|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
393
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 04:20:00 -
[1] - Quote
With the Big Bang and the expansion, do you think Light or waves is a big part to the expansion of it? I keep imagining the first sun forming and the light given off and how light keeps traveling, it would reach the edge of the universe, but then keep going expanding it. That or any wave or maybe asteroid could expand the galaxy, but I just like to imagine light doing it.
Also I almost don't like time dilation since there is no "save" attached. As in if you are in a falling house, you get a few seconds, but the house still lands and you die when it does. Wondering if you have any thoughts.
Also the theory I like, that is like time dilation is the speeds a human can overcome to stand up or walk in. (overcome velocity or acceleration) Like I like to think if there was a ship that could go the speed of light, a human would be dragged by it, not fly it. Or if a human was in a falling house, the human could overcome the acceleration of the fall and stand up. But the house would still land and the human die.
Third observation I have is on Fusion. Lots of scientist like to say its cold fusion or gravity fusion. I mostly see it as a way to balance things, then once things are balanced the world makes sense and you can operate it. Like if its so cold, and you think about it being that cold things might get clearer for you to see. Or like setting a measuring standard first. So the gravity of the sun standardizes things so fusion can happen. The gravity there is so massive it brings balance then, then fusion can happen. Wonder what your opinion is. Signature removed, CCP Phantom |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
415
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 21:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
[quote=Tsadkiel][quote=rodyas]
as for the next three paragraphs... i am not entirely sure about what you are saying here :( what do you mean by "save"? as for the second bit, i have never heard of this... the force acting on an object is determined by that objects acceleration and visaversa. if a ship is moving at a constant velocity of .99c, a person riding in that ship would feel no force and could walk around as if they were on the ground at "rest" (assuming there's gravity and such).
quote]
I think this is the only one I can describe well. Yeah at lower speeds like you describe I see that. But here in my country we are experimenting and trying to build high speed rails. So the idea is how fast can something can go and its still safe in a sense. Like pilots have to wear those suits ( in jet craft) at high speeds and that might be how fast a human can go really.
So it kind of goes with safety testing. How fast should high speed rails go with how well humans can deal with speeds. Like if a human could go the speed of light on a rocket. He would be more like a suitcase or luggage really then a pilot or anything else. But at lower speeds the human stays human. Can walk around and jump and buy products. I kind of equate time dilation to when the speed goes so fast its hard for a human or so to deal with the speed. Like they cant pilot it anymore and then in sense are just luggage being dragged by the craft.
Thanks for answering the post as well. It was cool to see how the galaxy expands. disorientating |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
426
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 13:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
Well with my post, I am going with people are not superman. I agree with your science, but to do live your science. That is mostly what I am going with. Like you say yo u can go any speed, and humans are superman so its no big deal. I usually dont see it that way really. My questions are bit wierd since I am not doing just pure science and humans can handle any science theory real well. Mostly going with science, plus how people are right now handling the science really.
Best way I can describe it is stephen hawking. He was chasing the unifying theory and thought it could be reached. But now he sees the way things are and how humans are and has given up on that chase, and thinks we are far from it. He now just looks at different branches and tries to learn about them. Like try to see the individual better, more then the big picture always or something. disorientating |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
426
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 14:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
Arcosian wrote:[quote=rodyas]
.
As for your thoughts on time dilation you are thinking more like EVE's time dilation where time slows down and not relativity time dilation. With actual time dilation you wouldn't get "extra" time to save your life in your "falling house" idea. The way time dilation works is this. For the person moving at .99c they would experience 1 second just like you are now. For the observer standing still they would experience 1 second just like you are now. But the .99c person's 1 second would last "longer" than the 1 second for the observer but each person wouldn't feel any different. This is like that "twin paradox" thought experiment where one twin gets on a spaceship moving .99c and the other twin stays on earth. When the spaceship returns to earth the twin on earth is much older if not dead and the other is only slightly older. Time travel is a hard concept to grasp.
Yeah I do think of time dilation in EVE's sense, cause what I learned of it, EVE's works the same way.
To clarify, I think time use or the definition of time is wierd and we havn't set the definition yet for it in this thread. Mass is usually agreed as a resource not magical. Distance is agreed to be a resource, but not magical. Distance is agreed to be a resource but not magical. For some reason when I read about time though, it is magical as well as a resource.
Everything but time is a resource, but not magical. Time = magical and resource.
To me time is a variable like distance or mass or velocity. Though like most others that slips into magical, and I view time as havign magical properties, like time travel. It is easy to slip between these things and not really know it or so.
So time dilation as time = resource (like distance or so) its works like in newton mechanics then. When a variable in newton mechanics is stressed out it adapts or changes. So with time dilation, time is the variable that is being stressed out and changes to handle that stress. Time dilation.
The reason I said time dilation has no save is this: It slows things down and not have lag, which is nice, but the fights and movements take longer. A player logs onto EVE with only having 2 hours to play the game, but with time dilation the player needs 4 hours to play the game, but he only has 2. So you see time dilation does not save the player. The player would have to recieve 2 more hours of game play with having time dilation then he would be saved.
I do support time dilation on EVE even with that happening in a way. Since there were many abuses caused by lag. One fleet warp in, another fleet warp in, and only one fleet could shoot and the other fleet would be ******. With time dilation that doesnt happen anymore. So time dilation can make things fairer for the players, but with it taking longer, and players dont have any way to increase the amount of time they have to log in and play. disorientating |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
426
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 18:42:00 -
[5] - Quote
Its no problem really, just go on posting with the thread, as if I never posted. :) disorientating |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
435
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 22:28:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tsadkiel wrote:
very true as well, but as i stated in my original post, i am trying to get better at explaining science to people, especially those who may not have a background in it. i thought that molecular vibration was the best way to convey the idea of temperature causing thermal noise and why it is an issue when trying to create nanoscale technologies.
if you have a better description of it for the general reader i would really like to hear it! and no, i'm not trying to be an ass or anything. i am honestly interested =D
Yeah this is kind of interesting. The way I see it is that temperature(heat) is a big barrier to nanotech. Also we are surrounded by temperature, so I see why that is brought up first over the atomic level.
So if we did take away temperature being a barrier, and then free to focus on the kinetic energy at the atomic level. Would like to hear more on that, I dont know much about that. disorientating |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
439
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 20:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
tikktokk tokkzikk wrote:And what about the fire that comes from the hull when you get into structure? Is that also possible?
The ships have crews onboard, which means they need oxygen to breathe, which means at hull O2 would release and fires would start. Or if after that an explosion. Some oxygen in a pod as well so explosion could happen there. disorientating |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
446
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 19:12:00 -
[8] - Quote
Sorry, but that invading troll bit me and now have a fever in my blood.
Does physics explain why minorities are easier to teach physics to? Even Stephen Hawking is looking for a black Albert Einstein.
Also wondering, what profession you are looking at going into once the Ph.d is over with? Suppose with you handling trolls well, maybe a teaching one perhaps.
Edit: Also what is a Particle Astrophysicist? Don't think I have heard of those put together before. Keep thinking of particles in space and how they operate or function.
Like you would handle the particle accelerator in space or something, rather then one on earth. disorientating |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
446
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 21:45:00 -
[9] - Quote
Well when I learned about Newton in calculus classes, I learned he died a virgin apperently. Its always funny having those fun side stories in physics and stuff.
Yeah I had an asain roommate, should have seen that stronger work ethic coming. He always got angry at me for not having one.
Yeah can see you going to the corporations, with how active you are at using physics.
Sorry gay puns coming in. Was thinking of you studying huge amounts of energy in space. Seems like if you could harness that amount of energy you could legalize gay marriage and stuff like that. I suppose though we don't need another scientist doing it just for a personal cuase but oh well.
Also what will develop tools better for you to use? Univeristy or a corporation? Seems tool intensive phsycis. disorientating |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
446
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 22:05:00 -
[10] - Quote
Sturmwolke wrote:Tsadkiel wrote: ok so, after reading what i could find on the site i think this is probably (practically certainly) bunk...
Perhaps. Generally, imo, his writings are a little bit too detailed from the average folks that are into the "fringe" free energy research. The average scientists are usually quick to dismiss something un-conventional, basing their proofs from the conventional theories - ignoring empirical results (usually as random chance). You can go around in circles not finding anything when the fundamental flaws are the conventional equations trying to explain the un-conventional. I was piqued by the FTL neutrinos announcement and claims of a debunk from the folks at Imaging Cosmic and Rare Underground Signals (ICARUS) - basing it on the energy level of the neutrinos (CohenGÇôGlashow effect - a sort of Bremsstrahlung loss for neutrinos). Problem with that is no one actually knows what happens to neutrinos at speed >= c. Think about it, when you apply Newton's theories to relativity, it won't fit ... however, it's still valid for lesser systems. Essentially, the ICARUS's debunk, imo was only a confirmation there was no bremsstrahlung loss for superluminal neutrinos detected ... and that's about it.
Do you think you can go over superluminal nuetrinos for me, its a bit confusing. As well as Bremsstrahnlung loss for neutrinos. I think me trying to say that aloud is the best I can do with that. I might play with some newton applied to relativity in a way. I was hoping to aks what schools of thinking the OP uses to help grasp new topics or understandings. I usually use newton and relativeity to help understand new things. I saw the OP use chaos theory or planks uncertaintity principle as well, but that is harder for me to use, but it did seem he used it the right way from what I understand of it.
I usually like to watch people who use planks or chaos theory, since they are so hard for me to use. disorientating |
|
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
446
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 22:45:00 -
[11] - Quote
Yeah I saw corporations as trying to make the sciences more real. And univerisities kind of playing with ideas more. I think someone earlier asked about science theories and how real they are or useful. University is propably not bad, but its hard for me to be in the relaxed state or so. Except for Stephen Hawking, as the chair person of the college, I imagine he is more active then most professors I suppose.
I was actually studying for chemical engineering years ago, sadly never passed it though. The jobs led to oil and other boring things mostly. So wasn't too inspired by the corporations so much. But I loved the concepts and math and science, so thought teaching would be cool. I heard most engineers became managers there anyhow. Kind of shows the potential of science then, if they all become managers or so.
Supose there aren't any military branches for you to go into. Would be fun to bomb Iran with supernovas and stuff that comes from them, but not sure if bombing is on the table or not. disorientating |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
446
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 23:32:00 -
[12] - Quote
Well for #2, we havn't had foreign life arrive here, or make themselves known to us. Also we have telescopes and Hubble scope. We dont see any life out there. We have radio and other instruments and there are no foreign waves out there life would create.
That kind of leads us to say there is no life out there. But recently planets that could sustain life have been found. Also what by life you mean aliens or just plants out there. Maybe in the life sustainable places trees could be there maybe, but or very primitive people. Just havn't seen or heard any so it seems there are none out there so far.
Just make a forum and invite inter-gallactic people to it. See if anyone shows up, and you will know the answer to it, I suppose. disorientating |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
446
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 23:36:00 -
[13] - Quote
JinSanJong wrote:
like why do all the idiots like yourself come to play eve..
Because the Devs invite us to. More Idiots help grease the wheels for them. disorientating |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
457
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 20:48:00 -
[14] - Quote
Well with evolution, it would only take time for humans or souls to adapt to hell and rise above it. It only took Jesus 3 days to evolve enough to leave hell. Satan just stays there cause he likes it, he has evolved enough to leave a long time ago, but is staying for sentimental reasons. disorientating |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
460
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 08:15:00 -
[15] - Quote
^ Matt Damon will be in hell, That is a very good line to use. disorientating |
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
479
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 01:19:00 -
[16] - Quote
Tsadkiel wrote:Jeyson Vicious wrote:Ive always wondered: when it comes to space propulsion and carrying fuel - why couldnt you make an engine out of a big spring? It could be coiled and then released sending the ship forward. Then electrical power and hydraulics could wind it back up and spring it again.
It seems like you could do it over and over, easily using potential energy to go faster and faster. Or maybe I don't get the real math / concept of how a spring works. (I don't... :) this reminds me of some of my favorite "rage" comics, called troll science/physics, which detail all kinds of free energy or perpetual motion machines. they can all be explained away with a proper examination of internal and external forces, thermodynamics, and/or newtons laws! your question is most easily addressed with newtons third law. newtons third law tells us that forces acting between bodies always come in action-reaction pairs, which are always equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. that is, if your coiled spring exerts a force on the ship, then the ship must also be exerting a force on the spring! if the spring were free to be launched out the back of the ship then you are golden; each object would be propelled by an acceleration from the action-reaction forces applied on each. however, if the spring were attached to the ship, the total force acting on the ship would encompass both the force of spring-on-ship AND ship-on-spring. both of these must be equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, and so they cancel each other out. these types of forces are classified as internal forces. another example of an internal forces are the bonding forces at play in a solid, like a wooden block sitting on a table. these molecules are constantly in motion, if not on the molecular then on the atomic level, yet their motion does not propel the block in any way. this effect is identical to your spring on a ship scenario, except there are may billion springs heheh.
I liked the post. I think the only "spaceship" that works like this is the pogo stick. For those who had no childhood. Only has enough energy to go places that your body has though.
Tsadkiel, do you think newton's 3rd law is the inspiration of EVE ships needing, +1 warp strenght to enter warp? Like the +1 shows there is at least one external force on you and your just not an internal force, so you can enter warp and escape. disorientating |
|
|
|