| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Reply to Topic | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Ender Karazaki
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:03:00 -
[121] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Ender Karazaki wrote:I'm a fairly new player and although I do not know much about the game yet, I can tell you that my first few days in eve has been bewildering, furstrating, confusing and sometimes enjoyable.
The skill training is not something I'm used to. Since I've played EQ1 it was level bar in that filled by killing rats and snakes and completing quests. The more you put in the more you progressed. I log onto eve and I see things are done over time, fair enough I think this is something that everyone in the game will have to go through. I ask for advise get 100 different answers.
Some suggested that I just buy some isk and train my implants up to lvl and not log in for a week! You can guess how that made me feel. It felt as if I was wasting my time in the game since no matter what i did in the game, a guy who just logs on to fix his training que and logs back out again could be ahead of me because he buys ISK to get the best implants. That made me feel like ****
Another thing is the contradictory advice you get in what to train and how best to move farward in the game and the how the career paths diverge. For example, say I want to PVP but use mining and industry to fund it. That simply isn't realistic and these sort of restrictions furstrate me although I accept it's part of the consequences of my choices. However I hate the idea of being given the choice of choosing one path over another or
I would make one suggestion. Before the game starts I would have the game ask a player what their chosen career path would be. If they say Industry, put them in a n00b corp for industry. If the say PVP put them in a n00b corp for that so they can get into a corp that is relevant to their interest. I liked your post, but noob corps aren't the answer. Blind leading the blind and all. The best thing you could possibly do is get out of noob corps for good. Obviously I'm going to suggest combat PVE, to synergize with your goal of PVP combat. But don't grind too much. Go out and have fun in cheaper, throwaway ships. Who knows, you might find a faction spawn out in low-sec. I did. On my third day subbed. In a frigate. I got a Halo Beta for my troubles, even though I didn't get any player kills that night! The ISK sorts itself out in time.
Perhaps not a noob corp but a help channel that focuses solely on PvP run by these people who run the help channel.
By the way, I completely agree with Degren. There are too many PVE corp that recruit players that want to focus on the PvP side of the game and end up making them mine and stuff. I've been approached a few times by corps less than a month old who assume that if I join that I will suddenly give up on my PVP focus and start on industry. This happened to me at another game and it ruined it for me. |

Valentyn3
Deep Core Mining Inc.
125
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:04:00 -
[122] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:
I liked your post, but noob corps aren't the answer. Blind leading the blind and all.
The best thing you could possibly do is get out of noob corps for good. Obviously I'm going to suggest combat PVE, to synergize with your goal of PVP combat.
But don't grind too much. Go out and have fun in cheaper, throwaway ships. Who knows, you might find a faction spawn out in low-sec. I did. On my third day subbed. In a frigate. I got a Halo Beta for my troubles, even though I didn't get any player kills that night!
The ISK sorts itself out in time.
I would say instead of newbie corps, a system that gives you a list of registered player corps relevant to your career path and forces you to join one is a nice idea. It dumps you in the game with people who play how you want to and who actually want to help you because they benefit from it as well. I don't always use hax. But when I do, it's because I'm an NPC.. http://i.imgur.com/PUZou.jpg
|

Tomiko Kawase
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:07:00 -
[123] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Tomiko Kawase wrote:Coming from other mainstream titles, EVE was a breath of fresh air. I started playing in the midst of the Incarna rollout and if nothing else, the Jita riots sealed the deal for me. For a playerbase to show such emotion and effect change I knew I stumbled on something great. You really should have seen the threadnaught on ghost training. Now there was a hot topic! It had everything...lies...manipulation...deceit...treachery... ...not to mention a lot of backpedaling and an extremely stoic CCP staff who utterly refused to comment. CCP could outright lie to you and you'd still play the game. Trust me, it happened to hundreds of thousands of us.
For me it was just the fact that a riot could actually happen. Content generated by players and not a themepark ride was something I couldn't even comprehend happening. CCP absolutely could have handled both situations better, but the world they've constructed is second to none. |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
129
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:08:00 -
[124] - Quote
Valentyn3 wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:
I liked your post, but noob corps aren't the answer. Blind leading the blind and all.
The best thing you could possibly do is get out of noob corps for good. Obviously I'm going to suggest combat PVE, to synergize with your goal of PVP combat.
But don't grind too much. Go out and have fun in cheaper, throwaway ships. Who knows, you might find a faction spawn out in low-sec. I did. On my third day subbed. In a frigate. I got a Halo Beta for my troubles, even though I didn't get any player kills that night!
The ISK sorts itself out in time.
I would say instead of newbie corps, a system that gives you a list of registered player corps relevant to your career path and forces you to join one is a nice idea. It dumps you in the game with people who play how you want to and who actually want to help you because they benefit from it as well.
Sorry to have to disagree, but I think the emergent behavior they're expecting noobs to engage in is better played out if it happens organically. What you're proposing seems awfully heavy-handed.
Players do need to think for themselves. Choosing a corp is one of those things they'll eventually have to figure out.
It may not be easy, but I believe it's best for the game not to coddle the rookies any more than absolutely necessary.
Tomiko Kawase wrote:For me it was just the fact that a riot could actually happen. Content generated by players and not a themepark ride was something I couldn't even comprehend happening. CCP absolutely could have handled both situations better, but the world they've constructed is second to none.
I can't help but agree. See what I mean? He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse Sanctuary Pact
432
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:12:00 -
[125] - Quote
Ai Shun wrote:Thorn Galen wrote:There have been some very good responses in this thread and of course the expected "nothing is wrong", "show proof" and other non-contributing responses. Thanks for those, folks. It seems to me all you wanted was somebody to say: "Yes, Thorn. I agree with you Thorn". Asking you for more information about player retention, when you make a fairly substantial claim, is not non-contribution. It comes from somebody who works with data, information and so forth for a living who is interested in the health of this game. If you don't have it, just say so. Then I know you're just full of **** and I can treat your post as opinion, instead of fact as you stated it. Not that difficult, is it?
It's a pity you see it that way. At the very least my opinion, as you put it, has generated a respectable thread with good information, which is all I was looking for. There is no way I, or anyone else, can please all of the people all of the time. The universe is an ancient desert, a vast wasteland with only occasional habitable planets as oases. We Fremen, comfortable with deserts, shall now venture into another. - STILGAR, From the Sietch to the Stars. |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
69
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:12:00 -
[126] - Quote
The high barrier to running Incursions and runaway inflation due to riskless "PVE" in high-sec would drive any new player away from the game. Think about it, running missions or frigate mining/hauling for paltry ISK sucks when the Incursion fleet you can't join is devaluing ISK faster than you can earn it. What possible incentive does a new player who doesn't hook up with a decent player corporation really have for staying subbed to Eve? Oh snap![/quote]
[/quote]
Bull I let ships w/o super shiney fits in fleet all the time you are wrong in thinking a high cost to get into incursions is a deterrent into Eve. You are part of the problem not the solution a hole |

Darth Gustav
Sons Of 0din Fatal Ascension
129
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:15:00 -
[127] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:
The high barrier to running Incursions and runaway inflation due to riskless "PVE" in high-sec would drive any new player away from the game. Think about it, running missions or frigate mining/hauling for paltry ISK sucks when the Incursion fleet you can't join is devaluing ISK faster than you can earn it. What possible incentive does a new player who doesn't hook up with a decent player corporation really have for staying subbed to Eve? Oh snap!
Bull I let ships w/o super shiney fits in fleet all the time you are wrong in thinking a high cost to get into incursions is a deterrent into Eve. You are part of the problem not the solution a hole[/quote]
Meet my signature. Let me know how that goes for you. He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom |

Tomiko Kawase
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:16:00 -
[128] - Quote
Valentyn3 wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:
I liked your post, but noob corps aren't the answer. Blind leading the blind and all.
The best thing you could possibly do is get out of noob corps for good. Obviously I'm going to suggest combat PVE, to synergize with your goal of PVP combat.
But don't grind too much. Go out and have fun in cheaper, throwaway ships. Who knows, you might find a faction spawn out in low-sec. I did. On my third day subbed. In a frigate. I got a Halo Beta for my troubles, even though I didn't get any player kills that night!
The ISK sorts itself out in time.
I would say instead of newbie corps, a system that gives you a list of registered player corps relevant to your career path and forces you to join one is a nice idea. It dumps you in the game with people who play how you want to and who actually want to help you because they benefit from it as well.
Forcing someone to do something shouldn't really be an option, at least not in that context. What needs to be reworked is the archaic UI for finding corps. For the first week I played EvE I wasn't really sure if the "corp" I was in was controlled by NPCs or not. By a stroke of luck I found Dreddit and was able to avoid the debacle of newbie corps. |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
69
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:21:00 -
[129] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:[ Meet my signature. Let me know how that goes for you.
lol I troll U better C U n teee U dunno what u talk abouts bring it on U CANT NERF ME S L uuu t |

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
69
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:22:00 -
[130] - Quote
yAWN SOO u ARE AN EXPERT HUH HOW? TELL ME TROLL? |
|

Valentyn3
Deep Core Mining Inc.
125
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 08:40:00 -
[131] - Quote
Tomiko Kawase wrote:Valentyn3 wrote:Darth Gustav wrote:
I liked your post, but noob corps aren't the answer. Blind leading the blind and all.
The best thing you could possibly do is get out of noob corps for good. Obviously I'm going to suggest combat PVE, to synergize with your goal of PVP combat.
But don't grind too much. Go out and have fun in cheaper, throwaway ships. Who knows, you might find a faction spawn out in low-sec. I did. On my third day subbed. In a frigate. I got a Halo Beta for my troubles, even though I didn't get any player kills that night!
The ISK sorts itself out in time.
I would say instead of newbie corps, a system that gives you a list of registered player corps relevant to your career path and forces you to join one is a nice idea. It dumps you in the game with people who play how you want to and who actually want to help you because they benefit from it as well. Forcing someone to do something shouldn't really be an option, at least not in that context. What needs to be reworked is the archaic UI for finding corps. For the first week I played EvE I wasn't really sure if the "corp" I was in was controlled by NPCs or not. By a stroke of luck I found Dreddit and was able to avoid the debacle of newbie corps.
Probably a better idea.
It was just a random thought I had. Maybe a section of the tutorial just for the corp system ect. As you said, it can be pretty complicated, like the rest of the game, for a new player. I don't always use hax. But when I do, it's because I'm an NPC.. http://i.imgur.com/PUZou.jpg
|

Mr Katsumoto
ScrapYard Cerberus Laika.
0
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:37:00 -
[132] - Quote
Guttripper wrote:
Thanks for reading.
Excellent read and I agree. |

Roime
Shiva Furnace
281
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 10:50:00 -
[133] - Quote
Pink Leaf wrote:New player comes to eve. New player see's all of the things you can do, all of the careers you can take up. New player gets excited.
A few weeks down the line and new player realizes that apart from missions none of the other stuff is worth doing. New player is told that things are better in low-sec. New player fly's to low-sec. New player gets blown up.
New player get's fed-up and bored. New player leaves eve.
This is total bullshit and direct result of new players being exposed to the negative influence of infininoobs polluting the starter NPC corps.
I flew to lowsec. I didn't do missions. I made my first billion after one month of playing.
I stayed.
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
304
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:17:00 -
[134] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Cearain wrote:What you said makes no sense in relation to my post. Yes it does - you were effectively putting the question as "Hey new guy, would you like to play a game that forces you to do X and Y horrible terrible things?" You prime the pump with the question and get the answer you want to get from the new person. Quote: Eve doesn't require alt scouts or alt tackle. So I don't complain that it does.
The booster alts however are becoming required if you want to be competitive. You don't need to get upset just because you use them. I don't blame you - its a huge advantage. I'm training one myself. But certainly if I knew the game was going to force me down this path I probably would not have installed it.
Nevertheless ask new players what they think about starting into a game where you will be at a severe disadvantage if you do not dual box these alts. Ask it however you want you don't have to use my wording - if that is your issue.
While I do have booster alts, I don't actually use them. When I roll with a booster alt, I do it on my main and play the scouting roll (yes, really). I might be more inclined to use booster alts, but I found that running Eve on 1920x1080 with high graphics and getting acceptable Fraps footage just doesn't pan out. But hey, don't let me stand in the way of your pathetic pity party where you complain that someone in your fleet might want to run bonuses.  -Liang
I thought I saw a video of you in a talos with an extremely long point. Maybe it was faction or something like that. Or maybe that wasn't you. I don't know. So let me ask: were you in a talos getting the benefit of someones booster alt?
I am not calling for a pity party I am just observing some facts. The facts are off grid alt boosters give huge combat advantages to those who use them. Are you denying this?
Do you think that prevalance of them is increasing, decreasing, or staying the same?
I'm pretty sure I know the answers. But who knows maybe diagoras or past qens could give us some answers if you aren't convinced the game is going in this direction.
Again I am training one myself because they are just too large of an advantage not to use. But I know having to use that alt account will make eve more of a chore.
As far as your comments regarding the wording of questions regarding booster alts. How would you ask it? It doesn't matter how you ask the question. The above facts won't change. And these facts are likely to be a big turn off for new players and old players alike.
Making these sorts of short term cash gains is not good for the long term health of the game. I realize it may be necessary for ccp to do this now, but I hope they are planning on undoing this in the future once the financial issues pan out. Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
304
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 14:24:00 -
[135] - Quote
Ephemeron wrote:Cearain wrote:Eve doesn't require alt scouts or alt tackle Actually, speaking from experience and good understanding of EVE game design, I'd argue that EVE does require an alt scout for 1 major reason: star gates The only way to know what's on the other side of the gate is to jump and see, and jumping leaves you vulnerable to gate camp. Map statistics aren't good enough. In pretty much everything else, it is possible to scout solo without putting your life on pure luck. I suppose you could argue that a gate can be scouted solo in a cloaker ship, but that's basically doing the job of an alt scout by switching ships one 1 char. If EVE was better designed, there would be a way to "peek" on the other side of the gate without gambling with your ship. But I suppose it's more profitable for CCP to require alt scouts
When I am solo I never used an alt scout, and I pvp solo probably at least 80% of the time. Again I may start using one but its not nearly as necessary as having the booster alts.
Low sec and faction war has been a decent way to get fights in eve without having to have an army of scouts. Yeah you may want to fly smaller stuff and you will lose an occassional ship to a gate camp but its not as necessary as the booster alts.
Without a booster alt when you finally do get a fight you will likely just die an embarrassing death.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Ai Shun
361
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:34:00 -
[136] - Quote
Thorn Galen wrote:It's a pity you see it that way. At the very least my opinion, as you put it, has generated a respectable thread with good information, which is all I was looking for. There is no way I, or anyone else, can please all of the people all of the time.
Yes, it has generated an interesting discussion. In future please, when dealing with a topic for discussion that affects the health of the game; please state things in such a way it is clear it is an opinion. Because:
Thorn wrote:You have the numbers, you know we're losing a small number of new players on a daily basis. The number of players being lost to EvE outnumber the new players signing-up (who then also become ex-players).
that does not come across as opinion but as fact, hence my request for the actual data. Either way, thank you for clarifying that it was just an opinion and not an actual fact. It means I can now put the rest of the discussion in the proper perspective. Thank you. |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1067
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:14:00 -
[137] - Quote
Cearain wrote: I thought I saw a video of you in a talos with an extremely long point. Maybe it was faction or something like that. Or maybe that wasn't you. I don't know. So let me ask: were you in a talos getting the benefit of someones booster alt?
I am not calling for a pity party I am just observing some facts. The facts are off grid alt boosters give huge combat advantages to those who use them. Are you denying this?
I like how it's gone from everyone personally must have a booster alt to someone in the fleet might desire a booster alt. And yes, that was me - or at least I have put out a number of videos with me in a Talos where some of the time I have had gang bonuses.
Quote: Do you think that prevalance of them is increasing, decreasing, or staying the same?
I'm pretty sure I know the answers. But who knows maybe diagoras or past qens could give us some answers if you aren't convinced the game is going in this direction.
Again I am training one myself because they are just too large of an advantage not to use. But I know having to use that alt account will make eve more of a chore.
The prevalence is increasing, but you do not have to train one - and neither does the noob that you're saying shouldn't stick with the game because of it. Furthermore, I would argue that the density of booster alts will go down.
Quote: As far as your comments regarding the wording of questions regarding booster alts. How would you ask it? It doesn't matter how you ask the question. The above facts won't change. And these facts are likely to be a big turn off for new players and old players alike.
Making these sorts of short term cash gains is not good for the long term health of the game. I realize it may be necessary for ccp to do this now, but I hope they are planning on undoing this in the future once the financial issues pan out.
You are priming the pump by asserting that the behavior in question is necessary and bad, regardless of the reality of that. It isn't necessary, and its extremely unlikely that Joe Q Noob would find himself training up a booster alt for the first few years (if he ever did).
Furthermore, more and more I find that I play on one account at a time instead of multiple accounts - and I've even been known to go on corp roams as the scout+gang booster on my main. Yet that flies directly in the face of what you claim is the inescapable truth.
So yeah, get on with your pity party. 
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1067
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:15:00 -
[138] - Quote
Cearain wrote: Without a booster alt when you finally do get a fight you will likely just die an embarrassing death.
I successfully solo PVP without a booster alt (or even gang bonuses) all the time.
Less QQ, more Pew Pew.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|

gfldex
376
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:08:00 -
[139] - Quote
Archdaimon wrote:I'm not saying it should be different and I have done it myself, but it is really tough for a new player wanting to play with your friends facing more experienced players than yourself who war dec's corporations in high sec for money or tears.
Indeed. There are plenty of new players that join crappy corps that can't deal with wardecs. And the crappy wardec system drives the noobs out, not the crappy CEO who should never have been allowed to start that crappy corp in the first place. Sadly, as long as players can hide behind alts there is no way to solve that problem.
The game has a tutorial that gives you a mining laser and a railgun and tells you to go shoot rocks and red crosses. It teaches you nothing else. It's been that way for 8 years, so are you really surprised that there are people who aren't aware that this is a pvp game? --Jafit McJafitson |

gfldex
376
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:19:00 -
[140] - Quote
Henry Haphorn wrote:Besides, according to Eve-Offline, the daily average of the number of players has seen a healthy increase since December of 2011.
Have a guess when the last ban hammer hit! Since bots are not banned on a regular basis we can't really say anything about account growth or inflation. No reason not to troll Soundwave ofc. :)
The game has a tutorial that gives you a mining laser and a railgun and tells you to go shoot rocks and red crosses. It teaches you nothing else. It's been that way for 8 years, so are you really surprised that there are people who aren't aware that this is a pvp game? --Jafit McJafitson |
|

Cipher Jones
356
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:20:00 -
[141] - Quote
Tarsas Phage wrote:Cipher Jones wrote: You're pretty fail TBH. You can incursion in a logi, which is cheap and quick to get into.
What, exactly, is the color of the sky in your universe? When Incursions were first announced, I fired up a fresh account and started training a logi toon on it from scratch with the aim of using it to make isk in Incursions. After several months of training purely for base goodlogi skills (capacitor, armor tank, shield tank, RR to 5 with navigation, armor, sheld and generic rig skills to 4/5), I had another month of training a racial cruiser, then the prereqs for the Logistics skill.... and then yet another month of training that skill to 5. So when I hit logi 4 and my toon was able to fly a pretty decent Scimitar while training logi 5, I was still turned away from many fleets because I didn't train for tracking links or didn't have logi 5 yet, or both. In the end, my alt took just over 8 months of dedicated training to fly 1 race of logi at a skill level deemed 'acceptable' by the Incursion-running elite, and even then I ran into "basilisks only" shield fleets. Okay, 2.5 more months socked away for training the remaining races. I see comments like yours often enough - "oh a nub can just train logistics and run incursions, it's easy and fast!" - that is the most disingenuous load of crap ever. I'm in no way raging about skill training times, I'm raging at folks like you who have lost the RL perspective of time investment for new-to-eve people. EDIT: Let me add that no incursion fleet is going to take an osprey or exequeror. So somehow, while training the equivalent of the gestation period for a human, the nub needs to drum up enough isk for that "cheap" t2 logi+implants and hardwires. Posting in a thread concerning new player retention.
My brother and I ran some incursions this week. His toon is a <90 days old. Compared to running l4 missions properly, yes, a basi is a quick train. Sorry to hear you got dicked by elitists. I don't like those guys either.
04:25:37 Notify Cipher Jones, criminals are not welcome here. Leave now or be destroyed. |

Cipher Jones
356
 |
Posted - 2012.03.14 23:31:00 -
[142] - Quote
Darth Gustav wrote:Liang Nuren wrote:Cipher Jones wrote:Unless the data just changed overnight I doubt that highly. CCP Diagoras published the data on it, actually. -Liang Who's fail now, Cipher? By the way, all those ships you named? They all still take months to fly correctly. Months. We're talking about retaining new players, who can't earn ISK as fast as it is being devalued. Ever salvage a level one mission? ******* genius!
I was referring to said data, you are fail now. There was 4+tn of sleeper drone AI traded in one day. 302 bn in incursion isk and 4millionLP.
Another point i made but you ignored is that if you had ever tried salvaging a level 1 mission in the past, you made (X-current inflation) on the loot. Now you make (X+current inflation).
And yes, they take months to fly. And you need months to train level 4's to use the same ships too.
They retained me. So many people call me stupid because they don't know the difference between attitude and aptitude, yet they have pity on people who are clearly stupider than me [sic] by failing out of Eve.
04:25:37 Notify Cipher Jones, criminals are not welcome here. Leave now or be destroyed. |

Roh Voleto
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
107
 |
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:05:00 -
[143] - Quote
Hey, let's all ****-post about a controversial topic!
The truth is: One does not simply start playing EVE. You either get sucked in by a new player friendly collective, like E-Uni, the SA (Goons), or reddit (Test) communities, and stay for the space ship themed social network; Or, you are the solo kind of execretory opening at the end of the alimentary canal, like me, who gets off at the thought of annoying 7000 people at the click of a button.
Neither of these concepts are sustainable, but I am positively surprised by how long CCP managed to keep this game going, and would not be surprised if we, as a community, would manage to keep the scam going for another ten years, despite CCP's best efforts to ruin their product.
P.S.: I know that this post is as pointless as this topic, but I am too drunk to just lurk. |

gfldex
376
 |
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:12:00 -
[144] - Quote
Andoria Thara wrote:I started playing less than a month ago, signed up after my 2nd day on trial, I'm wishing I would have started playing this game sooner. I've always heard that this game was nothing but elitists and hardcore PvP, so I've stayed away for the past 8 or so years.
A warm welcome to you!
Andoria Thara wrote: I'm not a PvPer, although I do enjoy a friendly duel now and then. I enjoy the atmosphere, exploring, and mining. I'm not worried about ISK/hour, I'm just enjoying the game, and having a great time.
Don't worry, we will come and kill you sooner or later.
Andoria Thara wrote: I've tried to get friends from other MMOs to sign up with me, but they all say the same thing, EVE has a bad reputation, steep learning curve, and they'll never catch up with the veteran players so they won't even try it.
That's indeed a problem and easy to understand. There are so many MMOs that teach players that SP equal access to content. Something CCPs marketing folk (CAN YOU HEAR ME OVER THERE IN ICELAND?) should work on.
The game has a tutorial that gives you a mining laser and a railgun and tells you to go shoot rocks and red crosses. It teaches you nothing else. It's been that way for 8 years, so are you really surprised that there are people who aren't aware that this is a pvp game? --Jafit McJafitson |

gfldex
376
 |
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:20:00 -
[145] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:This totally explains why Eve is seeing so much more growth in the US and AUS than in the EU.
Most of EU got terrible exchange rates (relative to avg. wage) to both the EU and the $.
The game has a tutorial that gives you a mining laser and a railgun and tells you to go shoot rocks and red crosses. It teaches you nothing else. It's been that way for 8 years, so are you really surprised that there are people who aren't aware that this is a pvp game? --Jafit McJafitson |

Roh Voleto
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
107
 |
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:30:00 -
[146] - Quote
gfldex wrote: Most of EU got terrible exchange rates (relative to avg. wage) to both the EU and the $.
The real problem is purchasing power. Who cares about 15$ in the US? That's pocket change. Meanwhile, 15Gi< will buy you a whole week worth of cheap groceries. |

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
304
 |
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:51:00 -
[147] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote:Cearain wrote: I thought I saw a video of you in a talos with an extremely long point. Maybe it was faction or something like that. Or maybe that wasn't you. I don't know. So let me ask: were you in a talos getting the benefit of someones booster alt?
I am not calling for a pity party I am just observing some facts. The facts are off grid alt boosters give huge combat advantages to those who use them. Are you denying this?
I like how it's gone from everyone personally must have a booster alt to someone in the fleet might desire a booster alt. And yes, that was me - or at least I have put out a number of videos with me in a Talos where some of the time I have had gang bonuses.
I never said you needed more than one gang booster per gang. What are you talking about?
Would you agree these off grid boosters give a large combat advantage? I havenGGVt heard your answer to this question.
Liang Nuren wrote:Cearain wrote:
Do you think that prevalance of them is increasing, decreasing, or staying the same?
I'm pretty sure I know the answers. But who knows maybe diagoras or past qens could give us some answers if you aren't convinced the game is going in this direction.
Again I am training one myself because they are just too large of an advantage not to use. But I know having to use that alt account will make eve more of a chore.
The prevalence is increasing, but you do not have to train one - and neither does the noob that you're saying shouldn't stick with the game because of it.
Right we can just fight at a large disadvantage.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

Cearain
Imperial Outlaws
304
 |
Posted - 2012.03.15 00:51:00 -
[148] - Quote
Liang Nuren wrote: Furthermore, I would argue that the density of booster alts will go down.
IGGVm not sure what you mean. But I am fairly sure we will continue to see that a higher and higher percent of gangs or GG#soloGG% pilots will use booster alts. Do you disagree?
Liang Nuren wrote:Cearain wrote: As far as your comments regarding the wording of questions regarding booster alts. How would you ask it? It doesn't matter how you ask the question. The above facts won't change. And these facts are likely to be a big turn off for new players and old players alike.
Making these sorts of short term cash gains is not good for the long term health of the game. I realize it may be necessary for ccp to do this now, but I hope they are planning on undoing this in the future once the financial issues pan out.
You are priming the pump by asserting that the behavior in question is necessary and bad, regardless of the reality of that. It isn't necessary, and its extremely unlikely that Joe Q Noob would find himself training up a booster alt for the first few years (if he ever did). Furthermore, more and more I find that I play on one account at a time instead of multiple accounts - and I've even been known to go on corp roams as the scout+gang booster on my main. Yet that flies directly in the face of what you claim is the inescapable truth. So yeah, get on with your pity party.  -Liang
I never said no one would ever use these ships with their mains but itGGVs likely pretty rare. They are mostly going to be an alt. Again do you disagree?
IGGVm not saying booster alts are everywhere now. But they are growing and I donGGVt see an end in sight.
New players will more and more often come out to low sec and get owned by a frigate that can point them at 40k and wonder what the hell happened. They will increasingly learn that itGGVs not a mod they can save up for or a skill they can train. ItGGVs a matter of just going the immersion breaking route of dual boxing alts.
This is how eve is changing now. Once the change is complete and eve gets this reputation itGGVs hard to undo.
Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815
|

gfldex
376
 |
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:06:00 -
[149] - Quote
Valentyn3 wrote:Meh
Nothing to me is more nihilistic than making money to serve no other end than to make more money.
I just get tired of reading about how they are something that anyone can get into when they are so obviously not. It's the same minmax crowd you see in any highend pve area of a game and they never, ever change.
You know what the sad part is? When Incursions where new you could turn 8000ISK/LP (for the first 2 weeks) it then dropped to about 6000ISK/LP. Now with the fancy agreement you can be happy to get 1000ISK/LP.
I make more ISK/h with running lvl4 missions then with Incursions because they are just so crowded. The min/maxer managed to min the best way to make ISK known to men. :)
The game has a tutorial that gives you a mining laser and a railgun and tells you to go shoot rocks and red crosses. It teaches you nothing else. It's been that way for 8 years, so are you really surprised that there are people who aren't aware that this is a pvp game? --Jafit McJafitson |

Liang Nuren
Parsec Flux
1067
 |
Posted - 2012.03.15 01:09:00 -
[150] - Quote
Cearain wrote:I never said you needed more than one gang booster per gang. What are you talking about?
This is what you said:
Cearain wrote: Perhaps they see that pvp has more to do with having expensive booster alts that you dual box off grid rather than piloting skill.
I'm sure not many new players like the idea that they have to create alt dual box alts.
So yes, you most assuredly did say that new players MUST train their own gang boosters. Which is ******* bullshit.
Quote:Would you agree these off grid boosters give a large combat advantage? I havenGGVt heard your answer to this question. ... Right we can just fight at a large disadvantage.
Gang boosters give meaningful bonuses when used appropriately, but most of the time their bonuses just aren't very useful. The most useful bonuses are trivially the skirmish links, followed by either armor or shield - though you'll normally run with no more than one or the other. Info links are very specialized.
It is entirely possible to fight without disadvantage regardless of whether you have gang bonuses. I can, and frequently do.
Cearain wrote: IGGVm not sure what you mean. But I am fairly sure we will continue to see that a higher and higher percent of gangs or GG#soloGG% pilots will use booster alts. Do you disagree?
No, the population density of booster alts is going to go down because there's only one or two desired per fleet. This means that the noob that you're telling me must train his very own dedicated booster alt isn't going to have a whole hell of a lot of use for it.
Quote: I never said no one would ever use these ships with their mains but itGGVs likely pretty rare. They are mostly going to be an alt. Again do you disagree?
IGGVm not saying booster alts are everywhere now. But they are growing and I donGGVt see an end in sight.
New players will more and more often come out to low sec and get owned by a frigate that can point them at 40k and wonder what the hell happened. They will increasingly learn that itGGVs not a mod they can save up for or a skill they can train. ItGGVs a matter of just going the immersion breaking route of dual boxing alts.
This is how eve is changing now. Once the change is complete and eve gets this reputation itGGVs hard to undo.
There you go again, claiming that the noob must train up his own personal dual boxing booster alt. Bullshit.
-Liang Normally on 5:00 -> 9-10:00 Eve (Aus TZ?) Blog: http://liangnuren.wordpress.com PVP Videos: http://vimeo.com/user9887127
Twitter: http://twitter.com/LiangNuren
|
|
|
|
| |
Reply to Topic |
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |