Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 30 .. 33 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Monologue
Fishing for Compliments
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 11:00:00 -
[541]
I support the Nerf
|
Contenance
Nonchalante
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 11:01:00 -
[542]
fully supported
|
OSughhi
Romanian Army of ManiaCS
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 11:14:00 -
[543]
Support
|
astowv
Macabre Votum Imperial Republic Of the North
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 11:19:00 -
[544]
Edited by: astowv on 30/07/2008 11:18:47 Hell yeah ! Support!
----
--- CCP Navigator is watching me. It scares me ! |
Souvera Corvus
Redroom Eleven
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 11:31:00 -
[545]
I actually had a very long conversation with an ex-corpmate about how I was instinctively against 'nerfing' or any other brand of balancing. I went on to say that I'd be joining him in opposing the speed-nerf.
To be honest, my resentment stems from the absolute castration of the Arazu. Due to 'balancing' they made it a cloaking cabbage that's only ever used for sitting at the back of the class wearing a dunce's hat in recon gangs or scouting the opposition and staying cloaked as they slaughter your gang.
Damps? Yes I'm afraid they are sir, very damp indeed, try a kleenex.
The point of mentioning this was that I've always been of the impression that 'nerfing' causes far more issues than it was ever designed to solve and compounds issues of balance. Its possible to find a use for the arazu you just have to be prepared to look for a while and its possible to beat a gang who are loaded with falcons when you yourself have none, you just have to be prepared to think a little and try some off-the-wall set-ups. To use a well-worn eve-cliche, adapt or die.
The problem, as so well-stated in the blog (best I've ever read), is that adaptation meant getting nano'ed up yourself to the ultimate boredom of all. How many times have you seen 'no-mwd = death' in set-up thread's here or on SHC? Aximoatic? Yep, carved in radon-spewing granite for us all to read for posterity. Speed counters speed, so we're all in inties, HAC's, recons, EA frigs and if we're really cheap cruisers. Battleships? Only for specific engagements, in one of my old alliances their use was banned. Yep, battleships were banned for being 'fat-arsed barges'.
So here's me voting yes for the very well-reasoned changes.
Just un-nerf the Arazu while you're at it.
No-one likes flying a cabbage. |
Temitten
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 12:30:00 -
[546]
support in general
|
DjLowballer
FLASHTROOPER CORP
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 12:31:00 -
[547]
support
|
Crae Matreki
Sten Industries
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 12:33:00 -
[548]
I support this!
|
Deskent
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 12:37:00 -
[549]
Support :)
|
Kyoko Sakoda
Veto. Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 12:40:00 -
[550]
I'm for it. I've give my reasons elsewhere so I won't divulge, plus I'm sick of these threads so I'll leave it at this one. I think the nerf could be less severe, polycarbs, snakes, and nanofibers being the main three items that actually needed the nerf. I'm not sure about the rest. But I'm glad something is being done about the issue.
|
|
Fantastic Johnson
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 12:45:00 -
[551]
Yes, while the implementation will need balancing and the details ironed out, the concept is solid and will provide a lot more ability for tactical fittings. With lower-powered webs, larger (turret, and hopefully missile) ships will actually require support to take out smaller ships. Which in my book is definitely a good thing.
|
hired goon
Infinite Improbability Inc Mostly Harmless
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 13:02:00 -
[552]
-omg-
|
Myrhial Arkenath
Ghost Festival
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 13:35:00 -
[553]
/signed
Diary of a pod pilot |
Rainsdon
Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 14:12:00 -
[554]
For.
_________________________________________________________
|
nostramo
Tri Optimum Ev0ke
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 14:47:00 -
[555]
support
|
Optelius
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 14:49:00 -
[556]
support
|
Skyy
Sigillum Militum Xpisti
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 15:42:00 -
[557]
It's good for Eve. I support this.
|
UnShavenMonkey
Caldari Dragon's Rage Intrepid Crossing
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 16:06:00 -
[558]
/signed Ñ°v h¬vT t¦ =¬tO¦t thÇ ¦sºt t° ¬h¬±gF thÇ âvtn«O |
Celeste DeVall
Darksaber Technologies
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 16:10:00 -
[559]
supported. I'm all for more variety of play styles in any game. When one set up works too well, everyone starts doing the same setup to keep up. Less speed tanks = more variety.
|
Miss Razor
D00M.
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 16:29:00 -
[560]
Need nerfed
------------------------------
minings hard work these days
|
|
Alyna Shin'tay
Humanware Technologies
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 16:55:00 -
[561]
support
|
Steiner
Veto. Veto Corp
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 18:02:00 -
[562]
About time, I support. ---
|
Saito Shogoto
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 18:04:00 -
[563]
I support.
|
CorbinDalas Multipass
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 18:14:00 -
[564]
supported
|
Krell Thannar
Armada.
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 18:30:00 -
[565]
all for
|
Duncan Darkeye
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 18:53:00 -
[566]
support
|
Jasmine Dixon
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 18:54:00 -
[567]
needed a nerf
|
Slider46
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 19:02:00 -
[568]
Support!
|
Captain death7997
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 20:55:00 -
[569]
support
|
Lord Frost
Federal Defence Union
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 21:49:00 -
[570]
Great nerf.
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 30 .. 33 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |