EVE Search - A voice of reason in the Wilderness CSM7 candidate.

Search EVE-Online forums for:

All Channels

Jita Park Speakers Corner

A voice of reason in the Wilderness CSM7 candidate.

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Reply to Topic \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Sollana The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance 0	Posted - 2012.02.08 01:04:00 - [1] - Quote The general perception of 0.0 space, is lawless and those with the bigger guns take what they want. In most aspects you would be correct, But there are other options. My name is Sollana, and I announce myself as a candidate for the upcoming CSM elections. I live in Providence, and I am an Amarrian fighting for a cause greater than that of war, conquest and riches. I am Fighting for the future of our Empires. 0.0 space does not have to be war ridden and constantly changing, In the past year we have seen the fall of the Northern Coalition, We have seen the mighty powerblocks, stumble and fall. All because greed and power overcame them all. I propose that not all 0.0 pilots think this way, as part of CVA and its allies, we aim to build something greater, something more permanent something that will live on after we have turned to dust. We build a civilisation, we build infrastructure and we build for the capsuleers who have nothing, but the will to succeed. But Civilisation is not perfect, currently EVE does not allow us to protect our homes, unless we use ships?? Although this can produce some great fights, the old system before Dominion gave the defenders a chance, and I propose that as part of Sovereignty upgrades Station and Gate defenses should be onlined. Concord are allowed to have station and gate guns, so why is that not possible within 0.0. This would promote a reason to SBU a system and needing to do it covertly. currently there is no risk to SBUing a system, where the only defense is to use super capitals or grind them once they have been placed. Having armaments in position on gates and station, can be increase with upgrades in the Ihub and be based on sov level (1 battery per gate per level for instance, double that for the station). this would also add a new dynamic to gate camping reds blockading a system, as currently there is no risk in 0.0. 0.0 space does not allow for coalitions to have fully agreed charters, I propose the idea of presenting a charter. which will have many options and can be voted upon buy directors of many alliances, which will give automatic standings, standing updates (i.e if someone is turned red by 1 alliance./corp, the rest in the charter are notificed automatically of the change). 0.0 is the future of EVE, but not in the way most people see. If you feel I can represent you, then "like" this post, and If you have questions, Please feel free to post them here.
Issler Dainze Tadakastu-Obata Corporation The Honda Accord 643	Posted - 2012.02.08 01:10:00 - [2] - Quote Not to be confused with the "Voice of Reason" party.... Issler
TolidoBob Red Cross Mercenaries Silent Infinity 0	Posted - 2012.02.08 21:16:00 - [3] - Quote ...
Retar Aveymone GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 1	Posted - 2012.02.08 21:19:00 - [4] - Quote could you elaborate on why anyone would want to play eve under this model
Callean Drevus Icosahedron Crafts and Shipping Silent Infinity 91	Posted - 2012.02.08 21:21:00 - [5] - Quote I condone this idea, though having only a single reason to become CSM is a bit... well, you probably understand what I mean :) Developer/Creator of EVE Marketeer
Largo Coronet GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 50	Posted - 2012.02.08 21:38:00 - [6] - Quote You're going to demand everyone should shout "HUZZAH!" in local when they get a podkill, aren't you?
Haellena The Fiction Factory Silent Infinity 0	Posted - 2012.02.09 08:54:00 - [7] - Quote Largo Coronet wrote: You're going to demand everyone should shout "HUZZAH!" in local when they get a podkill, aren't you? No, we only do that when Tolidobob gets shot by his own alliance's pos. Like Callean said, a single reason to become CSM is a bit odd, but I do want those guns back... At least on stations...
Amiar The Fiction Factory Silent Infinity 2	Posted - 2012.02.09 09:40:00 - [8] - Quote I see the idea behind this and it may be a single item for CSM status, but in fact its a HUGE project if it gets thru. Larger than last expansion even I fully support Sollana and his idea +1
Deathwing Malevolent Energy Core 2 V.I.R.A.L. 1	Posted - 2012.02.09 11:05:00 - [9] - Quote +1 Some good ideas there
Ladie Harlot GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 1509	Posted - 2012.02.09 11:07:00 - [10] - Quote lol roleplayers The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Enthien Ruthar The Fiction Factory Silent Infinity 0	Posted - 2012.02.09 11:41:00 - [11] - Quote I wonder what these changes would do to small gang roams, specially with the guns on gates idea. But I do agree that "strength in numbers" and "who has the biggest guns" shouldn't be the only necessities to survive/stand a chance in 0.0. Being able to defend what you have build by other available means then the two I mention above should be possible, and that's why I like what Sollana is saying. +1
Wedieyounge Antilles DarkStorm. Supernova Federation 0	Posted - 2012.02.09 14:21:00 - [12] - Quote I like your vision, Sollana. Unless I got you wrong, I think it can give more security for people to live in null sec almost like in high sec, where alliances have strong, long and stable sovereignty. This isn't a simple or small change. It would change an important aspect of the game and how people play it. +1 -< Wedge Antilles [DKSTM] <SNF>, Commander and Diplomat
Krios Ahzek GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 493	Posted - 2012.02.09 14:25:00 - [13] - Quote Tell me more about roleplaying while in a corporation called ''The Legion of Spoon'' -aThough All Men Do Despise Us
DeadDuck The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance 5	Posted - 2012.02.09 15:34:00 - [14] - Quote Krios Ahzek wrote: Tell me more about roleplaying while in a corporation called ''The Legion of Spoon'' It's great you should try it
TolidoBob Red Cross Mercenaries Silent Infinity 0	Posted - 2012.02.09 18:23:00 - [15] - Quote Haellena wrote: Largo Coronet wrote: You're going to demand everyone should shout "HUZZAH!" in local when they get a podkill, aren't you? No, we only do that when Tolidobob gets shot by his own alliance's pos. Like Callean said, a single reason to become CSM is a bit odd, but I do want those guns back... At least on stations... i like the idea high sec / and low sec station's will shoot you why cant stations in 0.0 shoot you!
FloppieTheBanjoClown The Skunkworks Petition Blizzard 864	Posted - 2012.02.09 18:30:00 - [16] - Quote I've never hidden my dislike for CVA and some of its policies, so this will surprise no one when I say the idea of a CVA CSM is just frightening. Let's get a highsec carebear candidate before we let CVA impose their will on nullsec.
Raely Red Cross Mercenaries Silent Infinity 0	Posted - 2012.02.09 19:03:00 - [17] - Quote CVA and its NRDS allies make up a large chunk of EVE's ever growing population. It would be great if we had our voice in there somewhere. Sollana, I lova ya like a brother man, and I wish you all the best as one of my oldest friends in EVE. You have my confidence and support to represent us well.
Osabojo GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 86	Posted - 2012.02.09 19:11:00 - [18] - Quote What's your position on being able to purchase a robe and wizard hat with micro transactions?
entroncas Catalina Operations and Logistics Division Supernova Federation 0	Posted - 2012.02.09 19:17:00 - [19] - Quote The voice of the reason has spoken. SNF is with you. +1
Retar Aveymone GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 5	Posted - 2012.02.09 19:24:00 - [20] - Quote seriously who on earth would want to play this game and why


CCP Phantom C C P C C P Alliance 968	Posted - 2012.02.09 20:16:00 - [21] - Quote Off topic posts removed. Please stay polite and on topic, thank you. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator

Zirise Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 89	Posted - 2012.02.09 20:23:00 - [22] - Quote Translation: We cannot defend our space. Can we get some NPC guns on our stations? kthxbye
Sollana The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance 58	Posted - 2012.02.09 20:46:00 - [23] - Quote Largo Coronet wrote: You're going to demand everyone should shout "HUZZAH!" in local when they get a podkill, aren't you? Amarr Victor will suffice
Sollana The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance 58	Posted - 2012.02.09 21:00:00 - [24] - Quote Retar Aveymone wrote: could you elaborate on why anyone would want to play eve under this model the model is biased on a defensive stance rather than an agressive stance, that the game has now. War and fights are indeed fun, but it has become a game of large power blocks and who can squash the little guys first. My idea and proposal is that the little guy should have a chance. CVA is the little guy of the 0.0 power block and we accept that, we know our place. Providence is a great place for small gang skirmish type fights, that's what people want. fun fights. In a region with more station that most others, we feel we have the right to defend our homes. The original scope of Sov changes in Dominion did originally include the prospect of station and gate defences. Also those wondering what would happen if you did have gate guns in 0.0, nothing same as when you gate camp in low sec. my thoughts are this. these defences will be set via alliance standings, will require an upgrade in the ihub, and require a monthy fee as per most other upgrades. These gate guns can be interrupted with sbus as per current mechanics.
Sollana The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance 71	Posted - 2012.02.09 21:19:00 - [25] - Quote Retar Aveymone wrote: seriously who on earth would want to play this game and why There are people here who play this game for its economic PVP, theyre are people who play for faction war, there are people who play for the research and profitability it brings, people play to kill all who are not there allies. There are some that just want to play EVE there way, because it not the normal agressive sadistic moronic way most people play eve, does not mean it is wrong. As part of Goonswarm is that not how you play. You play the game how Goons want to play. Is that not what your reputation is built upon? Yes you have superior fleets, membership, Fleet commanders, resources and numbers of people you call enemies, but do you not play the game your way, your style no matter what others might say. That is how I perceive my proposals. NRDS is a way of life, building stations and infrastructure rather than SC's and Titans os how we play the game.
Mykael Skychild Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore 26	Posted - 2012.02.09 21:22:00 - [26] - Quote Sollana wrote: 0.0 space does not have to be war ridden and constantly changing, In the past year we have seen the fall of the Northern Coalition, We have seen the mighty powerblocks, stumble and fall. All because greed and power overcame them all. Yes it does. War is the engine that drives the eve economy. Die you terrible pubbie communist scum.
Tabernack en Chasteaux W.A.S.P Sons of Sylph 35	Posted - 2012.02.09 21:22:00 - [27] - Quote Sollana wrote: I propose that cloaking devices require fuel to operate, for example ozone. a small amount based on ship mass required to power the device. this would make them have a vulnerability that they currently do not have. Was this by any chance inspired by a recent thread on Reddit?
Sollana The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance 71	Posted - 2012.02.09 21:24:00 - [28] - Quote Osabojo wrote: What's your position on being able to purchase a robe and wizard hat with micro transactions? I do feel that if micro transactions are to be applied then so be it, but it should be for cosmetic reasons only. And if players want to play space barbie, why shouldn't they. Hey people make in game money in EVE playing Space farmville with PI and Pos's. Whatever floats your boat. I feel these proposals, and future ideals are about making the sandbox more challenging than just shooting stuff up, would be mice for the stuff to shoot back and make harrassment have more of a risk factor.
Sollana The Legion of Spoon Curatores Veritatis Alliance 71	Posted - 2012.02.09 21:26:00 - [29] - Quote Tabernack en Chasteaux wrote: Sollana wrote: I propose that cloaking devices require fuel to operate, for example ozone. a small amount based on ship mass required to power the device. this would make them have a vulnerability that they currently do not have. Was this by any chance inspired by a recent thread on Reddit? in fact no, it was inspired by a post made by a colleague on my alliance forums, if you have a link I would be interested in looking it over. Obviously this is something that other believe could work too.
Jowen Datloran Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 301	Posted - 2012.02.09 21:31:00 - [30] - Quote What? No. Automated gate camps (which the gate guns are if you turn them hostile on anyone who enter) should not be a common place in zero sec. While your small zero sec alliance might benefit from it so will all the major zero sec power blocks. And how do automated defences, that are mostly a hazzle to small gangs, promote small gang warfare? Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook-a


	Reply to Topic
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.