Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Apple Boy
Dirty Deeds Corp. Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.10.10 00:02:00 -
[121]
|
Mike Yass
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.10.10 18:19:00 -
[122]
There was no reason to not buff the Celestis family of ships after nerfing RSDs. Supportin' dis.
|
Hooded Person
|
Posted - 2008.10.10 19:09:00 -
[123]
Supported
|
Joss Sparq
ANZAC ALLIANCE Southern Cross Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.10.11 22:55:00 -
[124]
Originally by: Waterfowl Democracy They cannot keep a single target from doing damage like a falcon can or even like a pilgrim can to a turret based ship.
I would point out that they're also not chance based like ECM are. However, I agree that RSDs should be examined and perhaps given a slight boost to make them a more viable option, especially for role bonus ships.
Mind you, I think a good deal of the Electronic Warfare repertoire (RSDs, TPs, TDs, and the directly related Drones) need a tweak towards greater affect on combat. Supported.
|
Kransthow
The Scope
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 00:23:00 -
[125]
Originally by: Joss Sparq I would point out that they're also not chance based
Yes they are when you get out of optimal, which isn't very big to begin with.
|
Joss Sparq
Caldari ANZAC ALLIANCE Southern Cross Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 11:39:00 -
[126]
Originally by: Kransthow
Originally by: Joss Sparq I would point out that they're also not chance based
Yes they are when you get out of optimal, which isn't very big to begin with.
Errr, what? I've always been under the impression RSDs hit after optimal at a reduced degree of strength, but still "hit" they do - even if they have, at some point, little or no impact.
|
deadEd
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 11:41:00 -
[127]
Way too many ships were made effectively useless by the RSD nerf. Something needs to be done. Supported definitely.
|
Kransthow
The Scope
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 13:14:00 -
[128]
Originally by: Joss Sparq Errr, what? I've always been under the impression RSDs hit after optimal at a reduced degree of strength, but still "hit" they do - even if they have, at some point, little or no impact.
The reason behind it is that having to constantly recalculate the strength of the sensor dampner would just cause the server to keel over and die and as a compromise to stop lag, it was made to be a simpler chance based system.
|
Malcanis
RuffRyders Axiom Empire
|
Posted - 2008.10.12 15:26:00 -
[129]
Originally by: Joss Sparq
Originally by: Kransthow
Originally by: Joss Sparq I would point out that they're also not chance based
Yes they are when you get out of optimal, which isn't very big to begin with.
Errr, what? I've always been under the impression RSDs hit after optimal at a reduced degree of strength, but still "hit" they do - even if they have, at some point, little or no impact.
That's how they should really work, but no, in falloff, all EW is chance-based (ECM gets a falloff roll, then a sensor vs jammer roll)
|
Hooded Person
Amarr
|
Posted - 2008.10.26 11:31:00 -
[130]
/supported + bump |
|
Nilien
|
Posted - 2008.10.26 11:55:00 -
[131]
Edited by: Nilien on 26/10/2008 11:56:20 Good idea falcon /rook etc require appropriate answer . P S falcon /rook requires nerf permajamm is smth awesome
|
VonRijSE
Phoenix Tribe
|
Posted - 2008.10.26 12:12:00 -
[132]
|
Booken Blue
Ixion Defence Systems
|
Posted - 2008.10.26 15:42:00 -
[133]
Supported. I'm a big fan of Damps ships and the tactical elements they convey. The Damp Nerf did alot of damage in the strategy element of the game, and I want it restored. |
Rutger Centemus
Joint Empire Squad
|
Posted - 2008.10.26 18:36:00 -
[134]
|
Karentaki
Gallente Fighting While Intoxicated Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2008.10.31 11:15:00 -
[135]
Bump for gallente e-war love.
Quote:
EVE is like a sandbox with landmines. Deal with it.
|
Souvera Corvus
SPORADIC MOVEMENT FOUNDATI0N
|
Posted - 2008.10.31 11:31:00 -
[136]
Supported.
There is very little point using RSD these days.
If you need EW in a small gang the call for the Falcon goes out.
|
Jean Dessaut
MicroFunks
|
Posted - 2008.11.01 19:03:00 -
[137]
/signed
|
Xanja
2H Industries
|
Posted - 2008.11.01 23:15:00 -
[138]
----------------- |
shuckstar
Hauling hogs
|
Posted - 2008.11.02 05:42:00 -
[139]
|
Tulisin Dragonflame
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 07:38:00 -
[140]
Signed.
I am interested in trying a Keres, but I can't really find a use for it with damps being so, well, bleh.
|
|
Grigo
M. Corp Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 08:29:00 -
[141]
no...learn to use ure ships RO
Originally by: Avernus ...some kudos to using your main to post like an asshat though... doesn't really take balls though, you're on the internet.
|
Antihrist Pripravnik
The 13th Gallentean Armed Response
|
Posted - 2008.12.22 10:24:00 -
[142]
supported
|
Miss KillSome
School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2008.12.29 12:31:00 -
[143]
yes, we need a boost!! Fast ----- TCODA corporation is recruiting! TCODA is awesome! |
Pizi
Gallente
|
Posted - 2008.12.29 21:58:00 -
[144]
yes please they are lacking a role _______________________________________________ Mining Crystal II BPC Pricelist EVEpedia[Deutsch]
|
Romulus Silvia
Igneus Auctorita GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.12.29 22:20:00 -
[145]
Edited by: Romulus Silvia on 29/12/2008 22:20:40 i'd like to fly my arazu again.
|
Esmenet
|
Posted - 2008.12.30 03:41:00 -
[146]
bump
|
Imertu Solientai
|
Posted - 2009.02.22 16:07:00 -
[147]
Bump because this is still a major issue! I'm sick of seeing falcon threads when the arazu is so underpowered.
|
Isaac Starstriker
Amarr Assisted Homicide DEFI4NT
|
Posted - 2009.02.22 19:53:00 -
[148]
Not supported. Dampening still works and we saw a lot of it in the tournament. Gimp? I think not. Especially when most of them dampening weren't the ships in this thread.
--Isaac Isaac's Haul*Mart
|
Skylar Flame
Brackish Water
|
Posted - 2009.02.23 01:08:00 -
[149]
|
Imertu Solientai
|
Posted - 2009.02.26 23:23:00 -
[150]
Originally by: Isaac Starstriker Not supported. Dampening still works and we saw a lot of it in the tournament. Gimp? I think not. Especially when most of them dampening weren't the ships in this thread.
--Isaac
Quoted to prove that damp-specific ships are worse than their non-damp-specific counterparts.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |