Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Zalixus Orici
Dependent On Pilots Wormhole Society
2
|
Posted - 2017.07.12 14:41:56 -
[1] - Quote
Lol maybe not possible, you can match 1 out of 20 sometimes by luck, but most of them are just like guessing game. Even when you get right, you actually don't. http://i.imgur.com/SqoAOjw.png . Not sure, if bugged or just very dumb project. |
Netan MalDoran
Reckless-Endangerment Manifesto.
307
|
Posted - 2017.07.12 19:15:57 -
[2] - Quote
It worked well on SISI cause we had a small amount of players actually trying, now that its on Tranquility its being flooded by players which are random clicking just for money without caring about accuracy which is messing up all of the data.
"Your security status has been lowered." - Hell yeah it was!
Falcon's truth
|
Matthias Ancaladron
Wrath of Angels Solitaire.
406
|
Posted - 2017.07.12 19:34:47 -
[3] - Quote
The game was glitched yesterday in correctly labeling the first 100 or so samples with transits everywhere when the actual light graph had no transits present for most of the samples.
|
Baboo Yagu
29
|
Posted - 2017.07.12 19:59:56 -
[4] - Quote
Completely agree. I mean, just how the **** is anyone supposed to correctly identify this ****?
https://i.imgur.com/iyz7Wmv.png |
Lord Maghnus
Star Frontiers Brotherhood of Spacers
2
|
Posted - 2017.07.12 20:14:00 -
[5] - Quote
I suggest a review button be added so that we can take a better look after we transmit our inputs. Reviewing the consensus of other players, and the evaluation mode might help everyone better understand what we're looking for when we analyze the data. Once we transmit, it becomes locked and it's difficult to review so no effective way to learn from mistakes or other players inputs. Being able to learn from feedback will go a long way into making this effective. |
Luna Le Fey
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
20
|
Posted - 2017.07.12 21:36:48 -
[6] - Quote
Yea they really do need to sort this out, im up at rank 72 and I must have passed the point where all I get now are the really hard ones, the ones that are genuinely impossible to identify. I've only had like 1 or two that are somewhat obvious but even then, half of them are wrong.. look at this crap http://i.imgur.com/QS2mBkz.png apparently I'm wrong, it's freaking lower than the correct answer ffs |
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
30556
|
Posted - 2017.07.12 21:41:15 -
[7] - Quote
Luna Le Fey wrote:Yea they really do need to sort this out, im up at rank 72 and I must have passed the point where all I get now are the really hard ones, the ones that are genuinely impossible to identify. I've only had like 1 or two that are somewhat obvious but even then, half of them are wrong.. look at this crap http://i.imgur.com/QS2mBkz.png apparently I'm wrong, it's freaking lower than the correct answer ffs I had the same when I started out yesterday... then suddenly everything went well 'tll rank 26, and now I get only junk again. I already lost 20% accuracy dropping me down to 60%.
"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!"
Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)
|
Luna Le Fey
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
20
|
Posted - 2017.07.12 21:45:50 -
[8] - Quote
I was sitting at 99% for ages, thought I was doing super well http://i.imgur.com/aQ76MaL.png but at the 65-70 rank its just all gone to **** |
Baboo Yagu
29
|
Posted - 2017.07.12 23:35:44 -
[9] - Quote
How the **** do you people manage to get to such high ranks so quickly? I can't even get past rank 4, no matter how obvious the dips are it keeps on failing me because I didn't pick out some random section that looks exactly the same as the rest of the sample. Then most of the times I pick out the only dips in the sample it fails me and say they're a false positive.
It's a bloody joke is what it is. |
Galaxxis
Unicorn Rampage
200
|
Posted - 2017.07.12 23:56:56 -
[10] - Quote
It's not impossible, it's just a lot more challenging than the first Project Discovery. I'm an astrophysicist and have seen plenty of light curves, and even I can't figure out what in the hell they were thinking with a few of these. Sometimes one will fail because it just looked like noise, with one "maybe" signal if you squint really hard and stand on your head. And then they've gone and made an entire series of transits out of it. There are also some weird and blatantly obvious mistakes in some of the evaluation samples, which I'm sure most people have seen by now. To make it worse they've also just completely missed several transits in the evaluation samples! I just had one fail (and I wish I'd taken a screenshot) where it had one enormous transit, but then there was another much smaller transit with I think 6 or 7 relatively obvious signals that they missed. That's pretty **** poor if you ask me.
That being said, most of them do seem to have been done properly. Just keep at it and you should improve over time. |
|
Spc One
The Chodak Void Alliance
326
|
Posted - 2017.07.13 06:07:45 -
[11] - Quote
Also, how is this not correct ?
Image: http://www.netsky.org/eve/AFailedPD13072017a1.png |
Lord Maghnus
Star Frontiers Brotherhood of Spacers
3
|
Posted - 2017.07.13 06:26:48 -
[12] - Quote
Spc One, you're marking the trough of the stars rotation. It's very improbable the planets revolutions would exactly match the stars rotations. |
Luna Le Fey
KarmaFleet Goonswarm Federation
21
|
Posted - 2017.07.13 11:51:39 -
[13] - Quote
Thats a pulsating star, in the bottom right there are 4 options, one will be for pulsating stars |
Lunati Key's
Galaxy In Flames 2
0
|
Posted - 2017.07.13 12:05:44 -
[14] - Quote
GOOD JOB CCP ...
https://puu.sh/wIuJ8/8de6ea7e14.png
https://puu.sh/wIuKl/497624ab74.png
99% --------> 78% -------> 1% |
Zalixus Orici
Dependent On Pilots Wormhole Society
3
|
Posted - 2017.07.14 10:51:02 -
[15] - Quote
Seems, like they fixed it mostly, got to rank 43, around 65% accuracy. |
Yueh Ferrda
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2017.07.14 12:30:30 -
[16] - Quote
Nothing fixed. Always random and no fullscreen for UI. |
Photrius Pyrelius
University of Caille Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2017.07.14 14:26:26 -
[17] - Quote
Yueh Ferrda wrote:Nothing fixed. Always random and no fullscreen for UI.
Fullscreen would be nice. So would some manual y-axis zooming. |
Vanessa Celtis
Vanessa Atalanta
27
|
Posted - 2017.07.14 19:42:36 -
[18] - Quote
Luna Le Fey wrote:Thats a pulsating star, in the bottom right there are 4 options, one will be for pulsating stars
What are the crates giving above 75 ? |
Blade Darth
Room for Improvement Limited Expectations
276
|
Posted - 2017.07.14 19:53:29 -
[19] - Quote
1. Not sure wat happened here. 2. Someone forgot to de-trend. Or as you say it in french "extraile la compensa tentacle"
Omen Navy Issue Tutorial
|
Vanessa Celtis
Vanessa Atalanta
27
|
Posted - 2017.07.14 20:08:21 -
[20] - Quote
Blade Darth wrote:1. Not sure wat happened here. 2. Someone forgot to de-trend. Or as you say it in french "extraile la compensa tentacle"
Nice French, where did you learn it? |
|
Kevin Forrest
Yumping Amok Dot Dot Dot
0
|
Posted - 2017.07.15 17:19:27 -
[21] - Quote
Vanessa Celtis wrote:Luna Le Fey wrote:Thats a pulsating star, in the bottom right there are 4 options, one will be for pulsating stars What are the crates giving above 75 ?
Still the same superior one's giving only 2 skins, i was hoping for at least 3 skins per crate at this point.
Data still seems screwed, unless its totally obvious im clicking no transit only for it to have a dozen in it, but zooming into it to have a look still doesnt show any viable transit, i think a fresh wipe would be good now people have had a couple of days to figure out what they're doing, or 1 wipe per week so they can match up the results from previous weeks and generate a new consensus. |
Cypherous
Liberty Rogues Aprilon Dynasty
308
|
Posted - 2017.07.15 20:58:38 -
[22] - Quote
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/264781482348773376/335887428885938198/unknown.png
Its impossible when its still broke as **** |
Zalixus Orici
Dependent On Pilots Wormhole Society
3
|
Posted - 2017.07.16 19:59:43 -
[23] - Quote
Made 2 accs to rank 50 in 10 hours, not too bad. |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |