Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Martin Mckenna
D00M. Triumvirate.
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 20:21:00 -
[1]
Allow us to do it without having to jump into them again. Its annoying and ive got no idea why this was removed apart from to **** folk off.
---------------------------------------------
|
Evil Mckenna
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 20:21:00 -
[2]
Not an alt but i like this mans idea
|
Herschel Yamamoto
Bloodmoney Incorporated
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 20:31:00 -
[3]
Yup. Why was this ever changed, anyways? ------------------ Fix the forums! |
Mister Xerox
|
Posted - 2008.07.29 20:33:00 -
[4]
Wholly agreed!
Why they ever took this out makes no sense whatsoever, and it was never announced in patch notes, either... a 100% stealth, um, nerf? What'd it nerf, anyway? It was just a surprise kick in the gonands.
|
Fahtim Meidires
Caldari GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 03:56:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Mister Xerox Wholly agreed!
Why they ever took this out makes no sense whatsoever, and it was never announced in patch notes, either... a 100% stealth, um, nerf? What'd it nerf, anyway? It was just a surprise kick in the gonands.
My guess as to why it was removed. The ship you are piloting is the only ship that can be renamed, refitted, ammo reloaded, etc. All other ships are database items and by limiting the actions that can be performed on them streamlines server-client relations.
And seriously, how often does one need to rename every ship in their hangar? No support b/c it's not even close to an important issue.
|
Krystal Engle
Secretariate
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 08:37:00 -
[6]
/signed.
Quote: And seriously, how often does one need to rename every ship in their hangar? No support b/c it's not even close to an important issue.
Au contraire, Fahtim... Its yet one more example of something that got changed for no real benefit. You're telling me that renaming an item is going to slow down a database, versus having to initiate a session change associated with jumping into -each- ship?
As an IT professional with over 15 years experience in dealing with databases, I find this laughable that it was even changed steathily as it was. It not only makes the user work harder, but is a pointless necessity that could have been left well enough alone.
Oh, not even counting the amount of times the user has to click only to find Scotty tell them to hang on a few more seconds. What? Ridiculous. -- D a m n a t i o n FC Personal Stats |
Miss Razor
D00M.
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 16:25:00 -
[7]
Man I have no idea why they removed this but would be awsome to see it come back.
------------------------------
minings hard work these days
|
Fahtim Meidires
GoonFleet GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 16:59:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Krystal Engle /signed.
Quote: And seriously, how often does one need to rename every ship in their hangar? No support b/c it's not even close to an important issue.
Au contraire, Fahtim... Its yet one more example of something that got changed for no real benefit. You're telling me that renaming an item is going to slow down a database, versus having to initiate a session change associated with jumping into -each- ship?
As an IT professional with over 15 years experience in dealing with databases, I find this laughable that it was even changed steathily as it was. It not only makes the user work harder, but is a pointless necessity that could have been left well enough alone.
Oh, not even counting the amount of times the user has to click only to find Scotty tell them to hang on a few more seconds. What? Ridiculous.
I was just giving a reason as to why CCP did it, i never said they were stellar programmers like yourself. Well I guess they are stellar programmers in the literal sense. Or is that the figurative. Trying not to be so post-ironic.
Changing my mind however b/c I'm sure this is a pain for the people running our free frigate program, didn't think of that earlier.
|
Berendas
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 17:03:00 -
[9]
I like this idea too, its not a game breaking change or anything, just an annoyance that would be nice to get rid of.
|
Tomic
The Illuminati. Pandemic Legion
|
Posted - 2008.07.30 17:57:00 -
[10]
Yep, this has been ******ed since like forever.
|
|
WishBlade
Caldari Atomic Heroes Souls of Vengeance
|
Posted - 2008.07.31 09:21:00 -
[11]
/+1 Aweseomenessness |
Mecinia Lua
Galactic Express Burning Horizons
|
Posted - 2008.07.31 09:58:00 -
[12]
I support this.
Thoughts expressed are mine and mine alone. They do not necessarily reflect my alliances thoughts. |
Souvera Corvus
Redroom Eleven
|
Posted - 2008.07.31 10:47:00 -
[13]
Agreed.
Bloody pain. |
Inanna Zuni
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 12:09:00 -
[14]
Edited by: Inanna Zuni on 01/08/2008 12:11:09 My original reply got lost during a comms break while posting, but basically this was part of the 'need for speed' stuff as only the 'live' ship is touchable / changeable by the pilot at any time.
cf http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=819307
IZ
My principles |
Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 12:18:00 -
[15]
Yes please, I don't see how me spamming ships changes while waiting for the session change timer just to change names helps speed. -
DesuSigs |
Dihania
SniggWaffe
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 13:02:00 -
[16]
[hrhr]
Sniggwaffe is recruiting. Visit channel "join sniggwaffe" in game.
|
J'Mkarr Soban
Proxenetae Invicti
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 13:34:00 -
[17]
-- These are my personal views and in no way represent the views of Proxenetae Invicti, which maintains a neutral stance stemming from the strong ethics demanded of its work. |
Miss KillSome
School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2008.08.01 18:05:00 -
[18]
i support this
|
Che Biko
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 07:55:00 -
[19]
------------------------------------------ Are support posts still against the forum rules?
|
Daveydweeb
Ars ex Discordia GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.08.02 10:48:00 -
[20]
Isn't this really more of a bug report thing?
Your signature is too large. Please resize it to a maximum of 400 x 120 with the file size not exceeding 24000 bytes. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] - Mitnal |
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1] :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |