Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Bei ArtJay
The Galactic Collective Sovereign Technologies
6
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 09:24:00 -
[31] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Bei ArtJay wrote: You imply then that anyone who plays this game as a w-space 'resident' should vote tactically for you regardless of your opinions.
When voting becomes tactical it becomes corrupt and pointless in my opinion.
Congrats, with an attitude like that you're never voting on anything, ever. WH people with actual political sensibilities who aren't Objectivists or fainting, delicate flowers should back Two Step.
I'll agree that I am a delicate flower. I'd disagree I was an Objectivist, however we are all raised with certain Objectivist qualities in this capitalist society, something potential candidates would do well to remember.
I am actually planning to vote for you on at least one account based upon the fact I believe that that last CSM was really effective due to your leadership, and rather than caring about specific segments of the game, you seem to love giving CCP a kick up the ass and focus on its customers not itself, which in my view is what the CSM is good at.
Can I just get you to clarify that you are saying that because I am a 'WH People' you didn't need my vote anyway and I should give my vote instead to two step as it would make more sense tactically? |
Rek Seven
Probe Patrol Project Wildfire
144
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 10:32:00 -
[32] - Quote
Perish the thought of having more that one candidate for a wormhole space representative on the CSM... What's next, a fair election process or a CSM doing what is was designed for an representing the voice of the entire community and not just that of null sec players? |
Grumpy Owly
Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire
168
|
Posted - 2012.02.15 20:38:00 -
[33] - Quote
Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting
"All griefers are lazy cowards with the current climate of broken player policing systems." |
The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5041
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 02:47:00 -
[34] - Quote
Bei ArtJay wrote:
Can I just get you to clarify that you are saying that because I am a 'WH People' you didn't need my vote anyway and I should give my vote instead to two step as it would make more sense tactically?
It's a choice, really. Obviously, I want the votes. All of the votes.
But if you want to allocate a vote to a 'wormhole candidate', I think Two Step has proven - through his tireless efforts - that he is the one. He has established relationships with the devs and brought home results, despite being 4th alt.
If you have multiple votes, feel free to send some my way, because I can always use the power and influence that a mandate offers. I assume, however, that most people posting in WH candidate threads are primarily allocating their votes to WH candidates, as that's the simple reality of the situation 90% of the time. The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |
Two step
Aperture Harmonics K162
1177
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 02:52:00 -
[35] - Quote
I love that the first post has completely changed. Now I am apparently some sort of pawn of Mittens, and he and I came up with this dastardly plan to mess up the campaign of the fine Blackberry Bold, who just wants to bring direct democracy to the people. Vote Two step for CSM 7 CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog |
The Mittani
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5041
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 02:56:00 -
[36] - Quote
direct democracy is a ******** idea unless you really enjoy a society based on reality tv and the kardashians The Office of the Chairman: A Thread for Constituent Issues |
Mu'ad Diib
The Mighty
31
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 03:13:00 -
[37] - Quote
At the moment There's several candidates in the pool that have less than the 100 likes.
Here's an idea.
To encourage a wide and representative shortlist and help ourselves a little into the bargain, why don't we like each other publicly with a post in each other's election post thread, and encourage others via our own posts to like the members of the sub-100 group.
This way we might all make the shortlist.
Let me know what you think about this.
Mu'ad Diib . I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. |
Nathan Jameson
Talocan Dominion Talocan United
287
|
Posted - 2012.02.16 04:08:00 -
[38] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Perish the thought of having more that one candidate for a wormhole space representative on the CSM... What's next, a fair election process or a CSM doing what is was designed for an representing the voice of the entire community and not just that of null sec players?
I was going to point out that Lucius Arcturus from Taggart was running, but it seems he's pulled out due to IRL issues.
I've also been told that Rooks and Kings submitted a candidate, but I cannot find his Jita Park Speakers thread. Anyone have better luck than I?
The Mittani wrote:direct democracy is a ******** idea unless you really enjoy a society based on reality tv and the kardashians
lol. This is why democracy-based governments are usually technically republics. |
Grumpy Owly
267
|
Posted - 2012.02.25 14:29:00 -
[39] - Quote
Posting a reminder to a request for your candidacy views on the following subject of Bounty Hunting
(The linked thread is a posting to maintain a holistic view of the various candidates comments and in some way to act as a foundation for discussion. It seems to have offended one candidate that linking it is in some way implies a prescriptive need to read it or post in it, this is not the intention. Such that if you have specific thoughts on the subject due to your own awareness or thoughts, I would be happy to coallate the views for you as a result) Bounty Hunting for CSM 7
Stop EvE Apathy |
Malchristus
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 03:59:00 -
[40] - Quote
I see Blackberry Bold has a new corp.
Can we trust in the fact that you will pay as much attention to the writing of proposals as you did to the name of your corp?
I mean Pegasis? Seriously?? Are you representing whimholers and hosec moners too?
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |