|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |
testobjekt
Goonswarm Federation Human Resources Goonswarm Federation
106
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 12:01:00 -
[1] - Quote
To declare your support for this please vote: http://community.eveonline.com/council/voting/Vote.asp?c=438 |
testobjekt
Goonswarm Federation Human Resources Goonswarm Federation
111
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
Suzdal wrote:Tomytronic wrote:blablabla goonie saying non goon titan pilots do RMT blablabla Tell me goonie, where is all the money your alliance has earned in all these years? Our isk has been transformed into the titans we field but what about yours? Oh sorry, I know, you have no clue about what your leadership does with the isk and you are not able of think for yourself... Anyway you can repit that RMT song forever if it makes you happy.
Confirming DJ aka CCP Sreegs rmt'ed all our money. |
testobjekt
Goonswarm Federation Human Resources Goonswarm Federation
111
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 13:57:00 -
[3] - Quote
analogy time:
Raiden Pl NC. invested in AIG (titans) and Greece (supercarrier)
GSF/CFC invested in Apple (line members) |
testobjekt
Goonswarm Federation Human Resources Goonswarm Federation
111
|
Posted - 2012.03.13 15:33:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ikoma Sunblazer wrote:@ CCP Greyscale.
Did you intend to nerf shield titans even more?
A fully shield tanked titan without sensor boosters takes 64 seconds to lock another titan, god knows how long to lock a capital. Add in TiDi and, well you get the picture. Does that seem reasonable to you?
Please explain why TiDi influences the situation outside of player perception. |
testobjekt
Goonswarm Federation Human Resources Goonswarm Federation
132
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 12:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
I would encourage people to clasify their criticism by giving their stance on 3 issues
A) Do you agree with the fact that Titans are not supposed to do meaningful damage to subcaps.
B) The changes CCP proposes will accomplish this goal.
All comment who disagree with A can be safely ignored, because the decission is made. |
testobjekt
Goonswarm Federation Human Resources Goonswarm Federation
132
|
Posted - 2012.03.14 13:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
dooplex wrote:CCP Greyscale wrote:dooplex wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but Titans were supposed to be very expensive but also very effective strategic force multipliers and as such were working as intended. Smaller entities in nullsec could defend their space by relying on a larger supercaptial fleet. However, after this nerf, numbers will again be everything. A short look at http://evemaps.dotlan.net/alliance/memberCount should give us a general idea of who will be the sole beneficary of this "adjustment".. This has never been a stated balance goal in any discussion I've been party to. In particular, predicating "can survive as a small alliance in nullsec" on "can afford a large supercap fleet" would be extremely silly, because it excludes exactly the type of players who we're most keen on being able to maintain small holdings in nullsec, ie newer, poorer players. You completely missed the point, smaller does not mean "small as in tiny and new". I am talking about well establsihed alliances with 1,000-2,000 members facing a blobs of alliances with 8,000+ members or whole coalitions with more than 16,000 members. You can't seriously be that ignorant about your own game...
Because CCPs marketing for EvE is all about 1000 dudes who played since 2004 controlling large parts of the universe, and you as new player have the CHANCE(!) to become their serf.
If you are a small well established alliance you can hold a small portion of space (say one constellation) or not very valuable space.
EvE is not just about the battlefield on the grid but its about diplomacy, making allies, building a community. |
|
|
|