Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Henricks
10
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 09:28:05 -
[1] - Quote
I really Don't understand CCP......
First it was the removal of the Jukebox And now the In-game Brower.......
Making EVE more and more user unfriendly, Like to have the ability to look up EVE-central orders, Or Zkillborads with out having to go out of game......
Bring Jukebox and In-Game Brower BACK......
Might fix the Problem other then just the removing it all together.
I'm Just saying |
Lulu Lunette
Savage Moon Society
618
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 09:33:05 -
[2] - Quote
What's the jukebox?
I only miss right clicking 'Set Destination' otherwise my IGB was almost permanently minimized
@lunettelulu7
|
Henricks
11
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 09:48:42 -
[3] - Quote
Lulu Lunette wrote:What's the jukebox?
I only miss right clicking 'Set Destination' otherwise my IGB was almost permanently minimized
It was in-game App/program where you could upload you're own music or listen to all of EVE's Music, it was very nice. |
Heavy Metall
THR3SHOLD
7
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 09:50:25 -
[4] - Quote
CCP please put the IGB back......
I use it all the time, with running 3 clients i have each of them logged into siggy so i know were they are on the wormhole chain. now i can only have one logged in and now i have to bring the desktop up to check siggy....
well done CCP |
Tanthos
Tribal Liberation Force Minmatar Republic
123
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 09:54:11 -
[5] - Quote
I didn't mind, but since the patch Windowed Mode is stuttery and slow. Now I need an IGB, or the graphics problem fixed. One or the other. |
Do Little
Virgin Plc Evictus.
447
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 09:55:13 -
[6] - Quote
As a real world business CCP has limited resources - they can't do everything and need to pick their battles. Google, Microsoft and Mozilla all have excellent browsers available free of charge to the Eve player community and maintained at no cost to CCP. Why should they try to reinvent this wheel?
I believe they should focus their effort on the game itself. Our enjoyment and their paychecks depend on getting that part right! |
Heavy Metall
THR3SHOLD
7
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 09:58:02 -
[7] - Quote
they dont have to re invent anything the IGB worked and tone of players used it they dont have to focus on the IGB it was there not doing any harm to anyone.
I understand all this new API stuff etc... but no harm in leaving the IGB
|
Mark Marconi
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
19
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 09:59:51 -
[8] - Quote
I personally like the IGB
But CCP have only so many resources to go around. Their staff is half what is was at its peak.
So I would rather they fix some of the truly stupid mechanics that are in the game and update and improve the game than waste time on the IGB.
Just the reality of the situation. |
Vincent Pelletier
Pelletier Imports and Exports
69
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 10:21:35 -
[9] - Quote
The IGB was awesome but it never got any security updates because that would just be way too much effort to make that happen in game. Because of that it was a security risk and however much we like the IGB, security risks are a nono. It had to go. |
Elenahina
Agony Unleashed Agony Empire
1351
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 11:50:43 -
[10] - Quote
Heavy Metall wrote:they dont have to re invent anything the IGB worked and tone of players used it they dont have to focus on the IGB it was there not doing any harm to anyone.
I understand all this new API stuff etc... but no harm in leaving the IGB
Actually there was. It was an outdated browser version, and had huge security holes that had never been patched. CCP had the choice of either dedicating their limited resources to updating it and integrating the new version into the game client, or removing it so they could focus on other priorities. FWIW, I think they made the right choice.
Eve is like an addiction; you can't quit it until it quits you.
Also, iderno
|
|
TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
1753
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 12:00:08 -
[11] - Quote
And there's your problem. Instead of going out and figuring out WHY it was removed you took to the forum to spread your ranting. Google is a thing. Use it.
My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!
My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums
|
baltec1
Bat Country Pandemic Legion
18310
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 12:42:57 -
[12] - Quote
I will miss playing lemmings while POS shooting. |
Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3023
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 12:51:01 -
[13] - Quote
Tanthos wrote:I didn't mind, but since the patch Windowed Mode is stuttery and slow. Now I need an IGB, or the graphics problem fixed. One or the other. Please open a bug report + ticket, we need more input for CCP about configuations experiencing this problem.
I'm my own NPC alt.
|
Conrad Makbure
Trident Expedition
105
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 14:38:26 -
[14] - Quote
Vincent Pelletier wrote:The IGB was awesome but it never got any security updates because that would just be way too much effort to make that happen in game. Because of that it was a security risk and however much we like the IGB, security risks are a nono. It had to go.
Agreed. The IGB could have had it's own department at CCP, it doesn't deserve one. Much better to just remove it; have all links open the default browser on your computer. |
Nam Dnilb
Universal Frog
272
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 14:58:06 -
[15] - Quote
Space trucking without Dotlan? Not me for sure. |
Geronimo McVain
EVE University Ivy League
219
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 15:51:45 -
[16] - Quote
Nam Dnilb wrote:Space trucking without Dotlan? Not me for sure. Overwolf is your friend |
Nam Dnilb
Universal Frog
272
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 15:57:07 -
[17] - Quote
Geronimo McVain wrote:Nam Dnilb wrote:Space trucking without Dotlan? Not me for sure. Overwolf is your friend
I miss the radar mostly, overwolf does nothing for that. |
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors Escalating Entropy
10744
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 17:01:25 -
[18] - Quote
As I said in the last thread about this:
I wrote:- The in-game browser was a security risk for players as it had no (or extremely outdated) security features.
- It took up precious developer time and resources which are better spent elsewhere (especially since keeping a browser up to date is pretty much a "full time" deal... and players tended to use actual browsers that were better in every way).
Also... this has been a LONG time coming. I believe the removal of the in-game browser was announced earlier this year.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=495872&find=unread
How did you Veterans start?
|
Crying Assassin
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
22
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 17:38:31 -
[19] - Quote
I too miss the igb it did server a purpose maybe ccp should of been more diplomatic and held a vote. I now use overwolf but it has search isdues of its own unable to load pathfinder and unable to load straight into dotlan map from a shortcut. My opinion and i dont care if you dont like it
Cheers |
Bienator II
madmen of the skies
3591
|
Posted - 2016.10.16 18:28:28 -
[20] - Quote
you don't want a 10 year old browser on your system
how to fix eve: 1) remove ECM 2) rename dampeners to ECM 3) add new anti-drone ewar for caldari 4) give offgrid boosters ongrid combat value
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |