|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
2951
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 17:49:00 -
[1] - Quote
JEFFRAIDER wrote:Sup The Mittani,
How are you going to nerf alliances packing fleets with tons of mouthbreathers in Maelstroms?
Regards,
Jeff R Aider
Look at this guy: he's afraid to fight goons with subcaps. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
2966
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 11:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
Akelorian wrote:The Gard'ner wrote:The Mittani,
Most of your posts, that I have read so far, in several threads have a "like it or leave" ring to them. With that not only the response to a legit question from Grumpy Owly, but other remarks on the forum.
You will represent those who voted for you, what if something happens through the year where most of your voters don't agree on, will it be the same snobby additude telling us to "like it or leave" ? Its who he is, and what he does, like it or leave it. I'd much rather call him a **** than give him my vote, its up to the players to see Mittens for what he is and whats really on his agenda, and no, it is not for the good of the players but for his alliance. He is corrupt, cares very little for you or I, or the new player. He cares only about getting his way by proposing changes in the game that benefits only him and his alliance/coalition.
I challenge you to name 2 such proposals or admit to being a liar making things up to smear an in-game opponent. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
2983
|
Posted - 2012.02.17 19:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote:Malcanis wrote: I can't seriously imagine anyone being against METH-NAUGHTS
I will be the devil's advocate here: I thought we all also wanted more accessible PvP that is not auto-win for those with pockets deep enough to afford a boosting alt, Falcon alt, a supercap ready to hotdrop, a million implants, and boosters? METH-NAUGHTS would be a step in the wrong direction from that aspect, by making boosters common enough that they become yet another thing you "need" in order to be competitive in PvP.
Counterpoint: I'm forwarding this post to your mother. Expect to be disowned by morning. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3037
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 10:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
High Heel wrote:Mittens:
Why you hate Titans and SuperC's So much? Do they make you angry cause you can't afford them or what is it?
Why do you want to limit the game to subSupercap warfare? That is basically saying 400 VS 500. the ones whit 500 wins. So you are basicly supporting larger and larger fleetfights?
The tighter you squeeze, the more systems will slip through your grip, Center For Advanced Studies! Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3106
|
Posted - 2012.03.04 22:25:00 -
[5] - Quote
The best T2 BPO nerf would be a change in the focus on material cost for T2 production. The ME advantage of producing from a BPO is the big advantage of the T2 BPO holder. In short: you can boost invention by nerfing Technetium
That said, the fact that margins on SKUs like HICs, for which no BPOs exist, aren't noticeably different from HACs, indicates that the greatest competition inventors face is not BPO holders, but other inventors. (Barring low-volume items which, by definition, are less relevent.) Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3109
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 07:34:00 -
[6] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Jitacaldari wrote:The Mittani wrote:
I don't particularly /like/ T2 bpos, but the environment of uncertainty isn't good for anyone, bpo holders or anti-bpo holders.
If an insufferable clown like this guy didn't exist I'd have to invent him just to motivate players to vote so children like him would not be identified as the "typical" EVE player. Time we all realized the dumbing down of a complex space sandbox game to accommodate those who actually seem better fit for a playground sandbox is not good for a game thinking adults can enjoy. Would love to see a demographic breakdown of the high school dropouts and unemployed slackers that make up this guys voting support. The bottom of the barrel has great power when no one else bothers to vote. oh no another forum alt of a hurtbutte supercap owner saying mean things about me, this will truly ruin my campaign
fyp
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3112
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 13:59:00 -
[7] - Quote
Ladie Harlot wrote:People still mad about supercap nerfs are my favorite thing about Eve. Hopefully they will soon be replaced with people mad about titan tracking getting fixed.
Well I for one am sure that the luminaries of PL, NCdot And RDN will have learned their lesson from the previous supercarrier rebalance, and will accept the necessary changes with calm good grace and provide dignified, constructive comment. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3112
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 14:04:00 -
[8] - Quote
(ahahaha they'll all baww like a babby with a hornet in his dapiers and threaten to unsub their eleventy-seven accounts each) Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3114
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 16:56:00 -
[9] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Malcanis wrote:(ahahaha they'll all baww like a babby with a hornet in his dapiers and threaten to unsub their eleventy-seven accounts each) Or more likely, they'll adapt and you'll find something new to whine about for CCP to fix.
Well I guess we'll find out about that soon enough
Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
3123
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 10:35:00 -
[10] - Quote
Good luck mittens Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
|
|
|
|