Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Pedo 'Stache
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 20:21:00 -
[61] - Quote
Seleene wrote:Hesperus Vanderbeets wrote:are you a girl? No, but I can lie about it if you want to give me stuff?
Like votes?
(Kidding, I sort of <3 you) |
MeBiatch
Republic University Minmatar Republic
165
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 20:44:00 -
[62] - Quote
Seleene wrote:MeBiatch wrote:i will vote for you if you drop the STUPID infinity point in Super Carriers idea... total WTF about that one Sorry m8, I think it's a simple thing that would go a long way to helping the damn things die. Letting supers catch each other = more super deaths. Tell me why you don't like this. MeBiatch wrote:and if you support some of these ideas:
What I am looking for a candidate is for them to:
1. support some sort of casual pvp via a contract system 2. enhance WIS 3. upgrade the mission system 4. make PI more like sim city 5. push to open up story lines for jove (possible WH expansion) 6. make FW include pirate missions like (kill so many people in system A) 7. make referendums for important CSM decisionsGǪ (if its real important we should all vote for it) this would be for major game changing things such as refocus and such 8. eliminate clone costs for players over 4 years old (to encourage pvp for old vets) 9. gethe fith subsystem for Tech III ships 10. kill all super caps (as in a real counter to them not this crap that I will only fly super caps now so give me back my sp cuss I cant use drones sh*t) 11. a way to integrate PI and ship crews and have an effect on your ships performance
Basically a CSM who represents the old vet casual pve/pvper 1.) That would be the last feature I worked on before I left CCP - TREATIES, but it was sidelined due to PI. It would (and still could) revamp aspects of the standings system, allow for mercenary contracts, industrial trade agreements, etc... I NEVER SHUT UP ABOUT THIS ONE. I want this in the game NOW. RIGHT ******* NOW. 2.) Hats. Pirate eye patches. Got it. 3.) Improved NPC interaction. I've talked a lot about this. 4.) Spaceville would be cool. Anything would be better than what it is now. 5.) Jove finish wiping out the Amarr. Check. 6.) Anything that makes it to where I get rewarded for doing the stuff I'm supposed to be doing for my faction = good. 7.) That would work if CCP knew what they were going to do more than 2-3 weeks ahead of time. 8.) Clone costs make me rage pretty hard. This came up at the last summit and they need to be cut down or just murdered with a chainsaw. 9.) How about we get what we have balanced well first? Do we really need this? 10. ) You mean like get rid of them completely, refund my money and skill points n' stuff? 11.) Ship crews is another ~dream~ thing that I'd fully support if it was done smartly and well balanced.
10 and the fist part. While i do agree there should be a capital ship that has an infinity point... i think its a bad idea to have this be on super carriers... its a power scale thing... certain peeps already have crud loads of super carriers and this would make it so everyone elses super caps die and they get to keep thiers...
I had come up with the Idea two years ago to add "juggernauts" to the game with are a capital tackler/ewar ships... that have infinity points and capital nuets and so on... this would allow smaller groups of players to engage a super cap more easily and make it fair for those who dont have 50+ super caps to field at any given moment...
as for #1... i did not know you the details of the treaty system... is this on a corp level alliance level or just personal level?
hmm now i am at a loss who to vote for you or meissa......
|
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
800
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 23:32:00 -
[63] - Quote
Henry Haphorn wrote:Since your platform is about iterating on old, incomplete features, what do you think about the mining profession at large? I understand already that the CSM6 has already got the ball rolling on the mineral distribution part regarding drone droppings and loot so that mining can be a little more profitable, but what about the other aspects of the mining profession?
I'd like to see mining be more interactive and require some form of actual DOING SOMETHING. I'd like to see bigger rocks. I'd like to see rocks with variable mineral content. I'd like to see rocks with multiple layers / densities. (zomg, what if there is Kernite, Omber and morphite in the center?!") I'd like to see finite resources of things like moon goo have a % chance to be in a rock. I'd like to see skills affect the amounts / types of minerals you could extract from a rock. I'd like to see planetary ring mining. I'd like to see comet mining. I'd like to mine / hollow out a giant asteroid and make a home there to live out of. I'd like to see a variance in the 'purity' of minerals that are mined where some veldspar is worth more. I'd like to see that same Veldspar refined into Tritanium that gives a ship 10% more hit points due to it's pure qualities... ... IF you had the proper skills to use the proper blueprint that allowed you to take advantage of the improved alloys.
That kind of stuff. That's what I'd like to see happen with mining / industry.
Henry Haphorn wrote:A lot of people, during my 3+ years of playing Eve Online, have pointed out that mining is a 'boring profession' and that's it's not as interactive as compared to other professions. How hard will you push for the iteration of the mining profession on the fun aspect of it?
I think the opportunity to push harder will exist in the next year far more than previously. Whereas in the past the CSM had to be a bit more careful in the things we pounded on the table about, CCP's re-newed focus on fixing / iteration will allow a bit more of a shotgun blast of proposals. Speaking for myself, I've always felt that a heavily Industry-themed expansion is LONG overdue. I'd like to see what would happen if the fuzzy bears at CCP were allowed to just go wild for a full release cycle. Every good PVPer in EVE understands the basics of industry and market PVP.
How hard will I push? Hard. Take a look at my answers above. This isn't stuff I just shat out in a couple mins; I've had this stuff on my mind for a while.
Henry Haphorn wrote:Bots are also another big issue. Will you bring up this issue during the CSM7? Also, what do you say to those who think that CCP is under some kind of conspiracy with the botters (the tin-foil hat wearers)?
It's been brought up and discussed with CCP's Security team. It's also heavily ~NDA'd~. I'm satisfied that the people looking into the botting issue understand a lot more than the EVE community gives them credit for. I wish I could discuss methods and such, but I can't. As for any kind of conspiracy or whatever, that's just bullshit.
Henry Haphorn wrote:Finally, there is buff/nerf debate regarding mining ships and their aggressors (gankers). Some say to buff the tank, others say to nerf it, and others say neither a buff or nerf should ever happen. What do you think?
I think messing with ship stats for this reason would be a mistake. CCP is already re-working the crime watch system and I think we'll see what the results of that are first before going any further. Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter |
Sasha Khaine
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
32
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 23:39:00 -
[64] - Quote
+1 good luck matey!
Welcome to EVE"The entire British empire was founded on cups of tea... and if you think I'm going to war without one, mate. You're sadly mistaken" |
Rhapsodyy
EXTERMINATUS. Nulli Secunda
15
|
Posted - 2012.02.11 23:51:00 -
[65] - Quote
Seleene wrote:
I'd like to see mining be more interactive and require some form of actual DOING SOMETHING.
I think the opportunity to push harder will exist in the next year far more than previously. Whereas in the past the CSM had to be a bit more careful in the things we pounded on the table about, CCP's re-newed focus on fixing / iteration will allow a bit more of a shotgun blast of proposals. Speaking for myself, I've always felt that a heavily Industry-themed expansion is LONG overdue. I'd like to see what would happen if the fuzzy bears at CCP were allowed to just go wild for a full release cycle. Every good PVPer in EVE understands the basics of industry and market PVP.
I would like to see the fuzzy bears as you so aptly put it let loose for a full cycle to iterate on the industrial side of eve, including mining. There's been loads of ideas thrown about for it so they should be able to come up with some suitable solutions.
However, i very strongly oppose any sort of mini-game type interaction being introduced into mining. Certainly mining with multiple accounts would be a pain in the ass, i dont want to have to play pin the laser on this bit of the roids ass every 2mins, and many of my indy/miner freinds are of the same opinion.
Though we all agree mining/indy needs a long overdue revamp.
Anyway GL Seleene.
+1
|
Wolodymyr
Mando'a Navy Controlled Chaos
50
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 00:04:00 -
[66] - Quote
Yeah I might hate PL and everything they stand for.
But out of all of the candidates Seleene is one of the least ******** so yeah I'll vote for you. |
Hesperus Vanderbeets
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
130
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 00:28:00 -
[67] - Quote
Dame Seleene!
I art hier upon this very ground to lay siege to thine castle built of lies and falsehoods!
I dare thee to to encross lances with me upon the battlesteed of your choice.
The time for reckoning is here! |
Killer Gandry
V I R I I Ineluctable.
44
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 01:02:00 -
[68] - Quote
Well, last year I split my votes between Seleene and Trebor.
This year I think there won't be any split.
+ from me |
Vibesz
Aliastra Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 01:58:00 -
[69] - Quote
+1 vote, give them another headache |
Pslash Vaik
H A V O C
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 02:59:00 -
[70] - Quote
CSM of awesome +1 |
|
Raivi
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
44
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 03:16:00 -
[71] - Quote
Seleene obviously worked really hard for CSM 6 and his experience as a prominent dev is very valuable.
I'm convinced that CSM 7 won't be at it's full potential without him on it. |
Viktor Loire
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 06:29:00 -
[72] - Quote
I gave you four of my votes for CSM6, Seleene, and I am of the mind that you did a decent job I do however have one criticism. There was a period of nearly two months (at a time of great importance to the EVE community) where you became incommunicado. I understand we all get busy with this real life thing, especially someone working between two countries, however, as my elected internet space politician I had hoped that you would be able to maintain an open dialogue with your supporters throughout your term.
Real life issues sidelining you aside, is there any way in which you hope to improve your communications with the EVE player base during your inevitable second term? |
XZ888
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 15:52:00 -
[73] - Quote
Tech is (hopefully) due for a nerf soon. What are your thoughts on moon minerals / mining, and in what direction would you hope CCP would go to ensuring that no one area of space is more 'desirable' than others. (currently the north is where all the isk is, and the south is a ghetto).
Finally your thoughts on outposts. Should they be destructable? |
testobjekt
Creative Accounting Institute
43
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 16:26:00 -
[74] - Quote
Do you support the nerfing of titans to a level were they cant touch subcaps? |
Phigmeta
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
13
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 17:00:00 -
[75] - Quote
testobjekt wrote:Do you support the nerfing of titans to a level were they cant touch subcaps?
good question,
If you nerf titans and moon goo then you effectivly turn PL into just another merc corp. Maybe then PL will get back to what made them great.
Its about time that "the easy button" is turn the **** off. |
Dri Kulsane
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 17:58:00 -
[76] - Quote
I'm voting for Mark Heard, someone who I've known both inside of EvE and out for about 6 years.
Mark is a serious man, who has a burning passion for this game rivaling my own. We met at a time when our approaches were quite different, and through strife we were able to find common ground and help focus each others abilities for the betterment of the community which we are so greatly involved with. I'm proud to be a part of Mark's vision for a Corporation and for the fact that he has put himself out there so much to help the greater EvE community.
Vote Saline! |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
872
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 18:40:00 -
[77] - Quote
Raivi wrote:Seleene obviously worked really hard for CSM 6 and his experience as a prominent dev is very valuable.
I'm convinced that CSM 7 won't be at it's full potential without him on it.
You are the best looking man in PL.
Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
872
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 18:41:00 -
[78] - Quote
Viktor Loire wrote:I gave you four of my votes for CSM6, Seleene, and I am of the mind that you did a decent job I do however have one criticism. There was a period of nearly two months (at a time of great importance to the EVE community) where you became incommunicado. I understand we all get busy with this real life thing, especially someone working between two countries, however, as my elected internet space politician I had hoped that you would be able to maintain an open dialogue with your supporters throughout your term.
Real life issues sidelining you aside, is there any way in which you hope to improve your communications with the EVE player base during your inevitable second term?
I'm glad you think it's inevitable, m8. I guess we shall see.
There was a time when I wasn't blogging much, but then again I'm not a habitual blog spammer like some others. I tend to just put out information when there's something specific to talk / report about or whatever. Not every current CSM member even maintains a blog or reports on their activities, but I try to do so when 'big stuff' is going down. That aside, I'm always reachable through eve mail and tend to get quite a few CSM-related questions through that. I reply to that usually within a day or two.
In the future I will probably keep a thread similar to my Q&A thread going so folks can stop in and 'visit' and I can field things on a more regular basis. Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
872
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 18:41:00 -
[79] - Quote
XZ888 wrote:Tech is (hopefully) due for a nerf soon. What are your thoughts on moon minerals / mining, and in what direction would you hope CCP would go to ensuring that no one area of space is more 'desirable' than others. (currently the north is where all the isk is, and the south is a ghetto).
Tech and all moon goo needs to be nerfed and re-done completely. There should be finite resources available of these materials as well (see my thoughts on mining a few posts back). I'd like to see different regions of space have unique things about them that make them valuable. Some regions should still be 'worth more' than others to help drive conflict, but the current imbalance right now is just stupid.
XZ888 wrote:Finally your thoughts on outposts. Should they be destructable?
Yep. Done smartly, I see no reason why every player made object in game shouldn't be blow-up-able. Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
872
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 18:41:00 -
[80] - Quote
testobjekt wrote:Do you support the nerfing of titans to a level were they cant touch subcaps?
I don't think it should be ~impossible~, but I think it could be adjusted to where it's not very effective. I think most people would agree that there's no silver bullet for titans / supercarriers. The problem is bigger than 'titan guns'.
That being said, I don't think that a single titan ATM is overpowered because a lone titan is pretty much dog food against a support fleet. Over and over, the issue doesn't seem to be one of A TITAN doing anything bad; it's the scale of the problem when you have multiples of the same ship class, be they Titans or Battleships or whatever, all shooting at the same target - one of them is going to get a glancing blow of some kind and BLAP, that's it.
This stuff goes back to when 50 battleships were blapping frigates too. Once you get XX number of big ships in a blob, ONE of them is going to score. That is where the main problem lies, IMO, and where we should be looking to START to curb things, quickly and smartly. Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter |
|
sakurako
The Circle
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 19:38:00 -
[81] - Quote
i'm not a fan of the csm i have said before i think it is a pr stunt for ccp.
with that said i shall vote for you Seleene if only in the hope that you'll get the chairman's seat better then having a goon sitting in it |
Plutonian
Intransigent
90
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 19:49:00 -
[82] - Quote
I d-scanned a Rifter in a belt in lowsec, and warped to that belt at range. I aligned for the planet, and after allowing time for the pilot to see where I was going, I warped there. The other Rifter followed and we fought.
Given the circumstances, we both wanted to fight.
One of us took a GCC and lost security status. Eventually that pilot will have to start shooting little red crosses or suffer the consequences of 'going pirate'. On this occasion, it was me. Perhaps tomorrow it will be him.
Why are we punished for seeking combat?
Is this working as intended or something you feel needs fixing?
|
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
879
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 22:07:00 -
[83] - Quote
Plutonian wrote:I d-scanned a Rifter in a belt in lowsec, and warped to that belt at range. I aligned for the planet, and after allowing time for the pilot to see where I was going, I warped there. The other Rifter followed and we fought.
Given the circumstances, we both wanted to fight.
One of us took a GCC and lost security status. Eventually that pilot will have to start shooting little red crosses or suffer the consequences of 'going pirate'. On this occasion, it was me. Perhaps tomorrow it will be him.
Why are we punished for seeking combat?
Is this working as intended or something you feel needs fixing?
Oh man... I SUPER HATE THIS. It's a total LIFE IN JAIL thing.
So, like, I am never going to rat to recover sec status. I cannot stand it. A long long long time ago, sec status recovered back up to 0.0 at a rate of +.1 a day I believe. Then that was removed and the only option since has been killing NPC's to prove to CONCORD that you are a reformed murderer.
Why has this not changed? Why can't I bribe someone? What about if I kill another -10.0 dude that I get a sec status boost?
I guess I'm still emo because Sel's sec status got wrecked back when I was being a bad pirate. I was hunting down an EVE Marshall Dominix in a belt in Sosala. He launched drones at me and my buddy in our torp launching Blackbirds (yes, I'm going back in time a bit!). The torps hit the drones (this was back when people could launch 10-15 drones) and detonated and the splash damage caused all the other drones to explode. The amazigly accurate sec status penality system (or whatever it's called) then treated every drone I'd popped as an entire ship kill. Then I killed and podded the guy for having the gall to defend himself.
To sum up:
EVE Marshalls corp Blackbirds with Torps Torp splash damage Drones being damaged / hit by missiles Wrecking sec status due to bad code
...... RAGE!
Anyway, in all the years since, I've not been able to force myself to fix my sec status by shooting NPCs. I want to be a better person, but there has to be a better solution to this.
I've brought this up on the CSM forums previously and it had a fair bit of discussion. It is defiantly something I intend to keep pushing on. Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter |
Plutonian
Intransigent
90
|
Posted - 2012.02.12 22:22:00 -
[84] - Quote
Thank you.
Seleene wrote:Oh man... I SUPER HATE THIS. It's a total LIFE IN JAIL thing. Yeah... to me the 15 min GCC feels like CCP telling me to go sit in the corner until I learn to behave.
|
Shadoo
North Eastern Swat Pandemic Legion
37
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 00:04:00 -
[85] - Quote
Also posting support for Seleene.
Love him, or hate him -- you have to admit the man has been there, done that and knows not only the game mechanics, but also can appriciate the difficulties in balancing corporate pressures and tight game release schedules.
I think that gives him a unique position to speak as a peer, not only a customer, when it comes to important game wide issues. Having been involved in designing much loved game features such as Wormholes -- I think the man speaks the truth when it comes to the need for iterations.
While Elise is my man for my Combat votes -- my other account will vote for Seleene for the wider game issues.
<3 |
Rutherford B Hazed
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 01:11:00 -
[86] - Quote
Seleene
Before I pledge my support what do you think of The $99.00 thing CCP wants 3rd party developers to pay? What have you done to express your views on this subject to CCP? Also goodluck ill be watching your , Hanz and Elise's campaign with great interest to decide who I should pledge my vote too. |
MakkAnzy
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 01:51:00 -
[87] - Quote
I for one will be pledging all my votes to Sel just as I did for CSM 6. Sel I go back to the old days of MC and brought CONIN into the MC. He even drove up to visit and bring me my BDCI pin. We got to talk about Eve and other RL stuff too. I say this to say that he has more passion about this game than anyone that works for CCP! If your on the fence about who to put your vote torwards, I would not hesitate to put a vote torwards Sel!
We are all passionate about certain issues within this imaginary space ship game, but Sel takes on all the issues, I have been waiting on someone that would actually speak there mind and he doesn't have to hold back when he is a member CSM!
I recommend everyone go read his blog
As far the guy who says Sel doesn't communicate...... really...... this guy over communicates sometimes......
|
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
894
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 01:55:00 -
[88] - Quote
Rutherford B Hazed wrote: Seleene
Before I pledge my support what do you think of The $99.00 thing CCP wants 3rd party developers to pay? What have you done to express your views on this subject to CCP? Also goodluck ill be watching your , Hanz and Elise's campaign with great interest to decide who I should pledge my vote too.
When this first came up last year, it was right in the middle of CCP's completely befuddled efforts to talk to the community about much of anything. I actually wrote about this specific issue in my blog when it happened in an attempt to make sense of the thought processes behind it:
The $99 feedback loop
I can't really paste much of what I said on the internal CSM forums or in the joint Skype chat but there was a lot of emo going on. It didn't help that this was right in the middle of all the other drama. As a result of this and all the player rage, if you recall, CCP Zulu appeared on the EVE Online Alliance Tournament and another blog came out on the subject where he talked about the fee not being $99 but a 'token payment'. I didn't waste any time in making my thoughts known what this token payment should be:
LINKAGE to old forums
I think it's safe to say that any attempt by CCP to repeat this nonsense will be met by me, and the rest of the CSM, with all the subtlety of a small nuke. Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter |
Rutherford B Hazed
Hedion University Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 06:47:00 -
[89] - Quote
Seleene
Thanks for the answer ill be watching close! |
Jenna Mai
V0LTA 0ccupational Hazzard
4
|
Posted - 2012.02.13 08:54:00 -
[90] - Quote
Seleene wrote:testobjekt wrote:Do you support the nerfing of titans to a level were they cant touch subcaps? I don't think it should be ~impossible~, but I think it could be adjusted to where it's not very effective. I think most people would agree that there's no silver bullet for titans / supercarriers. The problem is bigger than 'titan guns'. That being said, I don't think that a single titan ATM is overpowered because a lone titan is pretty much dog food against a support fleet. Over and over, the issue doesn't seem to be one of A TITAN doing anything bad; it's the scale of the problem when you have multiples of the same ship class, be they Titans or Battleships or whatever, all shooting at the same target - one of them is going to get a glancing blow of some kind and BLAP, that's it. This stuff goes back to when 50 battleships were blapping frigates too. Once you get XX number of big ships in a blob, ONE of them is going to score. That is where the main problem lies, IMO, and where we should be looking to START to curb things, quickly and smartly.
First of all I'd like to say I voted for you last time and you'll get my vote this time, you seem to be a stand up guy who says what he believes and you have a welfare of the playerbase uppermost in your mind. You got a +1 from me!
However I believe titans are a problem as they are in groups AND on their own.
Very few people who've experienced titans as they are at the moment would disagree they're overpowered as far as their guns go. You're never going to be able to stop people blobbing with ships as it's just something that is part of human nature. PL are a good example of this, a titan pilot within PL knows he's a good chance of using his ship on a regular basis and getting some kills with a very low chance of losing it. The only way to fix it is to make it so titans NEED a backup fleet in order to function at their most effective.
The problem of titans guns being overpowered was excellently demonstrated to me about a week ago I was up in the drone regions and we got a PL Erebus tackled. What did he do? Popped our interdictors with his blasters.
Sorry, no, that should not be happening. Titans should need a subcap fleet to help then fight off what they can't, and right now they don't need that as they can pretty much fight off anything on their own, from the lowly interdcitor to doomsdaying a carrier.
I personally would make it so their guns (even if loaded with tracking computers) are marginally effective against battleships and totally useless at killing anything smaller.
Anyway good luck in the election, never thought I'd vote for a PL guy in anything! ;) *grits teeth* |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 12 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |