Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 26 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Benilopax
The Ashen Lion Syndicate
224
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 22:04:00 -
[661] - Quote
+2 votes as promised.
This guy has really shown what a great CSM member can be. |
knobber Jobbler
Seniors Clan Get Off My Lawn
50
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 22:12:00 -
[662] - Quote
Azelor Delaria wrote:I ended up voting on two accounts for Hans and one for Darius. I voted for Darius because his posts on the forums always make me smirk.
I hear many people voted Bush for the same reasons then it dawned on them how silly it was. |
I Legionnaire
The Foreign Legion Test Alliance Please Ignore
13
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 22:20:00 -
[663] - Quote
+2 votes |
Andrea Griffin
175
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 01:03:00 -
[664] - Quote
For me, this was a difficult decision. In the end I felt that Hans best represented my interests and the interests of my peers. I have in the past supported Seleene and Trebor - both are very good candidates - but Hans is the one pushing the hardest for low-sec revival and faction warfare, both of which affect my play the most.
So he gets my votes, even if he is slave scum... : > CCP Sreegs is my favorite developer. |
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
257
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 01:17:00 -
[665] - Quote
Voted, +2.
Hans for CSM7 Chair! In irae, veritas. |
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
257
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 01:21:00 -
[666] - Quote
Mikalia Sunstorm wrote:Ray Mitar wrote:If Hans Jagerblitzen can get players to cooperate in Empire space and join with them in FW I think he just might be the guy to unite players around the goal of making EVE Online BETTER for all players.
I live in null and the current CSM6 is great for the few giant alliances, but not for the little guys just starting out. I am not voting for any of the current members of CSM6 because they act like schoolyard thugs with no vision for improving the game. Additionally it seems like they want to take credit for CCP realizing they were going in the wrong direction when truth be told it was the actions of many players rioting and unsubscribing that made CCP reevaluate. If the CSM had really been effective they would have been able to convince CCP prior to the player revolt not afterwards. When the CSM finally gets CCP to listen what did they do? They get CCP to nerf everything their swamp with massive numbers tactics can't defeat. Selfish and small minded thugs squandering a great opportunity in my opinion.
More effective more rewarding FW will improve the PVP skills and coordinated combat skills of many newer players as well as older players who don't want PVP all the time, in my opinion, so I am supporting Hans Jagerblitzen.
The time has come for sensible rational leadership to speak for the majority of EVE players, the time for selfish juvenile bullies has past, vote for leadership that wants to improve the entire game, vote for Hans Jagerblitzen. I'd disagree with that assessment regarding TwoStep, Darius III, and maybe Trebor--my respect for Treb has see-sawed a bit over this last term--but overall: This...Oh my freakin' God, THIS! +1 Internets for you, Sir. Hans for CSM7 Chairman!
Trebor's recent EVE-Mail spam-campaign...
Treb, this is beneath you
In irae, veritas. |
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
257
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 01:28:00 -
[667] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Galatica789 wrote:http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=9129, Hans, your thoughts on this? [...] And trolling the existing CSM who should have known about it prior to release. Thats all I have to say for now, it'll take some for me to write a bit more about the specifics.
In all fairness, maybe they did, but it was/is still NDA'ed?
In irae, veritas. |
Vaurion Infara
Beyond Divinity Inc Excuses.
20
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 04:22:00 -
[668] - Quote
*Vaurion Infara secretly crafts theory that Trebor is working for Hans by hyping him in a 'voter's guide' then shooting himself in the foot with mass spam evemails.
MickeyFinn > Fyi Vaurion Infara is a bad apple in a bunch of good ones. Dont let his big mouth and moods bring you down! If anyone lives near him RL get him LAID! would help him a ton. Fly safe and gods speed. |
Marlakh
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
77
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 05:11:00 -
[669] - Quote
+2 votes for a well thought-out campaign and a solid platform. Good luck! |
asidburn Enaka
Alpha Arms and Manufacturing BROTHERHOOD OF DESTRUCTION
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 08:09:00 -
[670] - Quote
i just want to let everyone know about this scammer claming to be giving plex for votes dont be caught falling for this scam vote aganist darius III member of interstellar eXodus {IE-EX} they are scaming people pass the word on to everyone you can and vote aganist these undeserving jerks here is a copy of the chat log as proof of there unworthy actions!!!!!!!!
asidburn Enaka > what do i need to do Darius III > http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=480 go there Darius III > vote for me then paste the message you got after vote cast into this chat asidburn Enaka > your vote has been registered. We thank you for your participation. Darius III > Thanks man Darius III > that concludes our business Darius III > Fly safe asidburn Enaka > and what about the contract asidburn Enaka > i will have my alliance vote aganist you about 250 people asidburn Enaka > and then where will you be asidburn Enaka > send me the contract and i will have them vote for you asidburn Enaka > this is what we call a test of charecture Darius III > Have them vote against me Darius III > Sorry for the ssam Darius III > But I wouldnt sleep at night if I didnt do everything in my power to make syure that Goons dont ruin this CSM asidburn Enaka > your an idiot all your going to do is send more votes to the goons Darius III > not really Darius III > Goons will win chairman nbo matetr what, doesnt matter Darius III > nothing can stop them Darius III > and thats a real shame asidburn Enaka > well you just lost 243 votes asidburn Enaka > got 1 lost 243 Darius III > Didnt have them anyway Darius III > didnt lose anything Darius III > Just please dont make forum post about me, it would ruin my campaign asidburn Enaka > not to mentone att the isk spam bans you r about to get asidburn Enaka > too late asidburn Enaka > and i just copyed this conv asidburn Enaka > so i can post Darius III > You wouldnt dare do it Darius III > You too lazy anyway Darius III > I dont have a thing to worry about asidburn Enaka > haha i play eve 8 hrs a day and im retired all i have is time Darius III > no lazy bones like you would waste their time. LOL so much for your empty threats LOL
rember i dont care who you vote for just dont voter for them |
|
Abyss Azizora
Amarrian Warfactory
8
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 12:38:00 -
[671] - Quote
Voted. Hope we actually get a CSM delegate that isn't a RMT lord this time. |
Zodiac TheMarketRat
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 15:08:00 -
[672] - Quote
Bump for Hans. |
None ofthe Above
114
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 17:11:00 -
[673] - Quote
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Galatica789 wrote:http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=9129, Hans, your thoughts on this? [...] And trolling the existing CSM who should have known about it prior to release. Thats all I have to say for now, it'll take some for me to write a bit more about the specifics. In all fairness, maybe they did, but it was/is still NDA'ed?
I did actually find this worth investigating.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=77852&find=unread
I didn't get a definitive answer in the public thread, but I did get this private response from Trebor:
Quote:Well, there was some discussion of making the ship progressions more logical but no real details -- like the skills changes -- IIRC.
But mostly what Mittens was doing there was reacting to that huge mea culpa, and making sure the dev knew that everything was cool between him and CSM -- which it always was. We just would have liked to give him some pre-feedback to help him communicate stuff better.
My general opinion: way too early to get all bent out of shape about particular things, and huge props to CCP both for having the courage to address a big issue AND to bring it out for public discussion so early in the process. That's a BIG change and very welcome.
He mentioned maybe responding to my public thread later to get it on the record, but apparently he's been too busy fending off spam accusations.
TL;DR: It was discussed but it seems not with enough specifics to really react to.
Even None ofthe Above supports Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM7! |
None ofthe Above
114
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 17:18:00 -
[674] - Quote
Mister Kwong wrote:And btw, just a post that shows that CSM6 doesn't have as good of a rapport with CCP as you think it does. I guess Mittens isn't as chummy with CCP as he would like many of you to believe; http://scaurus.com/?p=673
Its been clear that the CSM is only allowed so far in to CCP's process.
IMHO, not far enough in, although I respect CCP's right to define a line there.
CSM election antics and crazy candidates devalue the CSM and would likely cause CCP to keep it at arms length. A CSM they can work with and is easy to respect will help us get a better game.
All the more important to vote for Hans, or at least take the election seriously enough not to vote for a joke candidate for the lulz.
Even None ofthe Above supports Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM7! |
Marlona Sky
EntroPrelatial Vanguard EntroPraetorian Aegis
554
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 18:47:00 -
[675] - Quote
Ok sure it might have been brought up, but ill ask anyways.
Hans,
I see other threads mention you represent faction warfare. Mittani has stated he wants faction warfare to be a test bed for null sov mechanics. What are your thoughts about this?
|
Vaurion Infara
Beyond Divinity Inc Excuses.
20
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 19:48:00 -
[676] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Ok sure it might have been brought up, but ill ask anyways.
Hans,
I see other threads mention you represent faction warfare. Mittani has stated he wants faction warfare to be a test bed for null sov mechanics. What are your thoughts about this?
99% sure he's absolutely against this.
MickeyFinn > Fyi Vaurion Infara is a bad apple in a bunch of good ones. Dont let his big mouth and moods bring you down! If anyone lives near him RL get him LAID! would help him a ton. Fly safe and gods speed. |
Macon Chalaise
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
7
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 20:18:00 -
[677] - Quote
Vaurion Infara wrote:*Vaurion Infara secretly crafts theory that Trebor is working for Hans by hyping him in a 'voter's guide' then shooting himself in the foot with mass spam evemails.
While I am not saying I believe this is true, it did cross my mind. Shoobie doobie doobie. |
Klown Walk
Black Rebel Rifter Club
44
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 20:20:00 -
[678] - Quote
+1 Vote from me and I hope my corp votes for you aswell. |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
2038
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 20:48:00 -
[679] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Ok sure it might have been brought up, but ill ask anyways.
Hans,
I see other threads mention you represent faction warfare. Mittani has stated he wants faction warfare to be a test bed for null sov mechanics. What are your thoughts about this?
Faction Warfare improvements should ONLY developed according to what works for Faction Warfare. If it works elsewhere, I don't care what they eventually do with FW mechanics out in null. I'm just adamant that they need to completely ignore what's good for null sec when making FW adjustments. The cultures are too different and trying to compromise will likely result in a system that fails to meet the specific needs of the Faction Warfare community, who deserve their own unique and highly functional set of game play tools. Missed an interview or debate? Check my CSM7 blog for details.
Many thanks to all of my friends and supporters for the kind words! |
Deen Wispa
Screaming War Eagles Incorporated
167
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 21:55:00 -
[680] - Quote
Chalk up another endorsement from one of the guys at Agony Unleashed; http://www.evealtruist.com/2012/03/csm-endorsement.html
Quote: When you're a fan of strategy and grand designs, it's easy to forget that for many people the fun is in the fight itself. Especially when it comes to smaller scale PVP (which despite what some may tell you, is still very much alive in NPC nullsec, lowsec, hisec and wormhole space), most people aren't really out to accomplish grandiose objectives so much as they are to find a fight and make explosions, and mechanics which make it easier and more enjoyable to get a fight on this scale are really good things. From reading Hans' manifesto, it's clear that this is something he gets. With a background in faction warfare, he comes from an area where easy to find, casual PVP is order of the day, and that's a perspective which I believe could go a long way, even outside of the areas he claims to have experience in.
There are many good candidates this time round, but if you're a fan of accessible, small scale PVP then Hans is worth a look.
If you want Empire and FW space enhanced, Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM7 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=66900&find=unread |
|
Marlona Sky
EntroPrelatial Vanguard EntroPraetorian Aegis
554
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 22:32:00 -
[681] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Ok sure it might have been brought up, but ill ask anyways.
Hans,
I see other threads mention you represent faction warfare. Mittani has stated he wants faction warfare to be a test bed for null sov mechanics. What are your thoughts about this? Faction Warfare improvements should ONLY developed according to what works for Faction Warfare. If it works elsewhere, I don't care what they eventually do with FW mechanics out in null. I'm just adamant that they need to completely ignore what's good for null sec when making FW adjustments. The cultures are too different and trying to compromise will likely result in a system that fails to meet the specific needs of the Faction Warfare community, who deserve their own unique and highly functional set of game play tools.
While I agree, I am curious how you plan on changing Mittani's mind?
|
Vordak Kallager
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
138
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 23:46:00 -
[682] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Ok sure it might have been brought up, but ill ask anyways.
Hans,
I see other threads mention you represent faction warfare. Mittani has stated he wants faction warfare to be a test bed for null sov mechanics. What are your thoughts about this? Faction Warfare improvements should ONLY developed according to what works for Faction Warfare. If it works elsewhere, I don't care what they eventually do with FW mechanics out in null. I'm just adamant that they need to completely ignore what's good for null sec when making FW adjustments. The cultures are too different and trying to compromise will likely result in a system that fails to meet the specific needs of the Faction Warfare community, who deserve their own unique and highly functional set of game play tools. While I agree, I am curious how you plan on changing Mittani's mind?
Why change The Mittani's mind? He is entitled to his opinion. I am hopeful that CCP will look at the voting statistics and see that a lot of people support Hans not because he is their alliance CEO, but because he has actual good ideas. Hans doesn't need to convince The Mittani, he needs to convince CCP; the actual FW community are eager to help show our support for Hans through petitions, threadnaughts, etc. if he is elected and CCP needs evidence that his ideas ACTUALLY represent the amalgamated desires of the FW community at large. Hans Jagerblitzen for CSM7 |
Alliance Rules
Playboy Enterprises - Tokyo
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 23:53:00 -
[683] - Quote
Just another reason to vote for.........
Read the complete Platform here: http://www.eve-online-dark-taboo.com/vote/
If you want your vote to count just once in EVE vote for PsychoBitch.
Sick of CCP devs and their hair-brained, half-baked, blue-balled ideas?
Sick of self-important fat puds and frail half-elves on the CSM?
Sick of things in eve that should have been fixed A G E S ago not being fixed and new errors being introduced daily?
Make your one vote count finally, vote for PsychoBitch!
If you are voting for someone who has been in the CSM before - you have wasted your vote on F A I L
Don't be a failure, be a hero. Vote for PsychoBitch now!
Campaign Song http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnOZAEbk7r0
If you don't drink whiskey - VOTE FOR SOMEONE ELSE If you don't like having sex with women - VOTE FOR SOMEONE ELSE If you don't live life on your own terms - VOTE FOR SOMEONE ELSE
THIS IS ALL YOU NEED TO KNOW IN LIFE - ANYTHING WRITTEN BELOW IGNORE |
Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
299
|
Posted - 2012.03.09 00:19:00 -
[684] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Ok sure it might have been brought up, but ill ask anyways.
Hans,
I see other threads mention you represent faction warfare. Mittani has stated he wants faction warfare to be a test bed for null sov mechanics. What are your thoughts about this? Faction Warfare improvements should ONLY developed according to what works for Faction Warfare. If it works elsewhere, I don't care what they eventually do with FW mechanics out in null. I'm just adamant that they need to completely ignore what's good for null sec when making FW adjustments. The cultures are too different and trying to compromise will likely result in a system that fails to meet the specific needs of the Faction Warfare community, who deserve their own unique and highly functional set of game play tools. While I agree, I am curious how you plan on changing Mittani's mind?
I don't think ccp views mittani as relevant regarding fw. Mittani would likely agree. Ccp is smart enough to realize that eves small scale pvp is fun enough to deserve its own major mechanic. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
2041
|
Posted - 2012.03.09 07:46:00 -
[685] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote: While I agree, I am curious how you plan on changing Mittani's mind?
I don't have to. He has already said that he not only supports my run for CSM but also that he would defer to me on Faction Warfare issues, should I be elected. All the more reason to get your friends to the polls! Missed an interview or debate? Check my CSM7 blog for details.
Many thanks to all of my friends and supporters for the kind words! |
Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
1401
|
Posted - 2012.03.09 13:12:00 -
[686] - Quote
Interesting the high numbers of people voting this time. Fingers crossed it leads to some genuine fresh air in the CSM and a return to representative accountability and focus on lowsec and small unit warfare.
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |
Jitacaldari
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.09 15:50:00 -
[687] - Quote
Hope to fly with you soon in FW, my skills are climbing to the point where i can contribute to a fight! Vote Hans Jagerblitzen CSM7 |
Macon Chalaise
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
9
|
Posted - 2012.03.09 16:38:00 -
[688] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Marlona Sky wrote: While I agree, I am curious how you plan on changing Mittani's mind?
I don't have to. He has already said that he not only supports my run for CSM but also that he would defer to me on Faction Warfare issues, should I be elected. All the more reason to get your friends to the polls!
Just doo eet! Shoobie doobie doobie. |
Hans Jagerblitzen
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
2049
|
Posted - 2012.03.09 18:52:00 -
[689] - Quote
Jitacaldari wrote:Hope to fly with you soon in FW, my skills are climbing to the point where i can contribute to a fight! Vote Hans Jagerblitzen CSM7
If you can fly a rifter / merlin / punisher, and fit both a scram and an afterburner, you're ready to contribute to a fight!
It's never too early to learn to pew. Let me know if you need any help getting on your feet - I can point you in the right direction depending on what faction you want to fight for or what ships you're interested in training towards. Mail me anytime! Missed an interview or debate? Check my CSM7 blog for details.
Many thanks to all of my friends and supporters for the kind words! |
Gabriel Darkefyre
Shadows Of The Federation Drunk 'n' Disorderly
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.09 19:04:00 -
[690] - Quote
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Ok sure it might have been brought up, but ill ask anyways.
Hans,
I see other threads mention you represent faction warfare. Mittani has stated he wants faction warfare to be a test bed for null sov mechanics. What are your thoughts about this? Faction Warfare improvements should ONLY developed according to what works for Faction Warfare. If it works elsewhere, I don't care what they eventually do with FW mechanics out in null. I'm just adamant that they need to completely ignore what's good for null sec when making FW adjustments. The cultures are too different and trying to compromise will likely result in a system that fails to meet the specific needs of the Faction Warfare community, who deserve their own unique and highly functional set of game play tools.
This.
To use an Analogy, look at FW being a Sports Car and Nullsec Sov being a High Speed Jet . You could have the best Sports Car Engine in the World, but if you try to put it straight into the Jet, well, it's just not going to fly. Likewise, strapping a Jet Engine to the Sports Car is just a Darwin Award waiting to happen even if it works perfectly for the Jet.
Simply put, if it works for one, it doesn't mean it'll work for the other. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 26 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |