Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
IGNATIUS HOOD
Zephyr Corp
277
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 22:24:00 -
[61] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Lady Spank wrote:What a joke. I knew you would quickly resort to ranting, petulance, namecalling and generally exposing yourself as inept. Well done. And you are, predictably as ever, contributing nothing worth mentioning to any thread on this forum whilst over-estimating your own worth. Vastly so. 1/10--got me to respond--but lacks any other redeeming qualities. Come on, Skank, I know you can do better than this. Feeling a bit off today, are we? Next!
Agreement or not I fail to see how resorting to shot taking as opposed to taking a graceful approach to the haters accomplishes anything. Question a persons actions, position on the issues, but throwing mud at them only makes you look childish and takes focus away from YOUR position and makes the thread about you as a PERSON. Now I don't always agree with Lady Spank becuase we play the game differently, but I do respect Lady Spank's opinion. Frankly you lost my support the second you responded to the angst ridden criticism with a shovel fulls of angst in return. That does not a politician make, no matter what you see on TV or read in on the web.
I personally don't now anyone on the CSM, never met any of them, I doubt you have either and I also doubt you've seen any of the CSM interactions with CCP to know exactly how that relationship works. You make a lot of over generalisations that may or may not be warranted. Instead of falling into the standard boorish behavior that people expect on the forums you should have taken the high road and stated your platform. 'perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim'
Be patient and tough; some day this pain will be useful to you. |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
168
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 22:35:00 -
[62] - Quote
IGNATIUS HOOD wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:Lady Spank wrote:What a joke. I knew you would quickly resort to ranting, petulance, namecalling and generally exposing yourself as inept. Well done. And you are, predictably as ever, contributing nothing worth mentioning to any thread on this forum whilst over-estimating your own worth. Vastly so. 1/10--got me to respond--but lacks any other redeeming qualities. Come on, Skank, I know you can do better than this. Feeling a bit off today, are we? Next! Agreement or not I fail to see how resorting to shot taking as opposed to taking a graceful approach to the haters accomplishes anything. Question a persons actions, position on the issues, but throwing mud at them only makes you look childish and takes focus away from YOUR position and makes the thread about you as a PERSON. Now I don't always agree with Lady Spank becuase we play the game differently, but I do respect Lady Spank's opinion. Frankly you lost my support the second you responded to the angst ridden criticism with a shovel fulls of angst in return. That does not a politician make, no matter what you see on TV or read in on the web. I personally don't now anyone on the CSM, never met any of them, I doubt you have either and I also doubt you've seen any of the CSM interactions with CCP to know exactly how that relationship works. You make a lot of over generalisations that may or may not be warranted. Instead of falling into the standard boorish behavior that people expect on the forums you should have taken the high road and stated your platform.
I'd make a really ****** politician, I've found.
Hey, that's cool: Self-discovery is an important part of life.
I stated the basics of my possible platform, and asked for ideas to help flesh out same, and then got trolled by U SUCK! UR BAD! etc., etc., etc.--as expected, frankly.
Sorry, no political career for me, it looks like: My ability to suffer fools only decreases as I age, and enjoyment of eviscerating them only increases in direct proportion.
Spank has not contributed anything remotely constructive to this thread--if it had done so, (even if a bit boorishly--don't worry, I can deal with it, I are big hyoomin!) then I would have engaged with it, but it just spewed its' usual shite--"go biomass yourself, herpity-derpity11!!--that I have neither time nor inclination to bother with.
E: As for making it all about the person--Hey, it seemed to work for the Mittani--he's a skilled political operator, if nothing else. NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1297
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 00:26:00 -
[63] - Quote
Its not trolling when you are genuinely bad. Feel free to believe you have even a scrap of intelligence though if it makes you feel better. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
171
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 00:44:00 -
[64] - Quote
More detailed ideas (about bloody time, eh?):
I'm pretty big for boosting losec, as you may have gathered.
I think that boosting losec, will of necessity require introducing content exclusive to losec that combines both a PvE/industry and a PvP component (along with existing aspects of the latter, naturally--IOW, more people having incentive to come to losec = more potential urp-splosions for everybody!).
So:
Booster-manufacturing and smuggling thereof (this idea is not original to me, by the way--ref.: former CSM Chair Mynxee's blog-archives).
1) The components for manufacturing boosters are only available in 0.1-0.4 rated systems, available from exploration sites and rat-loot drops. (Not moons: Monopolisation by power-blocs is a bad thing, OK?)
2) Manufacturing of boosters can only be done in losec stations or at properly-configured POS' in losec. More potential for PvP with more potential targets.
3) Smuggler stargate network. Introduce a skill (or re-tool an existing one), call it...I dunno "Forgotten Star-Chart Research" that enables one to learn if/where in a constellation a smuggler stargate exists, then find the system--the gate itself must be probed out--and after each jump, you apply the skill again to help find, and probe out the next. Each higher level of the skill narrows down the location of the gates more, but it's never 100% accurate:
The skill only gives you knowledge of which constellations the network--that particular "lost back-road," if you like--starts and ends at, each gate along the way must be probed, and their locations in their systems changes--you jump, it could drop you in the middle of nowhere, or it could drop you right into the arms of a waiting NPC Customs fleet or player gate camp. In any case, slower travelling, and exploration are required, so risk to go with the potential ISKies from selling the boosters in hisec, and competition involved in getting there first. (Oh, and also re-seed that skill--whose name escapes me atm--that reduced the chance of Customs scanning you in hisec.)
Additional losec content:
NPC pirate-faction agents--at least the level 1 ones--moved to losec, leave the highest level ones in NPC-zerosec. Booster-components/BPCs would be among their LP-store rewards.
So, that should do for a beginning. Any thoughts? NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Marlona Sky
EntroPrelatial Vanguard EntroPraetorian Aegis
394
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 00:55:00 -
[65] - Quote
I would make a better candidate than you and that's saying something.
|
Ai Shun
184
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 00:55:00 -
[66] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Sorry, no political career for me, it looks like: My ability to suffer fools only decreases as I age, and enjoyment of eviscerating them only increases in direct proportion.
With reference to your statement of eviscerating them - claiming something does not make it true. Thus far you have come across as a petulant prawn, squirming on the end of a fork and flinging poop everywhere because people did not bow down and worship as you desired. That is my perception, at least and it seems to be similar to the reaction of others based off their responses here.
Whilst I fully expect a reply explaining how incredibly clever you are and how the rest of the world consists of ignorant fools and that you have once again shown another idiot that you are so much superior; it might be worthwhile to reconsider your approach. Especially if you have ideas that you wish to communicate that could fit very well in Features and Ideas. However, if you have no desire to communicate your ideas - perhaps you could refrain from spewing your discontented verbiage all over the forums, please?
It is starting to get very annoying having a useless bunch of crud boosted to the top of the forum list, when there are other, more enlightening discussions to partake in.
I'm already ******* mortified that I clicked "View Post" to read another trite diatribe from you.
|
Solstice Project
Cult of Personality
1302
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 01:09:00 -
[67] - Quote
Ignore Spank, she's way over her expiration date and has constant PMS. Also, i believe she's actually a piefke, so not worth it anyway.
That said ... who are you actually ? O_o (serious question) Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
171
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 01:28:00 -
[68] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:I would make a better candidate than you and that's saying something.
Don't let me--or anyone--stop you from running.
Yes, I'm dead-serious.
We would all like player-base representatives, rather than the current crop of special-interest lobbyists, I'm sure.
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
171
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 01:31:00 -
[69] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:Ignore Spank, she's way over her expiration date and has constant PMS. Also, i believe she's actually a piefke, so not worth it anyway.
That said ... who are you actually ? O_o (serious question)
As far as anyone who actually is anyone in this game...well, I'm no-one really.
Think of me like your friendly neighbourhood ideas-person/court-jester unafraid to speak the truth to the people that are "somebody."
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
171
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 01:34:00 -
[70] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:Sorry, no political career for me, it looks like: My ability to suffer fools only decreases as I age, and enjoyment of eviscerating them only increases in direct proportion. With reference to your statement of eviscerating them - claiming something does not make it true. Thus far you have come across as a petulant prawn, squirming on the end of a fork and flinging poop everywhere because people did not bow down and worship as you desired.
Knee-jerk mixing of metaphors should never be done for purposes of self-indulgent forum-sturbation unless one knows what one is doing.
Next!
E: You know, that you can mouse over a thread title in a forum, and/or just skim the OP, and that'll usually give you the gist of what's up.
No-one's forcing you to read the "crud" and "discontented verbiage," that's entirely your own choice, so stop complaining. NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
|
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1297
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 01:45:00 -
[71] - Quote
Hurr: my ideas for low sec...
Mynxees idea.
Some misinformed notion that carebear weekend warriors have a hard time raising sec. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
171
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 01:52:00 -
[72] - Quote
Spank, seriously, you're past your sell-by date, and I'm not reading your crap anymore so stop wasting your time. Plenty of other threads for you to troll/flame in your inimitably petulant manner, I'm sure.
1/10 on account of getting me to respond, though NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
5575
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 14:57:00 -
[73] - Quote
He shoots, he scores........
CCP Zulu..... Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |
Zixie Draco
Tactical Knightmare
47
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 15:09:00 -
[74] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Lady Spank wrote:You will not be getting my vote. Like I care?
you probably should.
Would you like a kitten? |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1327
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 15:25:00 -
[75] - Quote
Mag's wrote:He shoots, he scores........ Heh. Also, I have more vote pledges than this fool and I haven't even stated any intention to run (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Zixie Draco
Tactical Knightmare
47
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 15:37:00 -
[76] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:
As far as anyone who actually is anyone in this game...well, I'm no-one really.
Think of me like your friendly neighbourhood ideas-person/court-jester unafraid to speak the truth to the people that are "somebody."
you might want to add "doesn't afraid to drunk post"
Would you like a kitten? |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1327
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 15:41:00 -
[77] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Spank, seriously, you're past your sell-by date, and I'm not reading your crap anymore so stop wasting your time. Plenty of other threads for you to troll/flame in your inimitably petulant manner, I'm sure. 1/10 on account of getting me to respond, though Sorry to inform you that I don't troll; I simply call out incompetent people for the stupid things they say. There is a particular reason you get an overexposure to this treatment (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Oxylan
1 Caldaryjski Pluton Uderzeniowy
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 15:58:00 -
[78] - Quote
We dont need horde of VIP-s caled CSM members look at login scren and look at numbers of loged people, we need normal people who play EvE not horde of people who give to us tons new ideas etc, we have solid basic rules in EvE we dont need super changes. |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
177
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 05:50:00 -
[79] - Quote
Zixie Draco wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:
As far as anyone who actually is anyone in this game...well, I'm no-one really.
Think of me like your friendly neighbourhood ideas-person/court-jester unafraid to speak the truth to the people that are "somebody."
you might want to add "doesn't afraid to drunk post"
It was more sleep-deprivation actually. Now where did I put that next two-six of Smirnoff... Think of me as the Jester to your King Lear: Because annoying you is more fun than politicking with you. Because your predictable outrage makes you even more fun to play with. Because forum PvP = best PvP. Come to me, little puppet! |
|
CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
947
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 14:35:00 -
[80] - Quote
Not constructive.
Thread locked. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |