Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
MinorFreak
Militaris Industries Cascade Imminent
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.05 01:25:00 -
[1] - Quote
Thank you CCP for dealing with autopilot to station and the warping through planets additions that have been overdue for years. Those make my current predicament seem petty. But, in the interests of helping CEOs encourage industry-minded n00bs get into that career, by allowing them to install jobs from the corporate hangars (without needing factory manager role), CCP needs to prioritize fixing the corporate roles. As it currently stands, the role 'factory manager' is needed for many actions specifically 'Cancel Job' whether it be R&D or manufacturing AND installing corporate jobs.
CCP needs to alter that so the role to CANCEL a job is a separate role than INSTALL. that will fix that problem. This game is wonderful because of the element of risk, but it's also interesting because of the level of effort one needs to put into doing anything - please correct this insanely easy way to grief that scares any sane CEO/director from giving 'factory manager' simply to allow someone to take advantage of those players' skills in research and manufacturing.
there's other things about corporation roles that needs work, so an overhaul is strongly recommended at this time now that autopilot to stations and that eyesore of flying through planets has been solved. |
Carlton Foster
Stizzy Twins Salvage
0
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 21:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
I completely agree with this.
Yes, I know people will say but you have to trust everyone and blah, blah, blah. But if that was the case then why have any security roles at all. It is just beyond crazy that just because someone can run some factory slots that they can cancel every single job ran by every single player in the coporation. It is just beyond crazy. I just can't understand why this hasn't been fixed yet.
Has CCP every repsonded to this issue? I have searched around but haven't been able to find any CCP resonse to this issue at all. It would be nice to know what their stance on it was. |
mxzf
Shovel Bros
1198
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 21:42:00 -
[3] - Quote
Yes. This one of the many issues in the morass of Corp Management that needs to be dealt with.
I really can't wait for the time when they completely overhaul Corp Management *wistful sigh* |
Carlton Foster
Stizzy Twins Salvage
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 23:41:00 -
[4] - Quote
What would one need to do to get an official respnse on this. You would be surprised what I would do to get said response. This one issue is probobly the only thing really keeping me from really getting into this game.
If anyone, anywhere has ever seen any official response on this issue, please post a link. I would be your friend forever! |
mxzf
Shovel Bros
1198
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 23:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
IIRC the best way is supposed to be to get in touch with the CSM. I keep meaning to do that about one of my threads, but I just haven't gotten around to it, lol. |
Carlton Foster
Stizzy Twins Salvage
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.12 23:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
mxzf wrote:IIRC the best way is supposed to be to get in touch with the CSM. I keep meaning to do that about one of my threads, but I just haven't gotten around to it, lol.
My understaning though is that the CSM has people who really don't care about this sort of stuff. They are more into the bang bang zap zap features of the game. Which is cool and all, but really I just don't know why this hasn't been fixed yet. It makes my head hurt thinking about it. |
Carlton Foster
Stizzy Twins Salvage
2
|
Posted - 2012.04.13 03:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
Wrapping duct tape around my head!!!
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!H!H!H!H!H!H!H!H!H!H!!HH!H!H! |
Mars Theran
EVE Rogues EVE Rogues Alliance
122
|
Posted - 2012.04.15 07:07:00 -
[8] - Quote
..and container access/removal from corp hangars. Can hardly call that security.
..and roles in general. What are these anyway, besides ambiguous unconfigured and undefined without a lot of work, and then they lack a great deal anyway.
..and more roles would be nice. How about Directors not being equivalent to CEOs unless the CEO wants them to be. (i.e. Not immediately gaining full access to Master wallets and 1st Division hangarshangars)
So why not have Categorized roles? Director-like role capabilities currently unavailable outside of Director positions, Soldier roles/titles, and whatever else. Essentially, what I'm suggesting is there should be a more divisive structure there. CEO and Chairmen/Directors, then Top-level Member roles/titles which are configurable, general member roles/titles, (also configurable), and finally more rank oriented roles/titles which may also be partially configurable. The latter would of course be compatible with any of the others or could stand alone by itself. The former may exist without the latter, etc..
..and why do we have to have 'Corporations'? I never really got that. I understand you have to call it something generally speaking, but should we be restricted to that sort of structure or havibng that label? Alliance is fine, and some may want to have corporations, but why not other options? ..and why shouldn't they have some bearing on internal structure?
..and why do Alliances have to be democratic? It actually says Dictatorial? and answers it with No. We don't even have the option. What sort of absurd joke is this? Of course I want it to be dictatorial, I don't trust anyone. TIIP: The Incredible Invisible Poster |
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |