Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
palit690
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 10:36:51 -
[1] - Quote
Tech 3 battle crusier Can fit covert ops cloaking device and covert cynosural field generator High slots 5 Can have 4 missles or 4 hybrid turret Med slots 4 Low slots 5 Drone bay 500 mbit/sec Structure hitpoints 6500 hp Capacity 600 m3 Drone bandwidth 250m3 Mass 16,000,000kg Volume 320,000m3 (20,000.0 m3 packed) Inertia modifier 1.100 x Inertia modifier 0.58x ARMOR HIT POINTS Armor hitpoints 2,500 hp SHIELD Shields capacity 1,500 hp Shield recharge time 1250.00 s CAPACITOR Capacitor capacity 7000gj Capacitor recharge time 1000.50 s TARGETING Maximum targeting range 70.00 km Maximum locked tergets 6 Signature radius 170 m Scan resolution 250 mm |
Lugh Crow-Slave
3930
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 10:41:07 -
[2] - Quote
sigh
what role or niche is this needed to fill? why is T3 the best way to fill that niche?
you seem to have at least put a bit of thought into this but have given no reasoning behind it
BLOPS Hauler
|
Cervix Thumper
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
71
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 10:41:21 -
[3] - Quote
nice idea, sounds like it would be a good front line recon / brawler. Get in there first with some punching power and then brin in the rest of the fleet.
|
Lugh Crow-Slave
3930
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 10:46:37 -
[4] - Quote
Cervix Thumper wrote:nice idea, sounds like it would be a good front line recon / brawler. Get in there first with some punching power and then brin in the rest of the fleet.
already plenty of ships that can do this lol
BLOPS Hauler
|
JC Mieyli
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 11:00:53 -
[5] - Quote
loving that 250mb bandwidth +1 game definitely needs some more op ships getting bored of 5.6% damn hmls |
Lugh Crow-Slave
3930
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 11:02:57 -
[6] - Quote
lol i thought that was a typo and assumed 25mb
BLOPS Hauler
|
Do Little
Virgin Plc Evictus.
1204
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 12:11:50 -
[7] - Quote
250mb bandwidth = full squadron of Geckos. Who needs the rest of the fleet?
Seriously. T2 ships are specialists - focused on a single role. T3 ships are adaptable, configurable to different roles using subsystems (cruisers) or mode switching (destroyers). How do you extend this concept to battlecruisers?
CCP has been talking about a special ship for fleet commanders - I can see a T3 battlecruiser modeled after the USN Blue Ridge class that can be adapted to tactical (small fleet) or strategic (large fleet) roles. Well defended with all functionality focused on command, control and communications. I don't know how practical this is since client functionality i.e. tactical overlay, overview, etc..., would need to work differently if you were piloting this ship. |
Lugh Crow-Slave
3930
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 12:19:21 -
[8] - Quote
pretty sure the FC ship will just be a brick that can lock a lot of targets
BLOPS Hauler
|
palit690
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 12:24:54 -
[9] - Quote
I was thinking of a ship that can get in and do cynoing when your emeny is trying to kill it and if you like u. I know that this is my frist time doing this but it can be modified to fit the role bounses for each race |
Lugh Crow-Slave
3930
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 12:30:41 -
[10] - Quote
wut?
there are already a lot of good cyno ships.
for covert cynos most of the force recons can tank more than enough to last the 30s cycle time
BLOPS Hauler
|
|
JC Mieyli
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 12:32:05 -
[11] - Quote
yeah but none of them can field 5 geckos |
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
3924
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 12:38:28 -
[12] - Quote
Forget about the stats (they are ridiculous anyways), if you want a new ship just think of the concept. What does it do? How does it do it? What is it's strengths/weaknesses? Why would it improve on the current line up of ships?
And when i say that last one i don't mean do existing jobs better, i mean how does it increase our options without making current ships obsolete?
EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"
Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs
|
Rhaegon Aesir
Static-Shock
6
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 13:13:17 -
[13] - Quote
Arguably, the racial bonuses are more important than raw stats, as the raw stats will surely be different for each racial version. The real question is, why is there a need for a high-damage, high tank, covops battlecruiser? This would be overpowered, and frankly we have enough overpowering ships in game already. |
Lugh Crow-Slave
3930
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 13:30:18 -
[14] - Quote
I don't thunk it is high damage pretty sure tv's bandwidth is a typo
BLOPS Hauler
|
Rhaegon Aesir
Static-Shock
6
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 15:10:13 -
[15] - Quote
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:I don't thunk it is high damage pretty sure tv's bandwidth is a typo
I mean I want to believe it's a typo too, but 25 mb and a 500m3 drone bay seems a little...odd. More likely he actually intended it to be 250/500...for whatever reason.
|
Vokan Narkar
New Eden Traders Aliance
47
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 15:27:40 -
[16] - Quote
no more t3 please, we still have balance issues with those in game already |
JC Mieyli
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 18:01:16 -
[17] - Quote
Vokan Narkar wrote:no more t3 please, we still have balance issues with those in game already yeah they suck so much now even t1 bc is better than t3c in combat roles |
Lauralite Anne Brezia
Wolf Brothers INC United Neopian Federation
15
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 18:06:40 -
[18] - Quote
Why don't we wait and see how well CCP handles the current t3 balancing pass they're working on before adding more T3 classifications why don't we? Do appreciate you trying to put at least some level of effort and thought into this though.
Neopian Citizen
Capsuleer
Organizer
Crazy Drunk Lady
"You want to know where I'm from huh? Well, it's a long way, and several Spacial Rifts removed, from this place."
|
Danika Princip
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5516
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 18:28:10 -
[19] - Quote
JC Mieyli wrote:Vokan Narkar wrote:no more t3 please, we still have balance issues with those in game already yeah they suck so much now even t1 bc is better than t3c in combat roles
reported for trolling |
JC Mieyli
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 19:43:03 -
[20] - Quote
oh one of those |
|
Atomeon
The Scope Gallente Federation
81
|
Posted - 2017.05.20 22:03:22 -
[21] - Quote
The slots are wrong, they dont even be similar to T1 BC. 2.5k armor and 1.5k shield is cruiser scale. 7k Capacitor is BS scale. 250mbit is crazy. The whole numbers are just wrong. i dunno, everything is wrong.... |
Matthias Ancaladron
Wrath of Angels Solitaire.
305
|
Posted - 2017.05.21 19:30:35 -
[22] - Quote
We don't need a t3 BC.
Just a tech 2 version of the tier3 battecruisers Let them fit a covert cloak, no targeting delay on npcs when decloaking, and can cloak while targeted by NPCs, immune to dscan. (Can't fit covert cynos)
For solo covert pve. Someone pops into system, scoop loot and cloak and finish your site when they leave. |
Rhaegon Aesir
Static-Shock
11
|
Posted - 2017.05.21 20:13:25 -
[23] - Quote
Matthias Ancaladron wrote:We don't need a t3 BC.
Just a tech 2 version of the tier3 battecruisers Let them fit a covert cloak, no targeting delay on npcs when decloaking, and can cloak while targeted by NPCs, immune to dscan. (Can't fit covert cynos)
For solo covert pve. Someone pops into system, scoop loot and cloak and finish your site when they leave.
Ahh yes, because what re really need is for PVE to become even safer and easier. Oh what's this, you're dying to the rats cause you didn't tank enough? Just cloak lol, no need to be worried about ever losing your ship. Oh, and a covops combat capable battlecruiser will totally not be abused by PVPers at all in any way. Surely not. |
JC Mieyli
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
26
|
Posted - 2017.05.21 20:19:18 -
[24] - Quote
go easy on him hes from my old corp theyre not the sharpest tools in the box |
Lugh Crow-Slave
3940
|
Posted - 2017.05.22 01:29:56 -
[25] - Quote
Rhaegon Aesir wrote:Matthias Ancaladron wrote:We don't need a t3 BC.
Just a tech 2 version of the tier3 battecruisers Let them fit a covert cloak, no targeting delay on npcs when decloaking, and can cloak while targeted by NPCs, immune to dscan. (Can't fit covert cynos)
For solo covert pve. Someone pops into system, scoop loot and cloak and finish your site when they leave. Ahh yes, because what re really need is for PVE to become even safer and easier. Oh what's this, you're dying to the rats cause you didn't tank enough? Just cloak lol, no need to be worried about ever losing your ship. Oh, and a covops combat capable battlecruiser will totally not be abused by PVPers at all in any way. Surely not.
just want to ask.
if he is dying to rats how exactly is he going to cloak?
no this would be broken as it would shoot the DPS of blops gangs sky high. its immune to D-scan so happy ganking. cov ops cloak with no targeting delay no that will go well with the DPS of these.
can't fit cover cyno just breaks consistency and is bad on principal
BLOPS Hauler
|
Rhaegon Aesir
Static-Shock
11
|
Posted - 2017.05.22 03:20:00 -
[26] - Quote
I mean he says that it can cloak while being targeted by NPCs, so I mean if things start to go sideways it can just cloak. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |