Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 .. 26 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Photon Ceray
|
Posted - 2009.06.14 12:31:00 -
[541]
signed 100% |
Hayaishi
Gallente East Eve Trading Co.
|
Posted - 2009.06.14 13:24:00 -
[542]
signed. |
Syberbolt8
Gallente I.M. Force
|
Posted - 2009.06.15 02:08:00 -
[543]
Edited by: Syberbolt8 on 15/06/2009 02:08:27
Originally by: SiliconWolf This thread started out as a request to update graphics, but also sneak some functionality upgrades in. And then went off on several tangents.
I see three main groups, and they've all posted. We've heard from the "it makes my computer slow" people, the "it looks too ugly" people, and the "new FUNCTIONALITY, not just graphics" group.
Would someone please delete this thread and start two new ones? I'd be happy to sign the new "functionality" thread, although I've personally set up 5 POSs and my wish list only has on it: powergrid booster modules, CPU booster modules, and silos that can be accessed without being offlined.
I won't sign the graphic petition because I don't really care what they look like.
If you had read the first page of the OP then you would know the poster didnt intend for it to be purely a gfx change
http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=391410&page=1#24
oh, also bump from the bottom of page one :)
|
JonnyKay
Federation of Freedom Fighters Aggression.
|
Posted - 2009.06.15 02:25:00 -
[544]
/signed |
Taladool
|
Posted - 2009.06.15 12:20:00 -
[545]
/signed again, and its on the wrong page. |
Syberbolt8
Gallente The Fated E.Y
|
Posted - 2009.06.15 23:27:00 -
[546]
bump, we need more supporters, lets try and keep this on the first page till the CSM see the need to bring this back to ccp. |
Re'taka
Minmatar Republic University
|
Posted - 2009.06.16 18:27:00 -
[547]
/signed again, and free bump
|
Twilight Magester
|
Posted - 2009.06.17 07:42:00 -
[548]
/signed
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente The Fated E.Y
|
Posted - 2009.06.17 17:02:00 -
[549]
CSM we are asking you to take this back, and represent it correctly, In the official manner it should have been taken to CCP to start with. |
Rudgier Thorrin
|
Posted - 2009.06.18 13:13:00 -
[550]
Edited by: Rudgier Thorrin on 18/06/2009 13:13:35 /signed
The cureent looks of POSes suck. Game is supposed to be fun, and that includes stuff looking good, not only being functional. |
|
Admiral IceBlock
Northern Intelligence
|
Posted - 2009.06.18 13:38:00 -
[551]
/signed |
riverini
|
Posted - 2009.06.18 17:14:00 -
[552]
/Signed |
Grumpy Munchkin
|
Posted - 2009.06.18 17:23:00 -
[553]
/signed
|
Valerie Burn
|
Posted - 2009.06.19 01:06:00 -
[554]
/signed |
Daveion Steel
Gallente 6thsense Corp
|
Posted - 2009.06.21 07:28:00 -
[555]
/me Signs this.
Just curious how you guys put a thumbs up under your char.
D... . Linkage |
Syberbolt8
Gallente The Fated E.Y
|
Posted - 2009.06.22 13:20:00 -
[556]
Edited by: Syberbolt8 on 22/06/2009 13:23:29
Originally by: Daveion Steel /me Signs this.
Just curious how you guys put a thumbs up under your char.
D...
There is a check box below the text box that says support this thread, just check it.
5 times in trying to post this, please CCP for the love of god fix the forums Support the DEAD HORSE POS's |
Vaneshi SnowCrash
|
Posted - 2009.06.22 20:54:00 -
[557]
I gave this a thumbs up three pages back. Subsequently I've read all of the CSM input in this thread and I have some choice words. Poppy****. Uttery poppy****.
Since "Dead Horse" appeared their have been changes to the code base, Drones have been revised completley as have missiles, nano modules and so on. Let us NOT forget that "Dead Horse" predates Trinity and the later move to a SM2/SM3 only engine in Apoc'.
"CCP say it's too difficult". I don't believe you, I don't believe them. Because they have already taken on much larger projects with regards to overhauling elements of EVE than this would require. You seriously want me to accept that rewriting the whole graphics engine AND redesigning all art assets is smaller than migrating the current half-finished joke of POSes to this system?
In a word. No. Will you please get this on the table. Not as "funky POS thing" but as the actual debate that's been going on for 3 years+. Just because CSM1 were fobbed off I see no reason for CSM2 and CSM3 to stick their fingers in their respective ears and go "lalalalala I can't hear you".
|
Zastrow J
|
Posted - 2009.06.23 06:47:00 -
[558]
When I go face to face with CCP later this year you can be sure that I will share some choice words about POS with them
|
Silwar Naiilo
Crimson Logistical
|
Posted - 2009.06.23 17:35:00 -
[559]
/signed
The current POS system is extremely disappointing. Permissions are convoluted, the actual POSes just look like floating junk, and the majority of modules are worthless.
There's 41 pages of support on the original idea thread. Tells you something. |
Syberbolt8
Gallente The Fated E.Y
|
Posted - 2009.06.23 22:58:00 -
[560]
Originally by: Silwar Naiilo Edited by: Silwar Naiilo on 23/06/2009 18:08:49 /signed
The current POS system is extremely disappointing. Permissions are convoluted, the actual POSes just look like floating junk, and the majority of modules are worthless.
There's 41 pages of support on the original idea thread. Tells you something.
This thread being little over a year old with 21 pages and almost 400 out of the ~ 560 posts are support posts with the thumbs up, and I'm willing to bet around 100 of the non-support posts are from jinx, myself and a few others who have lobbied this post for the past year.
Now THAT says something, it says that its wanted, and not only wanted, but wanted by most everyone that bothers to click post on this thread.
other then capital posts show me one active post that has that kind of support. CCP the players want this, and if we could get every one that plays the game to log onto the forums and read it, Im willing to bet that at very least 3/4s of the players would support this. |
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente The Fated E.Y
|
Posted - 2009.06.24 22:55:00 -
[561]
Edited by: Syberbolt8 on 24/06/2009 22:55:37
Originally by: Zastrow J When I go face to face with CCP later this year you can be sure that I will share some choice words about POS with them
When you do, if you bring up this idea, and I hope you do, could you please name it something other then the funky pos idea?? Support the DEAD HORSE POS's |
Big Bit
|
Posted - 2009.06.25 00:09:00 -
[562]
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente Mercurialis Inc. Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.06.26 02:24:00 -
[563]
page one again, Best idea for pos revamp since 2006 Support the DEAD HORSE POS's |
Re'taka
Minmatar Republic University
|
Posted - 2009.06.27 13:26:00 -
[564]
need more support for this topic guy, keep the thumbs up comming. |
Jinx Barker
Caldari GFB Scientific
|
Posted - 2009.06.27 16:04:00 -
[565]
Originally by: Zastrow J When I go face to face with CCP later this year you can be sure that I will share some choice words about POS with them
Don't let them railroad you, because they love to do that. And I hope you would not fall into a trap like rest of the CSM where the trip to Iceland and a circle-jerk at CCP, plus their own petty concerns, have outweighed the needs of the community, or had them turn blind eye to something asked, begged, and demAnded for almost 4 years now.
I am a very private person, do not want anyone digging around my life, or have copies of my passports, or anything like that, otherwise I would have ran for CSM myself on the sole premise of fixing POS - thats it. One main issue as a focus. Oh well.
|
Syberbolt8
Gallente Mercurialis Inc. Wildly Inappropriate.
|
Posted - 2009.07.01 19:17:00 -
[566]
I stop bumping for one day and its on page 10, we need more support guys, vote for this today :) Support the DEAD HORSE POS's |
Damodred Lun'itarae
Phoenix Horizons Inc
|
Posted - 2009.07.01 21:29:00 -
[567]
I approve this topic
|
Stormaar
|
Posted - 2009.07.01 23:39:00 -
[568]
/signed ----- Customizable UI / internal API for mods/addons |
Kaylan Jahlar
Minmatar Industrial Limited
|
Posted - 2009.07.02 02:46:00 -
[569]
The CSM already brought this to CCP and they said it was not going to be done. Why do you keep bringing it up?
|
Jinx Barker
Caldari GFB Scientific
|
Posted - 2009.07.03 17:06:00 -
[570]
Edited by: Jinx Barker on 03/07/2009 17:07:20
Originally by: Kaylan Jahlar The CSM already brought this to CCP and they said it was not going to be done. Why do you keep bringing it up?
1) CSM did not really bring it to CCP - there was a lot of double talk from certain CSM - who claimed that they have, when it turned out they devoted less than 5 minutes of time to it, because: "CCP said it was too hard, so we did not even bother discussing it, getting details."
2) CCP never said it was impossible - just that it will take a lot of work. Hence, we want CCP to take time, and do it properly, the way POS should have been done in the first place, not the half-arsed "junk-in-space-ala-deadh-horse."
3) Do some research on what CSM actually did, and you will find that that a discussion on "MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS IN EVE" took place, got approved, while the POS overhaul issue was barely mentioned as the "funky POS idea."
Now, be a good boy, and go conform somewhere else, with the rest of the CSMs who really did diddley-squat about this - longest running request in the history of EVE, yea mate, longest running, longest asked for, longest desired, and completely legitimate, and yet ignored request from the EVE community in the history of EVE.
Support the POS overhaul! Even if the "musical instruments" crowd would want you to give up!
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 .. 26 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |