Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Ultim8Evil
Fly Drunk Fatal Ascension
8
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 14:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
... when your russian ratting bot crashes? |
Sokratesz
Rionnag Alba Northern Coalition.
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 14:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
I find it far more terrible when there's no kill specified. |
Aquila Draco
102
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 14:25:00 -
[3] - Quote
ppl... learn to copy link and paste it in url bar of your web browser... so you will see kill... this forums dont like links and they dont work every time.
And about kill... LOL |
Xuko Nuki
Submerged Living
27
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 14:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
Could we at least have a story? |
Jenshae Chiroptera
423
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 14:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
Really? Ideas & Stuff EVE - the game of sand castles, either building them or kicking them down. -áStatus: Going phishing. |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
962
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 14:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
Xuko Nuki wrote:Could we at least have a story? It's faily self-explanatory, and hilarious too (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) -áGÖÑ New Years Resolution ~ Cease thy Smacktalk GÖÑ |
Doc Fury
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
179
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 14:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
This is why you should always use an Australian ratting bot. Qantas never crashed.
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'no.' |
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1277
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 15:16:00 -
[8] - Quote
if .. i dont see any reason why "bot" will post NPC kill ..
So .. |
supersexysucker
Uber Awesome Fantastico Awesomeness Group
32
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 17:25:00 -
[9] - Quote
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:if .. i dont see any reason why "bot" will post NPC kill ..
So ..
lolwut, API posted nub. |
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1277
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 17:46:00 -
[10] - Quote
supersexysucker wrote:Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:if .. i dont see any reason why "bot" will post NPC kill ..
So .. lolwut, API posted nub.
uh-huh
Yeah sure.. bots will register to get all his losses/kills posted automatically..
Good.. Great thinking there. |
|
baltec1
451
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 17:48:00 -
[11] - Quote
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:supersexysucker wrote:Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:if .. i dont see any reason why "bot" will post NPC kill ..
So .. lolwut, API posted nub. uh-huh Yeah sure.. bots will register to get all his losses/kills posted automatically.. Good.. Great thinking there.
That supercap got used for more than ratting so yea, he did and it got posted. |
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic
1277
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 17:50:00 -
[12] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:supersexysucker wrote:Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:if .. i dont see any reason why "bot" will post NPC kill ..
So .. lolwut, API posted nub. uh-huh Yeah sure.. bots will register to get all his losses/kills posted automatically.. Good.. Great thinking there. That supercap got used for more than ratting so yea, he did and it got posted.
fair enough.. Still it does not mean its an bot fail .. just that he felt asleep |
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
237
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 17:51:00 -
[13] - Quote
FFS, people, stick killboard links that have ampersands (&) in them into bit.ly or something first. Removing the "amp;" from the URL is getting tiresome. Here is the kill link without the issues.
At least, until CCP decide to spend another two years fixing a one-liner bug that causes this to happen (or they decide to use a real BBCode library rather than cooking their own up). |
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
237
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 17:52:00 -
[14] - Quote
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:fair enough.. Still it does not mean its an bot fail .. just that he felt asleep
TIL bots need to sleep. |
Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
814
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 17:57:00 -
[15] - Quote
Sokratesz wrote:I find it far more terrible when there's no kill specified.
learn how URL variables work and the failforum don't work
The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |
supersexysucker
Uber Awesome Fantastico Awesomeness Group
32
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 18:06:00 -
[16] - Quote
Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:supersexysucker wrote:Jaroslav Unwanted wrote:if .. i dont see any reason why "bot" will post NPC kill ..
So .. lolwut, API posted nub. uh-huh Yeah sure.. bots will register to get all his losses/kills posted automatically.. Good.. Great thinking there.
.......
omg you are this dumb.
If the corp (can't comment on allance, don't run one) enters the CORP api key to the KB... *ALL* kills and loses are *AUTO* posted as directors have access to the "wars" tab that has all kills and losses for the corp. So O snap, you have NO CHOICE in loses being posted if the API key is in.
Wow can you really be this dumb.
/facecat
Anymore fail? |
Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
513
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 18:08:00 -
[17] - Quote
supersexysucker wrote:Anymore fail? Well, there's your posting. |
Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
814
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 18:10:00 -
[18] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:FFS, people, stick killboard links that have ampersands (&) in them into bit.ly or something first. Removing the "amp;" from the URL is getting tiresome. Here is the kill link without the issues. At least, until CCP decide to spend another two years fixing a one-liner bug that causes this to happen (or they decide to use a real BBCode library rather than cooking their own up).
all they need to do is stop double encoding html entities for display in the warning popup
if you have to use && to get & to display to the enduser (like the link warning shows) it will fail.
CCP: URLs must use the proper html entites to be valid HTML, this is true, but you don't have to display it to the user as such when you make & look like & to the user as text, that means you are actually putting && in the URL (you override or escape by doubling up on the code) and as a result the entity never decodes properly for the browser and it also sees & instead of converting & to &.
If I feed & to a browser it converts to &, if I feed && to the browser it sees it as a command to overide the proper display and as a result strips the first & and leaves the 2nd as is.
This is the penultimate easy fix, seriously it involves nothing security related. Any of the fools here who run KBs could do it, hell a 12 year old could do it
SO DOOOO EEEEET!!! The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |
supersexysucker
Uber Awesome Fantastico Awesomeness Group
32
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 18:10:00 -
[19] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:supersexysucker wrote:Anymore fail? Well, there's your posting.
O look! a goon, should you not be busy sucking off anthoer goon right now, or check that your own bot is running? |
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
238
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 18:11:00 -
[20] - Quote
Heh. You'd think a botting alliance would have the killboard disregard kills by exclusively rats. Someone needs to have a talk with their web admin. |
|
Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
513
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 18:12:00 -
[21] - Quote
supersexysucker wrote:Lord Zim wrote:supersexysucker wrote:Anymore fail? Well, there's your posting. O look! a goon, should you not be busy sucking off anthoer goon right now, or check that your own bot is running? See, there's more of your posting. |
Xuko Nuki
Submerged Living
27
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 18:12:00 -
[22] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Xuko Nuki wrote:Could we at least have a story? It's faily self-explanatory, and hilarious too
I see now but would still like some narration |
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
238
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 18:16:00 -
[23] - Quote
Morganta wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:FFS, people, stick killboard links that have ampersands (&) in them into bit.ly or something first. Removing the "amp;" from the URL is getting tiresome. Here is the kill link without the issues. At least, until CCP decide to spend another two years fixing a one-liner bug that causes this to happen (or they decide to use a real BBCode library rather than cooking their own up). all they need to do is stop double encoding html entities for display if you have to use && to get & to display to the enduser (like the link warning shows) it will fail. CCP: URLs must use the proper html entites to be valid HTML, this is true, but you don't have to display it to the user as such when you make & look like & to the user as text, that means you are actually putting && in the URL (you override or escape by doubling up on the code) and as a result the entity never decodes properly for the browser and it also sees & instead of converting & to &. If I feed & to a browser it converts to &, if I feed && to the browser it sees it as a command to overide the proper display and as a result strips the first & and leaves the 2nd as is. This is the penultimate easy fix, seriously it involves nothing security related. Any of the fools here who run KBs could do it, hell a 12 year old could do it SO DOOOO EEEEET!!!
I don't know much about ASP (which they appear to be using for their forums for some daft reason), but if they used Python as they did for Eve, there is a marvelous postmarkup module that does all that for you. Give it BBCode, it gives you valid HTML back. I'm sure there is something like that for ASP as well.
supersexysucker wrote:O look! a goon, should you not be busy sucking off anthoer goon right now, or check that your own bot is running?
Stop posting. |
Chiggy W
Hard-Luck Industries
0
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 18:26:00 -
[24] - Quote
Xuko Nuki wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Xuko Nuki wrote:Could we at least have a story? It's faily self-explanatory, and hilarious too I see now but would still like some narration
Idiot goes ratting in a MoM, goes AFK/falls asleep, dies to said rats.
Pretty self explanatory, really no need for narration. |
Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
814
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 18:52:00 -
[25] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Morganta wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:FFS, people, stick killboard links that have ampersands (&) in them into bit.ly or something first. Removing the "amp;" from the URL is getting tiresome. Here is the kill link without the issues. At least, until CCP decide to spend another two years fixing a one-liner bug that causes this to happen (or they decide to use a real BBCode library rather than cooking their own up). all they need to do is stop double encoding html entities for display if you have to use && to get & to display to the enduser (like the link warning shows) it will fail. CCP: URLs must use the proper html entites to be valid HTML, this is true, but you don't have to display it to the user as such when you make & look like & to the user as text, that means you are actually putting && in the URL (you override or escape by doubling up on the code) and as a result the entity never decodes properly for the browser and it also sees & instead of converting & to &. If I feed & to a browser it converts to &, if I feed && to the browser it sees it as a command to overide the proper display and as a result strips the first & and leaves the 2nd as is. This is the penultimate easy fix, seriously it involves nothing security related. Any of the fools here who run KBs could do it, hell a 12 year old could do it SO DOOOO EEEEET!!! I don't know much about ASP (which they appear to be using for their forums for some daft reason), but if they used Python as they did for Eve, there is a marvelous postmarkup module that does all that for you. Give it BBCode, it gives you valid HTML back. I'm sure there is something like that for ASP as well. supersexysucker wrote:O look! a goon, should you not be busy sucking off anthoer goon right now, or check that your own bot is running? Stop posting.
asp is a steaming pile of garbage
I have a publisher friend who has a asp site made by a "top" development team it's so bad google won't even index the site, the shopping cart and a handfull of pdf's make it into the index
CCP is almost in the same boat, forum main pages are not indexed, however lucky for CCP the actual posts get indexed
why? well that publisher's website has about 280 errors on the home page, almost 500 errors on the product page and these are all errors you never see, it looks fine in a browser, but robots hate it and refuse to deal with it, except for the pages like the cart which has only 27 errors.
WTF errors... stupid stuff, declaring XHTML and coding tags in caps or mixed case, or using HTML 4 standards in an XML environment.
The rules have changed, people need to get with the standards or DIAF
as for my friend, I'll be migrating his site into a standard php zen package that they can maintain and update themselves since they really have no need for overblown bloated buggy code The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
238
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 18:58:00 -
[26] - Quote
Morganta wrote: The rules have changed, people need to get with the standards or DIAF
You're not telling CCP to DIAF right? You know what happens to people who do that.
But yeah, I was a bit disappointed when I saw ".aspx" on the Eve websites. I was rather hoping they'd use something Python-y and cool like Django. I suppose they initially wrote everything in ASP (back in 2003) and have just been building on top of that since then. Oh well.
Everything other than Eve Gate does sort of need an overhaul, though. Particularly the main eveonline.com pages. |
Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
514
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 19:02:00 -
[27] - Quote
Morganta wrote:as for my friend, I'll be migrating his site into a standard php zen package that they can maintain and update themselves since they really have no need for overblown bloated buggy code If you value your friendship, don't migrate his site to PHP, the worst scripting language known to man. |
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
239
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 19:03:00 -
[28] - Quote
... This thread is now about web developer e-peen and language/framework wars? |
Lord Zim
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
514
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 19:06:00 -
[29] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:But yeah, I was a bit disappointed when I saw ".aspx" on the Eve websites. I was rather hoping they'd use something Python-y and cool like Django. I suppose they initially wrote everything in ASP (back in 2003) and have just been building on top of that since then. Oh well. .aspx usually implies C#, VB.NET or similar, though, and it's not backwards compatible at all, so it's been completely rewritten. |
Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
814
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 19:11:00 -
[30] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Morganta wrote:as for my friend, I'll be migrating his site into a standard php zen package that they can maintain and update themselves since they really have no need for overblown bloated buggy code If you value your friendship, don't migrate his site to PHP, the worst scripting language known to man.
it's never let me down, and it does everything I want it to do, even things I didn't know I wanted it to do I have not yet encountered a need or feature that couldn't be coded with php and or java (and I really hate java)
whats your gripe? or did you read it online?
The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |