Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 36 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Alphea Abbra
Project Promethion
10
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 03:24:00 -
[421] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:There should be a limit to how many times you get re-elected. There should be a limit to who can get elected in the first place as well. So far I've found one (MAYBE two, but that's not my point).
Guess what, you get the honour of being very, very special and unique, and doesn't get to be elected.
At least, if I decided. |
Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
176
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 03:39:00 -
[422] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Grumpy Owly wrote:Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting Your sig says: "All griefers are lazy cowards with the current climate of broken player policing systems." Get out of my thread.
I guess then this implies I'm not allowed a personal view on the subject?
Can I similarly then simply assume you support griefing? Largely a rhetorical question given your stance on the game.
Please don't feel compelled to repsond however, I understand your denial of any viewpoint that doesn't support your own is of no relevance or concern to you or your campaign interests.
As a champion of "griefers" the very fact that you have not bothered to answer since you are scared by a players stance simply supports my signatures comment.
"All griefers are lazy cowards with the current climate of broken player policing systems." |
The Gard'ner
New Eden's Garden
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 05:10:00 -
[423] - Quote
The Mittani,
Most of your posts, that I have read so far, in several threads have a "like it or leave" ring to them. With that not only the response to a legit question from Grumpy Owly, but other remarks on the forum.
You will represent those who voted for you, what if something happens through the year where most of your voters don't agree on, will it be the same snobby additude telling us to "like it or leave" ? |
Akelorian
FinFleet Raiden.
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 07:20:00 -
[424] - Quote
The Gard'ner wrote:The Mittani,
Most of your posts, that I have read so far, in several threads have a "like it or leave" ring to them. With that not only the response to a legit question from Grumpy Owly, but other remarks on the forum.
You will represent those who voted for you, what if something happens through the year where most of your voters don't agree on, will it be the same snobby additude telling us to "like it or leave" ?
Its who he is, and what he does, like it or leave it. I'd much rather call him a **** than give him my vote, its up to the players to see Mittens for what he is and whats really on his agenda, and no, it is not for the good of the players but for his alliance. He is corrupt, cares very little for you or I, or the new player. He cares only about getting his way by proposing changes in the game that benefits only him and his alliance/coalition. |
Lolmer
Yahoo Inc Caffeine Nicotine and Hate
20
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 08:00:00 -
[425] - Quote
2bhammered wrote: Yeah, a lot of Americans and English people in general are very abusive sometimes. The hate against anyone Russian is also very strong, blacks, jews and Russians in particular are targeted a lot for abuse in this game. It reminds me a lot of many Americans and British people on Xbox live. Not sure what he can do about it? I suppose he can start by making sure goon mumble members not have swastikas as their profile pic? and also ensure goons members do not scream f'ing jew and the N word in local and such. At least then he sets an example and more can follow perhaps.
PS: For the record, there are blacks, jews, Russians and nice Americans as well as British people within the goons. Don't misunderstand me.
You're saying that we're racist in the same breath in which you are spouting racist nonsense? Xbox Live players are people too and you should show them respect!
NOTE: I don't actually own an Xbox nor do I have an Xbox Live account. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2087
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 08:21:00 -
[426] - Quote
Akelorian wrote:[quote=The Gard'ner]Its who he is, and what he does, like it or leave it. I'd much rather call him a **** than give him my vote, its up to the players to see Mittens for what he is and whats really on his agenda, and no, it is not for the good of the players but for his alliance. He is corrupt, cares very little for you or I, or the new player. He cares only about getting his way by proposing changes in the game that benefits only him and his alliance/coalition.
Tell me how much you care about the new player, akelorian of finfleet yeah no i'm not actually running for csm7
got you lol!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Mintrolio
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
296
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 08:23:00 -
[427] - Quote
Akelorian wrote:The Gard'ner wrote:The Mittani,..............
Its who he is, and what he does, like it or leave it. I'd much rather call him a **** than give him my vote, its up to the players to see Mittens for what he is and whats really on his agenda, and no, it is not for the good of the players but for his alliance. He is corrupt, cares very little for you or I, or the new player. He cares only about getting his way by proposing changes in the game that benefits only him and his alliance/coalition.
I AM THINK I MAY HAVE PLAN JUST FUR YOU.
PLEASE VOTIGN MINTROLIO - YOU CAN FINDIGN MINE WORDS IN LINK BELLOWS.
ALSO EVEN IF NOT VOTIGN MINTROLIO, I AM THENK YOU FUR TIME.
MINTROLIO FUR CSM7 |
The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5083
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 11:09:00 -
[428] - Quote
The Gard'ner wrote: Most of your posts, that I have read so far, in several threads have a "like it or leave" ring to them. With that not only the response to a legit question from Grumpy Owly, but other remarks on the forum.
You will represent those who voted for you, what if something happens through the year where most of your voters don't agree on, will it be the same snobby additude telling us to "like it or leave" ?
You get what you get from me. I've been entirely consistent in fighting for issues that are core to my constituents over the past year, and unlike any CSM in memory I've brought results. Someone who whines about 'griefers' isn't going to vote for me anyway.
It's unlikely that my views on nullsec priorities will do an abrupt about-face in the middle of CSM7.
There's an amusing misconception among some about the CSM elections. If I, a flaming leftie, go visit a bible-banging conservative representative who happens to have won my district, he's not going to hear my views on 'maybe we should stop bombing people all the time', he's going to laugh me out of the office. I don't represent consensual PvP, I don't represent people who are afraid of griefers, and I certainly don't represent those obsessed with e-honour.
Deal with it. vOv The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |
Malcanis
Vanishing Point. The Initiative.
2966
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 11:14:00 -
[429] - Quote
Akelorian wrote:The Gard'ner wrote:The Mittani,
Most of your posts, that I have read so far, in several threads have a "like it or leave" ring to them. With that not only the response to a legit question from Grumpy Owly, but other remarks on the forum.
You will represent those who voted for you, what if something happens through the year where most of your voters don't agree on, will it be the same snobby additude telling us to "like it or leave" ? Its who he is, and what he does, like it or leave it. I'd much rather call him a **** than give him my vote, its up to the players to see Mittens for what he is and whats really on his agenda, and no, it is not for the good of the players but for his alliance. He is corrupt, cares very little for you or I, or the new player. He cares only about getting his way by proposing changes in the game that benefits only him and his alliance/coalition.
I challenge you to name 2 such proposals or admit to being a liar making things up to smear an in-game opponent. Malcanis' Law: Any proposal justified on the basis that "it will benefit new players" is invariably to the greater advantage of older, richer players.
Things to do in EVE:-áhttp://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/ |
The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5083
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 11:19:00 -
[430] - Quote
The funny thing is that there's basically no difference in policy between GSF and Finfleet on null issues, unless it's titan gun tracking or if Raiden is Literally The Only Alliance Who Likes Tech The Way It Is.
Anyway, I just found out that the angry NPC alt who hates griefers ran, not walked, to the ~fire mttens~ thread to write a wall of text about how I am a 'punk' because I didn't represent his anti-griefing views.
'heh'
The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |
|
Galatica789
Autocannons Anonymous Late Night Alliance
15
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 11:28:00 -
[431] - Quote
I live in Lulm, ill expect that Brutix |
Gevlin
EXPCS Corp SpaceMonkey's Alliance
102
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 13:04:00 -
[432] - Quote
I have you have my support but....
be careful of making eve the one way to play only. the reworking of the Drone lands just so they are the same as all other region. As I have been told it is worthless space but the CSM wants to Nerf it making it like every other region.
I WANT MORE NON CONSENSUAL PVP BUT ALSO MORE I am a Carebare at heart to increase my type op player: Ie i believe there should be an added option of Consensual PVP like In game mechanic for fight simulators, or in game tournament mechanic to automate something similar to our Alliance tournaments.
But Don't remove the current non consensual PVP Suicide Ganking, wardecs, etc.... I mine in Null sec, it is exciting to be the mouse in a house of cats If you are a smart mouse you begin to learn ways to protect your self, in PVP servers I can't play because I can't make my self safe.
Though EVE needs to expanded Non Consensual PVP so the suicide gangker can't hide behind concord. Ie Goon ganks a Miner, who won't have any skill to fight back, in a throw away ship. Then gets into his expensive ship to fly around with little risk of retaliation. Care Bears should have the right to transfer "or sell" Their kill rights" to another. Now we have true non Consensual PVP as Care Bears are given the tools to fight back.
-->I like my pants but I don't need more , I want the opportunity to interact with other avatars even with limited mechanics. Role Playing. -->I want more marketing control, I want to open shop to sell to my choice of customers, giving me more control on who gets my goods, not some red buying my stock of damage controls, Even if it is off a tab in the Hanger UI I want more ships --> I want t3 Frigate, but I also want to have some new Industry ships or more industrial options for current combat ships. I love being hunted
In Summary. Eve is more than just SHIP PVP. -Market PVP, Asset Denial, Politics. Roleplaying, Inflated Egoes this is what makes eve great!!
so Don't be scraping what pants I got. Though I don't need more Don't be taking the sand our of my Sand box, put more in it!
I agree with several people: CCP needs to focus most of eve's recources on FIS, but the development of WIS still needs to continue, just as a slower and more efficient pace. In eve I wish to be more than just a machine. |
Mintrolio
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
299
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 13:17:00 -
[433] - Quote
GELVIN IST FINE LINE YOU WALKIGN
JUST A THOUHGT
KEEP UP GOOD POASTIGN MINTROLIO FUR CSM7 |
Boris Lachenkov
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 13:30:00 -
[434] - Quote
How long will Mintrolio's reign of slander be allowed to run? I call upon CCP to take action in this time of crisis.
Snipe. |
Mintrolio
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
299
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 13:50:00 -
[435] - Quote
Boris Lachenkov wrote:How long will Mintrolio's reign be allowed to run? I call upon CCP to take action in this time of crisis.
Snipe.
UNTIL MARCH 21ST. MINTROLIO FUR CSM7 |
Boris Lachenkov
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
19
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 14:01:00 -
[436] - Quote
This is much too long, I ask the Mittani what he plans to do in order to counter these horrific claims. Namely being compared to David Cameron.
|
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
152
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 14:05:00 -
[437] - Quote
The Mittani,
I can't verify that you have had the dramatic effect on the CSM that you claim, nor do i think you care about the views of the wider community, so i just have a couple questions that i hope you can answer honestly...
If it were up to you, what direction would you like to see EVE grow in?
What do you consider to be the biggest problem in EVE today and conversely what do you consider the best thing about EVE? |
Herbatrix
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 15:08:00 -
[438] - Quote
Mr Mittani, as someone who has no idea who you are, who has never voted, and who is not going to read through 22 pages, could you briefly summarise what sorts of changes you're looking to make, what issues you think need to be looked at, etc.? |
The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5103
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 15:17:00 -
[439] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:The Mittani,
I can't verify that you have had the dramatic effect on the CSM that you claim, nor do i think you care about the views of the wider community, so i just have a couple questions that i hope you can answer honestly...
If it were up to you, what direction would you like to see EVE grow in?
What do you consider to be the biggest problem in EVE today and conversely what do you consider the best thing about EVE?
I'd like to see more expansions like Crucible, and keep stabbing stakes into the heart of Incarna. Just to be absolutely certain that it's dead, and that Hilmar doesn't get more Kool-Aid.
Many of the sucking chest wounds impacting EVE were dealt with during CSM6 and the Crucible expansion. Lag, iterative ship balance, supercaps, etc etc. Right now the highest priority post-Crucible would be risk/reward balance, as EVE is spewing risk-free isk everywhere, while there's not much reason to actually hold or profit from sov, which is quite risky.
The best thing about EVE is the metagame - the politics, the treachery. That's what makes it unique. The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |
The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5103
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 15:18:00 -
[440] - Quote
Herbatrix wrote:Mr Mittani, as someone who has no idea who you are, who has never voted, and who is not going to read through 22 pages, could you briefly summarise what sorts of changes you're looking to make, what issues you think need to be looked at, etc.?
I'm not going to hold your hand if you're too lazy to educate yourself. The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |
|
Tubrug1
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
24
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 15:20:00 -
[441] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:
[list]
If you think that virtual pants are more important than spaceships, I donGÇÖt want your vote. .
But what about virtual hats? You think theyre important right? Don't listen to what i say |
RUSROG
Beasts of Burden
106
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 15:21:00 -
[442] - Quote
You have beautiful eyes.
-áE .-+ ` ' /-+. F
Your tears fuel me. And as always, have nice day. |
Johnny Marzetti
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
68
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 15:24:00 -
[443] - Quote
Tubrug1 wrote:The Mittani wrote:
[list]
If you think that virtual pants are more important than spaceships, I donGÇÖt want your vote. . But what about virtual hats? You think theyre important right?
At least people would actually seem them sometimes. I want a fez. My main wants a do rag. I would pay Aurum for these.
|
Dramaticus
Goonswarm Federation
53
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 15:44:00 -
[444] - Quote
The Mittani why do you support bad facial hair? |
Boris Lachenkov
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
20
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 15:48:00 -
[445] - Quote
If you vote for me in CSM 8, I will push for virtual hats to be added to the game in conjunction with a valve TF2 EVE hat release.
I want an avatar to dangle from the top of my head. |
Jonathan Malcom
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
52
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 15:57:00 -
[446] - Quote
Hey Mittens, any chance you can talk Vile rat into running again? He's dreamy. <3 |
Herbatrix
Love Squad Confederation of xXPIZZAXx
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 15:58:00 -
[447] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Herbatrix wrote:Mr Mittani, as someone who has no idea who you are, who has never voted, and who is not going to read through 22 pages, could you briefly summarise what sorts of changes you're looking to make, what issues you think need to be looked at, etc.? I'm not going to hold your hand if you're too lazy to educate yourself.
You're doing politics wrong. You're meant to be sucking up to the voters to get their +1 |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
152
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 16:32:00 -
[448] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:[quote=Rek Seven] I'd like to see more expansions like Crucible, and keep stabbing stakes into the heart of Incarna. Just to be absolutely certain that it's dead, and that Hilmar doesn't get more Kool-Aid.
Many of the sucking chest wounds impacting EVE were dealt with during CSM6 and the Crucible expansion. Lag, iterative ship balance, supercaps, etc etc. Right now the highest priority post-Crucible would be risk/reward balance, as EVE is spewing risk-free isk everywhere, while there's not much reason to actually hold or profit from sov, which is quite risky.
The best thing about EVE is the metagame - the politics, the treachery. That's what makes it unique.
Thanks for your reply. Although i want the existing content to be improved and fixed, personally i want to see the WiS features many people were expecting implemented in the future and I'm not going to be happy if all i can expect from now on is polish and more ships added to the list of ships i have no intention of flying.
For that reason i hope you don't get get your way as i think your attitude stifles the creativeness of CCP and will lead to a stagnate game with a dwindling player base, that may look pretty but will be filled with elitist players who forget that EVE is a game. |
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
482
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 16:44:00 -
[449] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote: Thanks for your reply. Although i want the existing content to be improved and fixed, personally i want to see the WiS features many people were expecting implemented in the future and I'm not going to be happy if all i can expect from now on is polish and more ships added to the list of ships i have no intention of flying.
For that reason i hope you don't get get your way as i think your attitude stifles the creativeness of CCP and will lead to a stagnate game with a dwindling player base, that may look pretty but will be filled with elitist players who forget that EVE is a game.
At the core, Eve is (still) a spaceship game. I don't mind adding more WiS stuff, as it looks really cool and can be great for immersion. I don't even mind AUR and vanity items all that much. However, the FiS part of the game has so many balance problems that it makes very little sense to prioritize WiS over FiS.
CCP has proven that it cannot properly do both WiS and FiS at the same time. That is why people like The Mittani are good, as they pound the "put FiS first" attitude that preserves and improves the game, rather than leaving glaring problems be and just add more ~awesome~.
More succinctly: stifling the creativeness of an architect who just wants to design fancy arch decorations in favor of making him do the much less fun task of making sure the building is stable is not a bad thing. Rifterlings - Small gang lowsec combat corp specializing in frigates and cruisers. US Timezone veterans and newbies alike are welcome to join us. Come chat in the "we fly rifters" in-game channel. |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
152
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 17:03:00 -
[450] - Quote
Petrus Blackshell wrote: At the core, Eve is (still) a spaceship game. I don't mind adding more WiS stuff, as it looks really cool and can be great for immersion. I don't even mind AUR and vanity items all that much. However, the FiS part of the game has so many balance problems that it makes very little sense to prioritize WiS over FiS.
CCP has proven that it cannot properly do both WiS and FiS at the same time. That is why people like The Mittani are good, as they pound the "put FiS first" attitude that preserves and improves the game, rather than leaving glaring problems be and just add more ~awesome~.
More succinctly: stifling the creativeness of an architect who just wants to design fancy arch decorations in favor of making him do the much less fun task of making sure the building is stable is not a bad thing.
I totally agree with you. The FiS content is the reason we were all attracted to this game in the first place and therefore the developers should be focusing on improving and expanding on that part first but the Mittani is saying he doesn't what WiS whatsoever.
Incarna as it is now adds next to nothing to the game and i'm not going to sit here and claim otherwise but i believe it has potential to be a hell of a lot more and could actually enhance/compliment EVE gameplay. |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 30 .. 36 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |