadel would be more Eve-ish, but I've put that on my 5 year plan to get into the game).
2. The -5 or lower character would need to park in LS, an attackable citadel or log off. The trip from LS would require some effort which is sorely lacking from the profession at this time. Logging in and grabbing a ship in space would also require effort. It would also allow for some game play at the safe spot where the ORCA or whatever provides the ships (yellow carding a pilot for giving ships to -5 or lower types would be acceptable to enhance this content point). Again - content is good. And I like this one as it gives AG some avenues to inflict damage on the gankers. They would have to work for it through scanning down safes or (dare I say) be somewhat evil and infiltrate the ganking organization to discern the names of the ORCA pilots and figure out when they will be where. CONTENT.
Currently ganking is pretty much an alt character function that is ping driven with no reasonable interaction points until the gank is in progress. AFK belt mining is more difficult than ganking currently is. AFK belt mining has obvious interaction / content points, I think adding some interaction / content points to the ganking profession would be healthy for the game.
I never understood the point of forcing CODE into low sec. You realize that Uedama is one jump from low sec right? Jita is 4. Amarr is 3. Forcing CODE into low sec for docking adds literally seconds to their travel time, and since their targets are AFK it doesn't change anything. |
Caco De'mon
The Conference Elite CODE.
89
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 15:04:24 -
[119] - Quote
Zanar Skwigelf wrote:Forcing CODE into low sec for docking adds literally seconds to their travel time, and since their targets are AFK it doesn't change anything.
Yep...can't speak for other Agent's tactics but our scout is rarely in the same system as the docked Cats. Once a target has been found and the scout is getting in position, then the Cats launch from wherever they were docked. If that were to be LS then so be it....as you say, it would just add 20-30 seconds to the trip. No biggie....plus his whole premise is to increase the retaliation level against CODE and this LS shift does nothing to achieve that.
*"See now that I, even I, am he, and there is no god with me: I kill, and I make alive; I wound, and I heal: neither is there any that can deliver out of my hand."
|
Sarah Flynt
Federation Interstellar Resources Silent Infinity
246
|
Posted - 2016.09.02 15:14:19 -
[120] - Quote
Limi Etherseed wrote:I browse these forums fairly regularly of late, and there's something about this whole "CODE vs Miners/Freighter Pilots/Whatever" that confuses me.
Why do the High-Sec carebears still play Eve? ikr? We're at an alltime-high of logged in players. People voting with their wallets are totally unheard of. I don't understand it either.
Sick of High-Sec gankers? Join the public channel Anti-ganking and the dedicated intel channel Gank-Intel !
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |