| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Topic |
Nenyu
    |
Posted - 2008.08.07 13:47:00 -
[1]
How dare we stand for this!!! For years Eve has been ours, (pirates, gankers) We had a nice cooshy life with plenty of fat carebears to kill whenever we wanted with little or no risk. We didnt have to be real men and go to 0.0 for our pvp!! We could stay right where we were and kill things to make our e-peen bigger and then brag about killing the helpless noobs by ganking them. We liked the old life didnt we?!!!!
Now, CCP expects us to use some talent!! How dare they!!! We have to weigh consequences! (mutter, mutter, grumble) and we can no longer gank for free (assorted tears from the crowd) We liked Eve just the way it was! We dont want it to change! We liked telling carebears to adapt or die! We liked telling them how harsh Eve is to everyone and that there are consequences to everything! Now CCP expects us to listen to our own advice! (more angry mutters) "How dare they!" (from the crowd) We dont have to listen to our own advice, which is only in effect when it comes to carebears, not us! RIGHT?!
Dont stand for it! Having consequences is too much! Having to risk anything is too much risk! We want the days of free and talentless ganking back! WHO'S WITH ME?!!!!
*The Pirate Gankers Union*
|
Plumpy McPudding
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 13:48:00 -
[2]
Well that was a good post, kinda.
2/10
I give you props for the effort though.
__________________________
Fear me for I have an insatiable appetite!
Proprietor and inventor of Chocolate Chip Chocolate Donut flavored Ice Cream. |
Schalac
Caldari
Brotherhood of Wolves
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 13:49:00 -
[3]
signed. I didn't read but I will still gank after the patch goes into effect.
|
Neesa Corrinne
Einherjar Rising
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 13:52:00 -
[4]
I've said it before and I'll say it again: Anyone who thinks that empire ganking is easy has only been on the receiving end.
|
Bodhisattvas
Wife BEATERS
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 13:52:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Bodhisattvas on 07/08/2008 13:54:52
Hoo humm its a reverse psychology carebear thread
Damn I been spelling unite wrong all this time.....
|
RaTTuS
BIG
Libertas Fidelitas
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 13:53:00 -
[6]
yes deffo - now we need to untie
--
BIG Lottery, BIG Deal, InEve
|
Tchell Dahhn
Suddenly Ninjas
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 13:53:00 -
[7]
Edited by: Tchell Dahhn on 07/08/2008 13:53:43
 Originally by: Bodhisattvas
Damn I been spelling unite wrong all this time.....
We're Recruiting! |
Reven Cordelle
Caldari
School of Applied Knowledge
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 13:56:00 -
[8]
But if we untie, we'll trip over our laces.
|
Bodhisattvas
Wife BEATERS
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 13:57:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Reven Cordelle
But if we untie, we'll trip over our laces.
No no were merely assuming the position as cccp would want it.... 
|
Sergeant Spot
Black Eclipse Corp
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 14:10:00 -
[10]
When ever the lazy victim seeking "pirates" (to use the term loosely...) find a basicly risk free way to get casual ganks in high sec, expect CCP to nerf it, and please stop the sad pathetic whining.
No, you dont get to demand that players grinding NPCs in high sec to be FORCED to be your suicide monkeys.
If you were SERIOUS about attacking macro users, you'd be in low sec clearing out the macro haulers (no profit there, so you are not there, and thus we see your real motive....)
High Sec suicide ganking is appropriate for multi billion fitted Ravens, cargos that VASTLY exceed the value of the ships needed to pop the hauler, etc.... AND SUCH GANKING IS STILL VERY VERY POSSIBLE. It is not appropriate to come anywhere near breaking even ganking untanked Hulks in 0.5.
CCP has a long long long long history wanting 0.5+ non-war gankage to be unusual except for rare ultra high value targets. If you find a way around this, EXPECT a nerf.
If you want more freedom to blast away, get the hell out of high sec or declare some wars. (and in those wars, if your target disbands, that means YOU WON, so you got nothing to complain about. If you want targets that wont fold up and disband, attack a fighting corp)
Some rich folks will still do high sec ganks for lols. This is expected. High value paper soft targets will still get popped, and this is expected. Cheap, casual 0.5+ suiciding is getting a much need nerf.
Play nice while you butcher each other.
|
|
hedfunk
Caldari
Low Sec Liberators
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 14:17:00 -
[11]
Please go buy some petrol, douse yourself with it, then go have a smoke.
 |
Schalac
Caldari
Brotherhood of Wolves
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 14:23:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Sergeant Spot
When ever the lazy victim seeking "pirates" (to use the term loosely...) find a basicly risk free way to get casual ganks in high sec, expect CCP to nerf it, and please stop the sad pathetic whining.
No, you dont get to demand that players grinding NPCs in high sec to be FORCED to be your suicide monkeys.
If you were SERIOUS about attacking macro users, you'd be in low sec clearing out the macro haulers (no profit there, so you are not there, and thus we see your real motive....)
High Sec suicide ganking is appropriate for multi billion fitted Ravens, cargos that VASTLY exceed the value of the ships needed to pop the hauler, etc.... AND SUCH GANKING IS STILL VERY VERY POSSIBLE. It is not appropriate to come anywhere near breaking even ganking untanked Hulks in 0.5.
CCP has a long long long long history wanting 0.5+ non-war gankage to be unusual except for rare ultra high value targets. If you find a way around this, EXPECT a nerf.
If you want more freedom to blast away, get the hell out of high sec or declare some wars. (and in those wars, if your target disbands, that means YOU WON, so you got nothing to complain about. If you want targets that wont fold up and disband, attack a fighting corp)
Some rich folks will still do high sec ganks for lols. This is expected. High value paper soft targets will still get popped, and this is expected. Cheap, casual 0.5+ suiciding is getting a much need nerf.
You know where I do find it beneficial to gank macros...In the space that I am currently residing. The rest of EvE be damned. Where I live is where I make my money. I do actively hunt those that put minerals up in huge numbers far below current region price. I buy 1 unit from them so I get a name. Then I go out and hunt. If I find them in a belt......holy shittski all bets are off I gank the ever living hell out of them. they lose a hulk or two they tend to post higher prices next time. I feel that is the way all of EVE should be. Am I wrong?
|
Jastra
Gallente
Black Thorne Corporation
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 14:31:00 -
[13]
Originally by: Schalac
Originally by: Sergeant Spot
When ever the lazy victim seeking "pirates" (to use the term loosely...) find a basicly risk free way to get casual ganks in high sec, expect CCP to nerf it, and please stop the sad pathetic whining.
No, you dont get to demand that players grinding NPCs in high sec to be FORCED to be your suicide monkeys.
If you were SERIOUS about attacking macro users, you'd be in low sec clearing out the macro haulers (no profit there, so you are not there, and thus we see your real motive....)
High Sec suicide ganking is appropriate for multi billion fitted Ravens, cargos that VASTLY exceed the value of the ships needed to pop the hauler, etc.... AND SUCH GANKING IS STILL VERY VERY POSSIBLE. It is not appropriate to come anywhere near breaking even ganking untanked Hulks in 0.5.
CCP has a long long long long history wanting 0.5+ non-war gankage to be unusual except for rare ultra high value targets. If you find a way around this, EXPECT a nerf.
If you want more freedom to blast away, get the hell out of high sec or declare some wars. (and in those wars, if your target disbands, that means YOU WON, so you got nothing to complain about. If you want targets that wont fold up and disband, attack a fighting corp)
Some rich folks will still do high sec ganks for lols. This is expected. High value paper soft targets will still get popped, and this is expected. Cheap, casual 0.5+ suiciding is getting a much need nerf.
You know where I do find it beneficial to gank macros...In the space that I am currently residing. The rest of EvE be damned. Where I live is where I make my money. I do actively hunt those that put minerals up in huge numbers far below current region price. I buy 1 unit from them so I get a name. Then I go out and hunt. If I find them in a belt......holy shittski all bets are off I gank the ever living hell out of them. they lose a hulk or two they tend to post higher prices next time. I feel that is the way all of EVE should be. Am I wrong?
no, you are not wrong, you are an island of reason in a sea of whinage
|
Cornelius Murphy
Cutting Edge Incorporated
RAZOR Alliance
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 14:36:00 -
[14]
Untie who? I am not untying Oveur until he solves lag! (Better get comfortable then  )
------------------------------------------
Free BREE for all mod hacks!
|
Schalac
Caldari
Brotherhood of Wolves
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 14:40:00 -
[15]
Originally by: Jastra
Originally by: Schalac
Originally by: Sergeant Spot
When ever the lazy victim seeking "pirates" (to use the term loosely...) find a basicly risk free way to get casual ganks in high sec, expect CCP to nerf it, and please stop the sad pathetic whining.
No, you dont get to demand that players grinding NPCs in high sec to be FORCED to be your suicide monkeys.
If you were SERIOUS about attacking macro users, you'd be in low sec clearing out the macro haulers (no profit there, so you are not there, and thus we see your real motive....)
High Sec suicide ganking is appropriate for multi billion fitted Ravens, cargos that VASTLY exceed the value of the ships needed to pop the hauler, etc.... AND SUCH GANKING IS STILL VERY VERY POSSIBLE. It is not appropriate to come anywhere near breaking even ganking untanked Hulks in 0.5.
CCP has a long long long long history wanting 0.5+ non-war gankage to be unusual except for rare ultra high value targets. If you find a way around this, EXPECT a nerf.
If you want more freedom to blast away, get the hell out of high sec or declare some wars. (and in those wars, if your target disbands, that means YOU WON, so you got nothing to complain about. If you want targets that wont fold up and disband, attack a fighting corp)
Some rich folks will still do high sec ganks for lols. This is expected. High value paper soft targets will still get popped, and this is expected. Cheap, casual 0.5+ suiciding is getting a much need nerf.
You know where I do find it beneficial to gank macros...In the space that I am currently residing. The rest of EvE be damned. Where I live is where I make my money. I do actively hunt those that put minerals up in huge numbers far below current region price. I buy 1 unit from them so I get a name. Then I go out and hunt. If I find them in a belt......holy shittski all bets are off I gank the ever living hell out of them. they lose a hulk or two they tend to post higher prices next time. I feel that is the way all of EVE should be. Am I wrong?
no, you are not wrong, you are an island of reason in a sea of whinage
I hope you aren't f'ing with me because if you aren't I'm going to add that to my bio
|
Bodhisattvas
Wife BEATERS
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 16:26:00 -
[16]
Originally by: Sergeant Spot
When ever the lazy victim seeking "pirates" (to use the term loosely...) find a basicly risk free way to get casual ganks in high sec, expect CCP to nerf it, and please stop the sad pathetic whining.
No, you dont get to demand that players grinding NPCs in high sec to be FORCED to be your suicide monkeys.
If you were SERIOUS about attacking macro users, you'd be in low sec clearing out the macro haulers (no profit there, so you are not there, and thus we see your real motive....)
High Sec suicide ganking is appropriate for multi billion fitted Ravens, cargos that VASTLY exceed the value of the ships needed to pop the hauler, etc.... AND SUCH GANKING IS STILL VERY VERY POSSIBLE. It is not appropriate to come anywhere near breaking even ganking untanked Hulks in 0.5.
CCP has a long long long long history wanting 0.5+ non-war gankage to be unusual except for rare ultra high value targets. If you find a way around this, EXPECT a nerf.
If you want more freedom to blast away, get the hell out of high sec or declare some wars. (and in those wars, if your target disbands, that means YOU WON, so you got nothing to complain about. If you want targets that wont fold up and disband, attack a fighting corp)
Some rich folks will still do high sec ganks for lols. This is expected. High value paper soft targets will still get popped, and this is expected. Cheap, casual 0.5+ suiciding is getting a much need nerf.
In addition to the petrol thang go buy yourself an exterminator dildo, tis basically explosive chemically enhanced dildo
designed to explode when introduced into some ones body cavity. It also comes with camera attached and a free
predator surveillance drone with uplink to youtube.
|
5pinDizzy
Amarr
Umpteenth Podding
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 16:42:00 -
[17]
Edited by: 5pinDizzy on 07/08/2008 16:44:38
I mean yeah it was way to carebeary and risk free for suicide gankers to gank haulers for potentially a small penalties, it's not fair.
Those carebears in their tech 1 haulers have it tough, to think that if they carried around obscene wealth in their paperweight tech1 ship they'd have to fit a couple of war core stabbers or a little bit of a tank, or some intelligent fitting.
Now they'll finally have the harsher and colder environent for gankers that they always wanted while they run around practically immune to danger, with the Carebear-Ganker relation tweaked slightly by CCP, Concord are finally going to be responding twice as fast, hitting a much higher security penalty, and giving ZERO insurance instead of 90%
Thanks for the well thought out finely tuned slight balance tweak CCP.
We finally have a world where safe zones are cold and harsh for people who want to try and pvp with people, just like my favourite games such as World of Warcraft.
Why should people have to be attacked in highsec? Go to lowsec or nullsec if you want to PvP, people in highsec have a right to be as safe as possible from any potential dangers. Leave them alone.
|
Sergeant Spot
Black Eclipse Corp
Band of Brothers
|
Posted - 2008.08.07 16:59:00 -
[18]
Originally by: Bodhisattvas
Originally by: Sergeant Spot
When ever the lazy victim seeking "pirates" (to use the term loosely...) find a basicly risk free way to get casual ganks in high sec, expect CCP to nerf it, and please stop the sad pathetic whining.
No, you dont get to demand that players grinding NPCs in high sec to be FORCED to be your suicide monkeys.
If you were SERIOUS about attacking macro users, you'd be in low sec clearing out the macro haulers (no profit there, so you are not there, and thus we see your real motive....)
High Sec suicide ganking is appropriate for multi billion fitted Ravens, cargos that VASTLY exceed the value of the ships needed to pop the hauler, etc.... AND SUCH GANKING IS STILL VERY VERY POSSIBLE. It is not appropriate to come anywhere near breaking even ganking untanked Hulks in 0.5.
CCP has a long long long long history wanting 0.5+ non-war gankage to be unusual except for rare ultra high value targets. If you find a way around this, EXPECT a nerf.
If you want more freedom to blast away, get the hell out of high sec or declare some wars. (and in those wars, if your target disbands, that means YOU WON, so you got nothing to complain about. If you want targets that wont fold up and disband, attack a fighting corp)
Some rich folks will still do high sec ganks for lols. This is expected. High value paper soft targets will still get popped, and this is expected. Cheap, casual 0.5+ suiciding is getting a much need nerf.
In addition to the petrol thang go buy yourself an exterminator dildo, tis basically explosive chemically enhanced dildo
designed to explode when introduced into some ones body cavity. It also comes with camera attached and a free
predator surveillance drone with uplink to youtube.
Your tears are like sweet sweet honey
Play nice while you butcher each other.
|
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |