|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Treelox
Amarr Market Jihadist Revolutionary Party
|
Posted - 2008.07.31 05:11:00 -
[1]
TL;DR version?????
Simply put are you PRO or CON Zuluparks proposal concerning carriers? --
|
Treelox
Amarr Market Jihadist Revolutionary Party
|
Posted - 2008.07.31 05:32:00 -
[2]
Originally by: Fahtim Meidires Edited by: Fahtim Meidires on 31/07/2008 05:14:27
Originally by: Treelox TL;DR version?????
Simply put are you PRO or CON Zuluparks proposal concerning carriers?
Stop whining and read the whole thing. It is much more in depth *than zulupark's* and you're being rude.
Then why reference Zulupark in the subject line, if they are more "in depth"(more thought out?) than Zuluparks?
I can not be arsed to read anything more than 2-3 lines long if it contains his name in it. I'm sure you understand why..... --
|
Treelox
Amarr Market Jihadist Revolutionary Party
|
Posted - 2008.07.31 05:55:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Treelox on 31/07/2008 05:56:09
Originally by: Fahtim Meidires Understood, and that's fine. Basically zulu has expressed discontent with 'capitals online.'
I am always stunned when I hear such sentiments from Dev's, that they didnt "expect" capital ships to become the next BS. OFC they would, it only evolution they provided in game.
Everyone one wants bigger, badder, more pew pew. Basic human nature, and the dev's perfectly fed it when they introduced Carriers 2-ish years ago.
Anyways, back to the OP, I am currently reading it, mulling it over, might even sleep on it and get back to you all later. Rome wasnt built in a day, you know.
p.s. Herschel Yamamoto, change your rag a bit more frequently, IMO.
p.s.s. Fahtim Meidires, at least we kept Bane's thread in the top 5, while you educated me ;) --
|
Treelox
Amarr Market Jihadist Revolutionary Party
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 17:44:00 -
[4]
NO SUPPORT FROM ME
Why?
While I agree that Carriers could use some retooling, the ideas that the OP puts forth are too broad in scope for me to agree wholeheartedly with.
If Bane could narrow down the scope, maybe put up a few different threads, each with an individual idea. Then we the unwashed masses could pick and choose. With the way things are currently presented, it is too much an all or nothing, myself at this point I chose nothing. --
|
|
|
|