|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
Griznatch wrote:The Economist wrote:What an amazing pile of steaming **** based on lies, misconceptions and endless exagerration. The situation presented as being responded to simply doesn't represent reality, but rather the deluded and deliberately misleading view of a vocal minority and those who don't know any better.
You, however, should know better CCP.
I can only hope this is laying the groundwork for an epic early April fools joke as opposed to being a concerted effort to bore all titan pilots into never logging in again (except for those wierdos who genuinely enjoy doing nothing but bridging).
Wow, just wow. If not a single titan pilot ever logs into this game again, the quality of this game will improve by several orders of magnitude.
Better to restart the server, would that be fair enough for you.
Risk / Reward anyone ever heard this concept, thought it was what this game was suppose to be based on.
|
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Better to restart the server, would that be fair enough for you.
Risk / Reward anyone ever heard this concept, thought it was what this game was suppose to be based on.
Yes you risk all of your titans when you drop them en masse ahahah
Every time we drop them we risk -Counter drop (trap) -One bumped titan (thanks for that one CCP) -Disconnect
And yes we risk all of them, it only takes one very bad day and we lose them all in one go ask RA.
You might not think this, but there are times that we don't use them because the risks involved.
|
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:40:00 -
[3] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:FeLiZk wrote:
Every time we drop them we risk -Counter drop (trap) -One bumped titan (thanks for that one CCP) -Disconnect
And yes we risk all of them, it only takes one very bad day and we lose them all in one go ask RA.
You might not think this, but there are times that we don't use them because the risks involved.
[Tell] me more about dropping a blob of titans with supercarrier support onto a fleet of battlecruisers. Something about risk/reward I believe you were saying.
So we risk 20 titan, just by fielding them. The drakes are not the issue here we escalated the fight, your move. Just so far you are not taking that move NC did and we lost titan's I think as many as they did.
So you would have only one way to escalate a fight, and that is more people in drakes? |
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:42:00 -
[4] - Quote
Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:So we risk 20 titan, just by fielding them. Your post fell apart here.
Tell me why, say it was PL we where against, they use their caps. Would we risk them then ?
|
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
Ser Berus wrote:
a bloo bloo bloo we actually have to field a balanced fleet
LOL
Balanced is lots of one ship type, drakes or maelstroms ? |
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:54:00 -
[6] - Quote
Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Ser Berus wrote:
a bloo bloo bloo we actually have to field a balanced fleet
LOL Balanced is lots of one ship type, drakes or maelstroms ? a fleet of maelstroms (or drakes), scimitars, huginns, lachesis, dictors, hictors, and interceptors is just one big blob of maelstroms
So we are keeping you on the field with our warp scramblers fitted to every titan. Jesus we have a more mixed fleet then you, we have all you do and titans -> just in less numbers ill give you that. |
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 18:57:00 -
[7] - Quote
On a side note I think it is so funny Goons are complaining about being blobbed, what is not funny is CCP is listening.
Change Titans by all means but don't do it for them. And don't rush it for them. |
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:05:00 -
[8] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:It is refreshing to see at least one titan blobber willing to come in and admit that they saw a pretty good subcap fight in progress and thought "Man we should just drop supers all over that". You know, risk/reward or whatever.
If there is a tactical structure we are in defending or attacking, and it looks like there is a chance we will lose it off cause we have. Just like you bring another full fleet.
I don't recall off hand a time where we have not been outnumbered, where we have brought Titans to a straight up fight. |
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:11:00 -
[9] - Quote
GeneralDisturbed wrote:FeLiZk wrote:GeneralDisturbed wrote:It is refreshing to see at least one titan blobber willing to come in and admit that they saw a pretty good subcap fight in progress and thought "Man we should just drop supers all over that". You know, risk/reward or whatever. If there is a tactical structure we are in defending or attacking, and it looks like there is a chance we will lose it off cause we have. Just like you bring another full fleet. I don't recall off hand a time where we have not been outnumbered, where we have brought Titans to a straight up fight. So what you're saying is, if there's a chance you'll lose a strategic objective, you drop titans. So you win. Sort of like an "Iwin" button you might say. Huh.
No more then 250 fleet on top would be.
And no one is preventing you from doing the same, as mittanie stated you have one of the biggest ones. |
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:47:00 -
[10] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:They hide these behind NPC alts because they don't dare show their faces; they know they have abused a broken mechanic and are unwilling to own up to their misdeeds. Their altposting is a scarlet letter of their shame, an admission of guilt.
They can't accept adult responsibility; they threw their toys around, misbehaved, and now their toys are being taken away. Alas!
Who is this you are saying is hiding, I see quite a few people posting with their mains, and can't you have an opinion if your not part of 0.0. Then remove a big portion of your 350000, and then Titans are no longer 0.02% or whatever you said they where.
As far as I am informed, you have more then once said you where going to use your position to destroy your enemy's so I give next to nothing for you opinion. And the timing and manner of this proves it congrats. Would almost say well played. |
|
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 19:59:00 -
[11] - Quote
Khadmos wrote:If this is such a horrible nerf, why isn't PL selling their titans?
I see a **** load of buyers in the buy/sell forum but no confirmed sales yet.
Either PL isn't actually selling their titans because they know they are still over powered or they are idiots and actually selling them to droves of people who know they are still over powered.
It's pretty obvious that all this whining is just an attempt to keep them as ridiculous as they are now.
Or people have used a lot of time on getting them, and want to see if CCP really does this. And then get them to dock them so they can reprocess. Almost 60 bil in minerals now I think.
|
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:18:00 -
[12] - Quote
btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ? |
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:30:00 -
[13] - Quote
Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ? tech doesn't have a "quick fix" or "stop-gap measure"
off cause it does. your kidding me right, you just have to not care what happens if you do it... you make 500 ish of the moons in empire/low sec tech that was gas before. Done
|
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:33:00 -
[14] - Quote
Wirbin wrote:FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ? I don't know what you mean by "out of context" but I agree that tech does need something done to it. Titan pilots were way too noisy and boisterous about abusing their imbalance so they get fixed (in the testicle removal sense) first, though. If only you had been the slightest bit humble this wouldn't be happening!
Not out of context when the nurf = monopoly for one of the involved partys
|
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:37:00 -
[15] - Quote
Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ? tech doesn't have a "quick fix" or "stop-gap measure" off cause it does. your kidding me right, you just have to not care what happens if you do it... you make 500 ish of the moons in empire/low sec tech that was gas before. Done you mean increasing the abundance of technetium? I dunno, that's a pretty silly approach, and it'd just boost neo to hell
Same approach till you get the balance you want. Don't tell me you can't do it, and this titan nurf is also a stated hot fix.
|
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:47:00 -
[16] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:Watch as the Titan apologist tries to deflect blame away from himself. Nerf tech, he says - yet we all agree. Anything, anything to get the topic away from how the Titan pilots brought this nerf on themselves through their own blatant misbehavior.
I have always supported a tech rebalance. This is not news.
Then push it at the same time, king Mittani.
Show some ******* impartiality.
|
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:52:00 -
[17] - Quote
Well we are taking a tech moon back atm. with our massive 50 titans |
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 20:56:00 -
[18] - Quote
Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Well we are taking a tech moon back atm. with our massive 50 titans digging your own grave
Well in your world 10=50
|
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:22:00 -
[19] - Quote
Kyle Myr wrote:FeLiZk wrote:The Mittani wrote:Watch as the Titan apologist tries to deflect blame away from himself. Nerf tech, he says - yet we all agree. Anything, anything to get the topic away from how the Titan pilots brought this nerf on themselves through their own blatant misbehavior.
I have always supported a tech rebalance. This is not news. Then push it at the same time, king Mittani. Show some ******* impartiality. It's like you don't want to see what's going on, and only want to deflect the issue: Mittani raised this issue repeatedly in his widely publicized debate with Riverini for CSM 7 under two weeks ago. He spotlighted it as one of the critical issues impacting son warfare in 0.0, along with super capitals, which prevent small alliances from breaking in to the 0.0 game.
So show me the post pushing this before the next big patch.
|
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:28:00 -
[20] - Quote
So you can make a crap fix for titans, but not for something as vital as Tech. And I will be the judge of when someone comes with a good augment. |
|
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:33:00 -
[21] - Quote
niishke wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Kyle Myr wrote:FeLiZk wrote:The Mittani wrote:Watch as the Titan apologist tries to deflect blame away from himself. Nerf tech, he says - yet we all agree. Anything, anything to get the topic away from how the Titan pilots brought this nerf on themselves through their own blatant misbehavior.
I have always supported a tech rebalance. This is not news. Then push it at the same time, king Mittani. Show some ******* impartiality. It's like you don't want to see what's going on, and only want to deflect the issue: Mittani raised this issue repeatedly in his widely publicized debate with Riverini for CSM 7 under two weeks ago. He spotlighted it as one of the critical issues impacting son warfare in 0.0, along with super capitals, which prevent small alliances from breaking in to the 0.0 game. So show me the post pushing this before the next big patch. The last time CCP rebalanced moons they cocked it up. They're going to need more than a few months to get it right.
And they need more for titan fix that's is very clear.
|
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:34:00 -
[22] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Andski wrote:FeLiZk wrote:btw Titan need an out of context fix and tech does not ? tech doesn't have a "quick fix" or "stop-gap measure" off cause it does. your kidding me right, you just have to not care what happens if you do it... you make 500 ish of the moons in empire/low sec tech that was gas before. Done holy **** i missed this post clearly we can't permit you to judge what kind of shoes you can wear in the morning
so this **** is important to you ? |
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:36:00 -
[23] - Quote
Not trying to come up with good ones, just equal ones |
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:40:00 -
[24] - Quote
Weaselior wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Not trying to come up with good ones, just equal ones i do not believe you're smart enough to understand why dumping extra tech moons wouldn't solve anything because it involves math so i will skip explaining that however i do believe you might (and i could be wrong here) be able to grasp that you can't moon mine in highsec idiot
change it, nothing is holy is it. |
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:51:00 -
[25] - Quote
Shadoo, I could not agree more I am raging because of the way this is being done. |
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 21:54:00 -
[26] - Quote
Khadmos wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Shadoo, I could not agree more I am raging because of the way this is being done. You agree that titans need to be nerfed MORE? I'm pretty sure that goes against everything you've said so far.
Want my ship to have a role, that's not a once in every 2 months role. Kinda stuck in a titan.
|
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:06:00 -
[27] - Quote
Kyle Myr wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Khadmos wrote:FeLiZk wrote:Shadoo, I could not agree more I am raging because of the way this is being done. You agree that titans need to be nerfed MORE? I'm pretty sure that goes against everything you've said so far. Want my ship to have a role, that's not a once in every 2 months role. Kinda stuck in a titan. I completely understand this point of view - I, too, want my ship to have a role in fleets. That's why I think Titan tracking is a problem, as it can be used to kill any fleet in the game regardless of numbers and composition, barring a larger number of Titans. As for being stuck in a space coffin, I'd suggest purchasing a holding alt. A character, minimally skilled to be able to sit in a Titan, should run you much less than the hull you're currently stuck in. Once you're out of the ship, you'll have (presumably) a character great at flying a whole range of this game's incredibly diverse and fun capital and sub capital ships.
you really thing this is a good solution. make money buy another char, park titan. you really that selfish that you can't even agree on the fact that they should be allowed to dock, and if the new role comes that we could chose not to fly them if we don't like it and get our skills back.
|
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:13:00 -
[28] - Quote
They don't want to use afterburners have not seen a fleet with them. |
FeLiZk
The Ankou Raiden.
0
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 22:46:00 -
[29] - Quote
Kerensky White wrote:Skill is having a dozen afterburning targets locked up then waiting for their transversal to get juuust right. And you have all the time in the world to do it too, because really is that fleet of subcaps actually doing anything to you?
You seem to think that Titans should be targets for your fleet, without bringing caps yourself. Isn't that just turning the tables. |
|
|
|