Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Prez21
coracao ardente Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 17:13:00 -
[871]
Changes are too big and not needed, i agree some speeds need looking at but this is just stupid, totally against
|
MaLa ZoRRa
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 17:14:00 -
[872]
I have tried the test server and I shame on CCP. That game now really sucks. Totally against.
|
naDuL
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 17:17:00 -
[873]
I played on test server and it really sucks. I am now more against than never. I hope CCP will not change anything or lots of $ will fly away ;) for example my 4 accounts.
|
Sebasv
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 17:20:00 -
[874]
AGAINST
|
galaxy rider
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 17:21:00 -
[875]
Against
|
Rob Hodin
The All-Seeing Eye G00DFELLAS
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 17:25:00 -
[876]
Edited by: Rob Hodin on 28/07/2008 17:26:13 Against
|
Ladin Avre'toc
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 17:28:00 -
[877]
Edited by: Ladin Avre''toc on 28/07/2008 17:30:32 Edited by: Ladin Avre''toc on 28/07/2008 17:29:37 well nanos are the last thing that will prevent all of pvp to be blob tactics and small skirmish warfare, and it's one of the few pvp-aspects where it still rquires more than just be able to press f1-f8 so lay off the speed. you will still be screwed if they got neuts or huginn/rapiers and so. And TBH people that are raging against nanogangs are usually new people that cant understand why their precius ratting raven got killed by 2 vagabonds, or other "pvp'ers" that only pvp in blops.
The proposed speed nerf is removing one of the most challenging way of fighting for me in the game. If anyone is in doubt I'm against the speednerf.
|
Jogvan
coracao ardente Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 17:29:00 -
[878]
against
|
RuriHoshino
Stimulus
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 17:31:00 -
[879]
Some changes are indeed necessary, but as it stands this is far too sweeping. Polys were out of line, high grade snakes were out of line, high level meta MWDs were out of line, but these are relatively easy changes. Not to mention that this change is being proposed after Factional Warfare has introduced an awful lot of new players to PVP who, instead of understanding and adapting to current mechanics have generated an epic level of forum whining that appears to have given them exactly what they want - devs promising to make it even easier to kill speed-dependent ships.
These are not the changes to make, CCP. I vote AGAINST. ________________
|
Reddherring
Minmatar Enterprise Estonia Veritas Immortalis
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 17:36:00 -
[880]
Against
just when i get finally skills done they nerf something again :(
|
|
FlumZ
x13 X13 Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 17:36:00 -
[881]
Edited by: FlumZ on 28/07/2008 17:38:10 against totaly
|
killerkhan
Mugen Industry
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 17:40:00 -
[882]
stupid nerf. AGAINST!
|
Hardknocks
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 17:42:00 -
[883]
against
|
Shinobi Kanjii
Gallente Society of Assassins
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 17:47:00 -
[884]
AGAINST !!!
|
ian666
Rave Technologies Inc. C0VEN
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 18:03:00 -
[885]
Totally against
|
Safjhas
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 18:10:00 -
[886]
AGAINST R-r-r-r-r!!!
|
gtcsellalt
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 18:19:00 -
[887]
Edited by: gtcsellalt on 28/07/2008 18:19:46
Originally by: Matalino Just couple of questions:
First, is anyone going to bother counting how many of these votes of opposition were made BEFORE we have even been able to test what exactly the changes are, or should we create a new thread to voice rational objections based on fact instead of speculation?
Second, do we need seperate discussion for what could be viewed as two different changes.
1) There is the nerf to "ludicrous" speed done by changing the attributes of nanos/poly's and various high-end modules/implants.
2) There is the "boost" to Afterburners by allowing MWD's to be scrambled, and changing the webber attributes.
Is there a thread anywhere that allows for rational and reasonable discussion of these needed changes or is only irrational ranting permitted?
your probably evangelical Christian, lack rationality. All your comments are so stupid they don't deserve a counter argument.
|
Yufudachi
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 18:23:00 -
[888]
Edited by: Yufudachi on 28/07/2008 18:22:48 against
|
Khfiva
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 18:36:00 -
[889]
Edited by: Khfiva on 28/07/2008 18:41:52 Edited by: Khfiva on 28/07/2008 18:40:52 Against!!
|
pedros
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 18:42:00 -
[890]
Im VOTE FOR the Nerf!
damn 10k flyers
|
|
KNK
Mugen Industry
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 18:45:00 -
[891]
AGAINST!!11!
|
Gajowy
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 18:46:00 -
[892]
Originally by: pedros Im VOTE FOR the Nerf!
damn 10k flyers
Ok but if you want to support nerf post it in appropriate thread FS
|
Dr Einstien
Circle of Steel Inc.
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 18:49:00 -
[893]
Just say NO
|
Black Jack21
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 18:57:00 -
[894]
This has to be one of the worst nerf attempts in CCP history....
AGAINST
If you need balance, fine. Balance ships and implants, NOT mods and skills. Hitting the ships and implants will get the worst "offenders". Mods and skills will hit EVERYONE. After all EVERYONE have been nerfed enough this past year...
|
Dr Nightmare
Digital assassins
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 19:03:00 -
[895]
against... byebye small gang 0.0, hi blob warfare
|
Frank May
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 19:13:00 -
[896]
against it
|
Nestor X85
eXceed Inc. eXceed.
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 19:14:00 -
[897]
Against the nerf.
|
Lonagan
Cutting Edge Incorporated RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 20:41:00 -
[898]
against
|
Solomon XI
Black Scorpion Navy
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 20:42:00 -
[899]
/Signed.
I am ***Strongly Against*** this patch.
|
Demus DaVet
Minmatar Mythos Corp RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 20:45:00 -
[900]
AGAINST
I doubt there could a way to implement this worse
|
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [30] 40 50 60 70 .. 73 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |