Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
DitchDigger
Hibi Proletariat
22
|
Posted - 2017.01.14 00:23:14 -
[1] - Quote
It would be nice if we could pay PI customs tax from a corporate wallet. It would be really really cool if we could import and export from a corporate owned container. (thus sharing imports and exports.) |
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Farsaidh's Freeborn Singularity Syndicate
2109
|
Posted - 2017.01.14 01:26:56 -
[2] - Quote
Better still they could overhaul PI completely... |
Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
2895
|
Posted - 2017.01.14 02:12:19 -
[3] - Quote
DitchDigger wrote:It would be nice if we could pay PI customs tax from a corporate wallet. It would be really really cool if we could import and export from a corporate owned container. (thus sharing imports and exports.)
Sigh. If we're not getting an overhaul this would be nice. I spend more time shuffling corp money around than I'd like to admit just to pay for my own PI. |
Kenrailae
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
711
|
Posted - 2017.01.14 02:24:06 -
[4] - Quote
Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote:Better still they could overhaul PI completely...
^this
The Law is a point of View
The NPE IS a big deal
|
Amarisen Gream
Divine Demise Sherwood Hisec Industrial Technologies
309
|
Posted - 2017.01.14 04:33:52 -
[5] - Quote
^that times a billion
"The Lord loosed upon them his fierce anger
All of his fury and rage.
He dispatched against them a band of Avenging Angels"
- The Scriptures, Book II, Apocalypse 10:1
DIDE- is open to new members
|
Do Little
Virgin Plc Evictus.
741
|
Posted - 2017.01.14 09:52:09 -
[6] - Quote
Personally, I would love to have hangar and wallet shared between characters on the same account. That would go a long way to easing the PI frustrations and would certainly make my life easier, I'm less confident it would make the game better. There would be less incentive to create ALT corps but the game needs problems to be solved. If it's too easy, everyone will do it and no one will make a profit! |
Lugh Crow-Slave
3508
|
Posted - 2017.01.14 11:15:15 -
[7] - Quote
Do Little wrote:Personally, I would love to have hangar and wallet shared between characters on the same account. That would go a long way to easing the PI frustrations and would certainly make my life easier, I'm less confident it would make the game better. There would be less incentive to create ALT corps but the game needs problems to be solved. If it's too easy, everyone will do it and no one will make a profit!
no need to further encourage alts
BLOPS Hauler
|
Beta Maoye
147
|
Posted - 2017.01.14 12:31:45 -
[8] - Quote
Corraidhin Farsaidh wrote:Better still they could overhaul PI completely... Factorio on planets of New Eden. |
Donnachadh
United Allegiance of Undesirables
1132
|
Posted - 2017.01.14 14:34:50 -
[9] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:no need to further encourage alts We have alts to trade with, cyno alts, scanning alts, low/nul/high/worm hole alts, boosting alta, remote repping alts, I could go on for days listing all of the reasons we have alts but let us just be real here and admit that alts have dominated this game to the point where there is no longer an option, alts are essentially a required part of the game so please tell me what difference this would make and why it would be bad for the game?
Also I find it hysterical, we often see ideas posted by the PvP(traditional shoot other players) side of the game that would make using alts easier and many of those are heralded as marvelous things that would make the game better, and yet when someone asks for a change that would make working with alts in the industrial side of the game easier it is magically a very bad thing.
Back to the OP I would be OK with this but I would prefer a new corp hanger and wallet division be set up in game specifically for PI, that would better suit my needs. |
Lugh Crow-Slave
3509
|
Posted - 2017.01.14 16:21:16 -
[10] - Quote
like i said no need to encourage more alts
and what on the pvp side are you talking about i seem to recall a rather extensive change made to pvp with one of its biggest goals being to make alts harder to use
BLOPS Hauler
|
|
Lena Crews
Universal Sanitation Corporation
35
|
Posted - 2017.01.14 21:36:08 -
[11] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:like i said no need to encourage more alts
and what on the pvp side are you talking about i seem to recall a rather extensive change made to pvp with one of its biggest goals being to make alts harder to use
Is there some way to get more than 3 toons per account? Do you think many paying players aren't already using all three?
If it encourages more PI alts... that would be good. For PI you need to be omega and that's more money to keep the game running... because nearly everyone is already using all of their alt slots. I'm pretty sure everyone at CCP wants every player to have as many paying accounts as possible. |
Shae Tadaruwa
science and trade institute Caldari State
1394
|
Posted - 2017.01.14 22:21:10 -
[12] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:like i said no need to encourage more alts
and what on the pvp side are you talking about i seem to recall a rather extensive change made to pvp with one of its biggest goals being to make alts harder to use You seem fine with encouraging more alts here:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6769492#post6769492
Why always so negative (and inconsistent)? Suggestions have workarounds, sure. Doesn't mean workarounds are what everyone should just always do and with this suggestion, it isn't about encouraging alts. It seems to be about encouraging cooperative play. Alts are just a natural part of EVE, so what?
Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."
|
Lugh Crow-Slave
3512
|
Posted - 2017.01.15 01:30:57 -
[13] - Quote
Shae Tadaruwa wrote:Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:like i said no need to encourage more alts
and what on the pvp side are you talking about i seem to recall a rather extensive change made to pvp with one of its biggest goals being to make alts harder to use You seem fine with encouraging more alts here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6769492#post6769492 Why always so negative (and inconsistent)? Suggestions have workarounds, sure. Doesn't mean workarounds are what everyone should just always do and with this suggestion, it isn't about encouraging alts. It seems to be about encouraging cooperative play. Alts are just a natural part of EVE, so what?
that is not adding something to encourage alts. that is not adding something to fully remove risk
BLOPS Hauler
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |