|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
squiddie
Yakuza Corp THE R0NIN
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 19:43:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Lysander Kaldenn Glad I never cross trained Minmatar like I was planning.
i did. lol.
- NO to mwd reactivation delay (wtf?) - NO to scramblers deactivating mwds - NO to minmatar ships being the heaviest
you change too many things at once. this is all wrong. see the side effects? you not only nerf a whole race, you also disable small gangs / soloing. there's nothing left for minmatar if you take away speed from the game.
i hope this is a bad joke.
|
squiddie
Yakuza Corp THE R0NIN
|
Posted - 2008.07.28 22:35:00 -
[2]
Quote:
[ 2008.07.28 21:58:34 ] CCP Atropos > sigh [ 2008.07.28 21:58:45 ] CCP Atropos > it's simple really [ 2008.07.28 21:58:52 ] CCP Atropos > when it becomes the de facto method for fighting [ 2008.07.28 21:58:55 ] CCP Atropos > it needs ot be nerfed [ 2008.07.28 21:59:02 ] CCP Atropos > simple as really
oh my god. oh my ****ing god. this makes me sad
|
squiddie
Yakuza Corp THE R0NIN
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 15:26:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Bendit * Vagabond`s are still able to speedtank while closing in on the hostile. Nothing changed regarding when it deals damage, since it is bound to the same tracking issues as before speed change. Get close and slow down to track.
the mwd reactivation delay (worst idea ever) totally killes the vaga. you just slow down too much, get caught and die as there is no tank. beside that it turns and accelerates like a submarine. this ship is no more fun to fly.
|
squiddie
Yakuza Corp THE R0NIN
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 14:01:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Cpt Branko ... but it appears that most of the people against the changes are against nerfing nanoships in principle ...
so wrong. scroll up and read. not even a minority.
|
squiddie
Yakuza Corp THE R0NIN
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 17:32:00 -
[5]
Originally by: carleyjones
Originally by: Grakkus
Originally by: HankMurphy
Originally by: Lilith Velkor
The logical step would be to nerf polycarbs, implants and boosters, and if that isnt enough even gangboosters. But the SiSi implementation is just a senseless nuking of everything related to speed.
ding ding ding, we have a winner
I have to say the shear size and scope of the changes is evidence to how clueless the author of the changes is.
Quoted for truth, this is precisely the issue
Requoted coz its the best suggestion so far
absolutely. it's far better than trying to tweak the current state of sisi as it doesn't screw up so much more than just speed. small steps wins. drop the sisi patch. it could be so much simpler.
|
squiddie
Sleeper Technology Industries
|
Posted - 2008.08.12 17:41:00 -
[6]
actually you won't die that fast atm. it seems theres was some rollback / mirroring today
Vote against the nano nerf! Don't forget to check the 'support' checkbox when replying. |
squiddie
Sleeper Technology Industries
|
Posted - 2008.08.12 18:08:00 -
[7]
i didn't find any difference to TQ yet. you can be pretty shure it won't stay like this. guess best will be to wait for a CCP statement now.
Vote against the nano nerf! Don't forget to check the 'support' checkbox when replying. |
|
|
|