Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Xavi Bastanold
58th Sveipar Capsuleer Group
62
|
Posted - 2017.01.31 15:32:14 -
[1] - Quote
This has been an annual thing for a while now and I got to thinking about how it fits into the lore of EVE. A large coalition rolls in to the core of the four empires' trade network and unleashes with wanton destruction. Sure Concord replies to each act of aggression, but it seems odd that there isn't something more comprehensive. It seems something this consistent and destructive would draw sufficient attention from many directions within all the empires to demand a response of its own.
As a player the whole thing only impacts me in the most indirect way (losec sort for the most part), but it does leave me wondering about that lore gap, as it were.
Good hunting,
Xavi
|
morion
Lighting Build
180
|
Posted - 2017.01.31 15:37:15 -
[2] - Quote
Xavi Bastanold wrote:This has been an annual thing for a while now and I got to thinking about how it fits into the lore of EVE. A large coalition rolls in to the core of the four empires' trade network and unleashes with wanton destruction. Sure Concord replies to each act of aggression, but it seems odd that there isn't something more comprehensive. It seems something this consistent and destructive would draw sufficient attention from many directions within all the empires to demand a response of its own.
As a player the whole thing only impacts me in the most indirect way (losec sort for the most part), but it does leave me wondering about that lore gap, as it were.
Just reduce buy prices so the muppets have incentive but the sponsorship still profit.
No good ganking was with out a ISK trail.
Lore Gap it was ... silly study history |
Lulu Lunette
Savage Moon Society
1191
|
Posted - 2017.01.31 15:38:12 -
[3] - Quote
Xavi Bastanold wrote:This has been an annual thing for a while now and I got to thinking about how it fits into the lore of EVE. A large coalition rolls in to the core of the four empires' trade network and unleashes with wanton destruction. Sure Concord replies to each act of aggression, but it seems odd that there isn't something more comprehensive. It seems something this consistent and destructive would draw sufficient attention from many directions within all the empires to demand a response of its own.
As a player the whole thing only impacts me in the most indirect way (losec sort for the most part), but it does leave me wondering about that lore gap, as it were.
Often times, Capsuleer troubles are not human troubles. Quite honestly I think that's how it fits into the lore. I'm sure that regular folks keep up on what the demigods are up to - especially with headlines like the "Winter War' or when there's battles involving 40,000 Capsuleers.
If you asked the Angel Cartel, they'd tell you it's just plain old Egger on Egger violence. Leave it to CONCORD to sort it out.
@lunettelulu7
|
Qwerty Ernaga
State War Academy Caldari State
19
|
Posted - 2017.01.31 16:33:34 -
[4] - Quote
Xavi Bastanold wrote:how it fits into the lore of EVE
It doesn-¦t. Same as many other things. |
mkint
1419
|
Posted - 2017.01.31 16:51:59 -
[5] - Quote
And nobody ever visited Jita again. The end.
Maxim 6. If violence wasnGÇÖt your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.
|
Akrasjel Lanate
Naquatech Conglomerate Naquatech Syndicate
1954
|
Posted - 2017.01.31 17:20:40 -
[6] - Quote
Ganking is ganking
CCP could unleash the might of CONCORD but wouldn't that end in whining of those that got pwned by it
Akrasjel Lanate
Founder and CEO of Naquatech Conglomerate
Executor of Naquatech Syndicate
Citizen of Solitude
|
Galaxy Pig
New Order Logistics CODE.
1060
|
Posted - 2017.01.31 19:47:21 -
[7] - Quote
I think it fits into the lore of our hyper-capitalistic dystopia just fine. :)
Highsec is owned by players now. Systems 0.5-1.0 are New Order Territory. All miners and other residents of Highsec must obey The Code. Mining without a permit is dangerous and harmful to the EVE community. See www.MinerBumping.com
|
Neuntausend
Rens Nursing Home
1383
|
Posted - 2017.01.31 20:13:24 -
[8] - Quote
This is Burn Jita 4 Kids. The Caldari would look like child-murdering monsters if they tried to prevent it from happening. It's charity after all. ;)
Seriously, though. The empires are loosing control to the capsuleers. I think even one of the trailers said so. So my take is that there's simply f\\k all they can do about it.
I would love to see Goons or PL or any other Nullsec blob engage in a Sov War with the Caldari State. Those puny NPCs would get steamrolled in no time. |
Algarion Getz
Aideron Corp
290
|
Posted - 2017.02.01 17:20:44 -
[9] - Quote
Wasnt the last burn Jita in like 2012? Havent seen one in ages.
On the other hand, i visit Jita once every 2 months, so i dont really know whats going on there. |
Wanda Fayne
499
|
Posted - 2017.02.01 23:45:26 -
[10] - Quote
Algarion Getz wrote:Wasnt the last burn Jita in like 2012? Havent seen one in ages.
On the other hand, i visit Jita once every 2 months, so i dont really know whats going on there.
The Ramen is good, just don't spill it dodging Tornadoes on the undock
your comments just confirms this whole idea is totally pathetic
-Lan Wang-
-
Locator Agents cease to function on Offline Players:
|
|
Neuntausend
Rens Nursing Home
1390
|
Posted - 2017.02.02 06:46:08 -
[11] - Quote
Algarion Getz wrote:Wasnt the last burn Jita in like 2012? Havent seen one in ages.
On the other hand, i visit Jita once every 2 months, so i dont really know whats going on there. There was burn jita 2012, 13, 14, as well as burn amarr and burn (out) warr akini in 2015. I don't think 2016 had one, but I would make a guess and say that's because miniluv needed to get used to not having warr akini around to organize things. |
Gregorius Goldstein
Ze One Man Show
1864
|
Posted - 2017.02.02 09:14:08 -
[12] - Quote
Now imagine the drama if Concord would take a day off when the next "burn jita" happens. Even if the log in screen would say "Today is "burn jita - there will be no CONCORD response in the system" ships would still explode in hundreds. |
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine Second-Dawn
2849
|
Posted - 2017.02.02 10:55:20 -
[13] - Quote
You should rename it "blow slightly tepid air on Jita!"
I guess it is one way for the Goons to keep their efficiency rating up along with ganking freighters, last time I worked it back they were at 40.4% if you took all the freighters out.... Elite PvP and being bad at Eve and all that...
When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.
Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein
|
March rabbit
Mosquito Squadron The-Culture
2042
|
Posted - 2017.02.02 11:15:14 -
[14] - Quote
Neuntausend wrote:Seriously, though. The empires are loosing control to the capsuleers. I think even one of the trailers said so. So my take is that there's simply f\\k all they can do about it. Well... They still own stations Closing doors for eggers would be pretty bold step.
If i'm not mistaken in one of story empire factions could close gates too. Just imagine what will happen in high-sec if they even start to do something.
The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
|
Scipio Artelius
Savage Moon Society
46749
|
Posted - 2017.02.02 11:31:40 -
[15] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:Closing doors for eggers would be pretty bold step.
Turning off all cloning facilities would be even better. |
Trevize Demerzel
68
|
Posted - 2017.02.02 13:20:43 -
[16] - Quote
CCP Devs, GMs, employees etc should have a all hands on deck and all login "as concord" and have a nice free for all out war. Give the burn jita some good fun and content!
Imagine a Concord played by real people and coordinated on coms. :-)
-
|
Revis Owen
The Conference Elite CODE.
457
|
Posted - 2017.02.02 13:43:35 -
[17] - Quote
Xavi Bastanold wrote:Sure Concord replies to each act of aggression, but it seems odd that there isn't something more comprehensive. It seems something this consistent and destructive would draw sufficient attention from many directions within all the empires to demand a response of its own.
Become the defender of Jita! Gather a militia of empire citizens to act in concert with Concord and empire navies, and defend your space.
The lore is there to support that narrative and the mechanics exist. Everything's working as intended. What exactly is your point?
Agent of the New Order
http://www.minerbumping.com/p/the-code.html
If you do not have a current Mining Permit, please contact me for issuance.
|
Neuntausend
Rens Nursing Home
1391
|
Posted - 2017.02.02 16:05:58 -
[18] - Quote
March rabbit wrote:Neuntausend wrote:Seriously, though. The empires are loosing control to the capsuleers. I think even one of the trailers said so. So my take is that there's simply f\\k all they can do about it. Well... They still own stations Closing doors for eggers would be pretty bold step. If i'm not mistaken in one of story empire factions could close gates too. Just imagine what will happen in high-sec if they even start to do something. It would be really funny if Goons could make the caldari navy close Jita 4-4 for eggers.
Anyway, since we are talking possibilities. If the empire factions were to limit capsuleer access to their stations, it would potentially mean war. Lore-Wise there is no reason why a capsuleer corporation would not be allowed to declare war on what we know as NPC corps and blow up their stations. We know their navies aren't that strong compared to the power of the nullsec blobs.
We just can't do it, because game mechanics. In the same sense, the NPC stations will not get blocked for capsuleers, because game mechanics as well. |
000Hunter000
Missiles 'R' Us
112
|
Posted - 2017.02.02 20:22:33 -
[19] - Quote
pointless comments and arguments.
If something like this happened, then it would be literally game over
So ccp would never allow it.
A 'the Purge' kind of event would be funny though, 1 day out of the year, Concord has its company picnic and lets everyone fend for themselves for 24h. |
Mike Adoulin
Adolescent Radioactive Pirate Hamsters
2089
|
Posted - 2017.02.02 22:48:38 -
[20] - Quote
000Hunter000 wrote:A 'the Purge' kind of event would be funny though, 1 day out of the year, Concord has its company picnic and lets everyone fend for themselves for 24h.
That's exactly what happened when they turned Luminaire into a lowsec system for the DUST 514 live event where the Caldy Titan went down.
Was much fun, wish they would do it again.
In all the trade hubs, say...:)
Everything in EVE is a trap.
And if it isn't, it's your job to make it a trap...:)
You want to know what immorality in EVE Online looks like? Look no further than Ripard "Jester" Teg.
Chribba is the Chuck Norris of EVE.
|
|
Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
4887
|
Posted - 2017.02.03 00:56:08 -
[21] - Quote
In the Templar One book, we see CONCORD as kind of a political entity itself. (Dealing with Amarr working on grabbing DUST clone technology, and how that would throw off the balance of power among the four factions. If Amarr get too strong, they could get cocky, go on the warpath, and we end up with real horror show war/planetary genocide/armageddon). So, from a lore standpoint, consider this maybe: -Eggers are powerful freelancers.
-CONCORD's main purpose is to set rules for eggers.
-CONCORD's engagement rules are designed to keep them perpetually blowing each other up. So they never become a unified force for the faction governments to worry about. Also, billions of ISK per day in ship, mod and pod destruction and replacement is good for economies.
-Therefore, CONCORD set up the wardec system for capsuleers fighting each other within empire space, under some pretty detailed rules. Let them trash each other, as long as it seems controlled and under a rule of law.
-Therefore, CONCORD does not stop a gank. It only retaliates and kills the rules violator. Another policy to let eggers in a self-contained fish-eating-fish aquarium. Better than having them blackmail and blow up planets (as happened in an old, old prime lore Chronicle).
-So, if eggers want to burn Jita, under the engagement rules as they stand-- regrettable, but for CONCORD to retain its trust and legitimacy, no intervening, the rules must stand.
So, what to the four factions get out of all of this? During the character creation process, it kind of implies that your char's capsuleer training was paid for by your faction. Why train up an egger, then release him from service and let him run wild? I have some ideas, but this is already a lot of text. What do you think?
|
Henry Plantgenet
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
159
|
Posted - 2017.02.03 16:07:51 -
[22] - Quote
I'm only suprised that people still undock freighters knowing it's burn jita. I guess Human stupidity is indeed infinite. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |