Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jamie 315
Yet Another CAOD Inspired 1 Woman Alt Corp
|
Posted - 2007.11.14 01:47:00 -
[1]
So is ccp changing the coding completely on ship maintance bays/arrays? Because when they nerfed GSC in carriers one of their reasons (only real reason aside from carriers aren't supposed to make eve easy to play) was because it would allow an exploit on the arrays at POS. CCP said that the coding is the same between these two (and it would be very hard to change), so wouldn't the upcoming nerf to mods and such in carriers pass onto POS or did ccp lie originally about the coding.
Recruiting is open |
Tortun Nahme
Minmatar Heimatar Services Conglomerate
|
Posted - 2007.11.14 01:49:00 -
[2]
try that again but make sense this time
Originally by: Surfin's PlunderBunny Edited by: Surfin''s PlunderBunny on 04/11/2007 21:34:44 *EDIT* You know what, Tortun has this one under control...*
*Basks in the chaos of this thread |
Jamie 315
Yet Another CAOD Inspired 1 Woman Alt Corp
|
Posted - 2007.11.14 01:50:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Tortun Nahme try that again but make sense this time
It doesn't make sense at all. If the coding is the same and blocking GSC in pos arrays will block it in carriers won't the new nerf to mods effect it pos arrays? Recruiting is open |
Anaalys Fluuterby
Caldari
|
Posted - 2007.11.14 01:58:00 -
[4]
Contrary to folk-lore, a few straws floating on the surface of a lake will not help you float.
CCP doesn't want carriers used to haul with, deal with it. Quit trying to make it into some big conspiracy.
Originally by: CCP Chronotis
Since this thread continues to fight against the people who derail it into the macro miners witchhunt. I will move it to features and ideas discussion where ...
|
Tarminic
Forsaken Resistance
|
Posted - 2007.11.14 02:00:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Jamie 315 So is ccp changing the coding completely on ship maintance bays/arrays? Because when they nerfed GSC in carriers one of their reasons (only real reason aside from carriers aren't supposed to make eve easy to play) was because it would allow an exploit on the arrays at POS. CCP said that the coding is the same between these two (and it would be very hard to change), so wouldn't the upcoming nerf to mods and such in carriers pass onto POS or did ccp lie originally about the coding.
As a software engineer, this post confuses me. ---------------- Tarminic - 29 Million SP in pink Forum Warfare |
RaTTuS
BIG Ka-Tet
|
Posted - 2007.11.14 02:21:00 -
[6]
I still say you have more than 29 Mil in forum warfare -- BIG Lottery, BIG Deal, InEve [Now Verified] & RaTTuS Home
|
Oniko Sengir
Coreli Corporation
|
Posted - 2007.11.14 02:41:00 -
[7]
CCP lied. And they're nerfing carriers to help BoB.
|
WarlockX
Amarr Free Trade Corp Kinetic Maelstrom Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.11.14 02:52:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Tarminic
Originally by: Jamie 315 So is ccp changing the coding completely on ship maintance bays/arrays? Because when they nerfed GSC in carriers one of their reasons (only real reason aside from carriers aren't supposed to make eve easy to play) was because it would allow an exploit on the arrays at POS. CCP said that the coding is the same between these two (and it would be very hard to change), so wouldn't the upcoming nerf to mods and such in carriers pass onto POS or did ccp lie originally about the coding.
As a software engineer, this post confuses me.
Make that two confused software engineers ----------------------------------------------- "I often quote myself. It adds spice to my conversation." |
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Minmatar mUfFiN fAcToRy
|
Posted - 2007.11.14 02:54:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Oniko Sengir CCP lied. And they're nerfing carriers to help BoB.
That makes a ton more sense than the op did! You win!
Originally by: Liz Kali Tic Toc Tic Toc , time is ticking
I owned someone on forums!!! |
Major Stallion
Four Rings Phalanx Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.11.14 03:03:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Jamie 315
Originally by: Tortun Nahme try that again but make sense this time
It doesn't make sense at all. If the coding is the same and blocking GSC in pos arrays will block it in carriers won't the new nerf to mods effect it pos arrays?
wow i didnt think it was possible for you to make less sense than u did in the first post...impressively enough, you trumped the first post with your second post ________________________________
Originally by: CCP Nozh As soon as people start comparing EVE to real life or battlestar galactica I stop reading.
|
|
Lazuran
Gallente Time And ISK Sink Corporation
|
Posted - 2007.11.14 03:12:00 -
[11]
This forum only fits one of several types, of which you are not one.
(CCP nuked my topic about that error message ;-P)
"...been designed for one purpose and one purpose only. Imagine a handful of repair drones pouring from the carebear's mouth. Now imagine they have um, nothing." -Unknown Hel redesigner (2007) |
Adunh Slavy
KIA Corp KIA Alliance
|
Posted - 2007.11.14 03:21:00 -
[12]
Edited by: Adunh Slavy on 14/11/2007 03:24:14
Originally by: Jamie 315 à CCP said that the coding is the same between these two (and it would be very hard to change), so wouldn't the upcoming nerf to mods and such in carriers pass onto POS or did CCP lie originally about the coding. à
It depends on what they meant by ôis the sameö and what they mean by ôhardö. Is it the same function, same class, what is ôthe sameö. As for the ôhardö business, in my experience that generally means, ôwe donÆt want to spend time/money on thatö or ôthe guy that coded that no longer works here and his documentation sucksö. Good coders that are tenacious can fix or change anything. Just because they do or donÆt, doesnÆt mean they lie.
Can they make them different, yes. Are they different, I havenÆt the slightest idea. Is it possible one inherited from the other, or that a POS ship array and a carrier ship hangar are exactly the same thing, yes it is.
P.S. Ya'll be nice now, English may not be the first language for some folks. -AS
The Real Space Initiative (Forum Link) |
Phantom Slave
Amarr Mozzaki United
|
Posted - 2007.11.14 03:22:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Phantom Slave on 14/11/2007 03:24:23 I've read, re-read, and re-read again the original post, and still can't make heads or tales of it.
How about you try to explain it better, that way we can figure out what you're trying to say?
How would a mod (in the strictest sense would be a Ship Modification) affect a POS? You going to place a CCC on a POS or something?
If you mean Modules, then what modules are you referring to?
*edit* I don't think this is a problem of somebody not knowing English as a first language, or even any type of language barrier. It just seems that the OP was trying to make a thread really quickly, and his logic bounces around in the post. ____________________
Changes on Sisi are NOT the end of the world. Wait until Rev III/Trinity is released before drawing conclusions. |
Dolem Ombric
|
Posted - 2007.11.14 12:31:00 -
[14]
Ok, this is what I think, The question revolves around the Ship Maintenance Array for a POS and the Capital Ship Maintenance Bay for use in Cap ships. At one point at least I think they were using the same code. When the nerf was put in to prevent a ship with assembled GSC's in it hold being put in a Cap ship it also prevented the docking of a ship with GSC's in a POS array. Now new nerf's for Cap ship arrays are comming and the OP is concerned that it will affect the POS array again. And if it don't then he/she was lied to by CCP. Frankly, I think the two now have thier own coding. Could be wrong but they have had time to seperate the POS ship maint array from the Cap ship maint array.
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |