Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8255
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 17:03:00 -
[61] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Tarsus Zateki wrote:Yes, Goonswarm is interested in destroying the game we enjoy playing . Its part of a secret plot within goonswarm to get goons to quit EVE and play STO instead so that Dental can be rebuilt. Sadly Dental has moved on to SWTOR. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM I am the Pubbie Whisperer |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local Break-A-Wish Foundation
282
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 17:05:00 -
[62] - Quote
Dental still exists in STO. There's just nobody running it. |
Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8255
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 17:07:00 -
[63] - Quote
Yeah, I still have a character in it (I think). But the world's not the same when you can't shoot pink lasers. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM I am the Pubbie Whisperer |
Bunnehrawr Rawr
Questionable Morality
1
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 17:11:00 -
[64] - Quote
If you're honestly looking for some input :D ...
Sort out the current war mechanics *dec shield and such* <- this is baddykins
Agression for remote reps.. i dont mean "zomg he can shoot the rr" we currently have.. i mean no docking for the 60 seconds like everyone else who agresses with guns/ecm/angry stares.
I dont honestly get why CCP makes RR half agressed and still be able to dock instantly / jump the gate.
I know this is a very large issue for anyone who wants to have some sort of legitimate pvp experiance in highsec. I've abused the hell out of this system myself for years.. im very sure its a broken feature :D anyone who claims otherwise is still exploiting it to "win" their wardecs. Most "good" highsec pvp corps basically just bring 5 shiny t3/pirate bs's with a metric ton of neutral rr's to win every fight.. atleast give the average lemming a chance to shoot and KILL their rr's not just force them to dock / undock instantly..
Nerf vanguards/ rebalance that ****.. harder incursions moar risk <- kinda think they mentioned this in the csm notes anyway :D
Highsec cov cynos = win . New player made content is good content . (could also help combat those nasty nuet rr's) "oh look.. 3 guardians 70km off.." cyno up.. income the 5 pilgrims ontop of their face. = happy days .
Everything i just said will probably never happen though so :D yay for ccp
|
Borun Tal
Cubicle Warriors from 'merica
40
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 00:54:00 -
[65] - Quote
If you can get the Quafe Girls back, I'll vote for ya. Until then, I won't vote for a Goonie, even a forum-troll Goonie like you. |
Demonfuge Malevolent
Energy Core 2 V.I.R.A.L.
20
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 11:32:00 -
[66] - Quote
Goonwaffe feigning interest in high-sec? Pull the other one, it's got bells on it ;) |
Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8429
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 20:42:00 -
[67] - Quote
Zixie Draco wrote:Lyris Nairn wrote:Zixie Draco wrote:
There's a special tinfoil hat for a goon that wants to know what the needs of the high sec constituency are. That's why I'm voting for Skippermonkey...he already knows the woes and actually cares.
That's just fine. I don't think ill of you at all for having another candidate in mind. But since the possibility exists that I will be elected to the CSM over your objection, and thereby put into a position of representing you whether you like it or not, is it not in your better interest to be sure that I understand the issues that you personally find important? Engaging me in discussion here in this thread is not an affirmation to vote for me, and I don't see how you have anything to lose by voicing your specific suggestions for High Sec. I feel threatened You know me to be a good person with a cute kitten, don't be scared. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM Vote Lyris Nairn for CSM. |
Ahrieman
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
26
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 20:50:00 -
[68] - Quote
This thread is evidence that CCP hates low sec.
The thread like this for low sec was locked on page 2, but the high sec thread is still going. This IS the C&P forum for **** sake! I scam on my main |
Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8429
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:00:00 -
[69] - Quote
My thread about my kitten never got locked. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM Vote Lyris Nairn for CSM. |
Ahrieman
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
26
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:04:00 -
[70] - Quote
Lyris Nairn wrote:My thread about my kitten never got locked.
Well that's cus your kitten was on topic for the C&P forums. Low Sec discussions (and how to improve low sec) have no place in the C&P forums.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_VAx3v2_5J_o/TFSv3l-uxRI/AAAAAAAAAJ4/AbJUN4JnE8w/s1600/tpsreports.jpg I scam on my main |
|
Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8429
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:07:00 -
[71] - Quote
Vote for Lyris, Kitten get. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM Vote Lyris Nairn for CSM. |
Ahrieman
Heretic Army Heretic Nation
26
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:09:00 -
[72] - Quote
You make a valid argument. You can have my vote if you can get the low sec thread unlocked... I scam on my main |
Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8430
|
Posted - 2012.01.31 21:14:00 -
[73] - Quote
Ahrieman wrote:You make a valid argument. You can have my vote if you can get the low sec thread unlocked... I will file a petition when I get home. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM Vote Lyris Nairn for CSM. |
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
34
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 05:03:00 -
[74] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:I for one have always felt very concerned about the lack of warp disruption bubbles on hi sec stargates. In my experience, the mark of a healthy and active system is a large population of mobile warp disruptors basking in the warmth of a nearby stargate. These 'bubbles', as they are affectionately called by locals, enjoy a symbiotic relationship with the capsuleer populations of both wh's and nullsec, but have been hunted to extinction in high security space.
What steps would you take to rectify this ecological disaster and restore this proud species to its rightful home? CONCORD hunted them to extinction in their lands. We have to protect the bubbles by allowing them to breed in nullsec.
However, the particles that come in from lowsec through the gates mean that those are the best places to allow them to grow. If you jump in through one of those, your killmail(s) will help the bubbles to grow and proliferate.
Anchoring V is the best V as it lets you breed the (relatively) rare and powerful Large Mobile Warp Distuptor.
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Its part of a secret plot within goonswarm to get goons to quit EVE and play STO instead so that Dental can be rebuilt. Wait, STO, but it doesn't have spaceships and tears (I hear you get in trouble for mining tears). |
Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
8533
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 20:25:00 -
[75] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote: Wait, STO, but it doesn't have spaceships and tears (I hear you get in trouble for mining tears).
From what I understand SWTOR is even worse. Sky Captain of Your Heart; Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com; Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM Vote Lyris Nairn for CSM. |
Killstealing
Broski Enterprises Elite Space Guild
372
|
Posted - 2012.02.01 22:41:00 -
[76] - Quote
remove hisec, remove all the problems about it |
Citizen Smif
Comply Or Die
68
|
Posted - 2012.02.03 09:19:00 -
[77] - Quote
Lyris Nairn wrote:As posted in General Discussion: logically fallacious argument.
I see what you did there.
Lyris has my vote because goons are a force for good in the universe. |
5p4c3 M4n
Perkone Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.03 14:23:00 -
[78] - Quote
Leave high sec alone and never speak of it again. change nothing.
Change 0.0 so alliance's can only hold space based on the active player amount. This would be counted by allowing more systems to be held based on how many active players each alliance has(another system held in sov for each 20 active players each alliance has). Measured as system jumps from the alliance "HQ system" for a maximum of the constellations connected to the HQ system's constellation.
This should make everyone happy as it would mean more people moving to 0.0 to participate in what ever pvp.
It's funny to me that goons and the other alliances holding massive unused quantities of 0.0 (except for moon goo) complain that not enough people move to 0.0 yet they hold so much space that no one can move to 0.0.
Also eliminate moon goo completely giving anyone with access to 0.0 the exact possibility of obtaining/making the items necessary to build caps/supers.
Obviously something needs to be done about how supers are built since they are currently being built like ammo by the few alliances holding all the high quality moons. The new reports showing supers destroyed and built should make that obvious to anyone. |
Themick Mccoy
23
|
Posted - 2012.02.03 15:11:00 -
[79] - Quote
An idea that just popped into my head (not limited to just High-sec, yet someone mentioned the bounty system earlier):
Alrighty, so for years now people have been using bots to gain success through mining, ratting, and other activities. Now CCP has spent at this point probably what amounts to around a million man hours to detecting and banning accounts that use bots. Now, how could we turn this into an event that A) the EVE community can assist in, and B) make it enjoyable?
CCP bounties on bots!
Maybe some sort of system where either through player reporting or whatever system CCP currently uses, an account is found to be in the act of using a bot. Instead of the account getting permabanned, a bounty is put up for lets say 60% of the hull currently being flown.
~120 mil per hulk kill:D millions for a botting carrier?
This is a spur of the moment idea and definitely needs more thought, but it is interesting, you gotta admit that!
I'm a noob! If you catch me ingame, don't bother with a ransom, I ain't paying! I'm still learning the pvpies, plus, I'm a Jew. |
Dunbar Hulan
The Flaming Sideburn's Art of War Alliance
66
|
Posted - 2012.02.03 15:12:00 -
[80] - Quote
Change the mechanics of docking games, too many hi sec dwellers sit outside in their Officer mod fitted Raven Navy Issue and dock at the first sign of trouble- make them fight. -áThe Sideburns- Always Outnumbered- Never Outgunned. Manchester United - Paul Scholes= Genius |
|
Harlot Hohannson
Eye on Wang Poo
33
|
Posted - 2012.02.04 12:13:00 -
[81] - Quote
high sec safe should be removed, or at least culled to only 0.8 and higher... let the rest be low sec and boost its payouts for pve |
Joyitii
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.06 08:13:00 -
[82] - Quote
Whelp not sure if troll or not but I suppose giving suggestions doesnGÇÖt hurt.
Personally I think that industry really needs a great big revamp, specifically the mining side of industry. To summarize a thread post that I was reading not too long ago it talks about how to improve mining to the point in which it could potentially be enjoyable and require skill to do properly. The ways in which to make mining more GÇ£funGÇ¥ also increase the difficulty of making a botting program that does everything on its own. Some of the things in this forum post include: Visual differentiation of asteroids up close in order to see a better yield, system wide belts (finally), Much larger difference in yields of ore essentially giving more use to the survey scanner along with the visual cues to show the difference (i.e. Instead of having there be 2 better yields of 5% per ore instead have 5%, 50%, 100%, 200%, etc.), remove drone mineral drops and replace them with higher bounties, remove t1 drops and instead have rats drop bpcGÇÖs (This one IGÇÖm unsure about but itGÇÖs mostly going towards only allowing players to acquire minerals through mining), and finally having probing mechanics assist you in finding this higher yield ore.
I could go on and on into specifics of each thing listed however IGÇÖd prefer if you are actually interested go to the original post about it here: (https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=672496#post672496)
Secondly not exactly sure if this is directly related to highsec however it does involve more things exploding. Remove the tier system from ships and put them into specialist roles. A fair amount of ships have never seen the light of day since the removal of training skills, and because of this there is a large amount of blobbing the best ship out there. According to the forum post that I will link momentarily BSGÇÖs for the most part are fairly balanced and fall into their roles already. (Aside from hybrids where there is a lot of griping still) Frigates are a fairly large part of this issue and a lot of them are unused because they have insufficient midslots/cpu/powergrid, and by eliminating tiers and properly balancing them then there will potentially be a lot more enticing choices for T1 frig roams. Forum post that got me hooked on the idea here: (https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=24582) ItGÇÖs a little all over the place if you do decide to click the link however so be prepared to go through quite a few posts to get the overall feel of what they want done.
Anyway those are the two biggest things that IGÇÖd like you to consider if you do get elected into the CSM Lyris. Good luck with the election either way. Fly safe o/
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |