Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
HydrogenBond Shaishi
C-H-C
10
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 00:24:25 -
[1] - Quote
How bout's we let a ship use the full bandwidth to fly a full fleet of drones. 100 bandwidth using 5 bandwidth lights should be 20 lights in space. How may years in the future and....only 5 max drones. weaksauce.
Anyway-
How about we have a drone hacking module that cuts the communication with an enemy's drone and makes it yours...hacking drone module.
Also...when's we getting T3 Battleships...it's 2017 and what's your excuse?
TL&DR- Static universe yields static gameplay and predictable space. |
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
11062
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 00:29:19 -
[2] - Quote
HydrogenBond Shaishi wrote:How bout's we let a ship use the full bandwidth to fly a full fleet of drones. 100 bandwidth using 5 bandwidth lights should be 20 lights in space. How may years in the future and....only 5 max drones. weaksauce. That's a good argument for EVE2. The current state of ancient code coupled with layer upon layer of poorly implemented "fixes" over the years means permanent TiDi with your idea in even the smallest engagement.
Mr Epeen
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass!
|
HydrogenBond Shaishi
C-H-C
10
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 00:32:23 -
[3] - Quote
I like the idea of getting harder PvE as you fly more drones as balance. |
Eternus8lux8lucis
Primus Inc. LEGIO ASTARTES ARCANUM
1551
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 00:46:05 -
[4] - Quote
TIDI and engagement lag was the main reason why Eve used to have 10 drones and is now at 5 per ship and why ships like the worm, gila and rattle with geckos are being explored. The lag.... its horrible. Your idea.... its horrible!!
Have you heard anything I've said?
You said it's all circling the drain, the whole universe. Right?
That's right.
Had to end sometime.
|
HydrogenBond Shaishi
C-H-C
10
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 00:49:15 -
[5] - Quote
Eternus8lux8lucis wrote:TIDI and engagement lag was the main reason why Eve used to have 10 drones and is now at 5 per ship and why ships like the worm, gila and rattle with geckos are being explored. The lag.... its horrible. Your idea.... its horrible!!
Remember when software used to be > terrible?
|
Sethyrh Nakrar
Drake Mining and Acquisition Inc.
72
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 00:58:19 -
[6] - Quote
Well Guardian Vexor was a terrible idea too. And yes, I saw one some weeks ago.
Praise the Omnissiah!
|
Sir BloodArgon Aulmais
Fortis Fortuna Adiuvatt Dot Dot Dot
126
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 01:18:39 -
[7] - Quote
I stop taking any argument/suggestion seriously once the phrase "common guys its [The current year] why dont we have X!"
I can't believe its the current year and people are still coming up with bad ideas like this. |
Rastuasi
The Dark Space Initiative Scary Wormhole People
45
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 01:29:40 -
[8] - Quote
We already had this pre-2008, it made boats like the Eos too powerful. So CCP introduced bandwidth to help keep drones within hull sizes. Don't need Eos with full flights of heavies again. |
Hal Morsh
Minmatar Confederate
589
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 02:04:58 -
[9] - Quote
YA know what?
http://imgur.com/a/xcKUv
People only shoot at me once they figure out I'm where their drones are going.
|
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
11068
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 03:12:47 -
[10] - Quote
Rastuasi wrote:We already had this pre-2008, it made boats like the Eos too powerful. So CCP introduced bandwidth to help keep drones within hull sizes. Don't need Eos with full flights of heavies again. Eos? I still fondly remember my ratting Myrmidon with pulse lasers and five heavies.
Now that was some OP T1 fun!
Mr Epeen
There are 86,400 seconds in a day. You just saved one of them by typing 'u' instead of 'you'.-á Congratulations, dumbass!
|
|
Alasdan Helminthauge
HC - Ice Munchers
155
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 03:25:08 -
[11] - Quote
If you can use 25 light drones on a ship with 125 bandwidth then who will use mediums and heavies any more? 2 lights have more dps than a medium and 5 lights have more dps than a heavy, and lights have far better speed and tracking. A VNI with 25 light drones can easily get more than 1,100+ dps, which is prerty ridiculous for a whole thing costing less than 100mil, and then I guess everyone will go to fly a kiting VNI or Ishtar and let their light drones swarm eat whatever the target is alive. |
Coralas
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
122
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 03:36:19 -
[12] - Quote
HydrogenBond Shaishi wrote:Eternus8lux8lucis wrote:TIDI and engagement lag was the main reason why Eve used to have 10 drones and is now at 5 per ship and why ships like the worm, gila and rattle with geckos are being explored. The lag.... its horrible. Your idea.... its horrible!! Remember when software used to be > terrible?
Each drone is an entity that has to have its position communicated to every client on the grid and drones can also be 'assisted' to the same person which causes them to take actions that wind up needing to be communicated at the same time (particularly locking and firing). There is a point where the bottlenecks for such things will be moved to outside CCPs realm and become difficult for them to control (ie your client(s) running on your hardware, and your internet connection). Its a bit more than just a software issue. |
Coralas
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
122
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 03:38:36 -
[13] - Quote
Alasdan Helminthauge wrote:If you can use 25 light drones on a ship with 125 bandwidth then who will use mediums and heavies any more? 2 lights have more dps than a medium and 5 lights have more dps than a heavy, and lights have far better speed and tracking. A VNI with 25 light drones can easily get more than 1,100+ dps, which is prerty ridiculous for a whole thing costing less than 100mil, and then I guess everyone will go to fly a kiting VNI or Ishtar and let their light drones swarm eat whatever the target is alive.
that would be countered by a smart bomb in pvp, but obviously the ratting VNI > all with 25 light drones.
|
Specia1 K
State War Academy Caldari State
319
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 04:31:00 -
[14] - Quote
or 25x EC-300s... |
Specia1 K
State War Academy Caldari State
319
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 04:34:02 -
[15] - Quote
I'd go for this if there was a + cumulative increase chance that they go rogue and attack anything on grid. |
Eternus8lux8lucis
Primus Inc. LEGIO ASTARTES ARCANUM
1554
|
Posted - 2017.05.17 06:14:09 -
[16] - Quote
Specia1 K wrote:or 25x EC-300s... Thatd put Falcon out of business....
Have you heard anything I've said?
You said it's all circling the drain, the whole universe. Right?
That's right.
Had to end sometime.
|
Yang Aurilen
The Mjolnir Bloc The Bloc
1439
|
Posted - 2017.05.18 00:49:43 -
[17] - Quote
How about 5 flights of all the ewar drones?
Post with your NPC alt main and not your main main alt!
|
Sethyrh Nakrar
Drake Mining and Acquisition Inc.
80
|
Posted - 2017.05.18 08:49:58 -
[18] - Quote
Or just use a carrier or supercarrier.
Praise the Omnissiah!
|
Gimme Sake
State War Academy Caldari State
494
|
Posted - 2017.05.18 08:58:57 -
[19] - Quote
Sir BloodArgon Aulmais wrote:I stop taking any argument/suggestion seriously once the phrase "common guys its [The current year] why dont we have X!"
I can't believe its the current year and people are still coming up with bad ideas like this.
The Normans : "Sir, why are we invading England?"
William the Conquerer: "Because it's 1066!"
"Never not blob!" ~ Plato
|
Nana Skalski
Taisaanat Kotei
33608
|
Posted - 2017.05.18 09:50:14 -
[20] - Quote
I imagined it somehow differently.
Small, medium, large and capital rigs for drones.
Small exterior drone launcher - 5m3 Small exterior drone launcher II - 10m3 + double the requirements Medium exterior drone launcher - 10 m3 Medium exterior drone launcher II - 20 m3 + double the requirements Large exterior drone launcher - 25 m3 Large exterior drone launcher II - 50 m3 + double the requirements Capital exterior drone launcher - ? Capital exterior drone launcher II- ?
Penalty for every one of them - 1 high slot.
ߦçߦáߦç-Ç-ŠߦÿߦÇ-Çߦ¢ ߦÅ-ô ß¦Ç +óߦÇߦìߦç -£ß¦ç-ƒß¦ÿs ߦ¢ß¦Å ߦ¢ß¦ç-ƒ-ƒ ß¦Ç sߦ¢ß¦Å-Ç-Å =ƒôò
ߦí-£ß¦ç-Çߦç +¬s ߦÇ+¦+ó-Ç-ŠߦäߦÅ+¦ß¦äߦÅ-Çߦà +óߦ£-Šߦí-£ß¦ç+¦ -ÅߦÅߦ£ +¦ß¦çߦçߦà -£+¬ß¦ì
ߦÅsߦÿ-Çߦç-Å =ƒÜÇ
GëíGïüGëí GÖÑ
|
|
Elmund Egivand
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
2387
|
Posted - 2017.05.18 10:13:55 -
[21] - Quote
I prefer a module where we can pod someone while he is in station. Like a high precision shield-piercing railgun or something.
Because someone needs to give the 0.01 isk traders the what-for. With ship-grade munitions.
A Minmatar warship is like a rusting Beetle with 500 horsepower Cardillac engines in the rear, armour plating bolted to chassis and a M2 Browning stuck on top.
|
Magnus Jax
47
|
Posted - 2017.05.18 10:22:14 -
[22] - Quote
OP is under the impression that if they would increase the amount of drones they wouldn't touch the dps per drone and leave it as is, massively increasing drone dps. OP doesn't understand balancing. |
Gimme Sake
State War Academy Caldari State
495
|
Posted - 2017.05.18 10:28:11 -
[23] - Quote
How about an Eve revolution that would remove combat drones completely from the gameplay?
"Never not blob!" ~ Plato
|
Cherry Sulphate
ojingo
64
|
Posted - 2017.05.18 11:05:17 -
[24] - Quote
OP did you come up with these ideas before or after the teacher took the colouring book off you? |
HydrogenBond Shaishi
C-H-C
12
|
Posted - 2017.05.19 02:43:41 -
[25] - Quote
Cherry Sulphate wrote:OP did you come up with these ideas before or after the teacher took the colouring book off you?
Both before and after.
|
HydrogenBond Shaishi
C-H-C
12
|
Posted - 2017.05.19 02:47:01 -
[26] - Quote
Magnus Jax wrote:OP is under the impression that if they would increase the amount of drones they wouldn't touch the dps per drone and leave it as is, massively increasing drone dps. OP doesn't understand balancing.
My thinking is CPP would boost the amount of DPS needed to crack PvE ships by raising resists. |
HydrogenBond Shaishi
C-H-C
12
|
Posted - 2017.05.19 03:00:48 -
[27] - Quote
Sir BloodArgon Aulmais wrote:I stop taking any argument/suggestion seriously once the phrase "common guys its [The current year] why dont we have X!"
I can't believe its the current year and people are still coming up with bad ideas like this.
I was referring to its year 33000 and we get a 2003 construct? |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |