|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Xolve
Intaki Armaments Important Internet Spaceship League
711
|
Posted - 2012.01.20 23:53:00 -
[1] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Max Von Sydow wrote:NERF? I'd almost call that a buff. Without the tank the drake is useless. A bit of extra range wont help when your expensive BC hull is instapopped by a small alpha fleet. Mise well fly a BS cruiser to get through the CTA and then go puke in some belt in frustration while an alliance leader counts this months moon goo production.
Confirming 25m is expensive now.
Excuse me while I laugh myself out of my chair.
I do love when pubbies speak of moon goo and CTAs, and call drakes expensive ships... Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Xolve
Intaki Armaments Important Internet Spaceship League
715
|
Posted - 2012.01.21 14:56:00 -
[2] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Going by the classic definition of that gratingly stupid word, you're as much a pubbie as those you're trying to insult, pubbie.
So why don't you just like, close that second ******* in your face? Pubbie.
Going by the classic definition, yes I am a member on the SomethingAwful Forums, therefore your argument is invalid.
Have a nice day!
Pubbie. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Xolve
Intaki Armaments Important Internet Spaceship League
716
|
Posted - 2012.01.21 16:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
Berendas wrote:Why should the Tengu be spared? It's just as overpowered as the Drake is. *Points at the alliance tournaments*
[Queue Caldari pilots' victim complex]
In all fairness.. a Tengu plus Subsystems costs about 20-25 times what a drake does (and that is not factoring in mods..). So yeah in that price range I would expect it to perform on a much greater wavelength then a 20m isk battlecruiser. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Xolve
Intaki Armaments Important Internet Spaceship League
718
|
Posted - 2012.01.21 18:31:00 -
[4] - Quote
Lyrrashae
Because nerfing everything into bland, generic uselessness is so much easier than fixing what's broken amirite?
Hey, I know! Let's fix the Nighthawk! And we can do that by...[i wrote:nerfing a completely different ship. [/i] Now this...this is the sheer MENSA-calibre brilliance I've come to expect from CCP. They'd hit a bump in the road with Crucible--gotta throw those pissed off paying subscribers a token bone eventually--but now, back to business as usual, it would seem.
Next-up, the return of the....errrm...new and improved (and NEx-only, 'natch)...Gold Scorpion?
E: Now with extra sarcasm and cynicism.
The rage is strong within this one. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Xolve
Intaki Armaments Important Internet Spaceship League
726
|
Posted - 2012.01.24 13:51:00 -
[5] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Maybe there's a fundamental disconnect here between the 1337 PvP!!!!111!!!oneoeneone!! crowd, and those of us who remember the days before Internet?
Cool Ad Hominem Bro. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Xolve
Intaki Armaments Important Internet Spaceship League
742
|
Posted - 2012.01.25 00:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Jack Corigan wrote:The Drake is overplayed and ruins the experience of eve. The tank is seriously overpowered and way too many people hide behind it. There is a lot of other fascinating ships out there that players ignore because a drake feels like a safter option. Why does this matter, even if true? You don't like it, no-one's forcing you to fly it. No-one's forcing you not to come up with ways to counter/beat it, either, of which there are many. Sig-radius : tank : speed--know it, live it, love it, and use it to help you kill those Drakes you hate so much.
I think you should shoot more of your emotional pain into this thread.
Seriously. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Xolve
Intaki Armaments Important Internet Spaceship League
742
|
Posted - 2012.01.25 00:25:00 -
[7] - Quote
I think you need to suppress your anti-social anger induced psychosis, not amplify it. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Xolve
Intaki Armaments Important Internet Spaceship League
745
|
Posted - 2012.01.25 00:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:One day, I hope to be as 1337 as you.
Mother of All Gods be praised, that day is not today.
Oh so you've fallen victim to my riveting tales of exploits and battle prowess, and all the other reasons I'm better then you, huh? Because you know- thats all that I do, stroll around the forums and profess my awesomeness and superiority to the pleeb like masses of high sec and the lowliest of carebears. Get a grip space friend.
Go back to spewing out diatribes about how amazing High Sec is, and how the Drake isn't imbalanced in comparison to other Battlecruisers; and while you're at it please make mention of why people should be permitted to farm high sec incursions for the maximum duration of their life because after all thats what the devs had envisioned all along; and finally please talk at length as to why lowsec isn't broken and is chock full of content.
I might be a whole list of things, but at least delusional isn't one of them.
Pubbie. Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Xolve
Intaki Armaments Important Internet Spaceship League
745
|
Posted - 2012.01.25 00:45:00 -
[9] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote: *pleb. Pleeb is not a real word.
I am better than you. Ha!
My posts are more entertaining (and I have more Spacebook likes then you (so your argument is invalid (style points for super nested parenthesis)))
Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
Xolve
Intaki Armaments Important Internet Spaceship League
745
|
Posted - 2012.01.25 00:58:00 -
[10] - Quote
Anya Ohaya wrote:Xolve wrote:Berendas wrote:Why should the Tengu be spared? It's just as overpowered as the Drake is. *Points at the alliance tournaments*
[Queue Caldari pilots' victim complex] In all fairness.. a Tengu plus Subsystems costs about 20-25 times what a drake does (and that is not factoring in mods..). So yeah in that price range I would expect it to perform on a much greater wavelength then a 20m isk battlecruiser. No reason that it should outperform, by a comfortable margin, every other sub-capital ship (including all the other t3s).
So something that costs 40M ISK fitted, should perform in a relatively plateau-esque capactiy as something that costs 700M (Tech 2) - 4b (100mn AB Deadspace/Officer) ISK fitted? Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
|
Xolve
Intaki Armaments Important Internet Spaceship League
745
|
Posted - 2012.01.25 01:06:00 -
[11] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote: Wall-o-text
You completely lost me.
I'm drowning in words, seriously.
What is this? Inappropriate signature removed. Navigator. |
|
|
|