Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
164
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 01:10:00 -
[1] - Quote
Ok, so of late...
I've been thinking more and more seriously of standing for CSM 7.
I'm not even joking, either--well, not totally, anyway, except to say that misanthropy =/= masochism, but I'm digressing....
I would stand as a hi- and losec PvP-oriented candidate, with secondary emphasis on wormholes (and I don't mean pants-on-head stupidity like "make wormholes easier for fleets to invade11!!!11") as well as push for re-vamping of the NPE (idea being to emphasise the "never-100%-safe" nature of EVE, as well as implementing/expanding a tutorial about hisec aggression-baiting mechanics, and war-decs.), and re-inventing EVE's laughably archaic PvE component*
And then, quickly, I remember that if I were to be elected, then I'd have to deal with twats like the Mittani directly and frequently, and feel an overwhelming urge to run for the porcelain bus
But:
If I--or anyone else who is more of a masochist than I am--were to stand on an empire-space/wormhole-PvP platform, then what do you, the player-base, think said platform should emphasise?
*Because these, if done correctly, would contribute holistically to breeding a harder, more aware, more PvP-combat focussed breed of newbie, and this, imho, is a very, very good thing for EVE's future. Conversely, where we seem to be going at present is the diametric opposite of what EVE should be.
(Oh, and pushing for BLOPs buffs + allowing covert cynos/bridging-to in hisec would go without saying )
Discuss, and flame on! NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Nephilius
Grey Legionaires
302
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 01:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
I'd need more detailed ideas, but hey, if I was down with what you proposed, I'd probably vote for you. I'm going to hang out in F&I for awhile...less crazy there right now. |
seany1212
eXceed Inc. No Holes Barred
76
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 01:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:and I don't mean pants-on-head stupidity like "make wormholes easier for fleets to invade11!!!11
You stick with that view and you have my vote
I guess RnK are still butthurt over AHARM to bring up that ******** idea, it just sounds like they've given up on tactically thinking about thinks and gone "WAHHHH CCP FIX THIS FOR ME"
|
Berendas
Clandestine Vector THE SPACE P0LICE
180
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 01:23:00 -
[4] - Quote
Pretty much any candidate that would make a motivated push for improving low sec would get my vote in a heartbeat. |
Dirk Magnum
Sarz'na Khumatari Ushra'Khan
187
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 01:42:00 -
[5] - Quote
It's hard to navigate the well of ideas for improving lowsec without encountering pants-on-head stupidity, but if you can do it that'd be a huge motivator for me to vote. No I haven't been a lowsec resident in a long time but I'm a strong believer in the notion that if you improve one part of space, you improve all of them (or if you prefer, improve the game in general) with the residual effects. "For example, if you are thinking about selling a Republic Fleet Firetail as a regular Firetail, be sure that the market volume is high on regular Firetails and that there are plenty of buy/sell contracts for Republic Fleet Firetails. [...] The players most interested in Republic Fleet Firetails are going to be players flying regular ones."-á -- PB |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
165
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 05:56:00 -
[6] - Quote
I'm still fleshing out some ideas...The revamped, harder/more explicit-in-tone NPE is definitely staying on.
Because a clued-in EVE player who is worthy of this game is not born, s/he must be made.
E: This game as it bloody well should be, not the sinking-into-enforced-mediocrity that seems all too apparent at present. NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1277
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 06:41:00 -
[7] - Quote
You will not be getting my vote. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 06:47:00 -
[8] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:You will not be getting my vote.
Like I care?
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
353
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 06:56:00 -
[9] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Lady Spank wrote:You will not be getting my vote. Like I care? I think rants such as the nice little one you had in the Drake QQ thread cost you in respect points. Just sayin' |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 07:03:00 -
[10] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:Lady Spank wrote:You will not be getting my vote. Like I care? I think rants such as the nice little one you had in the Drake QQ thread cost you in respect points. Just sayin'
My little rant was a Hell of a lot better-reasoned than all the "Nerf it because I can't figure out how to fly/counter it!" mindless carebear sheep-bleating in that thread, if I may say so myself.
And if I were to stand, then I would do so because I feel that I could contribute to improving EVE by doing so, not gaining "respect-points" from people who don't actually matter to me on any level beyond the possibility of encountering them in a video-game.
The improvement of EVE and/or stemming the increasing enforced mediocrity in same is what matters to me. Whose tender sensibilities I may/may not stroke enough in the process do not.
But then, I never said I was a politician, did I
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
|
baltec1
485
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 07:07:00 -
[11] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:(Oh, and pushing for BLOPs buffs + allowing covert cynos/bridging-to in hisec would go without saying ) Discuss, and flame on!
Just lost my interest. |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 07:15:00 -
[12] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:(Oh, and pushing for BLOPs buffs + allowing covert cynos/bridging-to in hisec would go without saying ) Discuss, and flame on! Just lost my interest.
That's fine, your corp/alliance affiliation ensure that you never had mine.
Next! NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
353
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 07:19:00 -
[13] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote: My little rant was a Hell of a lot better-reasoned than all the "Nerf it because I can't figure out how to fly/counter it!" mindless carebear sheep-bleating in that thread, if I may say so myself.
I'd look for more in an elected representative than his or her claim that "I am smarter than a mouthbreathing idiot." Might be just personal taste, but I like to believe I have standards.
Lyrrashae wrote: And if I were to stand, then I would do so because I feel that I could contribute to improving EVE by doing so, not gaining "respect-points" from people who don't actually matter to me on any level beyond the possibility of encountering them in a video-game.
That's all well and good, but while I might not individually matter, having the endorsement of important people can count for a lot (this works in the reverse, too).
Lyrrashae wrote:The improvement of EVE and/or stemming the increasing enforced mediocrity in same is what matters to me. Whose tender sensibilities I may/may not stroke enough in the process do not. But then, I never said I was a politician, did I
You're not, and it shows. You're not even past the first page of your "tentatively running" announcement, and you're handing out "**** you"s to possible constituents.
I wouldn't recommend running. You'd be wasting your time. |
Ai Shun
183
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 07:31:00 -
[14] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:I wouldn't recommend running. You'd be wasting your time.
If it wasn't for people quoting her I wouldn't have known she was running. Lyrrashae? For CSM? No, thank you.
|
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 07:35:00 -
[15] - Quote
And why is that bad--not being a politician, I mean.
We've already got hacks like Meissa (or however it's spelt) and the Mittani, they seem to enjoy it, leave it to them, as they--or Mittens alone if Meissa doesn't run again, as I've heard s/he won't--will almost certainly get in again.
Hey, maybe I'm just being nai'ive, thinking ideals and conviction, and absolute commitment to/refusal to compromise same can amount to anything? My bad, sorry...
Standards--yes I have them too. That was part of the impetus behind my little rant. EVE is not supposed to be for mouth-breathing idiots, so where did all these that we're seeing come from? As for the CSM, the only people on it for whom I have any respect at all are D3, TwoStep, and maybe Trebor. The rest are a joke.
Besides, as you correctly note, this is quite tentative indeed. How/if this changes frankly depends on how much masochism I'll be able to cultivate between now and then.
Ugh...Come back to us, Mynxee, Lass, we hardly knew ye! NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 07:35:00 -
[16] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:Petrus Blackshell wrote:I wouldn't recommend running. You'd be wasting your time. If it wasn't for people quoting her I wouldn't have known she was running. Lyrrashae? For CSM? No, thank you.
Hi, I'm nobody! Who are you?
[/cynicism] NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
354
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 07:43:00 -
[17] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Hey, maybe I'm just being nai'ive, thinking ideals and conviction, and absolute commitment to/refusal to compromise same can amount to anything? My bad, sorry...
Unwillingness to compromise is antithetical to collaboration, which would be counterproductive to the CSM.
Unwillingness to asskiss your voters leaves you with no voters.
Unfortunately that's how politics works. I wish it wasn't, and that knowledge/ideas were more important than having a good smile, but that's not how things work. It's why I could never subject myself to running in an election, TBH.
|
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 07:49:00 -
[18] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:Hey, maybe I'm just being nai'ive, thinking ideals and conviction, and absolute commitment to/refusal to compromise same can amount to anything? My bad, sorry...
Unwillingness to compromise is antithetical to collaboration, which would be counterproductive to the CSM. Unwillingness to asskiss your voters leaves you with no voters. Unfortunately that's how politics works. I wish it wasn't, and that knowledge/ideas were more important than having a good smile, but that's not how things work. It's why I could never subject myself to running in an election, TBH.
Yep, you know it...
"EVE is real," indeed, eh? (I never thought it possible, but this is rapidly becoming one of my favouriite memes, by virtue of the unlimited cynical amusement I can get from applying it.)
Maybe not run as a politician, but be vocal a...ummm...needed ****-disturber, that speaks the truth to power*--IE Shakespeare's jester in King Lear?
The question is, how does EVE's jester get their voice heard by those who matter, in a timely fashion, and get heard above all the mindless know-nothing bleaters?
E:
* Despite his utterly hilarious delusions to the contrary, Mittani is not the heavy-hitting Eminence Grise he seems to think he is. The real power lies with CCP, and the CSM just...well, doesn't amount to that much in the long run. Which is a shame, because I genuinely hate to see exceptional, committed individuals like TwoStep, D3, former CSM Chairwoman Mynxee, and Trebor reduced to what is essentially a bread-and-circuses sideshow.
They are worthy of, and deserve, much better, imho. NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lord Mandelor
Consolidated Holdings War Ensemble.
120
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 07:54:00 -
[19] - Quote
Hey OP, you seem to really want to be known by who matters and not nobodies. Too bad each of their votes count as one. ConHo Daily: http://conhodaily.blogspot.com Stories ranging from midgets inside your Damage Control to drones becoming self-aware. |
Tore Vest
158
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 07:55:00 -
[20] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Ok, so of late... I've been thinking more and more seriously of standing for CSM 7. I'm not even joking, either--well, not totally, anyway, except to say that misanthropy =/= masochism, but I'm digressing.... I would stand as a hi- and losec PvP-oriented candidate, with secondary emphasis on wormholes (and I don't mean pants-on-head stupidity like "make wormholes easier for fleets to invade11!!!11") as well as push for re-vamping of the NPE (idea being to emphasise the "never-100%-safe" nature of EVE, as well as implementing/expanding a tutorial about hisec aggression-baiting mechanics, and war-decs.), and re-inventing EVE's laughably archaic PvE component* And then, quickly, I remember that if I were to be elected, then I'd have to deal with twats like the Mittani directly and frequently, and feel an overwhelming urge to run for the porcelain bus But: If I--or anyone else who is more of a masochist than I am--were to stand on an empire-space/wormhole-PvP platform, then what do you, the player-base, think said platform should emphasise? *Because these, if done correctly, would contribute holistically to breeding a harder, more aware, more PvP-combat focussed breed of newbie, and this, imho, is a very, very good thing for EVE's future. Conversely, where we seem to be going at present is the diametric opposite of what EVE should be. (Oh, and pushing for BLOPs buffs + allowing covert cynos/bridging-to in hisec would go without saying ) Discuss, and flame on!
no
Highsec carebear... and proud of it |
|
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
355
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 07:57:00 -
[21] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:The question is, how does EVE's jester get their voice heard by those who matter, in a timely fashion, and get heard above all the mindless know-nothing bleaters?
Regular people do that by posting well-reasoned, non-inflammatory posts in the proper location, while keeping to civil conversation and not reducing to petty namecalling, or by talking more privately to an elected representative.
If you want to play the role of "court jester", though, you are on the right path indeed, but don't expect to be taken seriously. Why? Here are a few of synonyms of "jester":
- Fool
- Clown
- Buffoon
- On the Eve forums... Troll
edit for clarity of point |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:00:00 -
[22] - Quote
Tore Vest wrote: no
No, to what?
No Cov-Cynos in hisec?
No to revamped NPE?
No, I shouldn't run (already suspected this, Petrus' well-reasoned posts just kinda helped cement it into place...and once, again, I'm not so masochistic as to relish dealing with Mittens on a constant basis)?
No, what, exactly, O Paragon of Ultra-1337 Endgame PvP? NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Tore Vest
159
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:02:00 -
[23] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Tore Vest wrote: no No, to what? No Cov-Cynos in hisec? No to revamped NPE? No, I shouldn't run (already suspected this, Petrus' well-reasoned posts just kinda helped cement it into place...and once, again, I'm not so masochistic as to relish dealing with Mittens on a constant basis )? No, what, exactly, O Paragon of Ultra-1337 Endgame PvP?
No to you
Highsec carebear... and proud of it |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:04:00 -
[24] - Quote
Tore Vest wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:Tore Vest wrote: no No, to what? No Cov-Cynos in hisec? No to revamped NPE? No, I shouldn't run (already suspected this, Petrus' well-reasoned posts just kinda helped cement it into place...and once, again, I'm not so masochistic as to relish dealing with Mittens on a constant basis )? No, what, exactly, O Paragon of Ultra-1337 Endgame PvP? No to you
NO, U!
Lawlz....
E: Humour me, it's 2.00am here.... NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
255
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:06:00 -
[25] - Quote
posting in typical highsec CSM candidate thread
Nicolo 2012 - Death To All NPC Corps |
Lord Mandelor
Consolidated Holdings War Ensemble.
121
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:06:00 -
[26] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Tore Vest wrote: no No, to what? No to you
[ ] told [ ] not told [X] No Country For Told Men ConHo Daily: http://conhodaily.blogspot.com Stories ranging from midgets inside your Damage Control to drones becoming self-aware. |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1279
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:11:00 -
[27] - Quote
What a joke. I knew you would quickly resort to ranting, petulance, namecalling and generally exposing yourself as inept. Well done. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:12:00 -
[28] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:posting in typical highsec CSM candidate thread
Nicolo 2012 - Death To All NPC Corps
That's hi + losec + wormhole PvP "generalist," actually.
And who are you, again? NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
255
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:14:00 -
[29] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:What a joke. I knew you would quickly resort to ranting, petulance, namecalling and generally exposing yourself as inept. Well done.
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:posting in typical highsec CSM candidate thread |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:16:00 -
[30] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:What a joke. I knew you would quickly resort to ranting, petulance, namecalling and generally exposing yourself as inept. Well done.
And you are, predictably as ever, contributing nothing worth mentioning to any thread on this forum whilst over-estimating your own worth. Vastly so.
1/10--got me to respond--but lacks any other redeeming qualities. Come on, Skank, I know you can do better than this. Feeling a bit off today, are we?
Next!
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
|
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
5567
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:20:00 -
[31] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Lady Spank wrote:What a joke. I knew you would quickly resort to ranting, petulance, namecalling and generally exposing yourself as inept. Well done. Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:posting in typical highsec CSM candidate thread
CCP Zulu..... Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:22:00 -
[32] - Quote
Don't bother Mags, you've been blocked for a while now. NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
baltec1
487
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:26:00 -
[33] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Lady Spank wrote:What a joke. I knew you would quickly resort to ranting, petulance, namecalling and generally exposing yourself as inept. Well done. And you are, predictably as ever, contributing nothing worth mentioning to any thread on this forum whilst over-estimating your own worth. Vastly so. 1/10--got me to respond--but lacks any other redeeming qualities. Come on, Skank, I know you can do better than this. Feeling a bit off today, are we? Next!
This from a person who cant even run an election campain without ranting at everyone in their own election thread. |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:30:00 -
[34] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:Lady Spank wrote:What a joke. I knew you would quickly resort to ranting, petulance, namecalling and generally exposing yourself as inept. Well done. And you are, predictably as ever, contributing nothing worth mentioning to any thread on this forum whilst over-estimating your own worth. Vastly so. 1/10--got me to respond--but lacks any other redeeming qualities. Come on, Skank, I know you can do better than this. Feeling a bit off today, are we? Next! This from a person who cant even run an election campain without ranting at everyone in their own elsection thread.
Read what I wrote:
I never said that I would run, just that I'd been thinking about doing so. But likely won't.
Stating a truth to a generic forum troll using words of more than 1 syllable is now "ranting," is it?
Well.
Aaaaall-righty, then.
E: Campaign-season hasn't started just yet, by the way. NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
5567
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:31:00 -
[35] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Don't bother, Mags, you've been blocked for a while now. Blocking me and ignoring me, but still finding the time to talk. I feel the love.
Edit: I bet you secretly take a look at what I'm posting..... Hi \o
CCP Zulu..... Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |
baltec1
487
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:37:00 -
[36] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:
Read what I wrote:
I never said that I would run, just that I'd been thinking about doing so. But likely won't.
Stating a truth to a generic forum troll using words of more than 1 syllable is now "ranting," is it?
Well.
Aaaaall-righty, then.
E: Campaign-season hasn't started just yet, by the way.
Well I wouldn't put much more thought into the subject because you clearly do not have what the roll needs |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1279
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:47:00 -
[37] - Quote
Instead of ~thinking~ about running for CSM, which you won't get into, you should be compelled to biomass. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 08:49:00 -
[38] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:
Read what I wrote:
I never said that I would run, just that I'd been thinking about doing so. But likely won't.
Stating a truth to a generic forum troll using words of more than 1 syllable is now "ranting," is it?
Well.
Aaaaall-righty, then.
E: Campaign-season hasn't started just yet, by the way.
Well I wouldn't put much more thought into the subject because you clearly do not have what the roll needs
Roll? Dice-roll? Barrel-roll? Immelmann-turn plus half-roll on top? Sweet-roll? What "roll" is that, mate?
But seriously, now:
If kissing ass to people I normally can't stand and want nothing to do with is needed for the role, then yes, probably, you're quite right.
I still want ideas though, as stated in my OP:
How to revamp lo-sec, bring back the genuine risk to hisec whilst preparing beginners to face it properly, and general empire-space PvP.
Plus ideally, ways to ensure Mittani and his ilk keep their grubby paws out of worm-space, just because someone else's end-game is different from his/theirs.
Being court-Jester to the 1337-sters' clueless, befuddled, and half-insane Lear is much more fun, besides
(And I can visit Iceland on my own time, as well. For reasons that--shock! Horror!--have nothing at all to do with EVE, imagine that!) NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 09:04:00 -
[39] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Instead of ~thinking~ about running for CSM, which you won't get into, you should be compelled to biomass.
My God, you are such a perfect little Internet-cliche, aren't you.
Aaaaaand, blocked.
Generic little prat.
(Can I have my bandwidth back noaw, plx, kthxbai.)
I feel compelled to actually go play EVE, instead of moulding myself into anything the likes of you can approve of, and probably bending my principles and convictions into knots in the process, all for a bunch of meta-gaming bullshit about a pixel-spaceship game that may well not be around in another 3 years.
Sigh...Sanity is once again restored:
It honours me to note that I would make a reeeeeeeally bad politician.
I still want to hear ideas, as detailed above, though.
Make them reasonable, please, pants-on-head stupidity like wormhole mass stabilisers will be summarily eviscerated as they deserve.
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
5568
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 09:07:00 -
[40] - Quote
He'll still be reading your posts Spank, he can't help himself.
CCP Zulu..... Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |
|
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1280
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 09:15:00 -
[41] - Quote
Mag's wrote:He'll still be reading your posts Spank, he can't help himself. I am devastated that I will be missing out on its laughable feedback. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
5568
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 09:18:00 -
[42] - Quote
Lady Spank wrote:Mag's wrote:He'll still be reading your posts Spank, he can't help himself. I am devastated that I will be missing out on its laughable feedback. Yea but the beauty of it is that even though he's reading our stuff, he can't reply without creating even more laughable posts.
CCP Zulu..... Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 09:21:00 -
[43] - Quote
seany1212 wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:and I don't mean pants-on-head stupidity like "make wormholes easier for fleets to invade11!!!11 You stick with that view and you have my vote I guess RnK are still butthurt over AHARM to bring up that ******** idea, it just sounds like they've given up on tactically thinking about thinks and gone "WAHHHH CCP FIX THIS FOR ME"
I lol'ed at that blog-post of Meissa's: That's exactly what it is.
It's like they're not even trying to hide it anymore, isn't it. But I've heard s/he/it won't run again, so maybe it doesn't matter in the long run--providing TwoStep does run, and gets elected full member this time.
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Hemmo Paskiainen
Silver Snake Enterprise Against ALL Authorities
294
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 09:23:00 -
[44] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:(Oh, and pushing for BLOPs buffs + allowing covert cynos/bridging-to in hisec would go without saying )
Make this one of your key points when you run as kandidate and i make sure you get minimum 40 votes from me and friends (exluding alts).
CCP FIX BLACK OPS FFS |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 09:24:00 -
[45] - Quote
Hemmo Paskiainen wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:(Oh, and pushing for BLOPs buffs + allowing covert cynos/bridging-to in hisec would go without saying ) Make this one of your key points when you run as kandidate and i make sure you get minimum 40 votes from me and friends (exluding alts).
Why thank you, sir :)
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
baltec1
487
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 09:29:00 -
[46] - Quote
Hemmo Paskiainen wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:(Oh, and pushing for BLOPs buffs + allowing covert cynos/bridging-to in hisec would go without saying ) Make this one of your key points when you run as kandidate and i make sure you get minimum 40 votes from me and friends (exluding alts).
Would they be all of the russians who have lost frieghters in the past few weeks? |
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
661
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 09:32:00 -
[47] - Quote
I always vote in these CSM things.
I pick my candidates by spitting a wad of gum at the monitor and voting for who it sticks to.
If you run and you are under my gum, you have my vote.
Mr Epeen Me too!-á I ate one sour, too! |
Ssakaa
Murientor Tribe
6
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 09:39:00 -
[48] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:
It honours me to note that I would make a reeeeeeeally bad politician.
There is some hope, because:
Quote:I still want to hear ideas, as detailed above, though.
A good politician will listen first and speak last.
|
Ai Shun
183
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 10:33:00 -
[49] - Quote
This should go in every thread a pretend CSM candidate raises. |
Orion GUardian
98
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 10:35:00 -
[50] - Quote
Who were you again? |
|
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
166
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 10:41:00 -
[51] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:This should go in every thread a pretend CSM candidate raises.
And, another useless waste of bandwidth....
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Ciar Meara
Virtus Vindice
506
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 10:42:00 -
[52] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:[ My little rant was a Hell of a lot better-reasoned than all the "Nerf it because I can't figure out how to fly/counter it!" mindless carebear sheep-bleating in that thread, if I may say so myself. And if I were to stand, then I would do so because I feel that I could contribute to improving EVE by doing so, not gaining "respect-points" from people who don't actually matter to me on any level beyond the possibility of encountering them in a video-game. The improvement of EVE and/or stemming the increasing enforced mediocrity in same is what matters to me. Whose tender sensibilities I may/may not stroke enough in the process do not. But then, I never said I was a politician, did I
I think you and The Mittani would get on just fine. - [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow] |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
167
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 10:48:00 -
[53] - Quote
Ciar Meara wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:My little rant was a Hell of a lot better-reasoned than all the "Nerf it because I can't figure out how to fly/counter it!" mindless carebear sheep-bleating in that thread, if I may say so myself. And if I were to stand, then I would do so because I feel that I could contribute to improving EVE by doing so, not gaining "respect-points" from people who don't actually matter to me on any level beyond the possibility of encountering them in a video-game. The improvement of EVE and/or stemming the increasing enforced mediocrity in same is what matters to me. Whose tender sensibilities I may/may not stroke enough in the process do not. But then, I never said I was a politician, did I I think you and The Mittani would get on just fine.
I think you're quite wrong, there.
I haven't words foul enough to encompass what I think of the Mittanis of this world. NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Vyl Vit
Cambio Enterprises
267
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 11:58:00 -
[54] - Quote
A lone voice crying in the wilderness is heard only by the rattlesnakes, and sech like. A lone CSM "pushing" for customizing the game to suit a lone CSM's vision of...the perfect game? (I guess) ... is so unrealistic, and grounded in goo the very idea of you being elected to anything is (to put it kindly) remote. The fact you can't detect that in your grand scheme if you stand back and look at it makes it doubly so. Anyone with any sense has already left town. |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
167
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 12:40:00 -
[55] - Quote
Vyl Vit wrote:A lone voice crying in the wilderness is heard only by the rattlesnakes, and sech like. A lone CSM "pushing" for customizing the game to suit a lone CSM's vision of...the perfect game? (I guess) ... is so unrealistic, and grounded in goo the very idea of you being elected to anything is (to put it kindly) remote. The fact you can't detect that in your grand scheme if you stand back and look at it makes it doubly so.
What makes you think I couldn't detect it?
That's another reason I probably won't run, aside from having to make nice to up-themselves babies like certain trolls I've got blocked here.
And now, I shall indulge in some ironic intellectual-wanking, because it's really late, and I have no cigarettes...
As usual, you, like an increasingly (and distressingly) large proportion of this once-perceptive/once-great community, now so comically intellectually-incarcerated, know nothing.
You just assume that cutting me down in a way that's so obviously informed by your inadequacies is good because anyone not automatically conditioned to the level of mediocrity that you're comfortable with...Well, dealing with that, as it actually is, that's just too much ::effort:: innit.
We can't have that, bland generic sameness on all levels is all we want to deal with anymore! And we're entitled to have CCP give that to us--despite that being anathaema to everything EVE ever was, but we'll just conveniently ignore that, for today is a new day, after all.
For ****'s sake...
My "grand vision" is simply helping bring us back to, and then evolving from, what makes EVE great. In ways that I think will benefit most everyone, from the cariest of bears, to the hardest of the "hardcore (whatever that is)." What EVE could have been, what it may have been after Apocrypha, but before ::18 months:: (And Gods, if we only knew what awaited at the end of those ::18 months:: There would not be an EVE anymore, if we had, I strongly suspect.)
I'll ask again:
What is so wrong with a singular vision? Especially if a few people might actually agree with it?
Why must we automatically subsume ourselves to a more broadly-palatable level of mediocrity, simply because that's what everyone else does?
Everything about EVE, that makes it EVE is based on a singular, grand vision.
Because EVE could be "the perfect game," and in a way that I think a lot of us will agree with, and the prospect of helping contribute to that in however small a way is why I thought about standing for election, but you know what?
You can have your safe, easy, insipid, not-too-mentally-trying dullness, if that's truly what you want. And it does very much seem that way.
It would seem, that the EVE that once was, is soon to become just another ****** MMO.
Hey, the people have spoken, indeed! (And they will, in the next year or two at the most, see just how clearly they've been heard--At this rate I give EVE as we know it another 3-4 years, maximum.)
Good God, what's happened to EVE?
Right then, trolls and guardians of...easily-digestible...forum-fu: Have at it! NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1290
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 13:24:00 -
[56] - Quote
Mag's wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Mag's wrote:He'll still be reading your posts Spank, he can't help himself. I am devastated that I will be missing out on its laughable feedback. Yea but the beauty of it is that even though he's reading our stuff, he can't reply without creating even more laughable posts. Crushed Ambitions indeed, so bad. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Skippermonkey
Tactical Knightmare
339
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 13:27:00 -
[57] - Quote
Vote for me instead
I'm going to stand as 'that guy on the CSM that doesnt live in NULSEC'
its going to be great
VOTE SKIPPERMONKEY FOR CSM - TERRIBAD AT EVE BUT GREAT AT FORUMS |
Tian Nu
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
35
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 13:30:00 -
[58] - Quote
damn they triked me in to reading all pages. Father O'Malley about Darius III begging for whelp: GÇ£Hows that working out for ya ? I make it 02:21 and all I see is you begging Riverini to get numbers and trying to recruit from the incursion public channel.GÇ¥ |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
168
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 21:57:00 -
[59] - Quote
Skippermonkey wrote:Vote for me instead
I'm going to stand as 'that guy on the CSM that doesnt live in NULSEC'
its going to be great
Yeah, you know...that guy
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
168
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 22:02:00 -
[60] - Quote
Feel free to waste your time and bandwidth all you like, Skank--pardon: Spank--because I won't be seeing your knee-jerk arrogant childish tripe anymore, nor yet after this, responding to same.
Prat. NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
|
IGNATIUS HOOD
Zephyr Corp
277
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 22:24:00 -
[61] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Lady Spank wrote:What a joke. I knew you would quickly resort to ranting, petulance, namecalling and generally exposing yourself as inept. Well done. And you are, predictably as ever, contributing nothing worth mentioning to any thread on this forum whilst over-estimating your own worth. Vastly so. 1/10--got me to respond--but lacks any other redeeming qualities. Come on, Skank, I know you can do better than this. Feeling a bit off today, are we? Next!
Agreement or not I fail to see how resorting to shot taking as opposed to taking a graceful approach to the haters accomplishes anything. Question a persons actions, position on the issues, but throwing mud at them only makes you look childish and takes focus away from YOUR position and makes the thread about you as a PERSON. Now I don't always agree with Lady Spank becuase we play the game differently, but I do respect Lady Spank's opinion. Frankly you lost my support the second you responded to the angst ridden criticism with a shovel fulls of angst in return. That does not a politician make, no matter what you see on TV or read in on the web.
I personally don't now anyone on the CSM, never met any of them, I doubt you have either and I also doubt you've seen any of the CSM interactions with CCP to know exactly how that relationship works. You make a lot of over generalisations that may or may not be warranted. Instead of falling into the standard boorish behavior that people expect on the forums you should have taken the high road and stated your platform. 'perfer et obdura; dolor hic tibi proderit olim'
Be patient and tough; some day this pain will be useful to you. |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
168
|
Posted - 2012.01.26 22:35:00 -
[62] - Quote
IGNATIUS HOOD wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:Lady Spank wrote:What a joke. I knew you would quickly resort to ranting, petulance, namecalling and generally exposing yourself as inept. Well done. And you are, predictably as ever, contributing nothing worth mentioning to any thread on this forum whilst over-estimating your own worth. Vastly so. 1/10--got me to respond--but lacks any other redeeming qualities. Come on, Skank, I know you can do better than this. Feeling a bit off today, are we? Next! Agreement or not I fail to see how resorting to shot taking as opposed to taking a graceful approach to the haters accomplishes anything. Question a persons actions, position on the issues, but throwing mud at them only makes you look childish and takes focus away from YOUR position and makes the thread about you as a PERSON. Now I don't always agree with Lady Spank becuase we play the game differently, but I do respect Lady Spank's opinion. Frankly you lost my support the second you responded to the angst ridden criticism with a shovel fulls of angst in return. That does not a politician make, no matter what you see on TV or read in on the web. I personally don't now anyone on the CSM, never met any of them, I doubt you have either and I also doubt you've seen any of the CSM interactions with CCP to know exactly how that relationship works. You make a lot of over generalisations that may or may not be warranted. Instead of falling into the standard boorish behavior that people expect on the forums you should have taken the high road and stated your platform.
I'd make a really ****** politician, I've found.
Hey, that's cool: Self-discovery is an important part of life.
I stated the basics of my possible platform, and asked for ideas to help flesh out same, and then got trolled by U SUCK! UR BAD! etc., etc., etc.--as expected, frankly.
Sorry, no political career for me, it looks like: My ability to suffer fools only decreases as I age, and enjoyment of eviscerating them only increases in direct proportion.
Spank has not contributed anything remotely constructive to this thread--if it had done so, (even if a bit boorishly--don't worry, I can deal with it, I are big hyoomin!) then I would have engaged with it, but it just spewed its' usual shite--"go biomass yourself, herpity-derpity11!!--that I have neither time nor inclination to bother with.
E: As for making it all about the person--Hey, it seemed to work for the Mittani--he's a skilled political operator, if nothing else. NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1297
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 00:26:00 -
[63] - Quote
Its not trolling when you are genuinely bad. Feel free to believe you have even a scrap of intelligence though if it makes you feel better. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
171
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 00:44:00 -
[64] - Quote
More detailed ideas (about bloody time, eh?):
I'm pretty big for boosting losec, as you may have gathered.
I think that boosting losec, will of necessity require introducing content exclusive to losec that combines both a PvE/industry and a PvP component (along with existing aspects of the latter, naturally--IOW, more people having incentive to come to losec = more potential urp-splosions for everybody!).
So:
Booster-manufacturing and smuggling thereof (this idea is not original to me, by the way--ref.: former CSM Chair Mynxee's blog-archives).
1) The components for manufacturing boosters are only available in 0.1-0.4 rated systems, available from exploration sites and rat-loot drops. (Not moons: Monopolisation by power-blocs is a bad thing, OK?)
2) Manufacturing of boosters can only be done in losec stations or at properly-configured POS' in losec. More potential for PvP with more potential targets.
3) Smuggler stargate network. Introduce a skill (or re-tool an existing one), call it...I dunno "Forgotten Star-Chart Research" that enables one to learn if/where in a constellation a smuggler stargate exists, then find the system--the gate itself must be probed out--and after each jump, you apply the skill again to help find, and probe out the next. Each higher level of the skill narrows down the location of the gates more, but it's never 100% accurate:
The skill only gives you knowledge of which constellations the network--that particular "lost back-road," if you like--starts and ends at, each gate along the way must be probed, and their locations in their systems changes--you jump, it could drop you in the middle of nowhere, or it could drop you right into the arms of a waiting NPC Customs fleet or player gate camp. In any case, slower travelling, and exploration are required, so risk to go with the potential ISKies from selling the boosters in hisec, and competition involved in getting there first. (Oh, and also re-seed that skill--whose name escapes me atm--that reduced the chance of Customs scanning you in hisec.)
Additional losec content:
NPC pirate-faction agents--at least the level 1 ones--moved to losec, leave the highest level ones in NPC-zerosec. Booster-components/BPCs would be among their LP-store rewards.
So, that should do for a beginning. Any thoughts? NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Marlona Sky
EntroPrelatial Vanguard EntroPraetorian Aegis
394
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 00:55:00 -
[65] - Quote
I would make a better candidate than you and that's saying something.
|
Ai Shun
184
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 00:55:00 -
[66] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Sorry, no political career for me, it looks like: My ability to suffer fools only decreases as I age, and enjoyment of eviscerating them only increases in direct proportion.
With reference to your statement of eviscerating them - claiming something does not make it true. Thus far you have come across as a petulant prawn, squirming on the end of a fork and flinging poop everywhere because people did not bow down and worship as you desired. That is my perception, at least and it seems to be similar to the reaction of others based off their responses here.
Whilst I fully expect a reply explaining how incredibly clever you are and how the rest of the world consists of ignorant fools and that you have once again shown another idiot that you are so much superior; it might be worthwhile to reconsider your approach. Especially if you have ideas that you wish to communicate that could fit very well in Features and Ideas. However, if you have no desire to communicate your ideas - perhaps you could refrain from spewing your discontented verbiage all over the forums, please?
It is starting to get very annoying having a useless bunch of crud boosted to the top of the forum list, when there are other, more enlightening discussions to partake in.
I'm already ******* mortified that I clicked "View Post" to read another trite diatribe from you.
|
Solstice Project
Cult of Personality
1302
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 01:09:00 -
[67] - Quote
Ignore Spank, she's way over her expiration date and has constant PMS. Also, i believe she's actually a piefke, so not worth it anyway.
That said ... who are you actually ? O_o (serious question) Inappropriate signature removed. Spitfire |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
171
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 01:28:00 -
[68] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:I would make a better candidate than you and that's saying something.
Don't let me--or anyone--stop you from running.
Yes, I'm dead-serious.
We would all like player-base representatives, rather than the current crop of special-interest lobbyists, I'm sure.
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
171
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 01:31:00 -
[69] - Quote
Solstice Project wrote:Ignore Spank, she's way over her expiration date and has constant PMS. Also, i believe she's actually a piefke, so not worth it anyway.
That said ... who are you actually ? O_o (serious question)
As far as anyone who actually is anyone in this game...well, I'm no-one really.
Think of me like your friendly neighbourhood ideas-person/court-jester unafraid to speak the truth to the people that are "somebody."
NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
171
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 01:34:00 -
[70] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:Sorry, no political career for me, it looks like: My ability to suffer fools only decreases as I age, and enjoyment of eviscerating them only increases in direct proportion. With reference to your statement of eviscerating them - claiming something does not make it true. Thus far you have come across as a petulant prawn, squirming on the end of a fork and flinging poop everywhere because people did not bow down and worship as you desired.
Knee-jerk mixing of metaphors should never be done for purposes of self-indulgent forum-sturbation unless one knows what one is doing.
Next!
E: You know, that you can mouse over a thread title in a forum, and/or just skim the OP, and that'll usually give you the gist of what's up.
No-one's forcing you to read the "crud" and "discontented verbiage," that's entirely your own choice, so stop complaining. NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
|
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1297
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 01:45:00 -
[71] - Quote
Hurr: my ideas for low sec...
Mynxees idea.
Some misinformed notion that carebear weekend warriors have a hard time raising sec. (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
171
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 01:52:00 -
[72] - Quote
Spank, seriously, you're past your sell-by date, and I'm not reading your crap anymore so stop wasting your time. Plenty of other threads for you to troll/flame in your inimitably petulant manner, I'm sure.
1/10 on account of getting me to respond, though NO to Drake and Tier 2 Battlecruiser nerfs. NO to Alliances in Faction Warfare NO to "wormhole mass-stabilisers." **** NO to the cancers that are sov-nullsec Alliances metastasising throughout EVE! |
Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
5575
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 14:57:00 -
[73] - Quote
He shoots, he scores........
CCP Zulu..... Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |
Zixie Draco
Tactical Knightmare
47
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 15:09:00 -
[74] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Lady Spank wrote:You will not be getting my vote. Like I care?
you probably should.
Would you like a kitten? |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1327
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 15:25:00 -
[75] - Quote
Mag's wrote:He shoots, he scores........ Heh. Also, I have more vote pledges than this fool and I haven't even stated any intention to run (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Zixie Draco
Tactical Knightmare
47
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 15:37:00 -
[76] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:
As far as anyone who actually is anyone in this game...well, I'm no-one really.
Think of me like your friendly neighbourhood ideas-person/court-jester unafraid to speak the truth to the people that are "somebody."
you might want to add "doesn't afraid to drunk post"
Would you like a kitten? |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere HYDRA RELOADED
1327
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 15:41:00 -
[77] - Quote
Lyrrashae wrote:Spank, seriously, you're past your sell-by date, and I'm not reading your crap anymore so stop wasting your time. Plenty of other threads for you to troll/flame in your inimitably petulant manner, I'm sure. 1/10 on account of getting me to respond, though Sorry to inform you that I don't troll; I simply call out incompetent people for the stupid things they say. There is a particular reason you get an overexposure to this treatment (a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Oxylan
1 Caldaryjski Pluton Uderzeniowy
2
|
Posted - 2012.01.27 15:58:00 -
[78] - Quote
We dont need horde of VIP-s caled CSM members look at login scren and look at numbers of loged people, we need normal people who play EvE not horde of people who give to us tons new ideas etc, we have solid basic rules in EvE we dont need super changes. |
Lyrrashae
Crushed Ambitions Reckless Ambition
177
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 05:50:00 -
[79] - Quote
Zixie Draco wrote:Lyrrashae wrote:
As far as anyone who actually is anyone in this game...well, I'm no-one really.
Think of me like your friendly neighbourhood ideas-person/court-jester unafraid to speak the truth to the people that are "somebody."
you might want to add "doesn't afraid to drunk post"
It was more sleep-deprivation actually. Now where did I put that next two-six of Smirnoff... Think of me as the Jester to your King Lear: Because annoying you is more fun than politicking with you. Because your predictable outrage makes you even more fun to play with. Because forum PvP = best PvP. Come to me, little puppet! |
|
CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
947
|
Posted - 2012.01.28 14:35:00 -
[80] - Quote
Not constructive.
Thread locked. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |