Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
6347
|
Posted - 2017.01.03 04:17:59 -
[91] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Beast of Revelations wrote:Whatever the truth of the matter is about how much load it would be to make dscan the way it should be, I think one thing could certainly be done without any added load (or, much).
Make a radar-like box or instrument which shows ships in local chat. The server is already calculating it. So just send it to the client and have it display it. In the 1990s I worked on electronic systems designed in the 1970s that would tell a fighter pilot if something, anything, was transmitting any signals that the funny little wideband on antenna on the back of the plane (usually a little white or gray dome) was was picking up. It had a display of "wingforms" to show what was transmitting, and it had a "threat library" as well. The ;pilot did not have to do anything beyond just switching it on. But that technology was apparently lost between the 1970s and 23000 years into the future.
It could scan out to 14 AU in real time? I'm amazed.
Woo! CSM XI!
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
|
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
8140
|
Posted - 2017.01.03 07:29:28 -
[92] - Quote
Steve Ronuken wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Beast of Revelations wrote:Whatever the truth of the matter is about how much load it would be to make dscan the way it should be, I think one thing could certainly be done without any added load (or, much).
Make a radar-like box or instrument which shows ships in local chat. The server is already calculating it. So just send it to the client and have it display it. In the 1990s I worked on electronic systems designed in the 1970s that would tell a fighter pilot if something, anything, was transmitting any signals that the funny little wideband on antenna on the back of the plane (usually a little white or gray dome) was was picking up. It had a display of "wingforms" to show what was transmitting, and it had a "threat library" as well. The ;pilot did not have to do anything beyond just switching it on. But that technology was apparently lost between the 1970s and 23000 years into the future. It could scan out to 14 AU in real time? I'm amazed.
Total range was classified. All I know is that at certain times of the day we could not switch it on when Soviet satellites were known to be overhead.
It did not always work well. I recall an Iraqi TV station that kept coming up wingform for a SAM site. We did once pick up Iranian F14 from Turkey. (yes they have F14s)
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
3256
|
Posted - 2017.01.03 09:17:40 -
[93] - Quote
Allowing key binding for dscan was a mistake IMO.
I'm my own NPC alt.
|
Tyrana McBitch
Lisnave Spaceship Samurai
27
|
Posted - 2017.01.03 13:05:07 -
[94] - Quote
I never spam dscan, only every 30 seconds to a minute. I also check for probes. If some one is in system & no probes pop up, I know I am safe ish. It also ads a bit of safety to an otherwise one sided winning situation if you didn't have a dscan.
Also it adds actually playing the game. I cant stand point & click games. They are lazy. Its nice to feel in control or your ship in a given situation. |
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
920
|
Posted - 2017.01.03 14:37:32 -
[95] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:You didn't explain why this wonderful button-mashing spam mechanic shouldn't also be added to overview, to local chat, etc.
Local chat needs to go away anyway. There's way too much free intel in the game.
Every game involves "button mashing". In a FPS, you "mash buttons" to shoot a gun. Why doesn't the game do it for you? |
Beast of Revelations
Hedion University Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2017.01.03 15:10:48 -
[96] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Beast of Revelations wrote:You didn't explain why this wonderful button-mashing spam mechanic shouldn't also be added to overview, to local chat, etc. Local chat needs to go away anyway. There's way too much free intel in the game.
That's beside the point. Assuming local chat needs to stay, why not add the wonderful button-mashing mechanic to that too? And overview isn't going anywhere... why can't we add the wonderful button-mashing mechanic to that? What makes overview and local chat different?
Quote:Every game involves "button mashing". In a FPS, you "mash buttons" to shoot a gun. Why doesn't the game do it for you?
Dumb comparison. Button mashing is fine if it is an on-demand thing you need, that isn't always wanted or needed in all circumstances - like firing a gun. But the screen should always automatically be refreshed - you shouldn't need to sit there and mash a button constantly to have the screen refreshed. Same for something like scan, overview, local chat, whatever.
You can compare it to driving a car. Steering wheel and gearshift and gas and brake should be 'buttons' in the sense that those are the controls for your car. But the speedometer should not be a button that needs to be mashed to get the refresh on how fast you are going. It should always be automatically updated.
I do wonder about the average intelligence level on these forums when this kind of simple concept cannot automatically be understood. |
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
920
|
Posted - 2017.01.03 15:18:23 -
[97] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:That's beside the point. Assuming local chat needs to stay, why not add the wonderful button-mashing mechanic to that too? And overview isn't going anywhere... why can't we add the wonderful button-mashing mechanic to that? What makes overview and local chat different?
what? I'm not assuming local chat needs to stay. That was my point. Learn to read. also, lowering yourself to use reductio ad absurdum won't make anyone take you seriously in any conversation.
Quote:Dumb comparison. Button mashing is fine if it is an on-demand thing you need, that isn't always wanted or needed in all circumstances - like firing a gun. But the screen should always automatically be refreshed - you shouldn't need to sit there and mash a button constantly to have the screen refreshed. Same for something like scan, overview, local chat, whatever.
You can compare it to driving a car. Steering wheel and gearshift and gas and brake should be 'buttons' in the sense that those are the controls for your car. But the speedometer should not be a button that needs to be mashed to get the refresh on how fast you are going. It should always be automatically updated.
I do wonder about the average intelligence level on these forums when this kind of simple concept cannot automatically be understood.
I also wonder about the intelligence of people. d-scan isn't always needed in game. You get rewarded for putting more effort in, so you have to hit a key to get more intel through d-scan. This isn't rocket science. |
Beast of Revelations
Hedion University Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2017.01.03 15:34:24 -
[98] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Beast of Revelations wrote:That's beside the point. Assuming local chat needs to stay, why not add the wonderful button-mashing mechanic to that too? And overview isn't going anywhere... why can't we add the wonderful button-mashing mechanic to that? What makes overview and local chat different? what? I'm not assuming local chat needs to stay. That was my point. Learn to read. also, lowering yourself to use reductio ad absurdum won't make anyone take you seriously in any conversation. Quote:Dumb comparison. Button mashing is fine if it is an on-demand thing you need, that isn't always wanted or needed in all circumstances - like firing a gun. But the screen should always automatically be refreshed - you shouldn't need to sit there and mash a button constantly to have the screen refreshed. Same for something like scan, overview, local chat, whatever.
You can compare it to driving a car. Steering wheel and gearshift and gas and brake should be 'buttons' in the sense that those are the controls for your car. But the speedometer should not be a button that needs to be mashed to get the refresh on how fast you are going. It should always be automatically updated.
I do wonder about the average intelligence level on these forums when this kind of simple concept cannot automatically be understood. I also wonder about the intelligence of people. d-scan isn't always needed in game. You get rewarded for putting more effort in, so you have to hit a key to get more intel through d-scan. This isn't rocket science.
Yeah, just what I thought - absolutely nothing constructive or intelligent to say whatsoever, and could not answer my questions, most likely because you couldn't even understand them. |
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
920
|
Posted - 2017.01.03 15:40:32 -
[99] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:Yeah, just what I thought - absolutely nothing constructive or intelligent to say whatsoever, and could not answer my questions, most likely because you couldn't even understand them.
You do realize insulting people more experienced in the game than you when they disagree doesn't help, right?
Are you 12 years old? |
Beast of Revelations
Hedion University Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2017.01.03 15:53:53 -
[100] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote:Beast of Revelations wrote:Yeah, just what I thought - absolutely nothing constructive or intelligent to say whatsoever, and could not answer my questions, most likely because you couldn't even understand them. You do realize insulting people more experienced in the game than you when they disagree doesn't help, right?
1) Experience with the game has absolutely nothing to do with rational thought, reading comprehension, IQ, etc. We aren't talking about an issue here that has anything to do with experience. I'm not asking "how do I do such-and-such?" Or "what's the best way to approach X?"
2) Noting that you have nothing intelligent to say and cannot answer questions is not an insult. Well, it is, but it's completely incidental. It's merely noting observations and facts.
3) It's a logical fallacy (appeal to authority) to cite your experience or anything else in the context of an argument. You can either make an intelligent rational point, and respond to such, or you can't. Period. Paragraph. End of story. |
|
Gregorius Goldstein
Ze One Man Show
1585
|
Posted - 2017.01.03 15:57:39 -
[101] - Quote
A "Pulse D-Scan" option would have to be limited in several ways to make sure not everyone would use it all the time:
-Pulsing D-Scan could increase the ships signature a lot so probing and targeting a pulsing ship would get much easier.(Like Sonar/Radar can reveal ones positon, my favorite option) -Pulsing D-Scan could require cap -Pulsing D-Scan could be limited to every X Secounds -To make Pulsing D-Scan not a performance problem in large battles it could be made expensive by requireing an rig or charges
|
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
920
|
Posted - 2017.01.03 16:22:27 -
[102] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:1) Experience with the game has absolutely nothing to do with rational thought, reading comprehension, IQ, etc. We aren't talking about an issue here that has anything to do with experience. I'm not asking "how do I do such-and-such?" Or "what's the best way to approach X?"
2) Noting that you have nothing intelligent to say and cannot answer questions is not an insult. Well, it is, but it's completely incidental. It's merely noting observations and facts.
3) It's a logical fallacy (appeal to authority) to cite your experience or anything else in the context of an argument. You can either make an intelligent rational point, and respond to such, or you can't. Period. Paragraph. End of story.
Given how many logical fallacies you have used so far, you can't really use that excuse...
Experience with the game has everything to do with it when you are...suggesting changes to the game. Gasp! I just used rational thought!
We already have enough free, easy intel. We don't need to change d-scan to make it even easier. d-scan takes effort, the overview and local don't. Everything is pretty well balanced, other than local chat in sov null. You do understand what balance in a game means, yeah? Are you capable of conversing like an adult?
Yet another thread by Beast , aka "anyone who disagrees with my poorly thought out ideas isn't intelligent" |
Hipqo
Tyde8
157
|
Posted - 2017.01.03 17:02:44 -
[103] - Quote
Reading this entire thread WILL give you all kinds of cancer (videogame cancer ofc) and most of what is said basically boils down to: "CCP, give me the option to get all the intel, while being afk, because its supposed to be a super fancy spaceship game!! Why am i even flying the ship manually in the first place??!!!??! AUTOMATE EVERYTHING!!" And thats exactly what it, its a game..... The least you can do is click a button and actively participate in the game.
While we are at it, shouldnt we just remove manual flight completely? Because hey, its in the future and we got computers to calculate all kinds of crap for us, so theres no need for us to manually click gates/wormholes or even dobbel click in space, it should be automatic because of the giant computer im flying around in!!
I cant figure out if im entertained or i feel sorry for the OP. Either way, CCP AUTOMATE ALL THE THINGS ASAP!!!
A life is best lived, to not step into your grave in a well preserved body. Instead, to slide in side ways, all battered and bruised, screamming, "Holy SH**! What a ride!"
|
Beast of Revelations
Hedion University Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2017.01.03 17:10:59 -
[104] - Quote
Hipqo wrote:Reading this entire thread WILL give you all kinds of cancer (videogame cancer ofc) and most of what is said basically boils down to: "CCP, give me the option to get all the intel, while being afk, because its supposed to be a super fancy spaceship game!! Why am i even flying the ship manually in the first place??!!!??! AUTOMATE EVERYTHING!!" And thats exactly what it, its a game..... The least you can do is click a button and actively participate in the game.
While we are at it, shouldnt we just remove manual flight completely? Because hey, its in the future and we got computers to calculate all kinds of crap for us, so theres no need for us to manually click gates/wormholes or even dobbel click in space, it should be automatic because of the giant computer im flying around in!!
I cant figure out if im entertained or i feel sorry for the OP. Either way, CCP AUTOMATE ALL THE THINGS ASAP!!!
I'd say this was a straw man argument, except that it's worse than that. You don't even know what a straw man argument is, and either way, you didn't intend to make a straw man argument because that would imply that you understood the issues and knew what you were talking about, which you don't. No, you just blathered a bunch of gobbledigook which pertained to nothing that this thread is about.
I thought trolls were bad, but now I'm dealing with low-grade morons. I think I prefer trolls. |
Hipqo
Tyde8
158
|
Posted - 2017.01.03 17:18:02 -
[105] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:Hipqo wrote:Reading this entire thread WILL give you all kinds of cancer (videogame cancer ofc) and most of what is said basically boils down to: "CCP, give me the option to get all the intel, while being afk, because its supposed to be a super fancy spaceship game!! Why am i even flying the ship manually in the first place??!!!??! AUTOMATE EVERYTHING!!" And thats exactly what it, its a game..... The least you can do is click a button and actively participate in the game.
While we are at it, shouldnt we just remove manual flight completely? Because hey, its in the future and we got computers to calculate all kinds of crap for us, so theres no need for us to manually click gates/wormholes or even dobbel click in space, it should be automatic because of the giant computer im flying around in!!
I cant figure out if im entertained or i feel sorry for the OP. Either way, CCP AUTOMATE ALL THE THINGS ASAP!!! I'd say this was a straw man argument, except that it's worse than that. You don't even know what a straw man argument is, and either way, you didn't intend to make a straw man argument because that would imply that you understood the issues and knew what you were talking about, which you don't. No, you just blathered a bunch of gobbledigook which pertained to nothing that this thread is about. I thought trolls were bad, but now I'm dealing with low-grade morons. I think I prefer trolls.
So i did the same thing as you did? Cool..
A life is best lived, to not step into your grave in a well preserved body. Instead, to slide in side ways, all battered and bruised, screamming, "Holy SH**! What a ride!"
|
mkint
1343
|
Posted - 2017.01.03 20:13:27 -
[106] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:Sonya Corvinus wrote:Beast of Revelations wrote:Yeah, just what I thought - absolutely nothing constructive or intelligent to say whatsoever, and could not answer my questions, most likely because you couldn't even understand them. You do realize insulting people more experienced in the game than you when they disagree doesn't help, right? 1) Experience with the game has absolutely nothing to do with rational thought, reading comprehension, IQ, etc. We aren't talking about an issue here that has anything to do with experience. I'm not asking "how do I do such-and-such?" Or "what's the best way to approach X?" 2) Noting that you have nothing intelligent to say and cannot answer questions is not an insult. Well, it is, but it's completely incidental. It's merely noting observations and facts. 3) It's a logical fallacy (appeal to authority) to cite your experience or anything else in the context of an argument. You can either make an intelligent rational point, and respond to such, or you can't. Period. Paragraph. End of story.
Confirmed troll. All previous posts retroactively irrelevant.
Experience = more tools to understand the nuances of the "problem." Failing to understand the value of experience = you obviously have ZERO experience in literally anything. The person calling you 12 must have been generous. I'd guess 4.
Maxim 6. If violence wasnGÇÖt your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.
|
Beast of Revelations
Hedion University Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 00:26:13 -
[107] - Quote
mkint wrote: Confirmed troll. All previous posts retroactively irrelevant.
Experience = more tools to understand the nuances of the "problem." Failing to understand the value of experience = you obviously have ZERO experience in literally anything. The person calling you 12 must have been generous. I'd guess 4.
Arguing that a logical fallacy is not a logical fallacy, LOL. Too funny! I'm quite amused :) I guess the antics of... the 'challenged' people I run across in my online escapades never cease to amaze me. |
Sonya Corvinus
Grant Village
923
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 00:38:23 -
[108] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:Arguing that a logical fallacy is not a logical fallacy, LOL. Too funny! I'm quite amused :) I guess the antics of... the 'challenged' people I run across in my online escapades never cease to amaze me.
Thread reported as a troll thread. If you're going to do what you are doing here, be more subtle. |
Beast of Revelations
Hedion University Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 01:18:24 -
[109] - Quote
Sonya Corvinus wrote: Thread reported as a troll thread. If you're going to do what you are doing here, be more subtle.
Yeah, the last recourse of a forum poster who can't tolerate a difference of opinion - report the post.
Report whatever the hell you want to report, I couldn't care less. |
mkint
1344
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 01:54:09 -
[110] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:mkint wrote: Confirmed troll. All previous posts retroactively irrelevant.
Experience = more tools to understand the nuances of the "problem." Failing to understand the value of experience = you obviously have ZERO experience in literally anything. The person calling you 12 must have been generous. I'd guess 4.
Arguing that a logical fallacy is not a logical fallacy, LOL. Too funny! I'm quite amused :) I guess the antics of... the 'challenged' people I run across in my online escapades never cease to amaze me. Arguing with a toddler troll I guess, but...
It never was a "I played longer, therefore I am right and you are wrong" which is the crux of it as a logical fallacy. The point here is "you obviously have no idea what you're talking about, how about you actually learn the ins and outs of the systems you've been babbling incoherently about from the beginning."
Also, this troll thread is in the wrong subsection anyway. Should be in F&I where it can be properly ignored. I guess I'll always be able to say ib4l.
Maxim 6. If violence wasnGÇÖt your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.
|
|
Beast of Revelations
Hedion University Amarr Empire
103
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 02:18:54 -
[111] - Quote
mkint wrote: I guess I'll always be able to say ib4l.
This thread has been here for weeks or longer without being locked, and was perfectly fine before the trolls showed up, which they often do. I've gotten many likes from this thread. So the only reason it would be locked is a because couple of troll posters run to Mommy and cry "Waaaah! Some post offends me! Shut it down!"
So go ahead and run to Mommy and cry. Quite frankly, I couldn't care less. Most anything of importance which needed to be said has probably already been said. And if I want to start up another thread, I'll just start up another one. |
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
8144
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 02:37:56 -
[112] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:mkint wrote: I guess I'll always be able to say ib4l.
This thread has been here for weeks or longer without being locked, and was perfectly fine before the trolls showed up, which they often do. I've gotten many likes from this thread. So the only reason it would be locked is a because couple of troll posters run to Mommy and cry "Waaaah! Some post offends me! Shut it down!" So go ahead and run to Mommy and cry. Quite frankly, I couldn't care less. Most anything of importance which needed to be said has probably already been said. And if I want to start up another thread, I'll just start up another one.
I would expect someone with a name like that to have no fcks to give.
Bring back DEEEEP Space!
|
Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
624
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 04:46:13 -
[113] - Quote
again OP, your suggestion/question/OP is limited because your experience on the use of D-Scan is limited to how a carebear such as yourself use it only.
try learning the other uses of it and you'l understand why it's needed to be manually clicked.
Just Add Water
|
guigui lechat
the no fock given
4
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 10:24:39 -
[114] - Quote
Nat Silverguard wrote:again OP, your suggestion/question/OP is limited because your experience on the use of D-Scan is limited to how a carebear such as yourself use it only.
try learning the other uses of it and you'l understand why it's needed to be manually clicked.
I reported your post for insults. Your choice of aggressive terms may make you feel you are superior but this thread was not for ****-size competition, so go play this game somewhere else.
The issue is precisely that he does not understand why it's needed to be manually clicked BECAUSE YOU CAN'T EXPLAIN. The only correct answer we had so far is "it creates possibility of failures so PvP is possible" - every thing else is filled with aggressivity, which of course prevents any form of discussion.
People should learn to only add comment that actually provide an answer - and only when they can be not aggressive. |
Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
631
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 11:36:20 -
[115] - Quote
guigui lechat wrote:Nat Silverguard wrote:again OP, your suggestion/question/OP is limited because your experience on the use of D-Scan is limited to how a carebear such as yourself use it only.
try learning the other uses of it and you'l understand why it's needed to be manually clicked. I reported your post for insults. Your choice of aggressive terms may make you feel you are superior but this thread was not for ****-size competition, so go play this game somewhere else. The issue is precisely that he does not understand why it's needed to be manually clicked BECAUSE YOU CAN'T EXPLAIN. The only correct answer we had so far is "it creates possibility of failures so PvP is possible" - every thing else is filled with aggressivity, which of course prevents any form of discussion. People should learn to only add comment that actually provide an answer - and only when they can be not aggressive.
ill go with your corp name, so fck off, dont give a sht.
Just Add Water
|
Beast of Revelations
Hedion University Amarr Empire
104
|
Posted - 2017.01.04 13:41:51 -
[116] - Quote
guigui lechat wrote: I reported your post for insults. Your choice of aggressive terms may make you feel you are superior but this thread was not for ****-size competition, so go play this game somewhere else.
The issue is precisely that he does not understand why it's needed to be manually clicked BECAUSE YOU CAN'T EXPLAIN. The only correct answer we had so far is "it creates possibility of failures so PvP is possible" - every thing else is filled with aggressivity, which of course prevents any form of discussion.
People should learn to only add comment that actually provide an answer - and only when they can be not aggressive.
Couldn't have said it better myself.
To summarize for the few non-trolls and the few readers with IQ and reading comprehension levels above 'low-grade moron,' we have been told:
1) Technical limitation (server load, etc).
We accept the concept of a technical limitation as an answer. We merely questioned whether it was a technical limitation because of implementation (algorithms, design, etc), and whether it could possibly be coded differently or better.
2) So 'carebears' don't ruin the game by having everything automated so that the game plays itself.
Of course it was never explained 'why stop there?' For instance, why not make the overview updated by manual spam-click? Why not local chat? Why not the entire display itself? No answer was provided, except 'don't question us, we have more experience' or other logical fallacies.
We tried to explain that there's a difference between a button that is needed for CONTROL - for instance on a gun or a ship - and a button that is not there for control and is therefore nothing but a stupid 'spam click' mechanic - for instance the current dscan. We tried to use a car as an analogy. It would be fine to wire up the gearshift, the steering wheel, and the gas and brake pedals to buttons - those are needed for CONTROL. But it wouldn't be fine to wire the speedometer up to a button that needed to be spam-clicked - you shouldn't need to control the speedometer, and the information it presents should be automatic. For our trouble, this analogy was either ignored, we were attacked and trolled, we were accused of being 'carebears' who wanted to automate the playing of the game, or again the fallacy of 'experience' was invoked.
|
Nat Silverguard
Aideron Robotics
635
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 03:59:56 -
[117] - Quote
Beast of Revelations wrote:
We tried to explain that there's a difference between a button that is needed for CONTROL - for instance on a gun or a ship - and a button that is not there for control and is therefore nothing but a stupid 'spam click' mechanic - for instance the current dscan. We tried to use a car as an analogy. It would be fine to wire up the gearshift, the steering wheel, and the gas and brake pedals to buttons - those are needed for CONTROL. But it wouldn't be fine to wire the speedometer up to a button that needed to be spam-clicked - you shouldn't need to control the speedometer, and the information it presents should be automatic. For our trouble, this analogy was either ignored, we were attacked and trolled, we were accused of being 'carebears' who wanted to automate the playing of the game, or again the fallacy of 'experience' was invoked.
OP for your convenience i'll use your own explanation, DSCAN is used as a CONTROL, therefore it shouldn't be automated.
if CCP will make it automated, people and me personally will ask CCP a mechanic that will allow me to do what the dscan can do today.
Just Add Water
|
Rain6637
NulzSec
34728
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 12:15:54 -
[118] - Quote
Ria Nieyli wrote:You can hotkey d-scan now. It's easier than ever. why... did this thread continue beyond post #2. Is there a gameplay reason for this?
Help, I can't download EVE
President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub
PLEX: A Giffen good? (It's 1B?)
|
Rain6637
NulzSec
34728
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 12:18:11 -
[119] - Quote
Are you sure it's not just because you weren't within range to execute this function?
Help, I can't download EVE
President of the Commissar Kate Fanclub
PLEX: A Giffen good? (It's 1B?)
|
Beast of Revelations
Hedion University Amarr Empire
105
|
Posted - 2017.01.05 14:05:29 -
[120] - Quote
Nat Silverguard wrote: OP for your convenience i'll use your own explanation, DSCAN is used as a CONTROL, therefore it shouldn't be automated.
if CCP will make it automated, people and me personally will ask CCP a mechanic that will allow me to do what the dscan can do today.
Naturally, the ability to narrow the focus into a cone, and adjust the range, should be manual. Nobody is suggesting that should be taken away or changed. We are talking about the need to spam-click a stupid button for no good reason. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |