EVE Search - CSM candidates - QUICK REFERENCE CARDS

Search EVE-Online forums for:

All Channels

Jita Park Speakers Corner

CSM candidates - QUICK REFERENCE CARDS

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Topic
Goumindong Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.06 00:56:00 - [1] Edited by: Goumindong on 06/05/2008 00:56:53 This is easy enough Italics are my comments, since a few of the questions don't make sense and might need more explanation which i would be happy to do in my campaign thread CANDIDATE NAME : Dale Moses COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : United States [5] Rate your own free time in the real life (what's left after work, school, other obligation) [1] Do you wish you didn't have to travel to Iceland for CSM meetings ? [6] Rate your own forum reading presence [5] Rate your own forum posting presence [4] Rate your own ingame presence [8] Rate your own PvP activity level [3] Rate your own PvE activity level [3] Rate your own industry/science/trade activity level [1] Number of most accounts you ever had active at the same time [9] Lowsec mining needs a boost [0] Highsec mining needs a boost [0] We need larger mining ships [0] Rorquals should be allowed to use stargates like jump freighters [0] Allow capital ships in highsec (cyno in highsec) [0] Jump freighters need another boost (extra cargo, extra hitpoints/resists, maybe even module/rig slots) [9] Lowsec mission-running needs a boost [0] Highsec mission-running needs a boost [0] L5 missions need to be available in highsec too [0] L4 missions need to be available in lowsec only [1] No insurance for CONCORD kills [0] No insurance for 0.0 kills [0] No insurance for Battlecruisers and above [0] No insurance for Battleships and above [7] Dysprosium situation is fine [2] Moon mining needs a total revamp [?] Moon mining in 0.4Needs what? [?] Moon mining in highsecNeeds what? [5] Input T1 BPC levels need to influence output T2 BPC levels [5] You should be able to research levels on BPCs in POS mobile labs [5] Mobile lab slots need to be allowed to become public [1] You should be able to build outposts in any system that have no stations at all (no sov requirements) [2] Local should be replaced with constellation [2] Local should be replaced with region [2] Local must go away [9] Non-covops cloaks need stronger drawbacks/penalitiessee next question for specifics [9] You should be able to probe non-covops cloaked ships [9] You should be able to probe all cloaked ships [5] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for all ships this needs much more expanation [5] Speed-tanking needs a nerf for the larger ships only this needs much more expanation [0] Active shield tanking needs a nerf [0] Active armor tanking needs a nerf [0] Passive shield tanking needs a nerf [0] Armor/hull buffer tanking needs a nerf [5] Web drones need a boost [5] Painter drones need a boost [5] ECM drones need a nerf [5] ECMs need a nerf [0] RDSs need a nerf [5] Carriers need a nerf [7] Motherships need a nerf [9] Titans need a nerf [9] Rigs on small ships need to cost less than rigs on large ships [5] T1 rigs are too expensive [5] T2 rigs are too expensive [7] Abandoned wrecks should be scannable via probes [5] Salvaging a wreck needs to be an act of agression [0] Looting a wreck needs to not be an act of agression [5] Older characters should be expelled from NPC corps in single-man corps [0] Wardec fees are way too low for corps [0] Wardec fees are way too low for alliances [0] People should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced corp until war ends [0] Corps should NOT be allowed to leave a wardecced alliance until war ends Vote Goumindong for CSM
Goumindong Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.07 22:56:00 - [2] Originally by: Eima Nalt In game, I hear a lot about nano-f----try from vairous pilots in various alliances but I notice that almost all of the responding candidates disagree with either of the statements about nerfing speed tanking. Is this a serious disconnect between candidate views and subscriber concerns? Is democracy broken? Discuss. The issue is a very complex one. It may be that they do not think that fast ships specifically should be nerfed but that counters should be added or that a more neutral speed change should be implemented that keeps the value of the tank high, but reduces the ability to disengage. Vote Goumindong for CSM
Goumindong Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.09 10:05:00 - [3] Originally by: Kayscha I'm shocked at how many candidates strongly feel that older (solo player) characters such as myself ought to be kicked out of NPC corps into one man corps. Hey, what have I ever done to you? :O Besides the small problem that I wouldn't have any skills to manage my own corp, I'd very much hate what this does to my role-playing attempts as a long-time NPC corp member. If this is about griefers hiding in NPC corps whenever the turf gets hot, I suggest you'd better address NPC corps as a whole instead and add the following option for candidates: [9] restrict membership to NPC corps to players with a certain minimum standing towards corp and empire as well as a minimum sec rating and [9] let players/corps/alliances declare war on NPC corps - at the cost of becoming hostile to that corp's NPCs and stations as well, and likely to their closest friends too (say, that empire's other corps). oh, and why not [9] make all NPC corps joinable, coupled with certain requirements as well as specific advantages and drawbacks, and a meaningful way to interact with them. Don't forget, NPC corps are in the game, so it should follow that they have an actual role in the game as well. Why i do not really support kicking these players out it would take all of 10 minutes and 20,000 isk to train up Corporation Management 1 for an older player. I started out with 5 charisma and it would take me 10 minutes, 17 seconds with no implant in. Managing a corp is essentially free. Vote Goumindong for CSM
Goumindong Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.09 19:35:00 - [4] Originally by: Xaen Originally by: Akita T Edited by: Akita T on 06/05/2008 09:49:52 CANDIDATE NAME : <Your Real Name Here - as listed on the voting page> COUNTRY OF ORIGIN : <as listed on the voting page> <snip> Version : 1.2[/yellow] No mention of the godawful state of the UI despite the 11 page ~2 year old thread I have about it in Features and Ideas Discussion. You sir, fail. And nobody inserted it, so I'm not voting for any of you! its in my manifesto :( Vote Goumindong for CSM
Goumindong Amarr Merch Industrial GoonSwarm	Posted - 2008.05.09 20:05:00 - [5] Edited by: Goumindong on 09/05/2008 20:05:23 Go ahead and ask in my thread, I'd be happy to explain. ED: Also, i think i am out of space on my post to add more Vote Goumindong for CSM

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.