| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
435
   |
Posted - 2012.01.30 01:10:00 -
[151] - Quote
Bloutok wrote:
1 full can of liquid.
Half of it is in contact with the other half thus making it all wet.
But to who? 
Welcome to the EVE Online forums, a place where stupid people come to debate ridiculous **** and pretend to be smart.
P.S. still pretending to be Tippa.
Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI.
Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Comrade Commizzar
Eve Revolutionary Army
43
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 02:40:00 -
[152] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Anything that is wet can be dried. You can dry a wet towel. You can dry a wet floor. You can't dry water, therefor it isn't wet. The definition of wet taken from dictionary.com is wet: moistened, covered, or soaked with water or some other liquid. You can't do that with water because it's already a liquid. Wet is a result of water touching it. Water in and of itself is not wet it may be soft and pliable but not wet. If water gets on my shirt then water wets my shirt. I dont have wet on my shirt. Wetness is a result not a description of water.
(Sarcasm still fully on)Tonight I am pretending that I am Tippa 
Don't worry about them Eternum. At least I see what you did there.  |
Lyris Nairn
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
8232
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 02:58:00 -
[153] - Quote
Just coming in to post that water is the name for dihydrogen monoxide, regardless of whether it is in a liquid state; so, yes, you can have non-liquid water and thereby water that is not wet or which does not contribute to things it touches being wet.
Sky Captain of Your Heart;
Lyris Chronicles of Narnia in the World of Tomorrow's Goonfleet dot Com;
Good Poster Extraordinaire and Spacebook Superstar : RIFTERSWARM
I am the Pubbie Whisperer |
RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed
RED.Legion
1315
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 03:31:00 -
[154] - Quote
Comrade Commizzar wrote:Zirse wrote:Comrade Commizzar wrote:Feligast wrote:Lyris Nairn wrote:The Mittani, AKA Numismancer on Something Awful, is not the "head cheese". He is not even a moderator. He is just a random guy with a registered username who happens to play EVE. By contrast, Weaselior and VIle Rat, a couple of important people in GoonWaffe, are moderators on Something Awful. By your logic shouldn't they be the CEO of GoonWaffe, or the guy giving huge speeches at the State of the Goonion, or the ones that everyone hates on the CSM? Vile Rat is on the CSM, and I think at least most people hate him. Once you realize that groups such as the Goons and certain other "easterlings" are engaged in "botting" and "RMT" to the point that it is practically impossible for new forces in highsec to challenge existing sovereignty boundaries in zero, you can pretty much just unsubscribe, unless you want to just putter around in the market side of the game as many do. [citation needed] Is water wet? Is the earth round? Do you need a citation for these things as well? Are you really this dense and slow, or do you have an agenda to cloud the issue?
I don't need citations for those now because I've been shown citations for those facts many times before.
You claim there are bots and RMTers and that you have specific knowledge of those bots and RMTers. When you make that claim, I can't help but ask two questions:
1) Why have you not reported them?
2) What evidence do you have to support these claims.
As to your examples of self evident facts:
Water is wet because of the definition of "wet," so it's a tautology, not an argument to say that water is wet.
The earth was proven to be round in Ancient Greece (couple hundred years BC) but while the discovery is attributed to Pythagoras, there's no specific historical evidence to support that fact, and without that I shall not claim that he discovered it (even though there's a cool story that accompanies it).
Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes. |
Selinate
631
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 03:51:00 -
[155] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Anything that is wet can be dried. You can dry a wet towel. You can dry a wet floor. You can't dry water, therefor it isn't wet. The definition of wet taken from dictionary.com is wet: moistened, covered, or soaked with water or some other liquid. You can't do that with water because it's already a liquid. Wet is a result of water touching it. Water in and of itself is not wet it may be soft and pliable but not wet. If water gets on my shirt then water wets my shirt. I dont have wet on my shirt. Wetness is a result not a description of water.
(Sarcasm still fully on)Tonight I am pretending that I am Tippa
So you are masquerading as what you see as being "Tippia" in this thread now because you've been wiped up and down this thread for your own stupidity?
Butthurt much?
Maybe find a seat with a bit more padding on it... I'm sure that will make your newly ripped ******* a bit more comfy. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
435
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 03:57:00 -
[156] - Quote
Awww, poor Selinate you seem so angry.
Alternatively, I think I made my point loud and clear. If there is any butthurt to be had it is coming from you as you superimpose it upon others. Poor, poor butthurt Selinate. If you talk about it you might feel better?
Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI.
Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Selinate
631
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:00:00 -
[157] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Awww, poor Selinate you seem so angry.
Alternatively, I think I made my point loud and clear. If there is any butthurt to be had it is coming from you as you superimpose it upon others. Poor, poor butthurt Selinate. If you talk about it you might feel better?
Yep, I guess I'm right, you're pretty darn butthurt. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
435
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:03:00 -
[158] - Quote
Here Selinate, this will help
Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI.
Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
435
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:05:00 -
[159] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:A red legion guy posting.
I was going to respond to your post with something well thought out and intelligent, but then I realized that you belonged to red legion. So instead I will give you this...
BwhahahahahahaTrolololololololo!!!!!!111111111111 Look at the red legion guy talking about bots and RMT!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!
Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI.
Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Selinate
631
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:09:00 -
[160] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Lol, yes, it will help you because you are butthurt.
You try to parade around in a thread acting like you're actually intelligent, then when someone shows you you're not, you passive aggressively pretend you're that person, just like a teenager who just got told off by... well... someone who's actually intelligent compared to you.
Keep on being butthurt. |
|
|
Selinate
631
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:10:00 -
[161] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:RubyPorto wrote:A red legion guy posting. I was going to respond to your post with something well thought out and intelligent, but then I realized that I can't come up with anything even remotely intelligent. So instead I will give you this... BwhahahahahahaTrolololololololo!!!!!!111111111111 Look at the red legion guy talking about bots and RMT!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!
Definitely still butthurt. FYP
They say ignorance is bliss, I'm starting to wonder if this applies to your stupidity also. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
435
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:10:00 -
[162] - Quote
Dude are you like 13 LOL
I never thought that someone would take water being wet so personally.
Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI.
Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed
RED.Legion
1315
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:12:00 -
[163] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:RubyPorto wrote:A red legion guy posting. I was going to respond to your post with something well thought out and intelligent, but then I realized that you belonged to red legion. So instead I will give you this... BwhahahahahahaTrolololololololo!!!!!!111111111111 Look at the red legion guy talking about bots and RMT!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
In no alliance that I have been in have I seen clear, articulable evidence of botting. I've seen no evidence of RMT.
I have heard from people in my alliance who will (with permission) gank the fuck out of suspected friendly bots. I have also seen that permission granted, and the resultant killmails.
Now if you don't want to believe me due to some preconceived notion of the company I choose to keep, that's up to you. But if we're going to have a debate, avoiding my arguments and focusing on that company is not constructive (nor is it productive to furthering your argument).
Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes. |
Selinate
631
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:12:00 -
[164] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Dude are you like 13 LOL
Yeah yeah, standard attempts at flaming because you can't actually come up with a clever way of doing it.
*yawn* |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
435
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:14:00 -
[165] - Quote
RubyPorto, no one can help you if your hiding under a rock out there. So no debate is possible.
@Selinate
Oh yea Mr. Poopy pants?
Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI.
Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Selinate
631
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:16:00 -
[166] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:RubyPorto, no one can help you if your hiding under a rock out there. So no debate is possible.
I can't even fix this post because I'm not sure what direction you were trying to take it in, given what you were trying to respond to...
Maybe you should just quit while you're... well.... very far behind? |
RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed
RED.Legion
1315
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:20:00 -
[167] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:RubyPorto, no one can help you if your hiding under a rock out there. So no debate is possible.
I have yet to see a sign or other indication that it is my duty as a player to test my allies for evidence of botting.
Again, you're skipping my questions:
If you have seen specific evidence of botting:
1) Why have you not reported it?
2) What specific evidence do you have?*
N.B. * "Everyone knows X" is not specific evidence.
Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
435
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:23:00 -
[168] - Quote
Selinate wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:RubyPorto, no one can help you if your hiding under a rock out there. So no debate is possible. I can't even fix this post because I'm not sure what direction you were trying to take it in, given what you were trying to respond to... Maybe you should just quit while you're... well.... very far behind?
Doesn't matter since it was not directed towards you.
Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI.
Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Selinate
631
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:23:00 -
[169] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
@Selinate
Oh yea Mr. Poopy pants?
You know, when some people try and flame me on these forums, I can at least get a good laugh out of it because they are intelligent, witty people.
This doesn't apply to you. You are, by far, the least witty troll I've seen on these forums. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
435
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:24:00 -
[170] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:RubyPorto, no one can help you if your hiding under a rock out there. So no debate is possible.
I have yet to see a sign or other indication that it is my duty as a player to test my allies for evidence of botting. Again, you're skipping my questions: If you have seen specific evidence of botting: 1) Why have you not reported it? 2) What specific evidence do you have?* N.B. * "Everyone knows X" is not specific evidence.
Meaning that if you have not seen said things for yourself by now, then you must be living under a rock out there.
Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI.
Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
|
|
RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed
RED.Legion
1315
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:24:00 -
[171] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Selinate wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:RubyPorto, no one can help you if your hiding under a rock out there. So no debate is possible. I can't even fix this post because I'm not sure what direction you were trying to take it in, given what you were trying to respond to... Maybe you should just quit while you're... well.... very far behind? Doesn't matter since it was not directed towards you.
Open forum. Everyone can respond to the "arguments" anyone else makes.
That's the beauty of it.
Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes. |
Selinate
631
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:24:00 -
[172] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Selinate wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:RubyPorto, no one can help you if your hiding under a rock out there. So no debate is possible. I can't even fix this post because I'm not sure what direction you were trying to take it in, given what you were trying to respond to... Maybe you should just quit while you're... well.... very far behind? Doesn't matter since it was not directed towards you.
What doesn't matter? The fact that you should quit while you're very far behind? Or the fact that I couldn't fix your post?
Is there some rule about fixing rather stupid posts if they're not directed towards you that I don't know about?
I can't be sure...... |
RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed
RED.Legion
1315
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:26:00 -
[173] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Meaning that if you have not seen said things for yourself by now, then you must be living under a rock out there.
So, you have seen the evidence you claim that I turn a blind eye to?
1) Why have you not reported that evidence?
2) What specific evidence have you found?
3) What evidence do you have to show that I have seen or should have seen the evidence from 1) and 2).
You keep adding claims without backing them up with any EVIDENCE
Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes. |
Selinate
631
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:27:00 -
[174] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:RubyPorto, no one can help you if your hiding under a rock out there. So no debate is possible.
I have yet to see a sign or other indication that it is my duty as a player to test my allies for evidence of botting. Again, you're skipping my questions: If you have seen specific evidence of botting: 1) Why have you not reported it? 2) What specific evidence do you have?* N.B. * "Everyone knows X" is not specific evidence. Meaning that if you have not seen said things for yourself by now, then you must be living under a rock out there.
You mean.... *GASP*
He didn't explore all of the systems owned by DRF just so he could make sure that none of his alliance mates or allies in general weren't botting! How shameful of him! All of his arguments must be invalid for this sake alone!
I mean really, how many systems does DRF have anyway.... ohhhhhhhh
You're up **** creek with a ****** argument, dude. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
435
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:31:00 -
[175] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Selinate wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:RubyPorto, no one can help you if your hiding under a rock out there. So no debate is possible. I can't even fix this post because I'm not sure what direction you were trying to take it in, given what you were trying to respond to... Maybe you should just quit while you're... well.... very far behind? Doesn't matter since it was not directed towards you. Open forum. Everyone can respond to the "arguments" anyone else makes. That's the beauty of it.
Ruby, I have obviously made him angry. I enjoy his nerdy forum rage and half baked stabs at me. Forum troll tears are the very best tears of them all. To you I can only say that you live in the very heart of RMT/ Botting central. I don't feel like debating this with you, because your stance is one that requires everyone else to believe that what people are saying about drone space is completely unwarranted and baseless hearsay. We simply know better, and if you don't that is fine. Have fun out there.
But, your taking a stance that directly contradicts the observations of many others. So... believe what you want. This is a thread about CSM corruption and water not being wet from what I recall. Why don't you go and make a "drone regions have no RMT and no Botters thread" and see what kind of response it gets.
I sure as hell don't have to debate it with you.
Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI.
Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
Selinate
631
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:35:00 -
[176] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Selinate wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:RubyPorto, no one can help you if your hiding under a rock out there. So no debate is possible. I can't even fix this post because I'm not sure what direction you were trying to take it in, given what you were trying to respond to... Maybe you should just quit while you're... well.... very far behind? Doesn't matter since it was not directed towards you. Open forum. Everyone can respond to the "arguments" anyone else makes. That's the beauty of it. Ruby, I have obviously made him angry. I enjoy his nerdy forum rage and half baked stabs at me. Forum troll tears are the very best tears of them all. To you I can only say that you live in the very heart of RMT/ Botting central. I don't feel like debating this with you, because your stance is one that requires everyone else to believe that what people are saying about drone space is completely unwarranted and baseless hearsay. We simply know better, and if you don't that is fine. Have fun out there. But, your taking a stance that directly contradicts the observations of many others. So... believe what you want. This is a thread about CSM corruption and water not being wet from what I recall. Why don't you make a "drone regions have no RMT and no Botters thread" and see what kind of response it gets. I sure as hell don't have to debate it with you.
Still up **** creek with a ****** argument, I see.
Still butthurt also. "Drone space is bot central because everyone knows this".
Apparently stupidity is bliss. |
Eternum Praetorian
Black Ops Trade Group
435
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:39:00 -
[177] - Quote
Proud to make an impression on you, Selinate.
Tears and weak troll posts from your like, makes it worth posting here.
Reallocate funds for Icelandic air fare to developing an integrated player input function in the UI.
Then talk directly to the customers with polls to collect demographics and game preferences
|
RubyPorto
Profoundly Disturbed
RED.Legion
1315
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:40:00 -
[178] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:Selinate wrote:Eternum Praetorian wrote:RubyPorto, no one can help you if your hiding under a rock out there. So no debate is possible. I can't even fix this post because I'm not sure what direction you were trying to take it in, given what you were trying to respond to... Maybe you should just quit while you're... well.... very far behind? Doesn't matter since it was not directed towards you. Open forum. Everyone can respond to the "arguments" anyone else makes. That's the beauty of it. Ruby, I have obviously made him angry. I enjoy his nerdy forum rage and half baked stabs at me. Forum troll tears are the very best tears of them all. To you I can only say that you live in the very heart of RMT/ Botting central. I don't feel like debating this with you, because your stance is one that requires everyone else to believe that what people are saying about drone space is completely unwarranted and baseless hearsay. We simply know better, and if you don't that is fine. Have fun out there. But, your taking a stance that directly contradicts the observations of many others. So... believe what you want. This is a thread about CSM corruption and water not being wet from what I recall. Why don't you go and make a "drone regions have no RMT and no Botters thread" and see what kind of response it gets. I sure as hell don't have to debate it with you.
You don't have to, but you are. Since you're ... uh... posting here... uh ... on the forums where... uh... debate happens.
The reason why the courts have consistently rejected hearsay evidence is because of the rapidity that information gets distorted, altered, muddled, etc (without need for any conscious malice). Ever play the phone game? Everyone whispers to the next person and what comes out after 10-15 people is barely recognizable as what went in. That's why hearsay evidence is worthless.
If you can quote someone who has direct knowledge of botting and/or RMT, that would be Evidence. "We simply know better" isn't even hearsay, it's fluff.
So, please link, quote, list, etc a tiny shred of Evidence to prop up your argument. So far the only evidence in this thread is my testimony.
Single-Shard, Player Driven Sandbox.
5 words. That's what makes it special in my eyes. |
Selinate
631
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:42:00 -
[179] - Quote
Eternum Praetorian wrote:Proud to make an impression on you, Selinate. Tears from weak trolls like you makes it worth posting here.
Getting even less witty. Not even trying any more. |
Selinate
631
|
Posted - 2012.01.30 04:43:00 -
[180] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:
You don't have to, but you are. Since you're ... uh... posting here... uh ... on the forums where... uh... debate happens.
The reason why the courts have consistently rejected hearsay evidence is because of the rapidity that information gets distorted, altered, muddled, etc (without need for any conscious malice). Ever play the phone game? Everyone whispers to the next person and what comes out after 10-15 people is barely recognizable as what went in. That's why hearsay evidence is worthless.
If you can quote someone who has direct knowledge of botting and/or RMT, that would be Evidence. "We simply know better" isn't even hearsay, it's fluff.
So, please link, quote, list, etc a tiny shred of Evidence to prop up your argument. So far the only evidence in this thread is my testimony.
I think this thread deserves a picture of an eiffel tower.
Guess who's in the middle.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |