Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [27]:: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
79
|
Posted - 2013.05.30 23:06:00 -
[781] - Quote
TL;DR but...I would love to see the stats on how many Capsuleers actually have CQ enabled and use it and how many have it disabled.
Personally, I don't want to spend 5 minutes walking to my Hanger when I can do all that from, oh what's that, the Hanger - that's right. I understand that some do and like the immersion but I'd want more functionality and the ability to run\sprint to my ship if I used CQ (not that I do right now).
Just my thoughts. My Feature\Idea:-á Fast Character Switching "XP Stylee"
Here's my tear jar > |_| < Fill 'er up! |
Ruze
Next Stage Initiative Trans-Stellar Industries
299
|
Posted - 2013.06.01 18:18:00 -
[782] - Quote
Maximus Aerelius wrote:TL;DR but...I would love to see the stats on how many Capsuleers actually have CQ enabled and use it and how many have it disabled.
Personally, I don't want to spend 5 minutes walking to my Hanger when I can do all that from, oh what's that, the Hanger - that's right. I understand that some do and like the immersion but I'd want more functionality and the ability to run\sprint to my ship if I used CQ (not that I do right now).
Just my thoughts.
I feel the functionality should be different, and a matter of taste. Let the windows we use pull up on the screens while we're in CQ. Let us use the functions around CQ to activate basic tasks, like the bed for logging off and the little control panel by the door for the options menu.
There is a fear that if you make too much unique functionality, players will feel 'forced' into CQ, which is essentially what's ruined it. It's not that things couldn't be added to make CQ fun, entertaining and worthwhile. It's that by doing so, the portion of the playerbase that screams for all of CCP's assets to be focused on them and their personal playstyle would scream even louder.
So many think that the riots during the release of Captains Quarters were about removing CQ from the game. Not at all. Most of the complaints were about the half-assed way that CCP installed it, with one crappy quarters, removing ship spinning, massive hardware issues, pay-to-win fears, etc. If it was a proper, finalized release, it wouldn't have generated half as much content.
I have a feeling that Odyssey, and the half-hearted approach it seems to have been given, is going to generate a lot of distaste and vinegar. The same as you would expect from any poorly-applied update. If you're driven to threaten others with harm or violence because of what they do in game, you can't separate fantasy from reality. That "griefer/thief" is probably more sane than you are. How screwed up is that? |
Xuixien
Elysium Dominion
464
|
Posted - 2013.06.04 23:50:00 -
[783] - Quote
Posting because I would like to see WiS worked on a bit.
I do not, however, believe it is "essential" to EVE Online.
It's polish. But it's relevant because CCP has been polishing EVE a lot the past few years.
- I want a "corporation" meeting room and an "alliance" meeting room.
- I want to be be able to furnish my room a bit. I'm ******* space rich and I want a god damned ... expensive thing that I can place in my home station. Everyone vs Everyone Xuixien - Space Cat, Queen of Rens |
Queotzcatl
Mirai Yume The Dark Nation
0
|
Posted - 2013.06.05 13:10:00 -
[784] - Quote
I would like a Nano-Dragon pet that flies around the Capt quarter incinerating things when hes too annoyed, sort of Tamagotchy style but more cohmprehensive.. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [27]:: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |