Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 .. 26 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc. Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris
31
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 05:55:00 -
[511] - Quote
WHAT!?!
You won one .. this will not do! I shall have words with our commanders for sure
FW actually has quite a lot of the big fights (100+ on grid, weekend ISK sinks!), both with and without capitals dropped. Both sides have bait-POS setup in locations meant to annoy the opposition and POCO's have started attracting attention .. although those are probably just used as excuses to have a romp. Beauty of it is that even when "blobby" there is still room for independent thought/prowess .. if sizes keep going up that won't hold true much longer though, but hopefully we have mechanics to encourage skirmishing at that point so all is well.
Does CCP poll incoming players in regards to NPE quality/content and if so is the polling done too soon for the pilot to be able to give an informed answer? We old-timers probably have a hard time thinking back to days of yore and tend to evaluate it based on our current "state" .. something for the ISD to do me'thinks.
|
Delici Feelgood
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 08:29:00 -
[512] - Quote
I see the next term as the hot topic (inferno pun intended) for warfare and crimewatch issues in its many forms.
As such the wealth of experience you have in these areas I see as vital for the next term of the CSM and think it would be a tragedy not to see you as a prominent figure of CSM7. |
Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 14:21:00 -
[513] - Quote
Just been set to Neutral by Hans.....Are you planning to kill the people that vote for you? Or is it some kind of private agenda |
Karl Planck
134
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 16:52:00 -
[514] - Quote
This thread has a lot of hope for actually getting a decent representative for empire game mechanics.
Delici Feelgood wrote:I see the next term as the hot topic (inferno pun intended) for warfare and crimewatch issues in its many forms.
As such the wealth of experience you have in these areas I see as vital for the next term of the CSM and think it would be a tragedy not to see you as a prominent figure of CSM7.
If they are going to be rewriting this code during CSM7 then we NEED Hans on the committee. Null never really has to worry about these mechanics, and if CCP plans on changing the rules the players need someone to let ccp know what has/hasn't worked and what players are looking for that they cannot get with the current mechanics.
GO HANS If you don't like it, you should go and ride your Emo high-horse all the way back to WoW.
|
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
1958
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 17:40:00 -
[515] - Quote
Andrea Roche wrote:Just been set to Neutral by Hans.....Are you planning to kill the people that vote for you? Or is it some kind of private agenda
Yes, of course I'm planning to keep on shooting some of my voters! Just because the militias have united behind me politically doesn't mean we aren't going to cross swords on Tranquility. Same with those flashy pirates :)
If I set everyone blue that voted for me I'd pretty much run myself out of reasons to play the game overnight. I'm pretty sure I'm the only candidate whose supporters include large amounts of enemies.
No one should read much into my contacts settings, I'm setting everyone I add to neutral here so it impacts gameplay the least. If you're friend or foe, there will be other indicators on my overview that end up determining that.
Good question though, glad you brought it up!
|
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
1958
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 17:54:00 -
[516] - Quote
In case any of you have missed my various radio and podcast appearances, IGÇÖve linked a summary of them all on my blog. Stop by and listen! The latest addition to the list was my EvE News 24 interview with Sindel Pellion.
IGÇÖve seen some recent questions to follow up on, I havenGÇÖt forgotten and I should get back to you all by the end of the day.
|
Simyaldee
Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
14
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 21:24:00 -
[517] - Quote
Unfortunately I missed the EVE-Radio one. However the VoV and News24 Interviews were good and you seemed very organized, well thought out and consistent. I cracked up about what happend in the VoV intereview.
I was, however, slightly disappointed. I expected your voice to be manlier .
P.S. Who was bleeding in the News24 one at the end their? |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
1963
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 23:22:00 -
[518] - Quote
Simyaldee wrote:Unfortunately I missed the EVE-Radio one. However the VoV and News24 Interviews were good and you seemed very organized, well thought out and consistent. I cracked up about what happend in the VoV intereview. I was, however, slightly disappointed. I expected your voice to be manlier . P.S. Who was bleeding in the News24 one at the end their?
My wife was attacked by our cat, so I had to take a moment and make sure she was alright before going back to the interview. |
Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 23:24:00 -
[519] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Simyaldee wrote:Unfortunately I missed the EVE-Radio one. However the VoV and News24 Interviews were good and you seemed very organized, well thought out and consistent. I cracked up about what happend in the VoV intereview. I was, however, slightly disappointed. I expected your voice to be manlier . P.S. Who was bleeding in the News24 one at the end their? My wife was attacked by our cat, so I had to take a moment and make sure she was alright before going back to the interview. was this like a really big cat? tiger perhaps? puss strikes back |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
1963
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 23:27:00 -
[520] - Quote
He wishes he was. He's just developed the nasty habit of jumping up and clawing her face whenever he wants attention. |
|
Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 23:28:00 -
[521] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:He wishes he was. He's just developed the nasty habit of jumping up and clawing her face whenever he wants attention. make the cat homeless and get mans best friend instead |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
1963
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 23:42:00 -
[522] - Quote
Andrea Roche wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:He wishes he was. He's just developed the nasty habit of jumping up and clawing her face whenever he wants attention. make the cat homeless and get mans best friend instead
Preaching to the choir. He just came with my wife, they were a package deal. At least he abuses her and not me for whatever reason. |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
1965
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 00:00:00 -
[523] - Quote
Oooooh, what's this?? Thanks for the kind words, Trebor!! |
Abyss Azizora
Amarrian Warfactory
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 08:41:00 -
[524] - Quote
Bump to the top for the best candidate to come along in a long while. |
Sui'Djin
Black Rise Guerilla Forces
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 12:44:00 -
[525] - Quote
looking forward to voting for Hans just 6 days left |
Snowflake Tem
The Order of Symbolic Measures
37
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 13:02:00 -
[526] - Quote
YouGÇÖre on the short-list! what would be your Dream Team? |
Iris Bravemount
Aliastra Gallente Federation
61
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 15:08:00 -
[527] - Quote
I have spent the last few days reading through the whole campaign.
You convinced me. You will have my two votes, and I'll talk about you to my contacts.
Let's stand for a revamped empire ! Improve weapon sound effects |
Celgar Thurn
Department 10
24
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 16:48:00 -
[528] - Quote
I haven't read your 'mission statement' but I would say that I firmly believe mining is not broken and does not need fixing. If you don't like mining or find it boring please go and choose another profession. Leave mining to those who like to mine.
I am looking to vote for someone to vote for who is not not focused just on nul sec - indeed someone who is maybe slightly biased in favour of low & high sec to 'even the odds' - but I will avoid voting for anyone who is going to propose 'fixing' mining. |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
1290
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 17:11:00 -
[529] - Quote
Celgar Thurn wrote:I haven't read your 'mission statement' but I would say that I firmly believe mining is not broken and does not need fixing. If you don't like mining or find it boring please go and choose another profession. Leave mining to those who like to mine. I am looking to vote for someone to vote for who is not not focused just on nul sec - indeed someone who is maybe slightly biased in favour of low & high sec to 'even the odds' - but I will avoid voting for anyone who is going to propose 'fixing' mining.
The problem with this stance is that you seem to be arguing for a mechanic that has stayed completely static for over nine years to not be evolved or iterated upon. That's just not very realistic, m8. At some point in the near future, once all of the sov mechanics and FW stuff has been given a good booosh, there is an industrial revolution coming in EVE. There are too many people that want to see positive changes and interesting game play applied to that part of EVE.
And now I've bumped Hans' thread, as if he needed it. Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter |
Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 18:45:00 -
[530] - Quote
There was an issue with parsing this post's BBCode |
|
Delici Feelgood
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 19:02:00 -
[531] - Quote
Andrea Roche wrote:Seleene wrote:Celgar Thurn wrote:I haven't read your 'mission statement' but I would say that I firmly believe mining is not broken and does not need fixing. If you don't like mining or find it boring please go and choose another profession. Leave mining to those who like to mine. I am looking to vote for someone to vote for who is not not focused just on nul sec - indeed someone who is maybe slightly biased in favour of low & high sec to 'even the odds' - but I will avoid voting for anyone who is going to propose 'fixing' mining. The problem with this stance is that you seem to be arguing for a mechanic that has stayed completely static for over nine years to not be evolved or iterated upon. That's just not very realistic, m8. At some point in the near future, once all of the sov mechanics and FW stuff has been given a good booosh, there is an industrial revolution coming in EVE. There are too many people that want to see positive changes and interesting game play applied to that part of EVE. And now I've bumped Hans' thread, as if he needed it. without a question, industry has not changed for far too long. The only changes since then was the introduction of the rorqual + noctis + rorqual + orca. But this are indirect changes. The ganking in high sec for these are too easy and to no cost to the ganker compared to a cost of a hulk. I dont mean that it should not be allowed BUT the cost of doing this should be much more closer. At present you can do this with a destroyer. Destroyer fully fitted only cost like 8m and a hulk fully fitted cost 130m+. Its too easy to get away with murder. I think the cost should be at least 40 percent vs 60 percent So far its no way near. This is grave issue.
EvE BBCODE doesnt like parsing the percentage symbol Andrea. |
Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
126
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 19:59:00 -
[532] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Celgar Thurn wrote:I haven't read your 'mission statement' but I would say that I firmly believe mining is not broken and does not need fixing. If you don't like mining or find it boring please go and choose another profession. Leave mining to those who like to mine. I am looking to vote for someone to vote for who is not not focused just on nul sec - indeed someone who is maybe slightly biased in favour of low & high sec to 'even the odds' - but I will avoid voting for anyone who is going to propose 'fixing' mining. The problem with this stance is that you seem to be arguing for a mechanic that has stayed completely static for over nine years to not be evolved or iterated upon. That's just not very realistic, m8. At some point in the near future, once all of the sov mechanics and FW stuff has been given a good booosh, there is an industrial revolution coming in EVE. There are too many people that want to see positive changes and interesting game play applied to that part of EVE. And now I've bumped Hans' thread, as if he needed it.
The other problem with your stance, Celgar Thurn, is how you start off "I haven't read [his] mission statement" so how do you know what his mission is? Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM7 |
Andrea Roche
State War Academy Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 20:16:00 -
[533] - Quote
Delici Feelgood wrote:Andrea Roche wrote:Seleene wrote:Celgar Thurn wrote:I haven't read your 'mission statement' but I would say that I firmly believe mining is not broken and does not need fixing. If you don't like mining or find it boring please go and choose another profession. Leave mining to those who like to mine. I am looking to vote for someone to vote for who is not not focused just on nul sec - indeed someone who is maybe slightly biased in favour of low & high sec to 'even the odds' - but I will avoid voting for anyone who is going to propose 'fixing' mining. The problem with this stance is that you seem to be arguing for a mechanic that has stayed completely static for over nine years to not be evolved or iterated upon. That's just not very realistic, m8. At some point in the near future, once all of the sov mechanics and FW stuff has been given a good booosh, there is an industrial revolution coming in EVE. There are too many people that want to see positive changes and interesting game play applied to that part of EVE. And now I've bumped Hans' thread, as if he needed it. without a question, industry has not changed for far too long. The only changes since then was the introduction of the rorqual + noctis + rorqual + orca. But this are indirect changes. The ganking in high sec for these are too easy and to no cost to the ganker compared to a cost of a hulk. I dont mean that it should not be allowed BUT the cost of doing this should be much more closer. At present you can do this with a destroyer. Destroyer fully fitted only cost like 8m and a hulk fully fitted cost 130m+. Its too easy to get away with murder. I think the cost should be at least 40 percent vs 60 percent So far its no way near. This is grave issue. EvE BBCode sometimes doesnt like parsing the percentage symbol Andrea. lol interesting, cheers
|
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3097
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 20:42:00 -
[534] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Celgar Thurn wrote:I haven't read your 'mission statement' but I would say that I firmly believe mining is not broken and does not need fixing. If you don't like mining or find it boring please go and choose another profession. Leave mining to those who like to mine. I am looking to vote for someone to vote for who is not not focused just on nul sec - indeed someone who is maybe slightly biased in favour of low & high sec to 'even the odds' - but I will avoid voting for anyone who is going to propose 'fixing' mining. The problem with this stance is that you seem to be arguing for a mechanic that has stayed completely static for over nine years to not be evolved or iterated upon. That's just not very realistic, m8. At some point in the near future, once all of the sov mechanics and FW stuff has been given a good booosh, there is an industrial revolution coming in EVE. There are too many people that want to see positive changes and interesting game play applied to that part of EVE. And now I've bumped Hans' thread, as if he needed it.
That will be a long, long overdue expansion, and I will be delighted to see it. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Silath Slyver Silverpine
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 20:50:00 -
[535] - Quote
I read every candidate's positions (Those that bothered to write one, anyway)
Hans' is by far, in my opinion, the most level-headed and realistic candidate. A few others had valid points, but in my opinion are simply to stubborn or hard headed to get things done. I think the candidates personality is equally as important as their views.
Anyway, come March 7th you've got my vote Hans. Hope you get a seat. |
Vaurion Infara
Beyond Divinity Inc Excuses.
18
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 03:25:00 -
[536] - Quote
Hans, you're the man. +1
MickeyFinn > Fyi Vaurion Infara is a bad apple in a bunch of good ones. Dont let his big mouth and moods bring you down! If anyone lives near him RL get him LAID! would help him a ton. Fly safe and gods speed. |
Zathryon
Amarr General Drilling and Construction
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 05:36:00 -
[537] - Quote
wow...the thought of having sweet grief tears in exchange for my hulk gank butthurt...so satisfying. I would be TOTALLY fine with losing a hulk if i knew it meant such sweet revenge soon.
my new main profession? ganking the gankers.
making.5 space kinda dangerous but worth it AND knowing anyone who F's with me has to deal with the size of my wallet when I drop a few bil on your head?
delicious
Hans, you just got +5
|
Jonathan Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd Ferguson Alliance
30
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 08:51:00 -
[538] - Quote
The message here is good. The messenger, not so much.
'99%ers I represent you!' is a good rallying cry, but back it up with past posts. Where were you during the summer of rage? What were you saying then? Do you really care about EVE or are you just hoping that enough people dislike Alex that you'll snag a free trip to Iceland?
If you're the next Mynxee or Teadaze, you should have plentiful old posts we can read to back up that assertion. |
Temba Ronin
136
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 08:55:00 -
[539] - Quote
It affirms the power the Hans Jagerblitzen campaign is generating when current CSM6 members are commenting in this thread.
They seem to sense the change that is coming and are trying to align themselves with the future. Glad to see that Hans Jagerblitzen the candidate with serious ideas, is being taken seriously by the current members of the CSM that hope to be his peers after this election. Hans Jagerblitzen's campaign platform proves he is the best candidate for the majority of EVE players.
Power To The Players! |
Rastrelli Strasov
EntroPrelatial Industria EntroPraetorian Aegis
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 09:08:00 -
[540] - Quote
If i have read this correctly... the candidate is a "High/Low Sec" representative? Joy
plaswan |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 .. 26 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |