Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
A-Z
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 17:19:00 -
[151] - Quote
Quote:Akkarin Deyb wrote: How do you feel about EWAR Balance (including EWAR drones)? Do you think super's are balanced now, or require more work?
You'll be getting my vote anyway but
Also, more taylor swift~.
Quote:In large scale combat, EWAR works the way it should - the ewar mods get put on the weakest ships, it is rather burdensome to coordinate, and you trade off from a different, possibly more useful, ship.
Ewar drones are a slightly different beast, especially ec-300s in a small engagement. You give up next to nothing for five little buggers that always seem to get off one vital jam, even if the target ship has eccm. The fact that the best counter is a smartbomb is what is wrong - the ship with the EC-300s gives us miniscule DPS, while the target ship has to give up a hugely significant high slot. It's rather telling that you rarely see EC-900s fielded
As far as supers go, I'm satisfied with the first round of changes that were made - especially the logoff mechanics and the tiered HP reduction that boosted the Hel and Rag. But like many things in this game they do need more work. I strongly believe supers shouldn't be fight-killing machines, but at the same time they shouldn't be dust-collecting heaps of rubbish either. For this to happen there needs to be a voice of experience to provide insight into how the ships are used and what they are capable of. There's plenty of data, and don't get me wrong I love me some data, but I find that data without context is meaningless. With regard to supercaps, I can confidently say that I am the most qualified to provide that context.
This, coming from someone who once dropped Super Caps (Nyx and Aeon) on a gang of 3 (Phobos, Scorp, Golem) when she was going to lose her Drake because "we used Ewar" to jam her Bassy. Dat skill. Not sure if I should vote for you for that (I probably will) but I still like the majority of your ideas, namely buffing low sec, and most parts of the delayed 0.0 local. |
Elise Randolph
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
708
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 20:07:00 -
[152] - Quote
If quad-boxing a Drake, Basilisk, Faclon, and Nyx is wrong, I don't wanna be right. Though in reality, the first iteration of supercap balancing has made it no longer feasible to drop a lone SC on a sub-cap target. It's a very good illustration that I am both willing and capable to make smart changes even if they affect the way I play the game. |
Tehg Rhind
Atlantic Innovations
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 03:51:00 -
[153] - Quote
Your LIE debate with Prometheus was pretty good, people on the fence should listen to it. You're the kind of level headed guy I would like to have talking in a meeting..
You're getting all of my votes, and I'll be promoting you on the podcast (assuming I get my next episode out before elections.....)
Oh yeah, one question: How do you feel about a Taylor Swift splash page on the login screen? |
Erv Kas
Enterprise Estonia Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.06 17:33:00 -
[154] - Quote
+1 Elise |
Oso Mafioso
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 02:54:00 -
[155] - Quote
Randolph 2012!!! |
Katka Filova
D00M. Northern Coalition.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 07:40:00 -
[156] - Quote
Gets My Vote +1 |
StarTrotter
Shiva Initiative Mercenaries
6
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 11:57:00 -
[157] - Quote
Elise you have my vote. Literally. Hope you get in. |
Peter Powers
FinFleet Raiden.
73
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 15:43:00 -
[158] - Quote
+4 votes, done. |
Matt Fairbanks
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 18:19:00 -
[159] - Quote
Elise Randolph once solo'd 800 AAA in a proteus. Take that, Prometheus Exenthal.
:)@ |
Jade Dragoness
Destructive Influence Northern Coalition.
1
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 19:13:00 -
[160] - Quote
+1 for Elise |
|
Elise Randolph
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
736
|
Posted - 2012.03.09 19:56:00 -
[161] - Quote
If you're voting solely based on PvP skills, just gonna leave this right here: https://www.pandemic-legion.com/killboard/view_kill.php?id=490480
The most active in-game of any CSM, ever! Vote Elise Randolph for CSM 7, there is no substitute for activity! |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2591
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 18:17:00 -
[162] - Quote
elise, what is your opinion on the new titan changes |
omgdutch2005
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:13:00 -
[163] - Quote
+5 votes for elise! go go go! |
Elise Randolph
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
740
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:24:00 -
[164] - Quote
I think the new Titan changes are both a step in the wrong direction and incredibly short-sighted. The changes to Titans were based more on sensationalized rhetoric than actual knowledge and thought. If you look historically at powerblocs that boasted the largest supercapital fleet, you'll notice that their supercaps never actually saved them: BoB, Atlas, The NC, IT, DRF, Team Tech, et al. Simply put: the changes were rushed.
Titans represent that last venue for significant loss in Eve; rich alliances can lose entire BS fleets or entire T3 fleets and not blink. If an alliance were to lose an entire super-capital fleet, however, it would be a loss like no other. Marginalizing the role of Titans with no clear groundwork for a role rebalance cheapens large-scale PvP in Eve. I have been very clear in my sentiment that Eve should not be Titan online. But it should not be blob online, either.
The topic of Titans was a big one throughout this entire CSM term, and I have posted many words about them. The first set of changes represented a good first step, with ample discourse and consideration. This set of changes, however, took a step backwards. There was no conversation, merely a "hi we're doing this" statement.
If re-elected I will continue to push for a pragmatic role-revamp for Titans instead of a knee-jerk reaction to rhetoric. The most active in-game of any CSM, ever! Vote Elise Randolph for CSM 7, there is no substitute for activity! |
D'yanoi
Viziam Amarr Empire
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:28:00 -
[165] - Quote
Typical PL response.
Adapt or die. |
Salpun
Paramount Commerce Tactical Invader Syndicate
222
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:31:00 -
[166] - Quote
This is droping before fan Fest as a topic for which feed back is wanted Hope we have more of these quick forum posts so Fan Fest can be focused on even bigger issues. |
Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2552
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 19:32:00 -
[167] - Quote
Elise Randolph wrote:I think the new Titan changes are both a step in the wrong direction and incredibly short-sighted. The changes to Titans were based more on sensationalized rhetoric than actual knowledge and thought. If you look historically at powerblocs that boasted the largest supercapital fleet, you'll notice that their supercaps never actually saved them: BoB, Atlas, The NC, IT, DRF, Team Tech, et al. Simply put: the changes were rushed.
Titans represent that last venue for significant loss in Eve; rich alliances can lose entire BS fleets or entire T3 fleets and not blink. If an alliance were to lose an entire super-capital fleet, however, it would be a loss like no other. Marginalizing the role of Titans with no clear groundwork for a role rebalance cheapens large-scale PvP in Eve. I have been very clear in my sentiment that Eve should not be Titan online. But it should not be blob online, either.
The topic of Titans was a big one throughout this entire CSM term, and I have posted many words about them. The first set of changes represented a good first step, with ample discourse and consideration. This set of changes, however, took a step backwards. There was no conversation, merely a "hi we're doing this" statement.
If re-elected I will continue to push for a pragmatic role-revamp for Titans instead of a knee-jerk reaction to rhetoric.
How do you feel about this being a stop-gap measure while proper role balancing is worked on? "WeGÇÖre a professional Merc Alliance, like PL" ~ snot shot, 2012 |
Weaselior
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2624
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 21:59:00 -
[168] - Quote
how will you reassure your support base that you are not limp-wristed and ineffective given that you got steamrolled on your signature issue |
riverini
Reliables Inc Initiative Mercenaries
507
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 22:51:00 -
[169] - Quote
Elise Randolph wrote:I think the new Titan changes are both a step in the wrong direction and incredibly short-sighted. The changes to Titans were based more on sensationalized rhetoric than actual knowledge and thought. If you look historically at powerblocs that boasted the largest supercapital fleet, you'll notice that their supercaps never actually saved them: BoB, Atlas, The NC, IT, DRF, Team Tech, et al. Simply put: the changes were rushed.
Titans represent that last venue for significant loss in Eve; rich alliances can lose entire BS fleets or entire T3 fleets and not blink. If an alliance were to lose an entire super-capital fleet, however, it would be a loss like no other. Marginalizing the role of Titans with no clear groundwork for a role rebalance cheapens large-scale PvP in Eve. I have been very clear in my sentiment that Eve should not be Titan online. But it should not be blob online, either.
The topic of Titans was a big one throughout this entire CSM term, and I have posted many words about them. The first set of changes represented a good first step, with ample discourse and consideration. This set of changes, however, took a step backwards. There was no conversation, merely a "hi we're doing this" statement.
If re-elected I will continue to push for a pragmatic role-revamp for Titans instead of a knee-jerk reaction to rhetoric.
The CSM6 has been there almost a year, we got three super-capital nerf. Given your "predictable" stance towards supers, should I declare you an ineffective CSM in pointing out your voters-base needs?
RIVERINI / EVENEWS24 @evenews24 |
David Magnus
109
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 07:02:00 -
[170] - Quote
If you had bothered to read Elise's campaign information, you'd see that he didn't come to the CSM table with a specific agenda, but instead to offer his advice as the most active and well versed member of the CSM. If CCP decides not to take advice from the one person on the council who actually knows EVE better than they do, that's their choice.
If anyone has yet to choose a CSM candidate, please listen to this totally objective and helpful song before making your decision:
http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/elect-elise http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/winterupdate http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/supercaps http://soundcloud.com/davidkmagnus/pandemiclegion |
|
IntegralHellsing
Eternity INC. Goonswarm Federation
60
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 07:35:00 -
[171] - Quote
riverini wrote:The CSM6 has been there almost a year, we got three super-capital nerf. Given your "predictable" stance towards supers, should I declare you an ineffective CSM in pointing out your voters-base needs?
Someone's desperate.
|
Anna Finster
Fnord Works The Initiative.
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 17:33:00 -
[172] - Quote
D'yanoi wrote:Typical PL response.
Adapt or die.
Typical ~goon/blob/newb/mittens/brainwashed~ answer. Why don't you adapt to titans? Oh wait... they just got nerfed, no need trolol.
//edit oh and +7 Elise :) |
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Divine Power. Cascade Imminent
471
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:02:00 -
[173] - Quote
lol how can this guy say with a straight face that current titans are an 'anti-blob' weapon for a guy who claims to play eve a lot he doesn't seem to remember the past two years where titans were used as an anti-frig, anti-cruiser, anti-hac, anti-bc, hotdropping, gatecamping weapon |
Elise Randolph
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
747
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:15:00 -
[174] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:how will you reassure your support base that you are not limp-wristed and ineffective given that you got steamrolled on your signature issue If I wanted to play the political game I'd just remind everybody that titans were supposed to be nerfed 4 months ago and I alone fended off the mongrel hordes of nerf titans.With a higher position on the CSM, perhaps I would have had more clout~
But in reality, of course, a successful CSM should not pigeon-hole his beliefs into what he wants as a player, but instead be open-minded, pragmatic, and advocate changes that are good for the game. Something that many CSM candidates lack.
riverini wrote:Elise Randolph wrote:I think the new Titan changes are both a step in the wrong direction and incredibly short-sighted. The changes to Titans were based more on sensationalized rhetoric than actual knowledge and thought. If you look historically at powerblocs that boasted the largest supercapital fleet, you'll notice that their supercaps never actually saved them: BoB, Atlas, The NC, IT, DRF, Team Tech, et al. Simply put: the changes were rushed.
Titans represent that last venue for significant loss in Eve; rich alliances can lose entire BS fleets or entire T3 fleets and not blink. If an alliance were to lose an entire super-capital fleet, however, it would be a loss like no other. Marginalizing the role of Titans with no clear groundwork for a role rebalance cheapens large-scale PvP in Eve. I have been very clear in my sentiment that Eve should not be Titan online. But it should not be blob online, either.
The topic of Titans was a big one throughout this entire CSM term, and I have posted many words about them. The first set of changes represented a good first step, with ample discourse and consideration. This set of changes, however, took a step backwards. There was no conversation, merely a "hi we're doing this" statement.
If re-elected I will continue to push for a pragmatic role-revamp for Titans instead of a knee-jerk reaction to rhetoric. The CSM6 has been there almost a year, we got three super-capital nerf. Given your "predictable" stance towards supers, should I declare you an ineffective CSM in pointing out your voters-base needs?
Heh. For the first set of changes, not only did I agree with them but I had a heavy hand in their design. There was a lot of discourse around the changes, and we spoke about them daily for three weeks before a decision was made. When the decision was made, everyone on the CSM was in agreement. It was as the process should be: CCP has an idea, the CSM buffs the edges a bit and adds its two cents. This change was nowhere near that. It was merely presented to the CSM, we gave feedback (my feedback mirrors much of the criticism from the 90-page thread, because hey I actually play), and the feedback was promptly ignored. Instead of throwing a conniption about it and fake-resigning, as CSM members in the past have done (and CSM7 hopefuls this term), I will continue to articulate my points and keep the conversation alive.
Being able to effectively articulate a point is an imperative CSM skill, something that I believe is your downfall. The most active in-game of any CSM, ever! Vote Elise Randolph for CSM 7, there is no substitute for activity! |
Dez Affinity
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
44
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:24:00 -
[175] - Quote
riverini wrote:
The CSM6 has been there almost a year, we got three super-capital nerf. Given your "predictable" stance towards supers, should I declare you an ineffective CSM in pointing out your voters-base needs?
You should stick to being a Fox News-esque Space Journalist because even for that job you are horrendously unqualified. You have a pis s poor understanding of the game mechanics, you are horrible at PvP, you have a huge bias and a huge boner for anything PL.
You have a very limited knowledge of spaceships and combat (I mean you've literally flown 3 ships in the last year, a heavy neut curse, a sniper talos and a nemesis).
So let's be honest, Elise could sit in the corner of the room and jerk off and still be a more effective CSM than you.
More so you seem to think that being a part of a COUNCIL somehow makes it so you can decide SOLELY what happens in the game, is that what you're judging 'being effective' as? Maybe you should have read up on what the CSM entails before you applied you slack jawed ****. |
Pidgie
Origin.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.15 11:28:00 -
[176] - Quote
Elise Randolph - you have my votes and vouch.
Booooooooosh! |
Anna Finster
Fnord Works The Initiative.
5
|
Posted - 2012.03.17 13:30:00 -
[177] - Quote
Today is a good day to vote! |
Alx Warlord
SUPERNOVA SOCIETY Tribal Conclave
76
|
Posted - 2012.03.18 03:12:00 -
[178] - Quote
I really hope you get Re-Elected!
Best regards! |
Elise Randolph
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
755
|
Posted - 2012.03.19 20:09:00 -
[179] - Quote
The last push is here, will continue my nerd activity and be open to any and all questions either in here or in game. The most active in-game of any CSM, ever! Vote Elise Randolph for CSM 7, there is no substitute for activity! |
Rowan Sjet
Sniggerdly Pandemic Legion
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.20 11:39:00 -
[180] - Quote
In Breaking News, DailyGrace has officially endorsed Elise Randolph for CSM! For Live coverage, click on our feed below. Our thanks go to FinalFlash84 for this exclusive scoop.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzINxoS8uKA |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |