Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] [20]:: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
NovaWelther
|
Posted - 2010.05.08 13:14:00 -
[571]
/support
|
Decon Ko
|
Posted - 2010.05.08 16:00:00 -
[572]
"1. BEFORE there were wrecks ... when you killed a Player Character's ship ... there were can drops ... IF you looted from them ... you were FLAGGED."
this won me, don't see why they would change how that works (not the -adding a wreck- part obviously). --
This: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=1248088 |
Octavia Ceasar
|
Posted - 2010.05.10 12:32:00 -
[573]
|
Kiithnaras
Lethal Injection. Hedonistic Imperative
|
Posted - 2010.05.12 16:13:00 -
[574]
/signed, sealed, and sent
|
RedFiber
|
Posted - 2010.06.29 02:49:00 -
[575]
100% support
|
Imapimp Youdaho
|
Posted - 2010.06.29 02:49:00 -
[576]
Support
|
Sard Caid
Gunpoint Diplomacy
|
Posted - 2010.06.29 04:24:00 -
[577]
+1
|
Tharill daSai
Humanum Erectum Axiom Alliance
|
Posted - 2010.06.29 04:55:00 -
[578]
|
Skippermonkey
Suddenly Ninjas Tear Extraction And Reclamation Service
|
Posted - 2010.06.29 13:40:00 -
[579]
Originally by: Dav Varan No.
Wreck belongs to Victim.
Grow a pair and PVP in low sec / null sec rather than high sec suicide ganking then you can shoot anyone who goes for the loot.
Concord should not support suicide gankers.
Pretty much this, pvp is full of risks, this is just another of those risks.
|
Jennifer Celeste
|
Posted - 2010.06.29 18:14:00 -
[580]
Originally by: The PitBoss PPL TAKING FROM MAH PVP WRECKS ARE BAD MEN
bro...stop pvping on the jita undock. |
|
Ilik Tanikalot
Black Rebel Rifter Club
|
Posted - 2010.06.29 21:19:00 -
[581]
Edited by: Ilik Tanikalot on 29/06/2010 21:19:25 Edited by: Ilik Tanikalot on 29/06/2010 21:19:04 Supported.
Btw, this is not something about people grabbing the loot and running for the hills. It is about them being basically invincible, beside a suicide kill. ****ed mechanic.
Edit: Page 20 ... sniper.
|
MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.06.29 22:06:00 -
[582]
Originally by: Balatar Couldn't agree more - the only people who could possible object to this are those no risk losers that wait for the PvPers to do their work for them.
You mean like the hi sec dwelling pirate corps that war-dec hi sec industrial corps for easy to no risk? The hypocrisy you guys spew is astounding. Do you even think one step ahead of what the crap you say?
Grief a PVP'er. Run a mission today! |
Lykouleon
Trust Doesn't Rust
|
Posted - 2010.06.30 00:09:00 -
[583]
yes
Quote: CCP Mindstar > Sorry - I've completely messed all that up. lets try again
|
Bfoster
Brutor tribe
|
Posted - 2010.06.30 20:38:00 -
[584]
Yup.. Wreck should belong to the killer, not the victim.. ------------------
|
Ori Blake
|
Posted - 2010.06.30 22:14:00 -
[585]
Not supported unless the original person wrecked is immune. A problem is that suppose the guy who gets ganked wants to get his stuff back? He's flagged for stealing from his own wreck since he doesn't own it. While he may be wardecced, he may also be in a 1v1, or lost his ship from a pirate.
|
Marlona Sky
D00M. RED.OverLord
|
Posted - 2010.07.01 09:00:00 -
[586]
I will support this if at the same time, they remove the ability to remote anything to someone outside your alliance/corp. NPC corps do not count.
Then, and only then would war decs in high sec be better.
|
General Escobar
Gung-Ho
|
Posted - 2010.07.05 18:09:00 -
[587]
Wreck should "belong" to both, victim and killer! both should get aggro to a 3rd party that is looting the wreck! and considering that the killer is the only one left on grid with a ship and a cargohold in that ship, hes most likely the only one of the two (victim and killer) that can take the loot!
|
Loi Shaini
Caldari Perkone
|
Posted - 2010.07.06 03:57:00 -
[588]
LOL - the griefer gets griefed and has a whine?
It's game mechanics boyo, suck it up and HTFU!!
Sad panda is sad for you
|
Clovermite
Kamikaze Fleet Command Kamikaze Project
|
Posted - 2010.07.06 05:07:00 -
[589]
I'm in support of this, only on the condition that it is legal war targets only.
I agree that suicide gankers, while operating perfectly within intended game mechanics, should not get rights to the loot.
So I'll hold off checking the box thingy until the OP gets edited to say "legal war targets only."
|
Bomberlocks
Minmatar CTRL-Q
|
Posted - 2010.07.06 10:55:00 -
[590]
Not supported. Even if a two day alt is flagged to you, it still means zero risk to the person flying the alt, as losing that alt just means he has to try again or perhaps two two day alts around next time. |
|
MatrixSkye Mk2
Minmatar
|
Posted - 2010.07.06 12:28:00 -
[591]
This change would make a lot of sense. Think about it. In real life when an aggressor kills someone all the victim's properties now legally belong to the aggressor. It is actually the police's job to defend and make sure that the aggressor can now pick up what now legally belongs to him.
|
Bagehi
Association of Commonwealth Enterprises Gentlemen's Club
|
Posted - 2010.07.06 17:20:00 -
[592]
Originally by: Marlona Sky I will support this if at the same time, they remove the ability to remote anything to someone outside your alliance/corp. NPC corps do not count.
Then, and only then would war decs in high sec be better.
This. Also, Marlona Sky for king of badgers.
This signature is useless, but it is red.
|
SammyullJackson
|
Posted - 2010.07.06 17:50:00 -
[593]
Originally by: MatrixSkye Mk2 This change would make a lot of sense. Think about it. In real life when an aggressor kills someone all the victim's properties now legally belong to the aggressor. It is actually the police's job to defend and make sure that the aggressor can now pick up what now legally belongs to him.
Umm... what?
In real life, when an aggressor kills someone, they go to jail...
Unless you're talking about self-defense or something... in which all the victims' property belongs to the family of the deceased.
|
Xorv
|
Posted - 2010.07.06 21:12:00 -
[594]
Makes sense in regard to Wardecs, which are not criminal.
But would add corp members of the victim as players not flagged for looting, to prevent a good idea for wardecs to be abused in other situations.
|
Epegi Givo
Amarr The Fimbriani Shadow of xXDEATHXx
|
Posted - 2010.07.07 00:07:00 -
[595]
Edited by: Epegi Givo on 07/07/2010 00:09:36 Edited by: Epegi Givo on 07/07/2010 00:07:51 Agreed 100%
Pretty much anything where someone can damage you and you have no way to protect against is stupid IMHO.
I killed the guy, I took heavy armor damage to do so and need the money to pay for it.
Also there is everyone saying "Go to lowsec".
Guess what? I tried going to lowsec, and very quickly got multi-BS ganked. In high-sec I can actually get a fair fight with someone of equal size to me, much more fun that way.
This, coupled with PitBoss' earlier thread of Neutral RRepping would fox high-sec PvP for me almost entirely.
Edit: Apparently I already supported this thread earlier on. __________________________
My other alt is A Ferrari |
Loi Shaini
Caldari Perkone
|
Posted - 2010.07.07 00:17:00 -
[596]
Edited by: Loi Shaini on 07/07/2010 00:20:45 But some of us make a very tidy living off the wrecks of the victim of gankers. They (the gankers) don't like it for obvious reasons, but it's seriously fun to do.
But the really clever part is that with the game mechanics, I can reroll an industrial flying alt every day (no sec status hit you see) perfectly legally - so you'll never know if that empty speed fitted hauler sitting on the inbound path to a gate or on the undock to a station, is gonna snatch ya loot right from under your nose.
Nothing like ruining someone's day when they see that all that hard work goes to nothing as their juicy target ends up in someone else's hold.
Now those are very sweet tears to suck on.
|
Obsidian Hawk
RONA Legion
|
Posted - 2010.07.07 03:14:00 -
[597]
I dont know why people are going to support this, it wont change. CCP has said before the wreck belongs to the victim and no one else, and who ever gets there first gets the spoils of war. And they already get flagged to that player who owns the wreck and the entire corp they belong to.
sooooo......
Move along now, nothing to see here.
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 [20] [20]:: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |