Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
792
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 21:24:00 -
[61] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:So what do you plan to do to help incursions as part of CSM7?
Do you plan to push hard for implementation of the modular Corp and POS system so that smaller corps can isolate potential spiez without shutting them out of everything if they are indeed legit?
Could we count of CSM7 to SERIOUSLY push the botting and RMT issue? I am sick of tired of hearing people say "Nothing CCP can do bout it" And even alliances having rules against reporting Blue Bots.
Incursions have been a tremendously well received addition to the game, so it is natural they should be built upon and improved. The first thing in my mind is to rebalance the highsec incursions to make sure the least-done sites get used and that sites stay longer to allow more casual people to participate. Another one is to get the content team to add more types of incursions, preferably with other races than sansha and with as strong an emphasis on backstory integration/addition as possible. CCP had been neglecting the roleplaying and events aspect for a while, this oft-requested change in direction was a very good thing and should be repeated. The lowsec/0.0 sites work fine as far as I'm concerned, so no change required there (other than diversity to keep the challenge fresh). Should CCP determine that new incursion types require too much resources at this stage, I'd still try and get them to create more collaborative PvE, if only because one of the major challenges to overcome for a highsec dweller to go into low/null is the lack of a social group and group experience.
Spies are an inevitable fact of life. It affects larger groups more than smaller ones though. Most of the heists in eve history didn't come from people who had been in a corp for a short period of time, but rather from people who had managed to sneak their way in for a long period of time, and I don't see how any game mechanics can prevent that from happening. So while I see where you're coming from, there's not much that I see can be done with relatively low effort to help foster security. What I'm saying in essence is that the return is too chancy for the large investment in development resources it would require. So, no... However some of the ideas in there are worth pursuing, if the cost is low enough.
CSM 6, as every CSM I've been a member of (all of them since CSM 2) has been pushing continuously against botting and RMT. The truth of the matter is that CCP actively goes against them. At our request they publicized their unholy rage initiative, but most of the work is done in the background. We have had continuous evidence that fight against RMT and botting is happening. Less than we'd like, but more than you know... It's essentially a game of whack-a-mole. You kill one, another springs up, and I understand and agree with CCP that providing information as to how they are fighting them could make that fight less effective. We are however constantly debating with CCP for them to provide figures/reports of their activity to show that the fight is going on. I hope CCP Sreegs will present some information to that effect at fanfest. To answer your question though: Yes indeed, I will be pushing for more fighting against botting/RMT in CSM 7, just know that it is already happening (and be sure to use the channels available to report their activity: petition and [email protected] ) Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |
Meissa Anunthiel
Redshift Industrial Rooks and Kings
792
|
Posted - 2012.02.18 22:02:00 -
[62] - Quote
Hroya wrote:What has the progress been on improving industry in null sec and getting people to move there since the previous elections ?
How high is finding a sollution to automated gameplay that makes actuall player involvement useless in all it's inefficiency ?
Eve is pvp, in every aspect. Some aspects just dont use guns or missiles.
The progress on improving in nullsec so far has been dismal. We have had conversations about it near the end of CSM 5 and during CSM 6, but there was no time/people to work on it. During this expansion cycle the focus is placed on all things war, I however expect that industry will get a look at after this.
I'm an industrialist at heart, that's how I started playing the game and I'm still doing it today. It should therefore be no surprise that I'd really really like some improvements on that front. Not just technical fixes (like manufacturing at POS), but really improvements to make industry in 0.0 viable.
But no, I'm not aware of any current improvement on that front. That said, CCP requested lots of feedback on industry this past year, and I've been happy to indulge. Usually while we get a preview of a plan, we don't get it past the feedback phase while the plan is being established, so it's not impossible something.
Botting, whether it's market, manufacturing, mining, pve or any other form is fought by CCP (cf. point above), stil a lot to be done, and more of what is currently being done, but it is happening.
And yes, I agree everything is PvP. It may sound stupid, but here's a small anecdote... I had one of the best fun having a trading battle with some guy who was undercutting me continuously, playing -0.01. I had the lead because of the 5 minutes change time, but I took a phone call and when I got back he got me unable to stay cheapest, so after a few more rounds , I undercut him by -10,000.01 and he failed to notice the "9" in the price changing to a 8, and when he undercut me, he was still more expensive than I and I had the lead again, he subsequently delisted his order and relisted split it in 2, but I had much more stock than he did and he eventually gave up. That was PvP too, and great fun. (he thought I was a bot, and I thought the same of him, but neither was true :p) Member of CSM 2, 3, 4 and 5. Vice-Chairman of CSM 6 |
Scrawler
Fairlight Corp Rooks and Kings
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 07:51:00 -
[63] - Quote
You have my vote.
Don't lose out guys, support Meissa!! |
Headlong
Katzbalger Industries
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 09:52:00 -
[64] - Quote
The T2 gun ammos have been buffed across the board during the last 2 years, do you think that T2 missile ammos need a rework as well (specificly the rage, javeling and precision ones, though fury isn't really working for all launchers either)? |
Min Mandragora
Babylon Knights Controlled Chaos
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 12:01:00 -
[65] - Quote
I like |
Yelrimbe
ReloaD.
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 14:06:00 -
[66] - Quote
My votes are with you!!!
|
Jazminum Conehead
Revered Mining Corp EntroPraetorian Aegis
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 17:10:00 -
[67] - Quote
Getting my vote for the 3rd year in a row.
(Best dude for the gig, even when he was red to me) |
Calvinus Maximus
Fairlight Corp Rooks and Kings
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.19 17:42:00 -
[68] - Quote
You have my vote |
Kirrella
Nightbird Explorations
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 01:55:00 -
[69] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:As far as R64 moons are concerned, I strongly favour a rebalancing of "alliance earning" mechanics. As it is, alliance income comes from such resources as R64s, while personal income derives from activities such as ratting, plexing and, for the 3 people who do it, PI. I have been working with CCP to try and make alliance income more aligned with personal income. At the same time, R64 serve currently as focus points where conflict happens (and that's much needed, PvP is the fuel needed for industry to be meaningful, it's also very fun). So, these are the paths I would pursue rather than placing hard limits on number of R64s held by a single entity.
Agreed, if you reduce the value, then no one cares about the moons anymore and a decision point is eliminated. Do you have a specific proposal for how to deal with this problem?
|
Yugo Reventlov
STA'IN The Devil's Warrior Alliance
2
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 09:26:00 -
[70] - Quote
As a Belgian myself, who else could I vote for?
Also, what's your favorite beer? |
|
Kies Her
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 17:53:00 -
[71] - Quote
I've never met a person with such a broad knowledge of all things eve like Meissa. All my votes belong to you :) |
Seleene
Body Count Inc. Pandemic Legion
1096
|
Posted - 2012.02.20 20:01:00 -
[72] - Quote
I first met Meissa when he was a CSM delegate back on CSM 3 and I was still wearing a dev shirt as CCP Abathur. Who is this guy mixed in with all these ~big name~ dudes? What does he bring to the table? Why is he here?
Stephan is one of those guys that defies expectations. He is one of the candidates that you can cast a vote for and be sure of one thing - he will never be intimidated or shy about his opinions, even if he is the only one at the table voicing them. Time and again, I have seen him fight battles that might have otherwise been forgotten or ask the hard questions that may have been overlooked. He has a very broad knowledge of EVE and while you may not see much of him 'on paper' or in a blog, his influence on the CSM over five terms is undeniable. I'm proud to have dealt with the man from both sides of the table.
If you have voted for him before, there is no reason not to do so again. Meissa has represented you very well. Seleene's Sandbox - My Blog, where I say stuff. Follow Seleene on Twitter |
Sgt Anti
Fairlight Corp Rooks and Kings
1
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 04:26:00 -
[73] - Quote
you hawe my vote |
Miss Safira
Diamond Sisters
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 11:39:00 -
[74] - Quote
+1 from me. You are the right one for the job! |
Del Terra
Eastern Agriculture
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 12:26:00 -
[75] - Quote
Meissa, congrats on your success in EvE politics. it's difficult to please damn nearly everyone in a dog eat dog universe, but you have done just that. it's largely due to your performance as CSM.
i look forward to CSM7 and their recommendations for improving nullsec industry opportunities, decreasing botting/rmt while creating more incentives for conflict in nullsec to highsec.
this can only be good for business after all. someone must sell the bullets. |
Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
215
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 16:05:00 -
[76] - Quote
Grumpy Owly wrote:Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting
Repeat request. Griefers are lazy cowards with the current climate of broken player policing systems.
Stop EvE Apathy |
Soccerthunder
Fairlight Corp Rooks and Kings
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 18:05:00 -
[77] - Quote
+1 from me!!!! |
C0nvicted DeadParrot
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 18:06:00 -
[78] - Quote
+1 I vote Yes!!!!! |
Old Man Irvam
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.21 18:08:00 -
[79] - Quote
I will Vote for you!!!!!! |
Plex4Free
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 05:06:00 -
[80] - Quote
What do you think of the recent changes to Super capitals and what other changes would you like to see done in the future? |
|
Alexis Zyl
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
14
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 08:51:00 -
[81] - Quote
I have admired some of the things that RnK has done.
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:What I'm doing is looking if a way can be found to address the issues that exist without negatively impacting the current playstyle. ... if a way can be found, good, if one can't, then the current situation is better than a botched change.
This is an astute observation that bears repeating because it is commonly overlooked. Not just pertinent to the subject that this quote was originally about, but all aspects of EVE (and you could even go as far as to say life in general, really). |
Snowflake Tem
The Order of Symbolic Measures
15
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 15:49:00 -
[82] - Quote
R&K vids are an eduction, your enabling style is practical and your holistic approach is probably appropriate - but - unless you select a cause to champion, how do you expect to rally new support?
I want to throw my vote your way, but I'm just not compelled to. |
Naunet
Diamond Sisters
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.22 19:00:00 -
[83] - Quote
+1 from me too. |
Foxtrot Zulu
Fairlight Corp Rooks and Kings
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 00:52:00 -
[84] - Quote
+1 |
vesla
Fairlight Corp Rooks and Kings
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 06:35:00 -
[85] - Quote
You have my vote! |
Courthouse
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
87
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 08:45:00 -
[86] - Quote
It's probably time for you to take a break from the whole CSM thing. Your 3+ years in the counsel really didn't accomplish anything of note and your entire platform has been "I've been here forever, vote for me (again)".
I say you haven't accomplished much of note because from CSM 2 through 5, about the only thing of note that got accomplished was skill queues. You completely screwed up jump bridges by advocating for something you had no knowledge or experience with. Luckily for nullsec alliances CCP added their own flavor of stupid and mistakenly sort of made them easier to manage.
In CSM 6 you spent your time berating all of the candidates except for Mittani, because you knew you didn't have the political tact to make an opponent of him and acted like a French jackass otherwise. Most of the major accomplishments would have occurred without your voice, certainly without your input since none of the ideas were specifically yours and I honestly can't find a reason that people should continue to vote for a lame duck incumbent when there are exciting prospects like Hans who can bring some fresh perspective to the table.
|
Esrevid Nekkeg
Justified and Ancient
89
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 15:07:00 -
[87] - Quote
Meissa Anunthiel wrote:N'h+¬sitez pas +á me contacter pour plus d'information. Contactame para obtener m+ís informaci+¦n. Bitte kontaktieren Sie mich f++r weitere Informationen. Dan ben je Belg en dan niet eens in het Vlaams? Zei de suffe Hollander....
But anyway, yes, you have my vote. You are one of the very few people that have voiced intelligent (and well written) view points on a very broad spectrum of this game. At least with you on the CSM it will not only be about 'Me, myself and I', about glorified self interest. It will be about the game as a whole.
Good luck. Here I used to have a sig of our old Camper in space. Now it is disregarded as being the wrong format. Looking out the window I see one thing: Nothing wrong with the format of our Camper! Silly CCP......
|
Talr Shiar
Angels Of Death EVE Mayhem.
16
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:38:00 -
[88] - Quote
You have all my votes as always m8,
Rooks and Kings! |
Luceiia MNM
Immortalis Mortis Angelus Mayhem.
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:42:00 -
[89] - Quote
I like your points about industry, for to long its been neglected +1 from me |
Xali Ying
Immortalis Mortis Angelus Mayhem.
0
|
Posted - 2012.02.23 18:47:00 -
[90] - Quote
The current system of POS research labs managemnet is flawed.
You ether have full access or you don't, the pos' have a public option but it doesn't work. How would you improve the R&D at pos' if you were eleted to CSM 7.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |