Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mike Azariah
Gallente Benevolence Association Greater Realms
189
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 03:20:00 -
[31] - Quote
What if you took the permissions for shared bookmarks by folder, rather than broad all or nothing. One folde ris corp, another has corp/available at alliance level
Written from my c5 pos while wondering how someone else is considered the 'only wh candidate'
|
Aiifa
Pandora Sphere Narwhals Ate My Duck
24
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 16:16:00 -
[32] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:What if you took the permissions for shared bookmarks by folder, rather than broad all or nothing. One folde ris corp, another has corp/available at alliance level
Written from my c5 pos while wondering how someone else is considered the 'only wh candidate'
You're still creating new roles.
Maybe have the executor corp bms shared with the whole alliance?
This isn't the thread for ideas though, I should think.
Have wormholes have been used as a testing ground by CCP? |
Fade Toblack
Per.ly The 20 Minuters
3
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 12:10:00 -
[33] - Quote
Two step wrote:What makes them tough is that right now, there are no alliance roles.
That's been fixed for adding alliance events to the calendar... and isn't it actually the same role that's used for calendar events and corp locations?
But yes, as a member of a small alliance all living together in w-space, anything that makes co-operation between corps easier would be a god-send. Alliance bookmarks just being the most obvious addition to the game. |
Aiifa
Pandora Sphere Narwhals Ate My Duck
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 14:05:00 -
[34] - Quote
whoops, deleted |
Franklin D Roosevelt
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
81
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 21:05:00 -
[35] - Quote
Max Kolonko wrote:I would like all (well, at least those that have anything to say in the subject) of CSM candidates to state their point of view on WH balancing/iterations/mechanics/tweaks/etc...
I would like to know what you think is broken and what works perfectly and should never be changed.
What would You like being added to WH and what taken away?
How do You see WH (as a gameplay style) fits in whole EVE gameplay experience? Wormholes should become an integral part of SOV mechanics IMHO |
Max Kolonko
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
156
|
Posted - 2012.03.02 23:00:00 -
[36] - Quote
Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Max Kolonko wrote:I would like all (well, at least those that have anything to say in the subject) of CSM candidates to state their point of view on WH balancing/iterations/mechanics/tweaks/etc...
I would like to know what you think is broken and what works perfectly and should never be changed.
What would You like being added to WH and what taken away?
How do You see WH (as a gameplay style) fits in whole EVE gameplay experience? Wormholes should become an integral part of SOV mechanics IMHO
Lets agree to disagree :P Read and support: Don't mess with OUR WH's What is Your stance on WH stuff? |
Aiifa
Pandora Sphere Narwhals Ate My Duck
25
|
Posted - 2012.03.03 13:30:00 -
[37] - Quote
Franklin D Roosevelt wrote:Max Kolonko wrote:I would like all (well, at least those that have anything to say in the subject) of CSM candidates to state their point of view on WH balancing/iterations/mechanics/tweaks/etc...
I would like to know what you think is broken and what works perfectly and should never be changed.
What would You like being added to WH and what taken away?
How do You see WH (as a gameplay style) fits in whole EVE gameplay experience? Wormholes should become an integral part of SOV mechanics IMHO
not to harsh your buzz but your wild freethinking is just too much for me
also o7 Max was nice seeing you thursday
Mittani is of course retreating from his position on grav sites in wh space
for the candidates more well-versed in w-space, what is the big deal with ABC ores being available? They are not easy pickings; sometimes you get lucky and it's quiet, sometimes you don't and lose everything. That seems a fair amount of risk. |
Khorghast
Saiph Industries SRS.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 14:41:00 -
[38] - Quote
This seems very straight forward to me. If you live in a wormhole, as I do, vote for Two step. Meissa is not a wormhole candidate, but rather a wormhole invasion candidate. |
Max Kolonko
High Voltage Industries Ash Alliance
160
|
Posted - 2012.03.07 20:11:00 -
[39] - Quote
Khorghast wrote:This seems very straight forward to me. If you live in a wormhole, as I do, vote for Two step. Meissa is not a wormhole candidate, but rather a wormhole invasion candidate.
pretty much THIS^^^
Aiifa wrote:
also o7 Max was nice seeing you thursday
o7 Read and support: Don't mess with OUR WH's What is Your stance on WH stuff? |
asidburn Enaka
Alpha Arms and Manufacturing BROTHERHOOD OF DESTRUCTION
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.08 08:48:00 -
[40] - Quote
i just want to let everyone know about this scammer claming to be giving plex for votes dont be caught falling for this scam vote aganist darius III member of interstellar eXodus {IE-EX} they are scaming people pass the word on to everyone you can and vote aganist these undeserving jerks here is a copy of the chat log as proof of there unworthy actions!!!!!!!!
asidburn Enaka > what do i need to do Darius III > http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=480 go there Darius III > vote for me then paste the message you got after vote cast into this chat asidburn Enaka > your vote has been registered. We thank you for your participation. Darius III > Thanks man Darius III > that concludes our business Darius III > Fly safe asidburn Enaka > and what about the contract asidburn Enaka > i will have my alliance vote aganist you about 250 people asidburn Enaka > and then where will you be asidburn Enaka > send me the contract and i will have them vote for you asidburn Enaka > this is what we call a test of charecture Darius III > Have them vote against me Darius III > Sorry for the ssam Darius III > But I wouldnt sleep at night if I didnt do everything in my power to make syure that Goons dont ruin this CSM asidburn Enaka > your an idiot all your going to do is send more votes to the goons Darius III > not really Darius III > Goons will win chairman nbo matetr what, doesnt matter Darius III > nothing can stop them Darius III > and thats a real shame asidburn Enaka > well you just lost 243 votes asidburn Enaka > got 1 lost 243 Darius III > Didnt have them anyway Darius III > didnt lose anything Darius III > Just please dont make forum post about me, it would ruin my campaign asidburn Enaka > not to mentone att the isk spam bans you r about to get asidburn Enaka > too late asidburn Enaka > and i just copyed this conv asidburn Enaka > so i can post Darius III > You wouldnt dare do it Darius III > You too lazy anyway Darius III > I dont have a thing to worry about asidburn Enaka > haha i play eve 8 hrs a day and im retired all i have is time Darius III > no lazy bones like you would waste their time. LOL so much for your empty threats LOL
rember i dont care who you vote for just dont voter for the |
|
Joseph SaintJohn
Native Freshfood Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2012.04.27 04:58:00 -
[41] - Quote
Alekseyev Karrde wrote:I'm very positive about WH as a gameplay style. Noir. has a WH home and we have taken many contracts in WH space, evicting, protecting, and working alongside big names like Si Radio, AHARM, CCRES, and many more.
I definitely don't think WH income needs a nerf of any kind. I'm glad the ABC nerf that was tossed out during CSM6 died on the vine and I'd work to keep it that way.
WH combat is currently pretty awesome, but obviously any ship balancing tweaks will impact WH PVP so I'd like to make sure they do so for the better i.e. improving less used ships and giving them a role instead of nerf batting everything.
Lvl 6 chain-collapsing, as featured in the latest Clarion call, seems a bit screwy and might need a tweak but I don't think introducing a "WH Stabilizer" to make links permanent is a good way to go about it. I'd look forward to working with the other WH reps like Two Step and/or Meissa in providing CCP better guidance there.
Corp bookmarks were a godsend to WH residents. Further improvements to the corp bookmark UI have my support and if scaling that feature up to the Alliance level was on the table, I'd push for the development resources to make it happen.
The POS code needs a redo; the players know it and CCP knows it. However the POS code is a big ungainly mess and given CCP's current priorities I doubt they will have the resources to devote to it this year. CCP has made great strides in tiding us over till then with fuel blocks and shortening the anchoring/online/unanchoring timers. Further quality of life POS improvements will strongly benefit WH residents as well as industrial and 0.0 players so I support them. With those changes made, I see the current weak areas as the POS management UI, permissions, and aggression-related bugs. The roles/permissions side of things may be too resource intensive but I am hopeful CSM7 can successfully advocate for improvements in the other two areas.
Wormholes are great!!
I suggest a simple change... create more C2 WH's with a static C4 and a static hs.
Maybe more classes shoud have their numbers increased, but I'm not sure.
Please, no change in WH mechanics.
Joe
"Wars come and wars go, but my soldiers stay eternal" - Tupac Shakur
|
Steph Wing
Fantabulously Terrific Wonderment
68
|
Posted - 2012.04.28 10:30:00 -
[42] - Quote
Necropost bestpost. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |