Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Umino Iruka
21
|
Posted - 2017.03.22 13:22:22 -
[1] - Quote
So, now that the chimera has been made all pretty and modern...can you guys finally fix the aeon model so it doesn't look like a makeshift asymetricall repurposed station plate? |
Cade Windstalker
1149
|
Posted - 2017.03.22 14:06:52 -
[2] - Quote
They're probably going to be at least tweaking all the Capital models so they use the new Texture Tech and don't look quite so much like they were designed under a 250 polygon limit. |
Rivr Luzade
Kenshin. DARKNESS.
2991
|
Posted - 2017.03.23 07:45:38 -
[3] - Quote
Umino Iruka wrote:So, now that the chimera has been made all pretty and modern...can you guys finally fix the aeon model so it doesn't look like a makeshift asymetricall repurposed station plate? GET YOUR HANDS OF THE AEON! Only people residing on the lower end of the intelligence spectrum* ask for a change to the Aeon model. People who understand the purpose of this design, however, appreciate the model. Since you belong to the first category, I'll explain it to you and the new CCP designers, just in case they get stupid ideas: The Aeon is a fortress on the battlefield, an impenetrable wall behind which fighters and fighter bombers can find shelter for repairs/rearming without having to fear attacks from enemies, and they can launch and land behind this massive wall without having to worry of getting shot by sniper ships (who have a very easy job at doing so on the Nyx, for instance), because the Aeon acts way behind the front lines and has an entire fleet of ships between itself and the enemy. The reason why *PROTLEOTIS ask for changes to this extremely practical model is because the dumb capsuleers do not know how to properly place their ships and just dumpster everything into one ball on the field like apes.
If anything, the Aeon just needs a bit of modernization and crisping-up its shape, but the overall model of the ship must remain as it is because it is extremely practical and meaningful.
UI Improvement Collective
My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.
|
Nana Skalski
Taisaanat Kotei
29847
|
Posted - 2017.03.23 09:30:55 -
[4] - Quote
It needs to be walled on the other side too.
Every part of a game helps to tell a story =ƒôò
Where is Angry CONCORD guy when you need him
Osprey =ƒÜÇ
GëíGïüGëí GÖÑ
|
Umino Iruka
21
|
Posted - 2017.03.27 15:39:07 -
[5] - Quote
Rivr Luzade wrote:Umino Iruka wrote:So, now that the chimera has been made all pretty and modern...can you guys finally fix the aeon model so it doesn't look like a makeshift asymetricall repurposed station plate? GET YOUR HANDS OF THE AEON! Only people residing on the lower end of the intelligence spectrum* ask for a change to the Aeon model. People who understand the purpose of this design, however, appreciate the model. Since you belong to the first category, I'll explain it to you and the new CCP designers, just in case they get stupid ideas: The Aeon is a fortress on the battlefield, an impenetrable wall behind which fighters and fighter bombers can find shelter for repairs/rearming without having to fear attacks from enemies, and they can launch and land behind this massive wall without having to worry of getting shot by sniper ships (who have a very easy job at doing so on the Nyx, for instance), because the Aeon acts way behind the front lines and has an entire fleet of ships between itself and the enemy. The reason why *PROTLEOTIS ask for changes to this extremely practical model is because the dumb capsuleers do not know how to properly place their ships and just dumpster everything into one ball on the field like apes. If anything, the Aeon just needs a bit of modernization and crisping-up its shape, but the overall model of the ship must remain as it is because it is extremely practical and meaningful.
Well, I'm sure if you ask nicely, CCP can implement a ship model roll-back option for role-playing forum warrior retards like you!
|
Sitting Bull Lakota
SBL Co
278
|
Posted - 2017.03.27 22:09:04 -
[6] - Quote
Rivr Luzade wrote:Umino Iruka wrote:So, now that the chimera has been made all pretty and modern...can you guys finally fix the aeon model so it doesn't look like a makeshift asymetricall repurposed station plate? GET YOUR HANDS OF THE AEON! Only people residing on the lower end of the intelligence spectrum* ask for a change to the Aeon model. People who understand the purpose of this design, however, appreciate the model. Since you belong to the first category, I'll explain it to you and the new CCP designers, just in case they get stupid ideas: The Aeon is a fortress on the battlefield, an impenetrable wall behind which fighters and fighter bombers can find shelter for repairs/rearming without having to fear attacks from enemies, and they can launch and land behind this massive wall without having to worry of getting shot by sniper ships (who have a very easy job at doing so on the Nyx, for instance), because the Aeon acts way behind the front lines and has an entire fleet of ships between itself and the enemy. The reason why *PROTLEOTIS ask for changes to this extremely practical model is because the dumb capsuleers do not know how to properly place their ships and just dumpster everything into one ball on the field like apes. If anything, the Aeon just needs a bit of modernization and crisping-up its shape, but the overall model of the ship must remain as it is because it is extremely practical and meaningful. Wow. I never thought I'd see someone defend the Sigil/Archon hybrid with such conviction. Takes all kinds, I guess.
Just out of curiosity, what is the lore reason for the truck lift on the aft end? For changing its bombers' oil? |
Fek Mercer
Tactically Challenged Tactical Supremacy
60
|
Posted - 2017.03.27 22:14:25 -
[7] - Quote
Rivr Luzade wrote:Umino Iruka wrote:So, now that the chimera has been made all pretty and modern...can you guys finally fix the aeon model so it doesn't look like a makeshift asymetricall repurposed station plate? GET YOUR HANDS OF THE AEON! Only people residing on the lower end of the intelligence spectrum* ask for a change to the Aeon model. People who understand the purpose of this design, however, appreciate the model. Since you belong to the first category, I'll explain it to you and the new CCP designers, just in case they get stupid ideas: The Aeon is a fortress on the battlefield, an impenetrable wall behind which fighters and fighter bombers can find shelter for repairs/rearming without having to fear attacks from enemies, and they can launch and land behind this massive wall without having to worry of getting shot by sniper ships (who have a very easy job at doing so on the Nyx, for instance), because the Aeon acts way behind the front lines and has an entire fleet of ships between itself and the enemy. The reason why *PROTLEOTIS ask for changes to this extremely practical model is because the dumb capsuleers do not know how to properly place their ships and just dumpster everything into one ball on the field like apes. If anything, the Aeon just needs a bit of modernization and crisping-up its shape, but the overall model of the ship must remain as it is because it is extremely practical and meaningful.
There are ways to achieve this without looking like a half built couch |
Rivr Luzade
Kenshin. DARKNESS.
2996
|
Posted - 2017.03.28 07:00:20 -
[8] - Quote
Fek Mercer wrote:There are ways to achieve this without looking like a half built couch Like the shallow trench on the Chimera or Wyvern? With the height of the Aeon's impenetrable wall, such a trench would look ridiculous. Such a trench would also limit mobility, available space and access vectors compared to the more open area of the Aeon's approach.
UI Improvement Collective
My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.
|
Fek Mercer
Tactically Challenged Tactical Supremacy
60
|
Posted - 2017.03.28 08:19:31 -
[9] - Quote
Rivr Luzade wrote:Fek Mercer wrote:There are ways to achieve this without looking like a half built couch Like the shallow trench on the Chimera or Wyvern? With the height of the Aeon's impenetrable wall, such a trench would look ridiculous. Such a trench would also limit mobility, available space and access vectors compared to the more open area of the Aeon's approach. Besides, the Aeon looks pretty much like a complete modern couch. The only thing missing are the legs to lift it up from the ground. What are you missing? Sitting Bull Lakota wrote:Just out of curiosity, what is the lore reason for the truck lift on the aft end? For changing its bombers' oil? Looks more like a maintenance area where bombers can be repaired in space or a top cover for the launch tube in the back. But as it stands out as a rather unrefined piece of the model, it's one of the things that a modernization of the model can improve.
I think what we have here is a nasty case of bad design stockholm syndrome. Also, You're relying too heavily on imaginary practicality to justfy the aeon's design |
Rivr Luzade
Kenshin. DARKNESS.
2996
|
Posted - 2017.03.28 13:13:28 -
[10] - Quote
I rely on space opera and science-fiction spaceship design and battle positioning experience when it comes to design, not some arbitrary stockholm syndrome accusations.
UI Improvement Collective
My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |